Archives for the month of: January, 2018

The Waltons are a singular American family. Not exactly like you or me, to be sure. They are, according to Forbes, the richest family in America, with a net worth of $140 billion or more.

They were recently praised by Trump for raising the minimum wage for their 1 million workers to $11 an hour. On the same day, however, they closed down 63 Sam’s Club warehouse stores, putting more than 11,000 people out of work without notice.

I wish any member of the Walton family would try to live for a month on only $11 an hour wages. However, since they are all heirs to their great fortune, it’s likely that none ever held a paying job where they had to show up every day.

Here is an article about them that appeared on the Walton Foundation blog.

While other billionaires have pledged to give away most of their money to charity, the Waltons decline to join them. They know money is power. Also, it means you never have to go to work.

Their primary takeover target is education.

“The largest chunk of the foundation’s retooled and accelerated giving plan — $1 billion over the next five years — will go to education. While family members still evangelize about the benefits of “school choice” for struggling families, they’ve fought enough battles over the past two decades to determine that simply providing parents a slate of options among traditional public schools, charter schools, and private institutions isn’t enough to improve student achievement.

“For school choice to succeed, the Waltons concluded, the foundation has to move beyond making start-up grants for charters and focus more on building a constituency of supporters in local school districts.”

Typically, that means they have to actually buy elections, although the article doesn’t put it quire like that.

Their passion is charter schools. This is a handy way to bust unions and advance the privatization of public education. The Waltons claim to have started one of every charter schools in the U.S.

“Some critics have complained that the Waltons have donated a relatively small percentage of their enormous wealth to charity. Still, their giving is so substantial in terms of raw dollars that other critics contend it gives them too much influence over public policy. In response, the family has sought safe havens: school districts where there are plenty of skilled teachers and administrators excited about new educational models. In those places, the foundation has courted local officials open to charter schools operating alongside traditional neighborhood schools.

“The new approach means the foundation will exit cities where charters have been a tough sell, including Phoenix, Chicago, and Albany, N.Y. Its roster of 13 target areas now includes New Orleans, Oakland, and San Antonio, where charters are seen as ripe for success.”

See, they just sit around and decide how to privatize the public schools in your community. Arkansas is one of the poorest states in the nation. Couldn’t they just concentrate on raising up the families in their own backyard?

 

Roxana Marachi writes about two proposals before the California State Board of Education today. Maybe the decision has already been made.

Question: Is it true that “anyone can open a charter school in California?”

Does it matter if the proposal comes from an organization that has previously failed?

Does it matter that no one knows who will actually run the school?

Do California taxpayers care how their money is spent?

Does the State Board of Educatuon have any quality standards?

Can convicted felons open charters?

Can maniacal parents home school their children and chain them to their beds?

Does California have any standards?

Or is it Betsy DeVos’ Dream State?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warning to parents in the Hudson Valley, New York.

Eva Moskowitz is opening a no-excuses Charter School in your neighborhood.

https://thehudsonvalleysuccessacademy.com/

Protect your children against harsh discipline.

Defend your public schools against raids on their funding.

 

 

 

Although the owner of the so-called Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow has collected over $1 billion in the 15 years he has owned the low-performing School, the State has demanded that he repay $60 million for inflated enrollment.

William Lager fought the judgment and lost in court.

Now the authorizer is cancelling its contract with ECOT.

We can call it the Electronic Classroom of Yesterday.

 

No member of the Republican majority in the Senate has been as eloquent in denouncing Trump’s stupidity and arrogance and authoritarianism as Senator Jeff Flake.

He excoriated Trump for his campaign to libel journalists and twist facts and truth. 

“2017 was a year which saw the truth — objective, empirical, evidence-based truth — more battered and abused than any other in the history of our country, at the hands of the most powerful figure in our government. It was a year which saw the White House enshrine “alternative facts” into the American lexicon, as justification for what used to be known simply as good old-fashioned falsehoods. It was the year in which an unrelenting daily assault on the constitutionally-protected free press was launched by that same White House, an assault that is as unprecedented as it is unwarranted. “The enemy of the people,” was what the president of the United States called the free press in 2017.

“Mr. President, it is a testament to the condition of our democracy that our own president uses words infamously spoken by Josef Stalin to describe his enemies. It bears noting that so fraught with malice was the phrase “enemy of the people,” that even Nikita Khrushchev forbade its use, telling the Soviet Communist Party that the phrase had been introduced by Stalin for the purpose of “annihilating such individuals” who disagreed with the supreme leader…

”Now, we are told via Twitter that today the president intends to announce his choice for the “most corrupt and dishonest” media awards. It beggars belief that an American president would engage in such a spectacle. But here we are.

“And so, 2018 must be the year in which the truth takes a stand against power that would weaken it. In this effort, the choice is quite simple. And in this effort, the truth needs as many allies as possible. Together, my colleagues, we are powerful. Together, we have it within us to turn back these attacks, right these wrongs, repair this damage, restore reverence for our institutions, and prevent further moral vandalism.

“Together, united in the purpose to do our jobs under the Constitution, without regard to party or party loyalty, let us resolve to be allies of the truth — and not partners in its destruction.

“It is not my purpose here to inventory all of the official untruths of the past year. But a brief survey is in order. Some untruths are trivial – such as the bizarre contention regarding the crowd size at last year’s inaugural.

