The news media have given ample attention to the story of the married couple who chained their 13 children to their bedsteads and starved them. One child escaped and called authorities. The parents registered their home of enslavement as a “home school.”
Needless to say, there was neither teaching nor learning, just two parents abusing their unfortunate children.
What would Betsy DeVos say? Trust the parents. They made their choice. The parents know best. I recall when John White, the state superintendent of Louisiana said the same thing. Trust the parents.
“The private school had a welcoming name. The principal was scientifically minded. But the Sandcastle Day School was a nightmare for the six students enrolled there.
“David A. Turpin created the school inside his nondescript stucco home southeast of Los Angeles. But the only ones enrolled there were the six of his 13 children who were school age. And what took place inside was not teaching but torture, the authorities said, after they raided the house over the weekend and found a horrifying scene of emaciated children chained to furniture. The putrid smell overwhelmed them.
“By creating such a school of horrors, Mr. Turpin had kept the authorities at bay. His children were never seen by teachers or counselors. Their absences never raised suspicions. On Tuesday, state and local officials were on the defensive as they tried to explain how such things could have occurred in a private school the state had sanctioned.
“Mr. Turpin, 56, and his wife, Louise A. Turpin, 49, were arrested on nine counts of torture and child endangerment after one of their daughters escaped from the home out a window before dawn and called the police on a deactivated cellphone that only allowed her to dial 911. The girl, 17, showed the police photos to corroborate her story. Once the authorities entered the disheveled home, they found the Turpins’ 12 other children, ages 2 to 29. They were so malnourished that the older ones looked years younger.
“I can’t begin to imagine the pain and suffering that they have endured,” Mayor Michael Vargas of Perris said of the siblings. “This is a very happy and tight, hard-working family community.”
“How a family that some described as normal just a few years ago had seemingly unraveled so severely, nobody seemed to know…
“Before Sunday, there was no indication that any authority had ever set foot in the home. Riverside County’s child protective services never received reports of abuse. And the State Department of Education said it had registered the school, but had never been inside.
The case raises questions about whether the state may be too lenient in its approach to home schooling and whether it should have been monitoring Mr. Turpin more closely. In California, almost anyone can open a private school by filing an affidavit with the state. California is one of 14 states that ask parents only to register to create a home school, and in 11 other states, including Texas, parents are not required to submit any documentation at all.
“The California Department of Education said it was sickened by the tragedy and was investigating what had occurred. The department registers private schools, but “does not approve, monitor, inspect, or oversee” them, said Bill Ainsworth, a department spokesman.
“Assemblywoman Susan Eggman, a Democrat from Stockton, Calif., and a social worker who teaches at California State University, Sacramento, said that she would support legislation to monitor such schools.
“The state has a responsibility to make sure there is at least an annual inspection,” she said. “If we’re not going to uphold educational standards, then for the love of God the least we can do is uphold health and safety standards. We need to do everything we can for vulnerable minors before it becomes anything this tragic.”
Please, if you are a journalist, ask Betsy DeVos about how home schools and private schools should be regulated.

I underwent far more scrutiny when I was considering adopting a dog from a shelter,
LikeLike
TARGO!
So very much said in so very few words.
So does that mean that those all in for corporate education reform care more about dogs than children?
😎
P.S. Please forgive my penchant for bringing up Ionesco: “It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.”
LikeLike
Me too, Catherine.
I adopted our rescued dog when he was 10 months old. I had to complete an application and get approved. The application was harder than ones to apply for a home loan. I even had to take pictures of my fenced yard. One questions on the application asked if I knew how much money it would cost to care for a dog per year
What surprised me even more was that there was a two-week “trial” period when I could return the rescue dog if I wanted to do so.
What is WRONG with this country? Could it be mostly PROFITS for the few, and the attitude that our young don’t matter much except to promote the agenda of the deformers?
.
LikeLike
I would not doubt that you also treat your dog better than many people treat their kids.
There might be some correlation between the two.
