This was posted by Politico Morning Education.
I don’t know which outrages me more:
1) the administration’s efforts to link the massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School to the Obama guidelines that sought to reduce disparate punishment based on race. As Politico points out, there is no evidence to connect the Obama guidelines with the shooting.
2) the statement that Betsy DeVos opened every meeting yesterday with an acknowledgement of the anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s assassination, and the suggestion that she was engaged in fulfilling his life’s work. What Chutzpah! She has been trying to slash the budget of the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights and appointed a woman to run it who is opposed to its mission.
Politico writes:
KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM THE GAO’S SCHOOL DISCIPLINE REPORT: The GAO released fresh evidence Wednesday that black students, boys and students with disabilities are all disproportionately disciplined in the nation’s public schools. The report, based on data from the 2013-14 school year, comes as Education Secretary Betsy DeVos mulls a repeal of Obama-era discipline guidance aimed at curbing such disparities. The numbers in the report are jarring. Black students by far bear the brunt of every type of discipline – from in-school suspensions to expulsions and school-related arrests. For example: While black students accounted for 15.5 percent of all public school students, they represented about 39 percent of students suspended from school. Here are some of the key takeaways:
– Boys overall were more often disciplined than girls, but the pattern of disproportionate discipline affected both black boys and black girls – the only racial group for which both sexes were disproportionately disciplined in every way: In-school and out-of-school suspensions, expulsion, corporal punishment, referral to law enforcement and school-related arrests.
– Minority students with disabilities are hit especially hard. Nearly a quarter – 23 percent – of black students with disabilities were suspended from school. More than 20 percent of American Indian and Alaskan Native students with disabilities were suspended from school. More than 25 percent of students who identify as two or more races and have disabilities were suspended.
– Poverty is a factor: The GAO found that when there were greater percentages of low-income students in a school, there were generally significantly higher rates of all types of discipline. But black students, boys and students with disabilities were still disciplined disproportionately, regardless of the level of school poverty. And, as was the case in every type of school, black students bore the brunt of it. In high-poverty schools, they were overrepresented by nearly 25 percentage points in suspensions from school, according to the report.
– The disparities can be a drag on the economy . The GAO report notes that research has shown that students who are suspended from school are less likely to graduate on time and more likely to drop out and become involved in the juvenile justice system. “The effects of certain discipline events, such as dropping out, can linger throughout an individual’s lifetime and lead to individual and societal costs,” the report said. It pointed to one study of California youth that estimated that students who dropped out of high school because of suspensions would cost the state about $2.7 billion. Another study the GAO referenced estimated that Florida high school students who drop out earn about $200,000 less over their lifetimes.
MEANWHILE AT ED: DeVos is considering scrapping Obama-era school discipline guidance meant to curb racial disparities. The secretary on Wednesday heard from both supporters and opponents of the guidance, according to meeting participants from two separate closed-press listening sessions. Nathan Bailey, a department spokesman, said that no policy decision has been made on the guidance. He added that the department has held 11 other listening sessions on the topic. Wednesday’s discussions were the first in which DeVos has taken part, Bailey said.
– DeVos opened each of the meetings by noting the 50th anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and highlighting the continued need to achieve the full realization of his life’s work, the department said. “She discussed the clear problem, revealed both in the data and in the stories told, of disparate treatment in discipline,” according to a department readout. “She welcomed the participants to share their perspectives on how to best protect all students’ civil rights and promote positive school climates, and asked how the current approach is helping or hurting those efforts.” Mel Leonor has the full story.
– View details about the meeting and participants here. In a statement after the meeting, the department said: “At the request of many of the participants, the sessions were closed to the press to protect the identities of participants who fear retaliation, are in active litigation or shared deeply personal stories involving family members and/or minors. Each session took place in the Secretary’s Conference Room to foster a candid exchange between the Secretary and stakeholders who presented varying perspectives on how school discipline policies should or should not change.”
