The Network for Public Education Action Fund is pleased to endorse Tony Thurmond for the post of State Superintendent of Public Instruction for the state of California. As an organization, we are committed to the improvement and preservation of public education. We oppose privatization in all ite forms, including charters, cybercharters, and vouchers. Thus, Tony Thurmond was the right choice for us, in light of his record.
“The Network for Public Education Action is proud to endorse East Bay Assemblyman, Tony Thurmond, for California State Superintendent of Public Instruction.
“Assemblyman Thurmond has been a member of the State Assembly since 2014. He serves on the Assembly Committee on Education, and has made education policy his top priority. Before serving in the legislature, he was on the West Contra Costa Unified School District Board for four years.
“Thurmond is passionate about improving public schools. His public school education prepared him for a 20-year career in social work, where he ran after-school programs and taught life skills and career training. Those years of experience provided him with a unique perspective into the lives of California’s youth.
“Thurmond told us that he will “ensure that every California student gets the education they need to realize their potential,” adding that “California is the 6th largest economy in the world, yet ranks 46th in per pupil spending in the United States. We cannot continue to underfund California’s public education.”
“He understands that class size has proven to be one of the most important factors in a child’s learning. Thurmond said that he will “support legislation, policy changes, funding to reduce class sizes.”
“Charter school issues are sure to be a central focus of the election. Thurmond’s opponent, Marshall Tuck, is a former charter school executive and CEO. In 2014, Tuck ran an unsuccessful campaign for State Superintendent, losing to incumbent Tom Torlakson. Tuck was heavily funded by outside money from national charter advocates, including Michael Bloomberg, Eli Broad, the Waltons, Laurene Powell Jobs, Arthur Rock and John Arnold. Thurmond stated that, “California’s voters don’t want this election to be bought by the Walton family, Eli Broad, and other billionaires who want to privatize public education.”
“Thurmond has made his position clear on charters. He has co-authored and voted for laws to increase accountability for charter schools and to ban for-profit charter schools. He believes that “charter schools must be measured through the same lens as public schools, follow the same guidelines, and be held publicly accountable.” He also believes that “charter schools should be authorized by local districts. Local districts host the charter and provide the services that the students and the charter will need – they are much better suited for this than the county or state.”
“Thurmond has vowed to “lead the resistance against Donald Trump and Betsy DeVos and their agenda to undermine and defund our public education system,” promising that he will not support policies that seek to divert taxpayer dollars from public education to private schools.
“Thurmond has already received numerous endorsements, including the endorsement of Superintendent of Public Instruction, Tom Torlakson. Thurmond will be on the general election ballot on November 6th. NPE Action urges our over 21,000 supporters in California to educate and inform your friends, family, neighbors and colleagues about Thurmond’s campaign and the importance of this election for the future of public education in California.”

Will do. Additional Info. for your California Readers:
https://www.laprogressive.com/marshall-tuck/?utm_source=LA+Progressive+Newsletter&utm_campaign=c715630c42-LAP_News_4_15_April_17_PC4_15_2017&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9f184a8aad-c715630c42-286776621&mc_cid=c715630c42&mc_eid=257106251e
http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2014/05/marshall-tucks-legacy-of-bigotry-and.html
LikeLike
Rarely do we Californians get such a clearcut choice in an election. We usually have to decide between the lesser of two evils. This time, we get to vote for the right person for the job, Tony Thurmond. He is good, completely and without question.
LikeLike
I will vote for Thurmond because I hate Tuck. But I doubt Thurmond has a lot of wisdom regarding education. Few education leaders do. CA touts its new “dashboard” to score schools, but it may be even worse than the tests-only accountability it replaced. Suspension rates are now one of only four measures by which K-8 schools are judged. My suburban district is already stigmatized because of this. We might be fantastic at teaching civics and science, but none of this shows up on the “dashboard”. We’re “bad” because we occasionally suspend kids who draw swastikas all over the place and bully kids to the brink of suicide. Stupidity reigns.
LikeLike
Rating schools is federally, dumbly mandated. The dashboard is just better than the single digit rating that overemphasizes meaningless test scores. You’re right, stupidity reigns, but blame Corey Booker and the rest of Washington D.C. instead of Torlackson or Thurmond. If Marshall Tuck wins, privatization and test prepping Common Core “skills” rather than teaching engaging content will be the order of every day.
LikeLike
In CA, “skills” kudzu is creeping into science and history too. Dimwits at constructivist Berkeley, the “brain trust” behind the new history frameworks, do not believe in teaching content. They do not believe in having a knowledgable teacher use his talents to make history lucid. They believe in having students “construct” knowledge by “struggling” with texts and engaging in “sacred” talk with classmates. Process is king. (NGSS is similar). But my kids can barely read, and they’re going to gossip rather than have deep talks about texts they do not understand. They need content delivered LUCIDLY so that they may become good readers by being armed with knowledge. The “inquiry” approach prescribed by the dim Berkeley constructivists results in NO REAL LEARNING. The fact that this is a terrible way to transmit knowledge does not bother them because they do not believe in transmitting knowledge. In other words, history teaching is sinking into the same miasma of vagueness and bad thinking that ELA and math have suffered from for years. The discipline of history teaching has been hijacked by hacks.
LikeLike
These are 4 horrible choices.
The Local Control Funding Formula that Gov. Brown created has taken money from what he deems are wealthy districts to fund ‘needy’ districts.
These ‘needy’ districts have corrupt school boards wasting the diverted funds.
Thurmond is from Tom Torlakson’s county and will continue the spineless educational antics.
The CA Public Pension Fund for teachers is bankrupting our school district as well as every other school district and city in the state.
If Thurmond tries to scoop up more money from suburban districts to wasteful LAUSD for instance then there will be 45 kids in each classroom in every suburban school. That’s not an advantage any way you look at it.
There is no money for our public schools. No one is talking about that. Just Dashboards.
Take the money wasted from Dashboards and the companies contracting for this nonsense and hire more teachers, and lower class size.
CA is collapsing. And these guys are focused on a politically a hot topic and missing the elephant in the room. There is no money.
LikeLike
No money in a state with so many billionaires?
LikeLike
Joan may be overstating, but it’s true that CA schools are still behind pre-recession (2008) funding levels. Meanwhile, Governor Brown’s STRS pension “fix” is sucking huge amounts from local districts. The Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), another Brown “innovation,” though well-intentioned perhaps, mandates more public meetings to allocate actually tiny pots of money for certain groups of students while the system overall is still underfunded. Not to mention the continued crisis of higher Ed funding or the charter school diversion of resources.
Thank goodness CA has avoided some of the catastrophes of states to our east. We have enough problems of our own. We certainly don’t need a charter cheerleader to replace Torlakson. Defend public education–elect Thurmond.
LikeLike
“Tiny pots of money” is right. 87% of our skimpy budget goes to personnel. The mandated LCFF/LCAP meetings revolve around the allocation of the tiny fraction of the budget that is discretionary. It’s hardly worth one’s time to attend. I see no value in this innovation (and I’m irate at the CA “innovation” that is the top-two primary: this may result in Dems losing Congress. In CA-10 and elsewhere, a plethora of Dem candidates will spit the Dem vote and allow two Republicans to advance to the November ballot. Catastrophic failure.)
LikeLike