Thomas A. Cox practiced law in Georgia for many years and taught Education Policy and the Law at Emory University. Recently he moved to Virginia and discovered that the state’s leading newspaper, the Richmond Times Dispatch, was habitually hostile to the principle of public education and cheerleading for privatization. Cox submitted this opinion article to set the record straight, which the newspaper published.
I hope the editorial writers read his article.
He wrote about the falsity of the “failing schools narrative” and demonstrated that it is just plain wrong.
“Not often heard over the noise of this failure narrative is some compelling evidence that America’s public schools, far from being awash in failure, have overall been performing remarkably well, particularly in the face of new challenges and changing demographics. This counter-narrative is shared by a number of education researchers, historians, and educators, although they seldom receive the same fanfare (or financial impetus) as the nay-saying privatization advocates.”
Privatization is no answer to the challenges faced by our students today.
“A blind reliance on profit-driven markets to address and solve the challenges in educating America’s children would constitute a non-evidence-based leap of faith. Even worse, it would drive us toward abandoning our long-shared concept of education as a “common good” that we as a democratic polity have a collective responsibility to provide to all children. For almost two centuries, our country has served as a model to the world by striving to achieve that ideal through a shared societal commitment to publicly funded and locally operated schools.
“Although far from perfect and in need of constant re-evaluation and improvement, public schools and their legions of dedicated teachers continue to serve as critically important institutional forces in our nation’s ongoing struggle to provide equal opportunities for all citizens. In an age when so many economic and societal forces serve instead to increase inequality, now is no time for us to abandon that common commitment.”

Cross posted at
https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Some-praise-is-in-order-fo-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Children_Education_Markets_Public-Education-180111-13.html#comment685675
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
We already have enough evidence that shows the limits of so called market based education, and it highlights the reckless policy path our policy makers have chosen. No nation has ever had a successful free market education policy, and we are no different. What we know is that the public schools get weakened in order to promote private interests that choose the most compliant students. Then, all the problematic and expensive students return to public schools that have been hobbled due to charter and/or voucher drain. Privatization does not educate all students, and they do not get any better results. In fact, the many privatized schools are getting worse results. Most policy makers want to destroy our public schools, not improve them. Instead of addressing issues of equity, social justice and support for poor families, they ignore all the contrary evidence and jump on some other privatized scheme.
Peter Greene recently posted one of his most significant observational posts called “Shameful Results,” that all policy makers should have to read. Instead of repeatedly casting aspersions on public education, our elected representative should be appalled that we lead the industrialized nations in the number of childhood deaths. This fact should be sounded alarm bells in Washington; instead, the media is more interested in Trump’s newest idiotic tweet. This statistic points to our main problem that our representatives often ignore. We have an enormous amount of poverty that no one is willing to address. As Pasi Sahlberg has correctly stated, “America does not have a school problem. It has a poverty problem.”http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2018/01/shameful-results.html
LikeLike
retired teacher,
AGREE!!!!!! Thank you.
LikeLike
I agree that the public schools are NOT failing our kids. I just want to add.
The committee that formed the panel that issued A Nation at Risk was entirely Secretary of Education’s Bell’s own doing. POTUS Reagan wanted nothing to do with it. In fact he campaigned on shutting the US Department of Education.
Please read the Sandia Report that we published in 1990. It shoots holes in A Nation at Risk. It pointed out, among other things, that A Nation At Risk overestimates the relationship between education in the macro and the economy in the macro.
The problem is A Nation at Risk received such fanfare and The Sandia Report is almost unknown.
LikeLike
Compare that to the Secretary of the US Department of Education.
Here she is telling public school students that they’re all suffering from “malaise”:
“For far too many kids, this year’s first day back to school looks and feels a lot like last year’s first day back to school. And the year before that. And the generation before that. And the generation before that!
That means your parent’s parent’s parents!
Most students are starting a new school year that is all too familiar. Desks lined up in rows. Their teacher standing in front of the room, framed by a blackboard. They dive into a curriculum written for the “average” student. They follow the same schedule, the same routine—just waiting to be saved by the bell.
It’s a mundane malaise that dampens dreams, dims horizons, and denies futures”
I realize she didn’t attend public schools and either do her children or grandchildren or anyone she knows personally, but is this the job of the federal government? To spend tens of thousands of dollars sending employees halfway across the country to bash public schools? Can they possibly see their way clear to making some positive contribution to public school students, or is that too much to ask?
