If you are as sick of reading about the brilliance of the young hotshots of Silicon Valley as I am, you will enjoy this article.
It appeared in “Wired,” the journal of the tech world. Summary: The bloom is off the rose.
“As headlines have exposed the troubling inner workings of company after company, startup culture no longer feels like fodder for gentle parodies about ping pong and hoodies. It feels ugly and rotten. Facebook, the greatest startup success story of this era, isn’t a merry band of hackers building cutesy tools that allow you to digitally Poke your friends. It’s a powerful and potentially sinister collector of personal data, a propaganda partner to government censors, and an enabler of discriminatory advertising…
”When Bodega, a startup making “smart” vending machines, announced its launch in September, it encountered an angry mob on Twitter. Bodega’s co-opted name, along with its founders’ stated plan to make corner stores obsolete, fit perfectly with the stereotype—arrogant, elite tech bros trying to get rich by disrupting a lovable local icon. “Let’s see your shitty glass box make me a bacon, egg and cheese with jalepenos on a roll you sick, capitalist scum,” the rapper El-P tweeted. The company’s founder issued an apology, which was subsequently mocked.
“Bro-dega,” as it’s since been named, was just one catalyst of the anti-tech sentiment rippling beneath our collective surface. After Skedaddle, an “Uber for Buses” startup, was featured on Business Insider, a screenshot of the four young male cofounders, smiling atop an article describing an unsavory-sounding mission, ricocheted across Twitter. “What a nightmare,” the writer Lisa McIntire tweeted, adding, “Silicon Valley is run by complete sociopaths.”
“A trend story about startups riding the trend of “co-living” emerged; Twitter screamed, “YOU INVENTED ROOMMATES!” When Bloomberg revealed that fruit packs made by Juicero, a well-funded startup selling expensive juicing appliances, could be squeezed with bare hands, commentators howled with schadenfreude. Juicero wasn’t just a preposterous company: It was “a symbol of the Silicon Valley class designing for its own, insular problems,” and “an absurd avatar of Silicon Valley hubris.” When a study showed that a “brain-hacking” supplement created by a venture-backed startup called HVMN was no more effective than a cup of coffee, mockery ensued.
“This week, when Netflix tweeted a joke about some of its customers’ viewing choices—a marketing ploy that, just a few years ago, would have felt like a clever insight gleaned from the wonders of big data—the press and tweeting masses immediately attacked it as creepy and a violation of privacy. These rifts have solidified the feeling that techies and their moneymen are painfully out of touch…
”In 2008, it was Wall Street bankers. In 2017, tech workers are the world’s villain. “It’s the exact same story of too many people with too much money. That breeds arrogance, bad behavior, and jealousy, and society just loves to take it down,” the investor said. As a result, investors are avoiding anything that feels risky. Hunter Walk, a partner with venture capital firm Homebrew, which invested in Bodega, attributes the backlash to a broader response to power. Tech is now a powerful institution, he says. “We no longer get the benefit of the doubt 100 percent of the time, and that’s okay.”
But is it okay to let these spoiled, arrogant brats take control of our lives and disrupt the institutions that meet other people’s needs? I think not.

I’ve had considerable experience with the geniuses of Silicon Valley and their kindred spirits in various New York City enterprises. Their “genius” is minuscule when compared to their self-regard. Because they were clever within a very small, relatively unimportant sector of American life, they believe they are brilliant in every other way. Same with the hedge fund “geniuses” who think education is just another commodity to analyze with their dandy little metrics. I specifically recall a hilarious and deeply disturbing meeting with a handful of young lions and lionesses in Manhattan who were in charge of charitable giving. They called themselves “The Wizards of Good.” They were interested primarily in branding, clicks on social media and figuring out how their “charitable” work would best serve their own interests.
LikeLike
stevenelson0248,
AGREE!
If those “so-called” geniuses of Silicon Valley really cared, they would have taken courses about teaching, learning, and education, student taught, get licensed, and teach in a public school for at least 5 years, before spouting off their mouths. But that would take effort and the admittance that they don’t know squat about education.
Besides, we know their enterprises are just about PROFITS at any cost, even BAD products. After all, there is no control re: BAD SOFTWARE. So BUYER BEWARE.
What gets me about these APPS and online world, is that many (like me) are being put into the programmers’ tricky tacky boxes to use those APPS and Software. It’s “their way of thinking,” with which we have to contend.
LikeLike
Agree agree.
LikeLike
It’s been a little sad to watch because they really did have a bigger vision back in the day. My son works in the field and he got interested in it in grade school- they had this whole online culture of “shareware” and collaboration and these big dreams of making things more equitable. He’s only 30 and he’s already missing the “good old days”.
