[I am reposting since I just discovered that I put the wrong link in the original post. Sorry, Susan!]
Susan Ochshorn of ECE PolicyWorks and a new member of the board of the Network for Public educatio, writes here about two polar opposites: Deborah Meier and Eva Moskowitz.
Ochshorn compares the biographies, the lives, and the education philosophy of these two people.
She begins with Meier, an advovate, like Ochshorn, for children’s right to play:
“More than two decades ago, Deborah Meier warned that the idea of democracy was in peril. “Is it ever otherwise?” she asked in the preface to The Power of Their Ideas, her elegantly argued manifesto for public education. A self-described preacher on its behalf, she has spent half a century nurturing “everyone’s inalienable capacity to be an inventor, dreamer, and theorist—to count in the larger scheme of things.”
“I met Meier in the mid-aughts, when I joined a grassroots campaign she spearheaded in New York City to restore creative play and hands-on learning to preschools and kindergartens. This éminence grise of progressive early childhood education and the small-schools movement (for which she received a MacArthur fellowship in 1987) had begun her career as a kindergarten teacher at the Shoesmith School in Kenwood, a diverse neighborhood wedged between the University of Chicago’s Hyde Park and an impoverished black community.”
When she turns to Moskowitz, she sees a power-hungry woman who uses children for her own purposes.
“The Education of Eva Moskowitz” is a torturous read. After 359 pages of copious detail, an internal structure that defies chronology, zig-zagging across Moskowitz’s life, the evisceration of journalists, politicians and “union flacks,” as she refers to people and organizations fighting for social justice, and anyone else who has crossed her, my mind was numb. Not to mention her hubris, greed, narcissism, humorlessness and lack of self-awareness…
“His hypocrisy would have been comical if the fates of real children weren’t at stake,” Moskowitz writes of Mayor Bill de Blasio, her adversary in building an empire. Ah, yes, the children. “While it can be frustrating to teach them because they don’t know how to behave,” Moskowitz writes in a chapter called “Weevils” (an infestation she attributes to snacks from the Department of Education), “the upside is that they are virtually a blank slate…. if you take advantage of that fact to teach them to become good learners, that investment will pay dividends for years to come.”
“Apparently, Moskowitz isn’t aware that the tabula rasa theory of the English empiricist John Locke has been discredited by decades of neurological and developmental science. As Berkeley psychologist Alison Gopnik writes in The Philosophical Baby, “Their minds seem drastically limited; they know so much less than we do. And yet long before they can read and write, they have extraordinary powers of imagination and creativity, and long before they go to school, they have remarkable learning abilities.”
“Moskowitz and other charter network operators such as KIPP’s David Levin have cast their “No Excuses” schools in the mold of Harvard psychologist B.F. Skinner, whose radical behaviorism ignores internal processes—thoughts, feelings, and neurophysiological processes—emphasizing the relationship between observable stimuli and responses. Through a process called operant conditioning, behavior is modified by positive and negative reinforcement. (See Pavlov and his dogs.)
“With harsh discipline, and incentives offered for good behavior and high scores on practice tests, Moskowitz remains convinced she can close the achievement gap between her students, the vast majority of whom are black or Latino living in poverty, and their more affluent, white peers. Her methods are abusive. Students’ every movement is monitored. Daydreaming is prohibited. Children are shamed, their lackluster performances on weekly spelling and math quizzes posted in a red zone on charts in the hallway.”
As we view these two, we see a struggle for the heart and soul of American education, or for the hearts and souls of our children. Big money is betting on Moskowitz. She is the darling of Wall Street, DFER, and other corporate titans. The survival of our democracy and humane ideals is riding on Meier’s vision.

The survival of our democracy and humane ideals is riding on Meier’s vision….
and countless others.
LikeLike
Doesn’t this say everything about Moskowitz’s techniques: “This year, a Success high school, on Thirty-third Street, will produce the network’s first graduating class: seventeen students. This pioneering class originated with a cohort of seventy-three first graders.” https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/11/success-academys-radical-educational-experiment
LikeLike
This post has an Aesop Fable-like feeling to it.
