In this stunning review of Oakland’s recent history, retired teacher Thomas Ultican shows how that city’s school district was completely captured and nearly destroyed by a succession of Broadie Superintendents.
The “Destroy Public Education Movement” was launched in 2001 by then-Mayor Jerry Brown, who started Oakland’s first charter school.
The district fell into debt, and the state took control. Under state control, Oakland schools were managed and mismanaged by a series of Broad-trained Superintendents. Oakland became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Broad Foundation, and each superintendent opened more charter schools than his predecessor.
“Like the Republican politicians in Detroit, Democratic politicians in California pushed OUSD into financial disarray. And like Detroit, Oakland’s financial issues were driven by declining enrollment stemming from the same drivers; privatization, gentrification and suburban development.”
Broadies, writes Ultican, have a long-established track record of disruption, discord, and fiscal mismanagement.
In Oakland, one Broadie followed another, driving demoralization and disarray.
There is at last, he writes, a new superintendent who is not a Broadie. Her name is Kyla Johnson-Trammell. If the billionaires get out of her way, she might be able to restore stability in the district.
Ultican writes:
“A constant theme promoted by the DPE movement is “every student deserves a high-quality school.” When you hear a billionaire or one of his minions say this, you and your community are targets and your about to be fleeced.
“The United States developed a unique education system that was the envy of the world and the great foundation upon which our democratic experiment in self-governance was established. Over two centuries, we developed a system in which every community had a high-quality public school.
“These schools had professionals who earned their positions by completing training at accredited institutions. Government rules and oversight insured that school facilities were safe, and the background of all educators was investigated. In urban areas like Oakland there was a professionally run public school in every neighborhood.
“Could it have been improved? Of course, and that is exactly what was happening before the deceitful attack on public education and teachers.”
He is hopeful that the new homegrown leadership might extract Oakland schools and students from the billionaires’ Petri dish.
He’s delusional! The Board of Ed just voted unanimously no less to adopt a strategy “plan” cincisted by GO a mouth piece organization for reformers. When the Blueprint effort was repudiated by the parents that participated in it, the BdofEd redubbed it a new name and has approved it. The Super attended a NRPE event in TX with BdofEd members not even 2 months ago. This leadership is nothing to hope from. The
Holy cow. Tultican’s article should be in the NYT.
It would be lovely to have some comparative ‘ed achievement’ results to track the wholesale dismemberment of this public school system. What were OPS schools like in ’99 before Brown got his hands on them (& what are they like now)? Presumably they were weak & in disarray – as Tultican notes, fertile ground for ideological invaders. But ‘weak & in disarray’ sounds like it fits as recently as A Wilson’s exit in 2016. And, as they only just got updated software showing Wilson left them $40 million in debt, there’s probably not much reliable historical data to go on.
I hope their new superintendent has gotten incredible support from the coalition that forced the board to choose a traditionally trained, home grown candidate. She will need every ounce of their support and more to defeat the billionaire boys club.
While I was encouraged by Ms. Trammel’s hiring as the new superintendent, we are still battling the following:
School board bought by GO (think Waltons, Gates, Bloomberg). Check. School board voting for every charter that lands in their lap (except for one, recently, oh, boy). Check. Overpaid outside consultants. Check. Charter operators actively steering 5 and 6 year olds away from their neighborhood schools. Check. District selling the underenrollment narrative to justify school closures. Check. Lousy data/surveys to support school closures. Check. $5.6 million in cuts to school sites to destabilize them even more, resulting in, you guessed it, potential school closures. Check. Charter giveaways via Prop. 39. Check. Charter operators sucking up to CRPE to get their hands on more tasty real estate by Lake Merritt. Check. Illegal $1M sole source contract to outside ed reform group via Antwan Wilson. Check. School administration overspending on pricey rent for their downtown Oakland space. Check. Taxpayer dollars spent on charter advertising on the backs of public AC Transit buses. Check. No, nothing to see here, move along, move along…
I am very surprised Oakland still has any public schools after four Broadies. In Los Angeles, we had one Broadie three years and he nearly burn the budget by billions at a time. The district would be bankrupt if we had more of that. How did Oakland public schools survive for that long?
burned
It ain’t over yet, and the district is dangerously close to being taken over by the state yet again…likely going to put more local parcel taxes on the ballot to patch the holes. They do this all the time-open charters, district enrollment declines, spend, spend, spend anyway, go back to the local taxpayer and ask them to fund the same budget hole that the board created, rinse, repeat. On one of the latest parcel taxes, the school board wrote it and snuck in a provision to give a portion to charters, and the public is kept blissfully in the dark unless they read the fine print. And they never do…
Cali residents- don’t forget former investment banker Marshall Tuck, running for State Superintendent of Education again, is another “Broadie.”