The industry itself is pretty brutal. I listen to ed reformers talk about “STEM jobs” as if it’s some shangri-la with skateboards and juice bars. They’re pushed to produce constantly. My son is a developer and he lives or dies by a “build board”- a constant measure of his output. They set unrealistic goals and then push, push, push the employees. It’s not unlike manufacturing. He’s paid well but this idea that they’re sitting around brainstorming is just nonsense. They’re churning out product.
LikeLiked by 1 person
AND pushing this very same attitude into our schools.
LikeLike
It sounds like the tech business can’t let go of Microsoft’s failed business strategies. Remember when VF wrote about their cannibalistic culture in 2012? It’s sad to know that their earlier vision of shareware & open access is fading. Though, I have hope that millennials & your son’s generation will disrupt the sociopathic disrupters by re-inventing business culture.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2012/07/microsoft-downfall-emails-steve-ballmer
LikeLike
@OfficeofEdTech
Follow Follow @OfficeofEdTech
More
Meet us at the Kennedy Center for the EDGamesExpo on Monday, Jan 8th! Over 100 learning games & technologies will be showcased!
Is it ethical for the US Department of Education to be pitching product to public schools?
This needs to stop. These are contractors and public schools are a huge market. The US Department of Education needs to stop putting a federal stamp of approval on product pitches OR public schools need to stop considering them a reputable and reliable source of advice or information.
Ed tech has PLENTY of paid salespeople. We don’t need federal employees pushing product.
LikeLike
OMG, Chiara.
Worst than I thought. Thank you.
You are right, “We don’t need federal employees pushing product.”
And OMG, more than 100 learning games and technologies will be showcased! NOT WHAT IS NEEDED.
I think the SCREEN is making us DUMB, and no one is watching the FOXES in the Hen House.
Remember: The Tortoise and the Hare? Right now, all we have a HARES running to make $$$$$ to buy more unnecessary toys. Sigh. I hope there are more Tortoises and less Hares.
LikeLike
It seems that many parents are not at all alarmed at the rise of ed tech/screen time in schools. Many compare the data mining of their kids online, to the data mining they experience on fb, etc.
They believe it is just the ways things are now… and I live in a highly educated community. Any advice on how to wake folks up would be appreciated.
LikeLike
One of the best ways to wake parents up is to have their kids experience this nonsense for a while. If the students at my school are any indication, they HATE this tech-based worksheets on the screens. Our district is mandated that students use tech for math at least once a week. The kids are bored and they see what crud they’re doing.
My son, for example, kept “failing” a section of the online math. He was getting the problems correctly, but the computer wouldn’t accept them because he wasn’t going out to FIVE decimal points. THEN, other problems in the same program PENALIZED him for going out to five decimal places. And the program never said which problems were which. I’m sure the kids are complaining at home, because they sure complain to me.
The problem is, then the camel’s nose is in the tent. I wish people would learn without actually having to experience it, but here we are.
LikeLike
Second that. The more tech you use in your class, the more people will complain about you. Those websites are not fun and not educational. Policy makers aren’t connecting the complaint dots yet, but they will (or be replaced by someone who can).
LikeLike
That’s true. Parents simply aren’t thinking ahead to what this could mean to affect their child’s future. When did America start thinking it’s ok to obtain our sensitive personal information? And sell it.
LikeLike
The idea of putting a child in front of a screen and calling it an education is unethical, unrealistic and unworkable. Tech is an adjunct and always will be – it never replaces the real thing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Within the world of Silicon Valley with all the so-called forward thinkers are several dirty little secrets. First, tech is still mostly a boy’s club, and females are often victims of unwanted sexual advances. As in other companies women are often passed over for raises and career advancement. The tech giants are mostly selfish people that use everyone and every thing around them. It is no accident that the service providers to the techies live in vans parked along the side of the road. Those that serve the tech leaders live in deplorable conditions because they cannot afford to live near the companies’ offices. More generous billionaires would have some regard for those that bring them their meals and dry cleaning, but not them. Their main priority is themselves and their own tech fiefdom.
LikeLike
“More generous billionaires” is a contradiction in terms. “Liberal” or “conservative”, billionaires by definition are avaricious in the extreme – that’s how they got to be billionaires. No one makes that kind of fortune because they worked hard or because they invented something wonderful. They get that kind of fortune specifically because they are willing to be ruthless.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes
LikeLike
Not all billionaires are ruthless. Some are very lucky, being in the right place at the right time, or making a good bet.
