We often read that the lion’s share of economic gains and tax cuts has gone to the upper 1% or 10%, but less attention is paid to those who are left at the bottom, living lives of desperation in a land of plenty.
Martin Levine describes the forgotten Americans in this powerful article.
https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2018/02/02/world-class-poverty-americas-booming-economy/
He writes:
“How bad is the situation? Over the first two weeks of December, Professor Philip Alston, United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, visited the United States. His findings, perhaps surprising, painted a very disturbing picture as he compared how the US, one of the world’s wealthiest nations, compares to other developed nations:
*US health care expenditures per capita are double the OECD.…
*But there are many fewer doctors and hospital beds per person than the OECD average.
*US infant mortality rates in 2013 were the highest in the developed world.
*Americans can expect to live shorter and sicker lives.
*U.S. inequality levels are far higher than those in most European countries.
*In terms of access to water and sanitation, the US ranks 36th in the world.
*The youth poverty rate in the United States is the highest across the OECD, with one-quarter of youth living in poverty compared to less than 14 percent across the OECD.
*The Stanford Center on Inequality and Poverty ranks the most well-off countries in terms of labor markets, poverty, safety net, wealth inequality, and economic mobility. The US comes in last of the top 10 most well-off countries, and 18th amongst the top 21.
*In the OECD, the US ranks 35th out of 37 in terms of poverty and inequality.
*US child poverty rates are the highest amongst the six richest countries—Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Sweden and Norway….
“For years…the needs of poor Americans (or poor Europeans) have received little priority relative to the needs of Africans or Asians. As an economist concerned with global poverty, I have long accepted this practical and ethical framework. In my own giving, I have prioritized the faraway poor over the poor at home. Recently, and especially with these insightful new data, I have come to doubt both the reasoning and the empirical support. There are millions of Americans whose suffering, through material poverty and poor health, is as bad or worse than that of the people in Africa or in Asia.
Alston observed that “There is no magic recipe for eliminating extreme poverty, and each level of government must make its own good faith decisions. But at the end of the day, particularly in a rich country like the USA, the persistence of extreme poverty is a political choice made by those in power. With political will, it could readily be eliminated.” The current administration does not see those in need as a priority.”

Exonomy — I think you just invented a Friedmanian slip …
LikeLike
I was thinking the same thing.
LikeLike
“The eXonomy”
EXonomy’s designed
To X the working class
With policies inclined
To bite then in the a**
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education and commented:
This study only shines a brighter light on the relationship between poverty and educational success. Until this country decides to begin working on the real problem of solving poverty then the current trends will continue downward.
We have a welfare system that is designed to forever keep people reliant on it. There are no mechanisms in place to help people work their way off the system without being penalized. We reward people by giving them more money for having more children that they can’t afford to take care of, they expect the government to take care of them.
LikeLike
“We have a welfare system that is designed to forever keep people reliant on it.”
We have a welfare system? That’s news to a lot of people who could use one. As for working one’s way off it, that is now forced, whether one is able to work or not and whether or not working is more beneficial than something else one could be doing, such as getting an education or taking care of young children. And, no, people don’t have more kids than they can afford to take care of because “we” reward them for it. They have more kids than they can afford for a variety of complex and interrelated reasons, but mostly it boils down to lack of support and resources.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Welfare reform was enacted in 1996, pushed by the right wingers and signed off by Bill Clinton (reaching across the aisle, ugh). This act had the effect of pushing massive amounts of people off welfare and reducing the welfare rolls by about 60%. But that’s still not enough for the libertarian vampires who consider Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment insurance and the ACA as socialist scams against our “upstanding” billionaire shrugging Atlases.
LikeLike
The data about the US raking 35 out of 37 OECD membership is not correct. For starters, there are only 35 OECD members (https://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/) as of today (Feb 5th, 2018), and the US can’t have more poverty and higher inequality than Chile and Mexico, at least.
LikeLike
Is this a variation on “economists have predicted nine of the last five recessions”?
LikeLike
Let’s not forget that the U.S. imprisons more of its population, in numbers, than any other country, including countries like China that have vastly larger populations. We do this because we have made prisons profitable. Likewise, keeping Americans in poor health is profitable, as is privatizing the water supply. If you want to know why we’re looking more and more like a banana republic, follow the money. There’s gold in them thar poor people.
LikeLike
How long before we reach the stage of selling air, like in the Lorax?
LikeLike
See especially № 6 —
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/10-things-about-flint-water-tragedy_b_9132150.html
LikeLike
Probably a stretch to say that for-profit prisons are the reason the US’s incarceration rate is so high. The Internet tells me that 8.4% of the US prison population is housed in privately managed prisons (which I assume are all “for profit”). 8.4% is a disturbingly high percentage, to be sure, and there are good reasons to say that number is unacceptable. But the traditional government-run prison industry is carrying the overwhelming load. And I haven’t seen the case made that the for-profit prison lobby has been the main driver of the legal and policy factors that contribute most to our high incarceration rate. (Although I’m eager to see that case.)
LikeLike
Current Google search put the US prison population at 2,220,300
8.4% are privatized or 186,673 prisoners.