LikeLike
Illuminating comparison. Thank you.
LikeLike
Moskowitz’ stated belief that children are a “blank slate” is belied by the fact that she creams and culls children on the front end (admissions) and back end (suspensions/”counseling out”) of her publicly-subsidized sweatshops.
It’s as if the lies, greed and will to power ooze out of her every cell and pore…
LikeLike
Qualifier: the scholars she chooses are a blank slate. She only accepts blank slates.
LikeLike
That’s sickening. Children are sponges for learning. What they learn in the first 7 years of life is extremely important. They are NEVER just blank slates.
LikeLike
No child is a blank slate! Every child has been learning since birth. And yes they are sponges with the desire to take in more and more of the world each day. Meier encourages this. Eva destroys it.
LikeLike
On the contrary, she only accepts those children perceived to be sufficiently prepped at home for her behavior modification sweatshops.
You have to be primed for the compliance that Moskowitz’s schools dish out, and those are the kids that are admitted.
LikeLike
EVIL!
LikeLike
LikeLike
Here’s a short clip from Michael Moore’s “Where to Invade Next.” He talks to Finnish teachers, students and Pasi Sahlberg about how Finland chose to improve education. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVCTqgrFIPs
LikeLike
In addition, Moskowitz’s abusive child abusing tactics that strip socializing among children from the classroom and school environment is removing a vital element of the maturing process.
We already know how invalid IQ tests are in predicting intelligence and success. Studies also have revealed that what has been labeled as social IQ is more important than mental IQ.
“It is important for children to learn socialization skills in school and at home. Children are naturally egocentric, thinking of themselves as the center of their world, at birth. It takes development and training to teach children to think of others as well as themselves.
“This tendency is not negative, and is inborn in all human beings. However, for children to operate successfully in society, they must learn to interact with others in a healthy, positive, and productive manner. In order to prepare children to be successful in adults, it is crucial that we as adults encourage social interaction, monitor social skills, and teach healthy ways to interact with other children and with adults. Socialization skills are important not only in school but in all of adult life as well.”
http://school-age-children.yoexpert.com/physical-and-emotional-growth/why-is-it-important-for-children-to-learn-socializ-1761.html
“Social Intelligence (SI) is the ability to successfully build relationships and navigate social environments. Our society puts a huge emphasis on book smarts and IQ, but our relationships effect a much bigger part of our lives. … Strong relationships improve our immune system and help combat disease.”
https://www.scienceofpeople.com/social-intelligence/
What Is Social Intelligence? Why Does It Matter?
Social intelligence is the key to career and life success. Do you have it?
Posted Jul 01, 2014
Intelligence, or IQ, is largely what you are born with. Genetics play a large part. Social intelligence (SI), on the other hand, is mostly learned. SI develops from experience with people and learning from success and failures in social settings. It is more commonly referred to as “tact,” “common sense,” or “street smarts.”
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/201407/what-is-social-intelligence-why-does-it-matter
Eva Moskowitz’s autocratic management style to educate children is crushing the ability of children to learn and develop their social intelligence skills. Instead, the children that survive in her abusive classroom torture chambers are learning the opposite skills. How to be an unfeeling robot without compassion.
LikeLike
These are interesting articles. The one I wonder about is the one that asserts the environmental influences on a person with a good ability to interact with the world. Sometimes I think the social intelligence is just as genetically influenced as any other aspect of who were are.
My daughter has always reacted more than other children to stories. When she was tiny, anticipation of the triumph of Cinderella would send her into audible exultation. People would tell us after a play or movie that they enjoyed watching her reactions every bit as much as they enjoyed the movie. This was innate. Nothing we did taught her any of that.
I do not think we can ever know the dividing line between genetics and environment. Thus harming children so we can view ourselves as great teachers appears even more horrific.
LikeLike
I’m about 50-50: introvert-extrovert
Anchee is mostly an introvert and even though she is a world-class author with all 8 of her books translated into more than 30 languages and millions of copies sold, she prefers not to interact with other people even in social situations. The exception is when she was promoting one of her new books and was bouncing around the country and/or the world giving lectures to hundreds or thousands of her fans and being interviewed by the media.