LikeLike
It’s safe to say billionaires are not exactly generous by nature. The money doesn’t fall into their laps. But their greedy and egotistical natures are less important than the public, especially the members of the public in charge of policy making for public institutions, seeing through the veneer of techies as “wizards” or “happiness engineers” or whatever cute names they contrive for themselves and their companies. It doesn’t matter that they’re not generous, but echoing Diane, it does matter that they’re not geniuses.
LikeLike
No, Diane. You can probably get to be a multi-millionaire by getting lucky or being in the right place at the right time, but not a billionaire. It takes ruthlessness. You find it in every billionaire’s story, even the good ones. I posted about Soros the other day (Ekaterina made me). If you think Buffett is such a good guy, look into Berkshire Hathaway sometime.
LikeLike
dienne, What are specific problems with Berkshire Hathaway? Their acquisition style is to keep leaders of well-run companies. They don’t downsize or sell off divisions as many LBOs do.
LikeLike
Booklady,
Berkshire Hathaway was a direct beneficiary of the TARP legislation passed after Lehman Brothers collapsed early in the financial crisis, since it had made emergency investments in Goldman Sachs – then mortally endangered by counter-party risk associated with AIG’s cascading losses – early on.
Berkshire also owns Clayton Homes, which manufactures and finances trailer homes, and which is known for its predatory behavior.
https://www.publicintegrity.org/2015/04/03/17024/warren-buffetts-mobile-home-empire-preys-poor
Buffett is also famous for his quotes (my personal favorite being his statement about the ruling class winning the current class war) and here’s a particularly unappetizing one, about the tobacco industry: “I’ll tell you why I like the cigarette business: it costs a penny. Sell it for a dollar. it’s addictive. And there’s fantastic brand loyalty.”
As it happens, Berkshire has only invested indirectly in tobacco stocks (Altria, formerly Phillip-Morris) not for ethical reasons, but as Buffet has explicitly said, in order to avoid the hassles of bad publicity.
Old Warren is a tricky and clever one, and always good for an amusing, seemingly honest quote, but I’d personally pay more attention to what he does than what he says. He is most definitely not the benign, avuncular old uncle he makes himself out to be.
PS: For teachers, and supporters of public education, there’s also the fact that he’s promised to roll at least part of his estate into the Gates Foundation, so his wealth will be perfoming Bad Works long after he leaves this mortal coil.
LikeLike
Warren Buffett sent his three children to Omaha public schools. His grandchildren went to public school in Omaha. His biggest error was to give Bill Gates his money to give away. Gates has failed at everything in education. All he knows is code.
LikeLike
Perfect segue for me to add this link, retired colleague.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/03/google-childcare-center-teachers-women-pay-pay-discrimination
LikeLike
Thanks for the link. Silicon Valley is another boys’ club where the women often start out at lower pay, and they may never catch up to male counterparts.
LikeLike
“In 2008, it was Wall Street bankers. In 2017, tech workers are the world’s villain.”
Let’s be careful here. Wall Street bankers have not miraculously molded into model citizens. They are still villains too. We can certainly add tech people to the list, but let’s not take Wall Street bankers (or hedge funders) off it.
LikeLike
I used to wonder why we created a society that gives sociopaths the quickest path to the top.
But eventually I came to realize that sociopaths created a society that gives sociopaths the quickest path to the top.
LikeLike
YEP!
No understanding whatsoever of a “veil of ignorance” when it comes to those designing/making that legal pat to the top.
LikeLike
John Rawls reference?
LikeLike
YEP!
LikeLiked by 1 person
“you will enjoy this article” as in interesting, not in the sense of taking delight or pleasure! 🤓
LikeLike
Au contraire! As a teacher constantly pushed and often forced to harm my students and public education in general by misapplying and overusing online platforms, I take a great deal of perverse pleasure in reading the harshest criticism of tech. The reaction to the co-living startup, “You invented roommates!” was more that delightful. It was deeply satisfying.
LikeLike
Sorry InService but you have never been “forced to harm my students”. You could have said no and refused to do so. May I suggest you start doing so asap.
LikeLike
I can’t refuse to use all the district online testing, grading, and evaluating websites or I will lose my job. I’d say that’s being forced. I try to be brave, not stupid.
LikeLike
Our daughter, a 2014 Stanford grad, was working in a startup near Silicone Valley that had about 200 employees and she was a team leader. Her starting pay was $85k + great benefits.