LikeLike
This is a classic case of why “government schools” and regulations are needed. I’m forwarding this to my legislators in NH to remind them that closer monitoring of home schooling is necessary, an issue that is embedded in the ongoing debate over SB 193. This godforsaken bill proposes giving homeschooling parents a $3,000+ grant to fund their child’s education, with no additional oversight provided by the State Department because our Commissioner, Frank Edelblut, and our GOP legislators, like Betsy DeVos, trust the parents to do the right thing. Most parents will… but without some oversight some parents will abuse the system.
And one more question: why is it that the GOP legislators can trust homeschooling parents to use their $3,000 stipends wisely but want to make sure Medicare recipients work to earn their payments?
LikeLike
First, if there are 13 children (or adult children, as the case may be), why only 9 counts of torture?
Second, don’t blame the Department of Education for this. They’re only following the laws that the legislature has put in place with the funding the legislature has allotted. If you’re looking for who to blame, try the ones who made the laws and the ones who allot the funding.
LikeLike
Not sure about home schools, but the legislature actually tried to make charters more accountable and transparent and Governor Jerry Brown vetoed the bill.
LikeLike
You’re right, I should have expanded that to all people responsible for making the laws, including the governor.
LikeLike
Obviously, once you accept the principle of complusory education, you accept the idea that those supposedly carrying it out, whether state schools, private schools or parents, must be checked up on periodically.
If we’re going to test state-school teachers to weed out the incompetent ones, then so also must we test private school teachers, and oversee the arrangements made by homeschooling parents to make sure that their children receive a proper education.
LikeLike
Brilliantly stated Diane. I did not make the connection of how the Home-Schooling system allowed this to happen. Thanks for insight!
LikeLike
Our children should be a priority….When will this ever be?
LikeLike
In this society, based on political behavior of recent decades?
On the First of Never.
LikeLike
How true…I am holding dearly for Hope…
LikeLike
If it’s choice of governors in the last 40 years is any indication, California has been a failed state for a long time.
The economic numbers might look good, but hiding stuff under numbers is what economists do best.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes; those who promote “alternate” school programs such as homeschooling and online schools make best profits when the game is negligently regulated
LikeLike
Home schooling would definitely appeal to those that did not want any scrutiny. Some states just write these students off. In New York any home schooled parents were expected to bring their children to the public school for the big standardized test so the state would have some record of their progress.
At a relative’s house saw the Letterman interview with Obama that is currently on Netflix. Obama said some interesting things about his mother that may help to understand his attitude toward public education. Obama said his mother cared deeply about education, and she was so sure that he would be “shortchanged” in the schools that she home schooled him to ensure he would have a good foundation. It must have worked for him because he went on to get a scholarship at a good private school, and the rest is history. Any way it may help to explain his dim view of public schools, although Michelle attended a great public school that enabled her to get into an ivy league school. I guess Obama was conditioned at a young age to be mistrustful of public education.
LikeLike
Obama’s mother tutored him in early morning hours before he attended school in Indonesia. In Hawaii he attended a private school that had been founded for missionaries’ children.
LikeLike
From the Detroit Free Press (freepdotcom): Quote – KANSAS CITY, Kan. — A Detroit brother and sister vanished more than two years before they were found dead in a freezer in their home, and an 11-year-old Florida girl disappeared more than a year before she, too, turned up in a family freezer. And a 7-year-old Kansas boy hadn’t been seen for more than a month before authorities found the gruesome remains of a child in a pigsty inside his family’s barn.
All of them were home-schooled, but despite their disappearances going unnoticed for so long, opposition from the government-wary home-schooling community means it’s unlikely these states will start keeping closer tabs on home-schooled children.
“It’s largely a conservative thing, but even progressive home-schoolers tend to resist oversight,” said Rachel Coleman, co-founder of the nonprofit Coalition for Responsible Home Education. “Part of it is because there is an assumption that parents always know what’s best for their children.”