“But many untruths are not at all trivial – such as the seminal untruth of the president’s political career – the oft-repeated conspiracy about the birthplace of President Obama. Also not trivial are the equally pernicious fantasies about rigged elections and massive voter fraud, which are as destructive as they are inaccurate – to the effort to undermine confidence in the federal courts, federal law enforcement, the intelligence community and the free press, to perhaps the most vexing untruth of all – the supposed “hoax” at the heart of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation.

“To be very clear, to call the Russia matter a “hoax” – as the president has many times – is a falsehood. We know that the attacks orchestrated by the Russian government during the election were real and constitute a grave threat to both American sovereignty and to our national security. It is in the interest of every American to get to the bottom of this matter, wherever the investigation leads.”

And yet the eloquent Senator Flake votes for every stupid bill proposed by his colleagues.

It is a puzzle.

Senator Flake is leaving the Senate. Three awful candidates are vying to replace him.

Why is his spine strong when it comes to talking but weak when it comes to voting?

This article summarizes a year-long investigation Of Michigan charter schools by the Detroit Free Press.

Eighty percent operate for profit.

No accountability.

This is Betsy DeVos’s handiwork.

Michigan scores on NAEP plummeted since adoption of the DeVos plan of choice with no accountability.

 

The horrific case of the abusive Turpin family in California, who enslaved their children while claiming to be a home school, reminds us that these children will remain after their parents are imprisoned.

A reader in Oregon contacted me to tell me about an organization that documents these cases. 

We trust parents to love and cherish their children. What happens when they don’t?

 

Betsy DeVos speaks only to guaranteed-friendly audiences, so she spoke at AEI, a think tank subsidized by her foundation.

Peter Greene reviews her speech here. 

What has she learned?

She has learned that she is always right.

She has learned that ignorance is bliss.

She has learned that all her biases are revealed Truth.

She will do nothing to dislodge the Common Core.

She says, “If the purpose of public education is to educate the public, then it should… not… matter what word comes before school.

Greene responds:

“This, for my money, is an even dumber statement than the infamous grizzly comment. If the word before “school” is “for-profit” or “flat earth” or “Aryan race” or– well, good lord, the list is endless. Does she really mean to suggest that as long as it’s some kind of school, we’re good…”

”First, it takes a special combination of ignorance and hubris to imagine that you are setting a new standard for calling to put students first, as if none of the millions of people who have worked in education never once thought, “You know, I’d rather like to make students my main focus here.” While DeVos has scrubbed a lot of the language that used to be her bread and butter– US schools are so bad they couldn’t get worse, and the whole government school system is just a scam created by unions to get fat checks for so-called teachers who just want to do nothing all day– this line shows some of the old DeVos creeping through.

“Second, let’s think about this. Because the short form of the DeVosian position is, “Here at the Department of Education, we will put students first by doing nothing.” That’s a neat trick, but it goes with that DeVosian disconnect in which the secretary remains unable to imagine a situation where her department would step in and say, “No, you can’t do that” to any school. Does she think that any state or federal agency should have stepped in and said, “No, Mr. Turpin, you cannot open a school where the curriculum is to chain your children in the basement without food and water.” And if the answer is no, as it seems to be, then how does she think this works? If her beloved marketplace is free to be overrun by fraudsters, scam artists, and cheats, how exactly are parents empowered?”

 

I posted this law review article in 2015. It remains one of my favorites. Her argument is straightforward. Abandoning the public school system is an assault on the rights of most children, especially the most vulnerable.

I wrote when I posted it nearly three years ago:

Osamudia R. James is a law professor at the University of Miami School of Law. She is a scholar of race and equity. She has written a scholarly article that was published in the Iowa Law Review titled “Opt-Out Education: School Choice as Racial Subordination.” I hope that readers of this blog will take the time to read it. It is an important legal analysis of the social inequities caused by school choice.

As more children are induced to leave the public school system, the public schools are less able to provide a decent education for those who remain behind. Many of those who leave will attend charter schools and voucher schools that are no better and possibly worse than the public school they abandoned. The harm done to children by this strategy is powerful, and the harm done to society is incalculable.

James advocates for limitations on school choice “to prevent the disastrous social consequences–the abandonment of the public school system, to particularly deleterious consequence for poor and minority schoolchildren and their families–that occur as the collective result of individual, albeit rational, decisions. I also advocate for limitations on school choice in an attempt to encourage individuals to consider their obligations to children not their own, but part of their community all the same….The actual impact of school choice cannot be ignored. Given the radicalized realities of the current education system, choice is not ultimately used to broaden options or agency for minority parents. Rather, school choice is used to sanitize inequality in the school system; given sufficient choices, the state and its residents are exempted from addressing the sources of unequal educational opportunities for poor and minority students. States promote agency even as the subjects supposedly exercising that agency are disabled. Experience makes clear that school choice simply should not form an integral or foundational aspect of education reform policy. Rather, the focus should be on improving public schooling for all students such that all members of society can exercise genuine agency, initially facilitated by quality primary and secondary education. Ultimately, improving public education begins with preventing its abandonment.

 

Alan Singer reviews the New York Times list of failed corporate reformers to replace Carmen Farina.

https://www.dailykos.com/story/2018/1/18/1733788/-Times-Endorses-Anti-Fari-a-Candidates-for-NYC-School-Chancellor-Alan-Singer-on-the-Daily-Kos

John King? Chased out of New York State.

Jaime Aquino? In charge of the iPad disaster in Los Angeles.

John White? Tool of rightwing former Governor Bobby Jindal.

Has beens.

Hey, Bill, find someone who believes in public schools.