Before even a year un that job, she quit last month after she sat down with the CEO and told him the company was carelessly burning through their startup money and they wouldn’t survive long enough to finish the proposed product line. The CEO, a he, shrugged off her concerns, pissed her off, and she quit. She saw no possibility for a long-term future with a company that spends money carelessly.
LikeLike
Tech moguls lobbied the president-elect in Trump Tower to help them, with HB-1 visas, cut the salary and benefits too.
LikeLike
An honestly SCARY line, here, since it has so much to do with Silicon Valley’s current attitude about public education: ” … the stereotype—arrogant, elite tech bros trying to get rich by disrupting a lovable local icon…”
LikeLike
I needed that. Thank you for sharing this article with us, Diane. I would never have read a Wired article on my own. This one was excellent, especially because I assume the techies I know will read it, the opposite of avid readers though they tend to be.
LikeLike
Also, thank you for correctly identifying them in the title as sociopaths.
LikeLike
Wired has had a lot of good stuff out lately. For starters, this one: http://www.wired.co.uk/article/chinese-government-social-credit-score-privacy-invasion
LikeLike
Tomorrow is show and tell day for edTech. Chiara had the link.
The federal “love-in for gamification” on display at the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts (January, 8, 2018) is really a project of The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program. This program, established in 1990, offers grants to help “domestic small businesses” get federal support for projects that have “potential for commercialization.”
The SBIR (taxpayers) supported more than half of the game-related projects in this year’s Expo. SBIR programs are part of the work at the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, and Department of Agriculture, and US Department of Education (Institute of Education Sciences, Office of Special Education Programs, Office of Innovation and Improvement, Office of Educational Technology and Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education).
SBIR grants are also tied to programs at the Smithsonian, Library of Congress, National Endowment for the Humanities, National Endowment for the Arts, Environmental Protection Agency, USAID, and NASA
This lovein is scheduled to have 38 participants. Participants were listed but without much information, so I looked at the website of at each, albeit briefly, in order to see where the investments of taxpayer money is going in support of for-profit ventures in tech.
More than a handful of these ventures are so well established that on-going federal support for them seems to me unnecessary. I judge that this is not just a commercial showcase for new tech products/services but also a venue for lobbying on behalf of sustained funding for the SBIR program and the many branches of government that sponsor these investments.
Here is my analysis of the tech products/services being marketed at the love-in.
THESE ARE FOR SCIENCE AND STEM
1. Alchemie games.com—Machine learning platform for college gateway courses in physics, statistics, or economics.
2. Andamio Games.com— “iNeuron,” app with lessons on basic neuroscience concepts built on state standards.
3. Apprendis.com—Digital science materials, with virtual labs that automatically assess students’ skill level.
4. Future Engineers.org— NASA sponsored design K-12 competition for multi-use tools and customized equipment astronauts can use.
5. IntellAdapt.com—Portfolio of adaptive courses for STEM subjects (pedagogy, “big data” analytics, remediation) with forthcoming “Brainwave Learning Strategy Aptitude Test.”
6. Killer Snails.com—Science games supported by the National Science Foundation, content partner: American Museum of Natural History.
7. Molecular Jig Games.com—Cell biology and immune defense game piloted with 14-19 year old high school students.
8. Querium. com—Online artificial intelligence tutoring platform for “critical STEM skills” in “personalized, bite-sized lessons,” for pre-collgiate students, especially for Texas “partners.”
9. Second Avenue Learning.com—Online multimedia games for STEM learning.
10. Strange Loop Games.com—Virtual reality field trips, science-oriented multiplayer games.
11. The Beamer. Mystery game with questions answered by historically important earth/space scientists.
THESE ARE FOR READING AND SCIENCE VOCABULARY
1. Mtelegence.com. Readorium®, web-based adaptive reading program for middle school, aligned with the Next Generation Science Standards and Common Core, multimodal vocabulary cards, strategy games, differentiated hints, rewards in “Readorium dollars” and gold medals.
2. SmartyPal.com —App for after school vocabulary and science projects for K-2 and 3-5
THESE ARE DESIGN AND MULTIMEDIA SERVICES FOR HIRE.
1. Fablevision.com—Full service multi-media game design (Sesame Street, Smithsonian. others)
2. Games That Work.com—Design studio for games with virtual reality, augmented virtual reality, computer generated graphics, multiplayer formats.
3. Parametric Studios.com—Design studio with experience in music, video, web production.
Schell Games.com— Design studio for games, full service for education and entertainment.
4. Sirius Thinking.com—Multi-media education and entertainment company. Talent from Sesame Street, The Electric Company, Nickelodeon, and Jim Henson Productions.