Records: Mom forced daughter to put dead sister in freezer
The most recent case, at a home near Kansas City, Kansas, is still being investigated and authorities said it could be weeks before they positively identify the child whose remains officers found in the barn. The officers were responding to a reported domestic disturbance at the home the day before Thanksgiving and were told of the 7-year-old’s disappearance. End quote
LikeLike
Continuing from freep, 12-7-15: Such cases are horrific but they don’t typically lead to new restrictions on home-schooling, which many parents see as their deeply personal right, said Rob Kunzman, director of the International Center for Home Education Research at Indiana University.
“They oftentimes create a short-term effort to increase regulation in the state where it happens, but rarely does this result in increased regulation because of the influence of home-school advocacy groups,” he said.
Although the number of home-schooled students jumped nationwide to about 1.7 million between 2003 and 2012, they still represent just over 3 percent of all students, Coleman said, adding that the relatively low number plays into the general public’s apathy toward home-schooling issues.
For home-schoolers, the emotionally charged argument against additional oversight is that parents, not the government, know what’s best for their children.
“As many as two-thirds are home-schooling in part for religious reasons,” Coleman said. “Part of that for conservative Christians is that God has given that child to the parents, not the state. The state doesn’t own my child, God has entrusted my child to me.”
Friend: Mom in freezer case pretended daughter was alive
Eleven states do not require parents to notify state or local officials that their children will be home-schooled, while 10 states require parents to file a one-time notice when they first start home schooling, but nothing further, Coleman said.
The other 29 states require parents to file an annual notice of home schooling. The information required to be included varies from state to state, with some requiring only the name of the home school and its administrator, while others require basic curriculum plans, student names and ages, and in some cases a copy of each student’s birth certificate.
Dr. Barbara Knox, an associate professor at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, said research she and five other pediatricians conducted on the torture of children found that of the 28 young victims studied, nearly half were home-schooled and an additional 29 percent weren’t allowed to attend school at all.
“For over half, few individuals outside the abuser(s) knew of the child’s existence,” researchers wrote. “This social isolation typically involved preventing the child from attending school or daycare.”
LikeLike
URL for the above article I cited:
https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2015/12/07/home-schooling-deaths-oversight/76912062/
LikeLike
@Joe: It is a fact, that parents do not automatically know what is best for their children. The recent horrible situation in Perris, California illustrates this quite explicitly.
BUT- In our free society, the government does not have “first dibs” on our nation’s children. The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925), that the state cannot compel any children to attend a state-operated school. see
https://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/family-law/family-law-keyed-to-weisberg/private-family-choices-constitutional-protection-for-the-family-and-its-members/pierce-v-society-of-sisters/
This case, although not directly addressing home-schooling, has been called the “backbone” of the home-school movement.
And I appreciate the remarks, that it is not fair to project this one situation, onto the millions of good parents who choose to home-school.
LikeLike
Just as it would be wrong to judge all of public education on the basis of one unfortunate incident, it is wrong to judge homeschooling on the basis of this atrocity. That said, all systems need feedback that alerts a community to the outliers of human behavior. We get this feedback through association and regulation.
A friend of mine who was homeschooling her children in rural Pennsylvania twenty years ago was on pins and needles during one of our visits there. The state examiner was to visit and interview the children. She was terrified that her children might not measure up. Other friends who homeschool seem to fall across a spectrum that is quite normal. Some of them are families of brilliant lone wolf types. Others are sure that their children will learn to hate other people in other schools, both public and private. Still others desire their children not confront other religious attitudes before they are older. A final group seems to use home schooling to get the public school off their backs when they cannot summon the ability to get their child to school.
It strikes me that a state regulating procedure like my friend experienced is very expensive. While I am opposed to restricting parents in their decisions concerning the raising of their children, it seems greedy for them to expect the state to spend so much money making sure their children are not being allowed to mentally atrophy under the pleasant guise of parental love.