LikeLike
Do school still use blackboards and chalk? I thought they had all gone to dry-erase boards.
LikeLike
How did I miss that?! Do you have a link you can share? Thanks.
LikeLike
Here is an excellent article on home-schooling. see
https://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/home-schooling/index.html?cmp=eml-enl-eu-news1-rm&M=58339958&U=2306083
Exact figures are difficult to obtain, but the number of American children being home-schooled is nearing 2 million.
I am excited about this phenomenon. Home-schooling is certain to grow, and with school choice/vouchers/ESAs the practice will grow even faster.
LikeLike
Sigh….
LikeLike
i am not sure how I feel,about home schooling. I have many friends who like it, but they seem to like it either because they are afraid of ideas their children might encounter in traditional school or because their life is just easier when they do it. Neither of these seem to justify removing your child from a caring professional. Still, some parents I know would have a hard time maintaining their career without it.
LikeLike
How does a parent combine a career with home schooling?
I have met Home-schooling parents who were highly educated.
Are most home schoolers highly educated?
Home schooling seems to me like using home remedies instead of seeing a doctor.
Some home remedies work.
LikeLike
I don’t know about “most” parents, but I know a lot of highly educated women who view raising their children as their job. They would be perfectly positioned to be highly educated parents who home school their children, if they were so inclined.
LikeLike
I am a highly educated woman, and the thought of homeschooling my children never crossed my mind. Among the women who were my classmates in college, all of whom are highly educated, none homeschooled.
FLERP, why don’t you stay home and homeschool your children? Can’t highly educated fathers forego their careers to educate their children at home?
LikeLike
I can’t afford to, Diane. If I stop working, we are out on the street. I don’t come from money, and I didn’t marry into money. So I work, not because I love to work, but because I’ve always had to work.
From what I’ve observed, highly educated women forego careers, or at least interrupt or postpone them, for various reasons. One of those reasons is that many highly educated women, not unlike many highly educated men, have trouble finding good-paying work. Raising children is something many women fall into. I think some love it. Most are probably somewhere between highly conflicted and very depressed. Complicated stuff.
LikeLike
FLERP,
Does your wife Home school?why not?
LikeLike
She would go insane. And we have access to fairly good schools (not that I’m without my gripes). And we believe that the socialization of school is important.
LikeLike
Agreed, FLERP.
LikeLike
There are many fine people who consider rearing their children to be their career. Sometimes only one parent works outside the home for wages. I know a family here in Fairfax. They have nine(9) children, all of the school-age children are educated at home. I knew a woman in Bowling Green KY, who won a national award for home schooling her three children.
Statistics about home schooling are hard to obtain. Not all states require registration, and the regulations vary all over the map. I would surmise that some parents who home school hold advanced degrees. Some are amateurs, who barely finished high school.
With the internet, there are more avenues for obtaining quality instructions and educational opportunities than ever before. Many (not all) home-schoolers form associations, and trade off their children so that all children in the group can get exposed to different instructions. The groups often organize field trips to museums, etc.
Some groups have outside adjunct instructors. I volunteered to teach electronics to home-schooled children in Bowling Green KY. The groups often contact professionals like attorneys and police officers, and these professionals volunteer to give instructions and lectures to home-schooled children.
It is an amazing phenomenon, and the concept is growing fast.
LikeLike
Charles,
Some who homeschool are uneducated, as you admit. Don’t you think their children would be better prepared for the world if they studied with well prepared teachers?
LikeLike
Q Some who homeschool are uneducated, as you admit. Don’t you think their children would be better prepared for the world if they studied with well prepared teachers? END Q
There is no easy, “blanket” answer to your question. Different states have different regulations. The one state that I am most familiar with is Kentucky. The state of Kentucky has one(1) requirement. That is that the home-schooler keeps a journal.
Do I think that children would be better prepared for the world, if they studied with well-prepared teachers?
Again, no easy answer. Home schoolers, have the internet, and SKYPE for long-distance learning with highly prepared educational professionals. And, (some) home-schoolers join associations, where they trade off their children with other home-schoolers with advanced degrees.
So your question is mostly moot. Let me say that, restricting a home-schooled child to one(1) instructor, who was uneducated, and not capable of delivering a quality education, is less desirable than having that child in an environment with a trained, educated professional.
LikeLike
I could not disagree more.
Distance learning works best with motivated learners. It is most effective with adults, not children.