– Repeal of the guidance has been under consideration for months, but interest in it was renewed following the Feb. 14 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., that left 17 dead. Some congressional Republicans have said the Obama-era school discipline policies contributed to law enforcement’s failure to identify and stop the school shooter. The White House targeted the guidance for repeal in its school safety plan – making it a key focus of the school safety commission created by President Donald Trump and chaired by DeVos. But as POLITICO reported last month, there’s no evidence to suggest that those policies had anything to do with the massacre in Parkland.
– The GAO report provides evidence that the guidance should remain in place, said Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.), the ranking member of the House Education and the Workforce Committee. Scott and Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, requested the GAO investigate school discipline. The report “dispels claims that racially disproportionate rates of discipline are based solely on income,” Scott said in a statement. “This report underscores the need to combat these gross disparities by strengthening, not rescinding, the 2014 Discipline Guidance Package, which recommends specific strategies to reduce the disparities without jeopardizing school safety.”

It’s clear that institutional sexism is out of control.
LikeLike
Absolutely, that’s clear from one glance at the incarceration rates for men and women.
LikeLike
It is inconceivable that boys are misbehaving more than girls. We are all exactly equal. It’s the largely female teaching corps that misperceives innocuous male behavior as aberrant. Government should punish schools unless they start suspending girls at the same rate they suspend boys.
LikeLike
Or eliminate all suspensions. That would achieve parity immediately.
LikeLike
FLERP!,
I don’t think it would be completely ridiculous to abolish all suspensions for 5 year old children or Kindergarteners of either gender. If such very young children are acting out so violently in such great numbers, then they should be removed to a separate place in the school where they can get the one on one attention needed.
I have never bought into the notion promoted by one of Betsy DeVos’ biggest fans that there are huge numbers of violent 5 year olds who are greatly helped by their out of school suspensions.
Some people believe that any school where 18% of the Kindergarten children are acting out so violently that they need out of school suspensions might have a teaching problem and not a “violent children just happen to enroll here” problem.
Other people — namely the SUNY Charter Institute and their leader, Joseph Belluck — believe that a school that suspends 18% of their 5 year old children is a school that has trained its teachers correctly and who should be rewarded and recognized for the excellence of their specially trained teachers who continue to recognize more of those violent children who keep enrolling and need to be suspended ONLY because of those children’s natural violent tendencies since the teachers – of course – are blameless.
LikeLike
Thank you, Ponderosa, from the mother of 3 boys. The diagnosis of choice of elem-sch male behavior by all-female elem-sch teachers was adhd. All 3 of my well-behaved, artsy, kinda-non-PC/ low-social-cued boys garnered out-of-school suspensions for oblivious, dumb moves- in each case reported to guid counselors by wise-ass, manipulative females. And our small-town local cops manipulated each of them into over-the-top charges, by capturing them ‘driving while teenage males.’
Eventually we found a nbhd lawyer who put paid to cop shenanigans against local kids & got ‘records’ expunged. It is not hard for me to extrapolate from there to the pipeline-to-prison experiencs of young males outside my bubble of white-suburb paid lawyers.
LikeLike
NYCpsp, I know this is a bugaboo of yours. Just to chime in, I am aghast at out-of-school suspensions of 5-y.o.’s, & can only imagine grossly incompetent teachers/ admins perpetrating this. Perhaps I am in a bubble? One of the schools to which I have long provided PreK/K Span enrichment, near Newark, probably 1/2 subsidized/ pov level — in 17 yrs I have seen onlyone [K-aged] kid they had to let go (big for age, aggressive & sexually acting out]– I have seen them handle autistic et al emo-disturbed kids w/calming methods & a bit extra staff as needed. And it’s just a chain preK, no big tuition…
LikeLike
Hey nycpsp, that’s just me, bethree. Getting mixed signals from wordpress.
LikeLike
Virginia Bucci,
Thank you. I admit that this bothers me tremendously. It astonishes me that a white charter CEO runs charters with no white children in which she suspends 18% of the Kindergarten and first graders in the school. And Joseph Belluck and the rest of the white board members at the SUNY Charter Institute don’t question it at all and in fact, reward her for it. (Which just encourages her to suspend even more non-white children since she can get away with it and SUNY incentivizes other charters to follow this practice since they greatly reward it.)