5. Spry Fox.com—Game developer for Apple and all android based devices, some word-building games.·
6. Thought Cycle.com— Game designers associated with University of Oregon projects in CBM Math and DIBELS
7. DIG-IT Games.com—Game design services and analytics. Also markets history, math, and other “quest”-like games.
8. Electric Funstuff.com—Game design service and analytics.
THESE PRODUCTS FOCUS ON MATHEMATICS
1. Brainquake.com—Math instruction, especially in middle school. via Wuzzit™ Trouble.
2. Fluidity Software.com—Specialist in pen-Computing and 3D scientific visualization with products for teaching math
3. MathBrix.com—Adaptive learning in math for “little minds” with interactive visuals.
4. MidSchoolMath.com—Math program beginning in grade 5, with multimedia, interactive “conceptual narratives” and practice with a “test trainer.”
5. Teachley.com—Math apps for ipads, adaptive program for Common Core, “targeting” at-risk students for intervention.
THESE COMBINE MATH AND ELA.
1. Children’s Progress Academic Assessment™ (CPAA™)— Non-profit computer adaptive tests for Pre-K ELA and math skills with recommendation system (scaffolding) from Northwest Evaluation Association.
2. Cognitive Toy Box.com—Touchscreen games that teach, test, and recommend practice for ELA and math skills.
THIS IS FOR READING ONLY
Foundations in Learning.com—Remedial reading program grade 2 and up, extended practice with adaptive tests marketed as personalized learning, minor role for teacher as “facilitator”
THESE ARE FOR SPECIAL POPULATIONS
1. IDRT.com—Platform and online products for games based on American Sign Language
2. Analytic Measures.com—Automated assessment of spoken responses special populations—young children, second language speakers, and people with cognitive or language disabilities.
3. Soar Technologies.com & Rush Medical University—Video-based artificial intelligence platform for telemedicine, also to assess and train children with autism spectrum disorders for improved social information processing (SIP) skills
4. Speak Agent.com— Interactive audiovisual game activities for learning academic language and vocabulary especially for dual-language and bilingual programs.
THESE ARE FOR SELF-HELP
1. 3C Institute.com,—Tools to help children build positive peer relationships and social coping skills, behavioral health.
2. 7 Generation Games.com—Advice on work, parenting, sports, school.
3. Mindset Works.com—“Brainology” products and services (growth mindset) developed and marketed by Carol Dweck, Professor of Psychology at Stanford University.
4. Scrible.com—Subscription platform for research. Enables tagging, saving, and annotating online resources.
I am bowing out now. I have overdosed on the hype for these products, too much mindless use of educational jargon as if a panacea. The most intriguing entries (for me) are designed for special populations.
LikeLike
Ladies and gentleman,
the ever diligent,
the amazing,
Laura Chapman!
Thank you for delving into all this; it must have been tiresome.
LikeLike
They used to call products such as these “snake oil” sold to unsuspecting consumers by quacks who promised everything but delivered bupkis.
As long as there are gullible people there will be these snake oil dealers ready to swindle in the name of progress.
LikeLike
One of the key features of the hyper-capitalist tech utopians is their lack of exposure in college and by inclination, to the humanities and liberal arts. In fact they are the pure example of what STEM focus can bring. The liberal arts and humanities place science and engineering in context as well as provide a moral and ethical lens. I would argue that our society needs more English and art and history and art history majors right now. Id argue we need a K-12 refocusing on social studies and English and art with zero screen time and zero technology in the classroom. We need to begin to worry about who these STEM babies will become. We have plenty of evidence.
Its a harsh comparison but one that should provoke some thought : Germany in the 1930s was a society that was topheavy with engineering and technical degrees. Possibly the most technology/engineering/science educated population on the planet.
As a collective result, and leaving out the military juggernaut they produced, they gave Germany one thing: a very efficient train system.
How was that used?
A society topheavy with STEM babies in NOT innoculated against genocide. History and English and art do that.
LikeLike
An under-acknowledged danger posed by Silicon Valley is not just that its leaders are creepy and greedy, though far too many are, but that it is able to promote it’s smash-and-grab (euphemistically called “Disruption”) ethos under the veil of “Science,” which inoculates it against the scrutiny its actions demand.
As Mark Zuckerberg has correctly stated, “Code is Law.” In other words, these companies have been allowed to become functionally sovereign via monopoly control of vital informational choke-points. However, as Cathy O’Neill (“Mathbabe”) has correctly pointed out, algorithms are nothing more than opinions/interests embedded in computer code.
In other words, it’s Ayn Rand in the ones and zeroes that happen to oversee our lives…
LikeLike