LikeLike
So true.
LikeLike
The next time someone complains about our mid-level NAEP scores, we should respond with information about our extreme poverty level and widespread inequality. As Pasi Sahlberg said,”America does not have a school problem; it has a poverty problem.
LikeLike
We also have the highest rates of birth mother deaths in the US. One of the reasons is that hospitals are rarely prepared when mothers hemorrhage. One hospital cut their deaths 70% by having a maternal crash cart in every delivery room. Doctors is America are paid a lot more than in most other developed countries. I think that doctors that are paid around $700,000+ could have figured this out before now. Everyone likes to blame teachers, but doctors get a free pass. The second problem is the lack of access to healthcare for the poor in our country. We still do not have universal healthcare like most developed countries.https://www.npr.org/2017/05/12/528098789/u-s-has-the-worst-rate-of-maternal-deaths-in-the-developed-world
LikeLike
I don’t care about NAEP scores either, the media does. They blast the results all over, and it gives a false impression of what is really happening in schools, dire poverty.
LikeLike
Unfortunately healthcare was taken over by for profit forces even before they turned their eyes on education. More and more doctors in urban and suburban areas have been forced into group practices affiliated with for profit hospitals. I am less familiar with rural healthcare. Doctors as a profession have less say over how care is delivered. The days when a doctor could spend as long as s/he wanted with a patient are gone. (No doubt they are paid well, but few doctors are making anywhere near $700,000.) It’s well past time for universal healthcare.
LikeLike
Don’t give a damn about NAEP scores.
Take that as a statement and/or a command.
LikeLike
I used to care about NAEP, at least quite a bit more than state tests. Last school year, though, some of my students took the NAEP and I had to complete a new, accompanying survey about how much tech I used in class. Big, red flags! All standardized tests are to be taken with a mountain of grains of salt, but when Gates’ tech surveys become part of the mix, the tests are completely invalid in my opinion.
LikeLike
All standardized tests should be banned.
LikeLike
If they were really interested in how much tech you were using, InService, it would seem to me that the students were not the ones to ask. What they really wanted to know was how much time students spent on computers in class.
LikeLike
Maybe all the foreign aid trump is denying countries could be used in the United States. This is a major problem that has existed for a while even though it has been exerbated under trump and his minions. I don’t know the solution but we definitely need to find one and not burden our young people with so much debt.
LikeLike
You forgot the priority list.
1. Waste 20 Billion on an unnecessary wall.
2. Give money to charter/vouchers/and private schools
3. Tax cuts for the rich (make even more money for Trump Family)
4. Start war with North Korea
9999999999999999998. Fund public education
9999999999999999999. Address poverty
LikeLike
LikeLike
Trump is also cutting aid to Africa so we can expect more deaths there. If we face a pandemic, the disease will not stop at a wall, or any other artificial barrier. The developed world may very well be at risk too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If a pandemic starts, then it will be world wide and do major damage.
LikeLike
Oh, he can use that supposed extra money for a wall.
LikeLike
“The time has come for us to civilize ourselves by the total, direct and immediate abolition of poverty”
Dr. King, “Where do we go from Here: Chaos or Community”, 1967
LikeLike
This is the legacy of neoliberal economic policies and a war economy since the 1970’s. Both corporate political parties are to blame for rigging the economy, with the help of the SCOTUS (Citizens United decision), resulting in widening inequality in the wealthiest nation in history.
The spending priorities of the U.S. are perverted and anti-humane, with 64% of the discretionary budget going to militarism and endless wars, while millions of its citizens still cannot afford health care, housing, or regular meals.
As long as corporations (fictional but legal “persons”) and the wealthy control the governments on federal, state and local levels, nothing will change for the better.
The U.S. is an imperial oligarchy with a mass-murderous global empire, and no amount of pretense about “democracy” will change that fact.
Trump is an odious, cretinous lout, but removing him from office will not change much. The entire political-economic system of the U.S. is sociopathic.
System change, not mere “reform”, is what is needed.
LikeLike
YEP!
LikeLike
What would the results of that report have been if the Koch brothers, ALEC, and the Wal-Mart Walton family had never existed to fund and lead the extreme, conservative Alt-Right movement to turn the United States into a Kleptocracy?
What is the Meaning of the Term Kleptocracy – rule by thieves
LikeLike
The first video on the Koch brothers’ influence mentions their work on univ profs. I wonder if there is an actual list of profs who hold grants or even directly paid by the Kochs.
LikeLike
It’s not just today. Almost finished rereading Zinn’s history of the US. Poor, mass quantities of poor, have always been a feature of the capitalist capital of the world.
LikeLike
There is no denying the facts outlined in America Today.
BUT, the “official” narratives continue:
A reality adjustment is but a vote away. Hold on for the Blue Wave redemption
to come.
The rooooskies goofed up the electoral pagent.
REALLY?
The US power structure is NOT elected.
Susan Lee Schwartz:
“There is no denying the fact that plutocrats, intelligence agencies, defense agencies and the mass media are both powerful and unelected, and there is no denying the fact that there are many convoluted and often conflicting alliances between them. All that can be debated is the manner and extent to which this is happening.