What kind of charter school suspends 18% of their Kindergarten and first grade children and blames it all on the CHILDREN? For being violent! One that has virtually no white students. One that has mostly economically disadvantaged students instead of disproportionate numbers of middle class ones.
Meanwhile, when a principal trained at those schools with no white children takes over a school with many middle class kids — including significant numbers of white students — and uses the same behavioral standards, suddenly there is a realization that maybe there is something wrong with the STANDARDS instead of the kids who are targeted and humiliated and act out (but are middle class and often white). Time for Moskowitz to meet with the parents and reassure them and the principal to get his orders not to treat the middle class kids with the harsh methods there were used in schools with no white parents whose opinion matter.
Joseph Belluck and the SUNY Charter Institute reward charters who suspend large numbers of non-white very young elementary school children. Joseph Belluck and the SUNY Charter Institute believe those schools are demonstrating the kind of values they support with their high suspension of non-white children that they want them to train their own teachers in the methods that suspend so many children — that is, suspend so many of the poorest children. And don’t treat white and middle class kids with those harsh methods.
And yes, I’m shocked that no reporter or journalist thinks that it is racist at all because they are certain that any school that suspends 18% of their 5 year olds but has no white kids must be because the kids are violent.
People see these GAO reports and think that it is older TEENS who are being disproportionately targeted. And that is definitely the case in public schools. But too many highly rewarded charter schools seem to target the very youngest elementary school children, which is even worse.
LikeLike
Obviously, I have not read the report, but I wonder if the GAO considered a phenomenon I have noted. There are years in my small school when disciplinary problems crop up due to what I call a critical mass of problems. Since my school is small, fewer students with the type of problems that get disciplinary attention are in the mix. Some years, however, seem to feature a problematic group that is quite difficult. Sometimes there seems to be a group that just keeps getting into stuff and landing in the office.
I realize this is a digression, and I do not intend to divert conversation from the point that there is ethnic tension in the handing out of penalty associated with school behavior. But it is a tangential subject because of the tendency of problematic youth to gravitate toward those whose behaviors mirror their own. Solutions to this problem should take into account the need to avoid the effect of some students banding together to create societal problems.
LikeLike
“The GAO report notes that research has shown that students who are suspended from school are less likely to graduate on time and more likely to drop out and become involved in the juvenile justice system. “
Who ever woulda thunk?
(GAO =General Accounting for the Obvious?)
LikeLike
Right, duh!
LikeLike
Roy: Race just compounds the problem of class warfare and battle of the sexes that plays out within schools segregated by class whereby lower class students are taught mostly by middle and upper class white women.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on The Most Revolutionary Act and commented:
The GAO released fresh evidence Wednesday that black students, boys and students with disabilities are all disproportionately disciplined in the nation’s public schools.
LikeLike
Anyone who bothered to carefully examine the suspension rates of the Success Academy Charter Network schools — which have some schools with virtually no white students and high poverty rates and some schools with disproportionately high numbers of white students and disproportionately low poverty rates — would see all the conclusions reached in the GAO reports.
And remember, these are ELEMENTARY schools and to demonstrate how young the children targeted for suspension are, I use data from when the oldest students at these schools were in lower grades.
Success Academy Springfield Gardens, 2015-2016: Virtually no white students (0%). 93% African-American. Over 70% economically disadvantaged. The previous year, when the school only had Kindergarten and first graders the suspension rate was 18%.
Success Academy Union Square, 2014-2015: 40% of the students were white, and only 25% of the students were economically disadvantaged. In 2014-15, when this school had only Kindergarten and first graders, the suspension rate was 2%.
In their opening year, Success Academy Springfield Gardens suspended 18% of their Kindergarten and first graders and Union Square suspended 2%.