LikeLike
I used to direct the engineering for distance learning at Western Kentucky University . Distance learning can work at the high school level.
So forget about distance learning. Home-school parents have the opportunity to “trade off” with other home-school parents. Home-school parents do not operate in a “vacuum”, all alone. The associations have adjunct instructors as well.
LikeLike
I have been told by professors that most distance learning doesn’t work because students lose motivation when they do not have Human interactions.
Remember MOOCs, which were going to replace brick and mortar colleges? They didn’t.
There is no research to support online learning in K-12. None.
LikeLike
Diane, on this topic you might be interested in Australia’s School of the Air, which was originally set up as a response to the incredible isolation that some families experience with our vast horizons and huge distances:
https://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/school-of-the-air
You’ll notice that its delivery is fairly well regulated.
LikeLike
I was just thinking about the “School of the Air”. Australian children in the “outback” were schooled by radio, and I understand that the system was very popular and produced good results.
Q I have been told by professors that most distance learning doesn’t work because students lose motivation when they do not have Human interactions. END Q
Maybe that is what you heard, but I have seen otherwise. I ran the 2-way video at Western Kentucky University. The professor was in Bowling Green, and the students were in a studio/classroom 30 miles away in Glasgow (KY). The professor delivered the lectures, and the students “interacted” by video. The students looked motivated to me, I believe they would have lost some of the motivation, if they had to drive 60 miles each day, to attend the lectures in person.
I am a telecommunications engineer, and I have seen this technology work, up close and personal. It is cost-effective, and has the potential to bring more diverse educational opportunities to home-schoolers, as well as students in “brick and mortar” schools.
LikeLike
Charles,
There is no Research—none, nada, zip, zilch—to support your claim that online instruction is effective for K-12. It does not exist.
LikeLike
Q There is no Research—none, nada, zip, zilch—to support your claim that online instruction is effective for K-12. It does not exist. END Q
I believe you. I would like to see some of the existing research on this topic, and perhaps some additional research could be conducted.
The Australian “school of the air” was very effective in providing instruction to children located on remote ranches in the outback of Australia. I remember watching educational TV, in public schools when I attended public school in KY. The transmitter was on an airplane over Chicago, and broadcast instructional programming all over the Midwest. I remember the students being very attentive to the instructions.
I still believe that two-way distance learning can be very effective in delivering instruction at the middle-school/high-school level. I have supervised the operation of two-way learning at the college level. It is a cost-effective method of delivering instruction, especially for specialty programs like Latin. Television station WNVC here in Fairfax, has a one-way Latin program for high school students.
LikeLike
Although you claim that there is no proof that on-line instruction benefits K-12 instruction, I think we can agree, that technology is PART of the solution.
One of my personal heroes is the late Marva Collins. She is the only school teacher, to ever refuse a cabinet post. President Reagan offered her the post of Secretary of Education. She refused, because she would rather be a classroom teacher. One thing she said, that always stuck with me: “Things don’t teach, Teachers teach”.
Nevertheless, I am an IT professional. I have taken on-line courses, and supervised the training of soldiers using on-line training. The Army believes in high-tech instruction, and I believe that it has at least some limited utility, in a K-12 setting.
One-way video instruction, two-way distance learning, interactive video, and on-line instruction, and other technologies that are coming down the line, will serve to complement traditional “Schoolmarm” instruction.
The days of a live instructor, standing in front of a room full of children, and delivering a lecture, are coming to a close. Technology, computer-assisted learning, and interactive video, are the wave of the present!
I remember, when I was in High School, I had an instructor who told the class, that a computer would never be able to play chess on an international grandmaster level. He actually believed that.
LikeLike
What is Technology the solution to?
Many studies show that kids enjoy games but do worse on computer assessments.
No studies show the superiority of tech instruction over human instruction.
LikeLike
Thomas Cox says nice, positive things about public education. Good.
But none of what he says is really new news, is it?
The Richmond Times Dispatch is better than it once was, when it railed against public schools and “outcome-based education” during the time when George “Macaca” Allen was elected governor and gave Virginia its Standards of Learning tests, which have cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars and set back efforts to promote genuine learning. But it isn’t better by much.
LikeLike
Ah, at last, a breath of fresh air! We need to accentuate the positive in order to take control of the narrative in regard to the commons. We need to band together to protect the commons (e.g.-the public schools, postal service, libraries, etc.). We need to include health care to the commons as well.
LikeLike