Being the son of an argumentative mother, I once engaged a homeschool friend in a debate over the subject. We parted without resolving the question of where one has a responsibility to the general community as opposed to a small counterculture. His point was the complete degradation of the culture, mine was that his dropping out of the culture degraded it. Hopefully, we parted as friends.
LikeLike
Impossibly to read stories like this without thinking violent thoughts.
LikeLike
Is home schooling even a thing in the other developed countries? In the US, anything to undermine the real public schools is cheered and applauded as “innovation” by the usual suspects.
LikeLike
@ Joe: Home schooling is legal in many developed countries. And it is on the rise in Europe. see
https://world.wng.org/2016/01/home_education_on_the_rise_in_europe
LikeLike
And so no one in the Trump administration wants to regulate anything? How does one get to classify their home as a school?
LikeLike
@patriciasplaceblog: The regulations for home-schooling vary from state to state. In Kentucky (I was an adjunct instructor for a home-school group), the only requirement, is that you keep a journal for each child, that you home-school. Kentucky does not “classify” the individual home as a school.
LikeLike
There’s a young middle school age girl that sits in an info booth at a local farmer’s market on Tuesdays, school days. She is homeschooled and says she reads lots of books she checks out of the library. She also has nothing good to say about when she was in a real classroom because she had “one” English teacher to complain about who spent more time texting on her smartphone than teaching. By 7th or 8th grade, the average student has had at least a dozen teachers if not more. But she only has that one to complain about.
LikeLike
Thus an irresponsible public school teacher can bias a client for life. Who was supervising that teacher?
LikeLike
“Who was supervising that teacher?”
I can’t answer that, but … in fact, I have no idea if this girl was in a public school, a corporate charter school, a parochial school or a private school. I didn’t ask her what type of school she had attended. Most of the questions came from a friend of mine, a fellow combat vet who also shops at this farmers’ market.
As far as I know, that particular teacher could have been a substitute teacher or a long-term sub. Some subs are horrible and do crazy things. For instance, there were only enough textbooks available for one class set per teacher and I used that class set with all five of the English classes I taught and one sub, horror of horrors, let my students take the texts home with no way to know who took what and I lost my entire class set. I asked for them to be returned, but not one was brought back. I made sure the office found out and the high school never let that sub return to our campus.
As for supervising, if teachers in the U.S. were treated like professionals like teachers are treated and trusted in Finland, instead of trash, I’m sure this teacher wouldn’t have been a teacher.
Teaching is a profession and teachers should be treated and trusted like professionals. In fact, most countries actually do treat teachers much better than in the U.S.
That said, when I was still teaching, we were observed teaching a lesson on a regular basis as the state ed code dictated, usually by one of our site administrators and later we met with that administrator for an evaluation. And just like teachers were observed teaching, public schools are also evaluated by teams from other districts that arrived to make sure the schools were operating as the law (ed code) dictated and not abusing or neglecting the children like Eva Moskowitz does to children in her corporate charter schools in New York City.
It would to impossible to supervise teachers every second they were in a classroom teaching unless there was a supervisor hired to watch every teacher and not one country in the world does that.
But students and parents do have the right to complain if they think a teacher is not doing their job, and I’ve known of students and/or parents doing this to one or two teachers at the high school where I taught. Those complaints always led to more observations of those particular teachers when they were teaching and surprise drop-ins to check and see if they were doing their job. In one case, the teacher retired early. She was burned out from all the stress. In another case, the teacher was put on probation and it was mandated she had to demonstrate improvements in her ability to manage a classroom and teach. She also ended up leaving education.
LikeLike
FYI: The federal Department of Education has links to each state’s regulations (or lack thereof) for private schools and home schooling here: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oii/nonpublic/regulation-map.html
Home schools are treated as private schools where I live and registering with the state is optional, not required here. I have some experience with this, including being hired as a tutor for home schooled children in Gypsy families –who only want their boys to be educated. I didn’t figure that out until the day some teenage girls asked me to teach them how to write their names, which I did –and that infuriated the parents. I reported them to the state authorities but the Gypsies just moved away…
LikeLike
The Roma people, do not like to be referred to as “gypsies”. That term is no longer, politically correct. see
https://thecoffeelicious.com/the-gypsies-aren-t-who-you-think-they-are-7e80a51bf5a1
LikeLike
Tell them that. I called them Gypsies because that’s what they told me they are. They lived down the street from me in an apartment building in my very diverse neighborhood. If they had not told me they were Gypsies, I would not have known, nor would I have called them that.