Success Academy Bensonhurst, more than 50% white students. Fewer than 50% of the students are economically disadvantaged. Suspension rate when school only had Kindergarten and first graders — 2%.
Success Academy Fort Greene, 7% white, suspension rate when school only had Kindergarten and first graders — 23%
Success Academy Harlem 3: 2011-2012. 3% white. Suspension rate when the oldest students were in 4th grade — 20%.
Many years ago the SUNY Charter Institute promised to look into suspension rates of the charters they oversaw. But they did not. On the contrary, Joseph Belluck and the other white board members of the SUNY Charter Institute have been well-aware of these high suspension rates for years and apparently believe that some Success Academy charters just happen to get far more violent Kindergarten children than others. And those charters with the most violent 5 year olds just happen to have very few white students.
If the supposedly “upright” SUNY Charter Institute white board members led by Joseph Belluck believe that lots of low-income 5 and 6 year old African-American children would act out so violently that they needed to be suspended just because Eva Moskowitz tells them it is so, then why wouldn’t Betsy DeVos believe it, too?
Those of us who aren’t racists know that 5 year olds in high poverty charters aren’t being suspended in large numbers because extraordinarily large numbers of them just happen to act out so violently in their kindergarten classes that nothing but suspensions will curb their natural violent instincts. Especially when each of those children comes from a family who was willing to jump through hoops for the chance to send their 5 year old child to the “best” school in the city.
Remember that Joseph Belluck and the SUNY Charter Institute board are so certain that it is the violent nature of these (non-white) 5 and 6 and 7 year old children that makes them violently act out so often in their class — and that their wonderful charter and perfect teachers are blameless! — that Joseph Belluck has demanded that this charter train their own teachers with no oversight from any educators or need for a license!
So it’s hard to blame Betsy DeVos for being just as racist as the SUNY Charter Institute board.
After all, the woman who fought so hard to make sure that DeVos was confirmed by the Senate has been saying for years that she gets extraordinarily high numbers of violent children in her elementary schools and has no choice but to suspend them. Joseph Belluck believes Eva Moskowitz so why shouldn’t Betsy DeVos?
LikeLike
^Note: typo in year referenced in SA Union Square data — the 2% suspension rate their opening year is from 2013-14, when the school only had K and 1st graders.
LikeLike
Kinda, sorta related to this:
LikeLike
This IS on point… as Mr. Edsall notes the authoritarian mindset is based on the “strict father” model of the family, and that model would insist that punishment be swift and even handed. The nurturant parent model would look deeply at the causes and conditions that resulted in the misbehavior and find the root causes. Our country has embraced the strict father model because it is SEEMINGLY cheap and efficient… but it is neither since prison costs more than counseling and early interventions that provide support to families.
LikeLike
This is an extraordinary article, and an encouraging use of a newspaper to make room to print it. I am glad they included my nephew Matt and his fellow professor’s chart as one of many parts of it. Matt Grossmann and Daniel Thaler of Michigan State University.
LikeLike
Thanks, GregB. Even if it stays from a point, it is worth reading.
LikeLike
I dunno I thought the logic there was squishy. Would have posted this there, but comments were closed:
Parenting has ranged across a spectrum from rigidly-authoritarian to permissive/ reasoning-w/yr-kids for 55+ yrs, yet polarized politics is a recent phenomenon.
If one can actually connect parenting style w/choice of political party (a big ‘if’ not addressed in the article), which party would they choose? My 1st-gen-Amer in-laws leaned authoritarian as parents, but routinely chose Dems. They were blue-collar, & Dems had their backs. My 1st-gen-Amer gf (roughly same age, rigidly authoritarian parent) bootstrapped self into white-collar & was dyed-in-wool Rep. Both sides were tribal, racist, emotional; as Gr Depr survivors, all prized security. Their political diffs stemmed from upstate/rural vs downstate/ urban.
