There is a renewed effort to impose privately managed charters in Nevada, without a referendum or any indication of public demand. This is ironic because Nebraska has a long tradition of good public schools that are the anchors of their communities. We know the playbook. A rightwing Republican will Press for charters for those poor black children in Omaha, for whom he has never shown any previous concern. He knows this is the nose under the camel’s tent, the wedge he can use to please his allies in ALEC, who want to privatize everything.
I visited Omaha in 2016 and learned about Nebraska before I went.
This is what I learned: Nebraskans love their public schools.
I gave a see h to civic and education leaders, and this is what I said:
“You are too independent, too smart, too stubborn to follow everyone else over the edge of a cliff. You have saved tens of millions (maybe hundreds of millions) of dollars by losing Race to the Top. You are a model for the nation. And without having adopted any of the so-called “reforms,” Nebraska is one of the highest-performing states in the nation on NAEP. In fact, Nebraska outperformed every state that won RTTT except Massachusetts.
“Nebraska dragged its feet implementing NCLB. It put in a proposal for Race to the Top, but fortunately lost. It has no charter schools, no Common Core. It didn’t get a waiver because the state doesn’t want to evaluate teachers by test scores. The state commissioner decided not to ask anymore but to wait and see if NCLB is overhauled.
“The state is mainly rural so there is not much enthusiasm for charters except in Omaha, where there is a poor black community. Some black leaders think that charter schools will be a panacea. Some white legislators agree. But so far no action on that front.
“Despite the fact that Nebraska avoided almost every part of the reform menu, its students did very well on the 2015 NAEP. The state was in the top tier, ranked 9th or 11th in the nation. It outperformed every Race to the Top winner except Massachusetts, which has been number 1 for years.
“Nebraska is a conservative state, in the best sense of the word. It doesn’t believe in following the crowd. It doesn’t want to blow up its public schools and hope for the best. It wisely decided to wait and see. No creative disruption. No experiments on children. Just common sense.
“Also, being a state where people know one another in small cities, towns, and rural communities, Nebraska loves its public schools. Even Warren Buffett, one of the richest men in the world, sent his own children to Omaha public schools.
“But there is a new governor, and he is convinced that Nebraska needs charters, vouchers, virtual schools, the whole bag of privatization schemes.
“Hopefully the good citizens of Nebraska will persuade him that conservatives don’t destroy; conservatives conserve. Hopefully, they will inform the governor that Nebraska’s public schools are among the best in the nation.”
If it ain’t broke, don’t break it.
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education and commented:
Stay strong Nebraska
My daughter lives in northwest Kansas. Very rural farming community. Got a MS in education & took a teaching job in NE about 30 min away in another very rural community. (Higher pay than in KS, good benefits & teacher’s union)
These small rural schools are the hearts of these communities as are schools in urban neighborhoods & these children deserve fully funded programming.
The tiny district she’s working in is trying to come up with (along with the union) creative ways to attract & keep teachers.
Charter & voucher dollars siphon overall state monies that would impact these schools.
As someone who grew up in Kansas and graduated from FHSU and my wife is from Omaha, NE I have ties to both Kansas and Nebraska.
I left Kansas because there were not any jobs when I got out of college. I have been in Texas for over 30 years now as an educator.
My wife always speaks well of the education she got in the Westside district in Omaha. Her younger sister moved her family back into the Westside district so that her kids could get the same quality education.
Charter/voucher dollars “siphon” overall state monies that impact publicly-operated schools. This is true. But, when public money follows students into non-public schools, the non-public schools, also “siphon” students.
The per-capita expenditures for the students who remain behind in the publicly-operated schools, is either unchanged or increases.
Has that “tiny district” considered incorporating more technology? They should consider distance learning, especially for more specialized subjects like Latin. Not every rural school in the prairies can afford to have their own foreign-language instructors. A county could have instructors located at one central location, and the students receive instruction by two-way video.
Distance learning and on-line instruction, can help equalize the advantages that children in large urban schools, have over smaller rural schools.
I would say, Beth, that all your daughter’s State needs to do is ‘stay the course’ and teachers (real teachers) will be flocking to the State. Most of these will not want to become millionaires, but value community support and acceptance. They have dedicated their lives to enhancing human communication and learning. They want to immerse themselves in other cultures so that they can experience new, and possibly better, ways to live. They may now be earning in the high 5 figures, however they are becoming disgusted with the current trends that force them to be submissive to a business-oriented administration and the latest publisher/software efforts that are simply aimed at making money.
If these poor, rural districts can reach out, they will get the very best.
Don’t they have open enrollment though?
Whether they do or not, I would bet that their strong rural background has colored the way they approach schooling. They have to be creative in the ways they meet the needs of their students within their means. Notice I said creative not destructive. They certainly do not need a business approach that destroys what already was there and leaves its failures for someone else to clean up. With all the information that is available now showing the degradation caused by the push to privatize, any move in that direction has got to be suspect. The governor would have to be willfully ignorant or expecting a handsome return on his investment.
http://fourthgenerationteacher.blogspot.com/2012/08/what-heck-is-reading-for-pleasure.html
Reading for Pleasure Class at Norman North High School developed by Claudia Swisher (now retired) continues. Do read this blog.
Was Carl Sagan right?
“It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken.”
“Nobody wants to find that the framework of critique they’re so comfortable with,
and good at, is based on false premises.” J. Kavanagh
Premise NUMBER ONE:
The creations (institutions) created (established) by the creator (PTB), were
created to control the creator.
Premise: Irresponsibility of the voters enables the “malefactors of great wealth”.
The vote of “we the people” doesn’t undermine the power of the unelected,
calling the shots, much less determine the white house money puppet.
Teach Betsy? Inform Gates? Appeal to conscience? Moral pleading?
Petition the lords with prayers?
Is it what the malefactors of great wealth DON’T know, that gets us into trouble,
or is it what we know for sure that isn’t so?
Bravo, Nebraska! Keep up the good work! It will take states like yours & mine to show how beneficial it is to resist the privatization agenda.
As a father of two young boys who will soon be entering the Omaha Public School system, I am inspired by and thankful for all the organizations and individuals I am finding who are actively working to keep the DeVos (et. al.) Doctrine from taking hold in this state and around the nation. This fight will not be easy and it will not be over soon: just last week a NE State Senator introduced legislation to put to a public vote a constitutional amendment to eliminate the state BOE, and give control to the office of the Governor. His claims of “ideological extremism” and characterization of the board as “out of touch with Nebraskans” are a none-too-subtle dog whistle for the right-wing agenda as applied to public education. Nebraskans and Omahans DO love our public schools, and these actions serve as an apt illustration of who these ALEC/Koch/DeVos sycophants are truly beholden to. (pro tip: it’s not the people of Nebraska!)