LikeLike
And Diane recently ran a post about “lists of words” we aren’t supposed to use and it seems these lists are all over the place from just about every political, ethnic, and religious group there is.
I’m going to still call gypsies, gypsies. If gypsies don’t like it, too bad. Although, I can’t remember ever using the “word” gypsies from my mouth or fingers until now.
gypsies
gypsies
gypsies
gypsies
I’m sure that’s more than I’ve ever used this word in 72 years.
LikeLike
In this case you’re all correct. In Europe, the classification of what we call “gypsy” is different in every language. Collectively, these people in Europe have adopted the cross-national term Roma. It hasn’t been an issue in the U.S., probably because of language homogeneity and lack of numbers. But I think, in whatever culture one lives, one should accept the term that the preponderant majority that a particular category of people have accepted or adopted for themselves. It often changes with time and experience. Hence we have African Americans, the Washington American football team (known by some as the “Racial Slurs”), and, in Canada, the Inuit. Even those who are included in the categorizations can be subject to debate.
LikeLike
Probably calling white people “White People” has become politically incorrect as well because doing so stigmatizes them.
LikeLike
I homeschooled my daughter for a bit in California, and it’s true – there is basically zero oversight. I only had to file an affadavit in October saying that I was a private school with an enrolment of fewer than six kids, and voila.
I got to know a lot of homeschoolers at the time, and all the ones I met were splendid: committed, creative, motivated by a perfectly good and fair desire for their kids to have something different, and for them not to spend their time filling out worksheets or doing standardized tests. They weren’t even very Jesus-y. So sure, there’s plenty of good homeschooling out there.
But – there was absolutely no mechanism, from the state, to see what curriculum we were coming up with, what kids were (or weren’t) learning, whether their education was being tended to in any way. Very startling. As people have been saying, there’s more oversight in adopting a dog.
LikeLike
Many homeschoolers do not want vouchers if that means there will be any federal or state oversight of what they are providing (or not).
see
https://www.hslda.org/docs/nche/000002/00000251.asp
LikeLike
I know a home-schooling family here in Fairfax VA. They would be delighted to receive a portion of their school taxes rebated to them, to help meet school costs. They are prohibited from participating in any extra-curricular activities at the public school, which their taxes support. Everyone knows, that with government “sheckels” come government “shackels”. If a family accepts government money to spend on education costs, government control will accompany the funds.
Home-schoolers should have the option to refuse the government money, if they choose to.
In view of the recent event in Perris, California, it is almost certain that at least some states will attempt to regulate home schooling more closely.
BTW- The state governments can choose to regulate home schooling, any time it chooses, regardless of whether the families are receiving government financial support!
LikeLike
Every family has choice now. But the public does not have to pay if they choose to keep their children home and chain them to their bed.
LikeLike
I do not follow your reasoning. Of course parents have the option to educate their children at home. (Subject to appropriate restrictions, which vary from state to state). The individuals in Perris, California were not receiving any school vouchers nor any financial support from the state, to operate their home-school.
A similar, tragic situation occurred in my home town of Bowling Green KY. see
http://www.johnsoncitypress.com/Local/2012/07/03/19-kids-found-alone-in-filthy-hot-Kentucky-home
These people also did not receive any funds to operate a home-school.
It is not fair to blame such situations on home-schooling. And it is not accurate to project the crimes of these individuals onto the home-schooling movement.
Over 2 million USA children are educated at home, by proper , loving parents, who only want the best for their children.
And no state should pay parents to abuse their children.
LikeLike