“If we’re going to see a gap in the bars of our cages, that’s a great place to keep our eyes trained, so keep watching. Watch what happens in a partisan war where both parties have a simultaneous interest in revealing as little of the game as possible and exposing the other party.”
LikeLike
I find it appalling that we can afford to give big tax breaks to the wealthy and corporations while many in this country have no access to healthcare except for a volunteer group called RAM. Why isn’t Trump bragging about this ‘wonderful’ happening? This is something that he should take credit for but it’s easier to ignore all who are suffering. After all he would have been happy to sign a law that would have taken healthcare from 23 million people. Why should people receive a decent minimum wage? Healthcare in this country is not a right but is a privilege.
……
Medical Charity Helping US Poor
Stan Brock is like a 21st-Century Florence Nightingale.
He started a charity – Remote Area Medical (RAM) – more than 20 years ago to bring relief to those cut off from healthcare.0529 02 1
Originally it was to help poor tribes in the former British colony of Guyana, South America.
That is where he lived after leaving Preston, Lancashire, more than half a century ago – he still is a British citizen.
But now Stan spends most of his time bringing relief to the richest country in the world.
Some 60% of RAM’s work is now carried out in the United States….Most of those I speak to seem to have jobs, but cannot afford healthcare….
Link: https://www.commondreams.org/news/2008/05/29/medical-charity-helping-us-poor?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=email_this&utm_source=email
LikeLike
Where are the billionaires in this country to end poverty?? Instead of wasting millions of dollars in ed reform bull crap why don’t the bloombergs and the koch bros of the world fix poverty?? The fact that the billionaires in this country do not help fix poverty is a complete testimonial as to why money and intelligence are NOT related.
LikeLike
I am not so sure our economy — based on inequality to favor the investor class — is going to boom for much longer. Scary stuff’s a’comin since we refuse to address the underlying causes of wealth inequality.
LikeLike
Its not just wealth inequality that they ignore.
It’s the entire real world.
The “investor class” are living in a gigantic bubble of their own making.
They live in an alternate reality that has no connection to the actual one.
Their world is one where “production” can continue to grow exponentially, where the air, water and other natural resources are just commodities to be used up and discarded. Where earth’s natural systems are not figured into the spreadsheets.
In other words, where the “economy” is nothing more than a castle in the air.
https://www.wikiart.org/en/rene-magritte/the-castle-of-the-pyrenees-1959
The plummet of the DOW by over 1000 points a couple days ago is an indication of just how precarious things currently are — like a giant stack of dinner plates.
The crash is coming. The question is not if, but when.
Unfortunately, it is going to bring all of us down with it.
LikeLike
It now seems that crashes are barely 10 years apart: dotcom bubble 2000, financial crisis 2007.
The current growing bubble is well represented by the fact that the Trump presidency has made the stock market literally skyrocket in the past year. Amazon stocks up by 50%! There is no actual product behind these increases—only hot, thin air blown by Wall street money manipulators, as they all get aroused by what they see on their Igadget’s screen .
So you are right, this bubble should burst soon. The striking contrast is that the value of the $ has gone down 20% right after Trump took office, and it has been down ever since.
LikeLike
Trump has had little to do with the performance of the stock market this past year. The upward trend was already well established during the Obama years and by some accounts was even stronger. Plus, I have heard that the first year of a President’s term is under the previous President’s budget, so the true test of Trump will come only in the next few years. Isn’t it interesting that the so called deficits hawks are the ones fueling unprecedented increases in the national debt? Funny how it was only under Clinton and Obama that the trend was reversed or at least slowed.
LikeLike
Yes, the first year of a new president is usually under the previous president’s last budget but not this time. The GOP majority refused to approve Obama’s last budget (just like they refused to vote on Obama’s Supreme Court Justice pick).
The GOP has been stacking the deck in their favor for almost two years and they are dealing from the bottom with cards they already know.
Any federal budget the U.S. has had since Trump was sworn in was not an Obama budget. This time, all the blame goes to the GOP and the Kremlin’s Agent Orange.
LikeLike
So we have had stop gap budgets now for over two years? Still does not change the stock market trends where there have been no significant upticks over Obama’s years. All it says is that Trump has not managed to sabotage the recovery yet.
LikeLike
The recovery, if we want to call it that, started years ago while Obama was still president.
LikeLike
I hope we truly recover before the next recession. It always seems to be the ones who can least afford to withstand economic turmoil are the last to receive meaningful relief. Trumpeting the great economic indicator numbers really means little when one is underemployed much less unemployed.
LikeLike
How can the economy boom when there is astonishing poverty?
LikeLike
In Memphis, the child (under 18) poverty rate is an astonishing 43%, which is more than twice the national child poverty rate
http://www.memphis.edu/benhooks/programs/pdf/2016povertyfactsheetwebversion.pdf
But this is only the 6th worst among US cities’ child poverty rates. In Detroit, the child poverty rate is almost 60%. These rates have been increasing significantly even in the last decade
http://www.nccp.org/media/releases/release_162.html
LikeLike