My mother’s generation (higher-educated, more inclined to ‘nurturing parenting’) just as likely to be Reps, as they were raised to fear communist/ socialist govt domination, & prized individualism; in ’50’s-’70’s, Dem progressivism rang warning bells. It took 8 yrs of Bush for them to get that Reps had jumped the shark.
Polarized politics seems better linked to economic insecurity: the convergence of oil embargo, digitalization, automation, & globalization ’74-early ’80’s– followed inevitably by a shift toward conservatism in Dem party, which pushed Rep far-right, finally causing far-left to re-appear [& now attempting to re-capture wkg/middle classes].
LikeLike
Someone really should tell DeVos what the NAACP’s position on charters is, and what a moratorium is. Someone should tell her about MLK’s association with the NAACP, and how school choice leads to the segregation King and the NAACP fought against. Someone should tell Betsy DeVos what the NAACP is, for that matter. Likely she doesn’t know.
LikeLike
Someone should tell Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren and many self-described progressive Senators about the NAACP’s position on charters as well. They both seem to be completely in the dark about it.
LikeLike
I agree.
LikeLike
It’s likely DeVos could care less about segregation. She is rolling back any rules regarding equity. Unbridled “choice” is her main value along with some right wing Christian beliefs.
LikeLike
As a white upper middle class teacher I have worked for many years in a middle school divided both by race and economics. I have struggled to reflect upon my own biases when dealing with disciplinary issues. Yes male, black students identified with disabilities are disproportionately suspended, yet what so many of these reports fail to do is discuss the disability…in many cases this is Emotional Disability. Through programs such as PBIS teachers try and navigate around these students who can be unpredictable and violent both verbally and physically but we are not Cognitive Behavioural Therapists and this is what many of these students need! Suspensions do not solve the issues but neither does forcing teachers (and the other students in class) to deal with them within the classroom so the statistics look better.
LikeLike
Well said, & speaks generally to pubschs’ inability to deal w/mental illness. ED is shorthand for var types of burgeoning mental illness, & more often seen in communities w/ endemic poverty, as it can arise from early child abuse/ prenatal issues incl maternal addiction/ kids exposed routinely to violence. And of course pubschs’ difficulty in dealing w/it merely reflects our society’s failure to deal: lack of access to adequate mental-health service affects all SES & our justice sys treats mentally-ill as criminals.
ED & LD both fall under the purview of SpEd, but the former entails active disruption to the classroom, & requires SpEd folk trained in defensive holds, calming methods et al better delivered in a separate setting of the sort taxpayers are loath to fund. Should a teen suddenly disassociate – e.g. the 1 in 70 w/bipolar – most schools except those in wealthy districts w/well-trained counselors & connections to user-friendly police & high-qual county services will throw him to the wolves.
LikeLike
Devos and Trump are almost adequate excuses to forget about Gates and Arne Duncan. THEY ARE NOT AND THEY NEVER WILL BE.
LikeLike
First of all, when it comes to long tern contributing causes of violence one of the most important factors is early child abuse, including corporal punishment leading to escalating violence including bullying. On any given year six to eight of the nineteen states that still allow it in schools are in the top ten for murder rates.
As you pointed out it is disproportionally used against minorities, other reports also indicate it’s used more against disabled people. Contrary to claims by conservatives, if Obama’s rules to reduce this disparity work it’s reasonable to assume that it will make violence less likely, including school shootings, not more.
I know you’ve spoken against corporal punishment in schools before, but I would appreciate it if you did it more often, since this is so important and most don’t recognize it.
Also, my most recent article in the link under my web-page cites your work. The cities that have more so called school reform often increasing reliance on Charter Schools are often the lowest income, the ones with the most cheating scandals and the highest murder rates.
One of the reasons that poor or minority people might be targeted for more discipline, in addition to bigotry, is that they often have less supervision at a younger age, which could be solved with increased funds to child care head start etc.
It’s truly amazing and shocking that those that are constantly cutting investments in education don’t hesitate to spend enormous amounts of money on prisons or wars based on lies, which is an obvious cause for violence including school or other shootings!
Thanks
LikeLike