It’s true. I am reducing my blogging. But the folllowing is a worthy exception.
I like to read obituaries in the New York Times. Not for macabre reasons, but because it’s a way to learn about people. The Times recently wrote about Gene Sharp. I didn’t know anything about him. It turns out he was the guru of nonviolent resistance in his generation. Not on religious grounds but on pragmatic grounds. He was widely read and admired around the world.
Here is the key takeaway:
“His philosophy could be reduced to two axioms:
“First, autocracies are vulnerable to being undermined because “dictators are never as strong as they tell you they are,” he said in Mr. Arrow’s film, “and people are never as weak as they think they are.”
“Second, while limited violence against dictatorial governments may sometimes be inevitable, violence provokes more violence, a strategy that gives dictators an advantage.”
Please remember these words as you resist unjust policies:
The strong ”are never as strong as they tell you they are and people are never as weak as they think they are.”

The NY Times editors and publisher obviously do not see the irony of publishing a glowing obituary of someone like Sharp when they themselves have been such vocal cheerleaders for the use of violence on a massive worldwide scale.
“Passing Resistance”
We celebrate the life
Of men who shunned the knife
But only when they die
It’s really just a lie
LikeLike
Might it also be said that democracy is not as strong as we hope it is and our electoral process is more vulnerable to being rigged than we ever imagined.
It is really weird to see the posturing from CEOs at the World Economic Forum in Devos, Switzerland. They want to be seen as morally informed activists on behalf of the common good–as long as plundering produces profits.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/02/market-business-morality-moment-movement-ceo-icar/
Your book in progress is needed, timely, and likely can include the result and the probable consequences of the pending Supreme Court case designed to kill collective bargaining.
LikeLike
“The Common Greed”
When “common good”
Means “common greed”
Then common word
Has meaning fleed
LikeLike
The Common Greed” ( take 2)
When “common good”
Means “common greed”
Then common word
Is con indeed
LikeLike
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” John Kenneth Galbraith
LikeLiked by 1 person
What was the word for the greed of the rich in European 1700/1800s arguing that “god” decided a person’s status in life and it was not theirs to question….
LikeLike
“The Right to Exploit Others”
When rights inhere in God
Then some are self-anointed
When rights inhere in man
Then some are self-appointed
LikeLike
“Absolutism?” Kings like Louis XIV thought they had a “divine right” to absolute authority that could not be questioned, .
Noblesse oblige means they have a moral duty to be honorable, kind and generous, but you don’t often see that happen in real life.
LikeLike
Apparently, according to Wikipedia, while noblesse oblige seemed “to impose on the nobility a duty to behave nobly” it gave “aristocracy a justification for their privilege. Their argument is “as nobles, we have rights, but we have duties also; so such duties validate our rights”. Jurists Dias and Hohfeld have pointed out that rights and duties are jural correlatives, [4] which means that if someone has a right, someone else owes a duty to him.”
LikeLike
I cannot explain why but this posting brought to mind these heartfelt words by a true American hero:
“I am not going to die, I’m going home like a shooting star.” [Sojourner Truth]
Perhaps these two shooting stars will be meeting up soon.
😎
LikeLike
https://www.alternet.org/trump-trauma/how-trump-trauma-resurrecting-jim-crow-era?akid=16716.2673806.PEe88G&rd=1&src=newsletter1088660&t=4
LikeLike
I highly recommend watching The Gilded Age on American Experience, on PBS. In so many respects, they are describing what’s happening in America today, because there was a grossly inequitable distribution of wealth and the 1% owned America and the politicians at that time as well. (The rich knew it and they had no intention of giving it up, as we’re no doubt witnessing now, too.) You can view this on your local PBS TV station, as well as on the PBS website
Also strongly urge everyone to read the following article by Thom Hartmann: “How the GOP Used a Two Santa Clauses Tactic to Con America for Nearly 40 Years”
https://www.alternet.org/right-wing/two-santa-clauses-or-how-gop-conned-america-nearly-40-years
LikeLike