Lauryann, the daughter we raised, is 80-percent extrovert and often, even as a young child, spoke for her mother when someone asked her mother a question.
When Anchee went on a raft trip down the Colorado River through the Grand Canyon with a raft full of best-selling, award-winning authors, she took her preschool child Lauryannn with her who did most of the talking at night around the campfires while her mother sat silent. This scenario was repeated often through the years. When Lauryann was 12, she went with her mother to a big dinner event in San Francisco where they sat at a table filled with big-name authors. Who did all the talking for her mother and held her own with Pulitzer Prize winners and/or bestselling authors, Lauryann did. Her mother hardly said a word.
Anchee often gets lost when driving a long distance and sometimes ends up driving around for hours for a trip that should have taken less than an hour. She won’t stop and ask for help. That’s how shy she can be. But Lauryann, even as a preschool child, would roll down her window at a stop sign and get the attention of the driver in the car beside theirs and ask for directions. Sometimes at Lauryann’s insistence and nagging, Anchee would pull into a gas station and the child would go in and talk to the clerk to get directions. Lauryann is not shy and not afraid to talk to others.
I’ve seen her easily step into a crowd at a social function and soon everyone is paying attention to her and obviously enjoying whatever she is saying and the crowd grows with her in the center. Anchee and I witness this from a distant corner where we are sitting in the shadows sipping water — no booze, please.
LikeLike
“Children are shamed, their lackluster performances on weekly spelling and math quizzes posted in a red zone on charts in the hallway.”
If there is any personally identifiable information posted on those shame charts, as I assume there is, that’s a violation of FERPA. Eva doesn’t know this? Reporting it to the federal Department of Education will probably go nowhere these days.
Parents are supposed to be informed each year of their FERPA rights. Is Eva doing even that?
Parents should sue Eva. Maybe Leonie Haimson can locate some of the affected parents and get on the case?…
LikeLike
The federal government (and this was under Arne Duncan) has eviscerated FERPA to the point that these schools can probably get away with what they’re doing. Parents have very few rights when it comes to their children’s information now.
LikeLike
At the school where I work, faculty have been required to take PD trainings on FERPA several times in the past few years and I just had to do that again at the beginning of this month.
From what I understand, despite the changes under Duncan, it is still not okay to post student’s grades with personally identifiable information in public places, without parental permission for kids under 18 and student permission for those who are in college. Schools also still need to inform parents and students of their rights under FERPA each year.
LikeLike
Also, states have privacy laws similar to FERPA, too, including New York, as can be seen at FERPA / SHERPA, The Education Privacy Resource Center’s website located here: https://ferpasherpa.org/state-laws/
LikeLike
How about mentioning my new book-/These Schools Belong to You and Me ,with Emily Gasoi
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
Please read Deborah Meier’s new book, THESE SCHOOLS BELONG TO YOU AND ME, written with Emily Gasoi
LikeLike
Deborah,
What is natural, inherent and inevitable – play among children – has been crowded out by a fascist penchant for literacy and math skills, rote, skill, drill, and kill, and measure, measure, measure, all at an age that is developmentally too young and that is taking on more and more the learning tasks reserved in a past epoch for children 2 to 3 years older.
Play is the work and business of children, and through it, content knowledge and oral language grow exponentially. Knowledge of the self, others, and the world grow also through play.
But the overclass is disdainful of self actualized humans who develop into functional, critically thinking and creative adults; they want automatons who will be able and willing to take on the employment that will keep the overclass in power. They want people who have between their synspases a lot of memorized knowledge that has been imprinted and imposed rather than people who can think for themselves. They want the masses to never question or even understand the concept of class difference and class oppression.
That means that playtime has to go. It’s too humanistic.
LikeLike
Dear Norwegian Filmaker,
You are right on the money, as it were. Although I dread acceptance of your dystopian vision, I find myself in that place more and more as the U.S. and the rest of the developed world destroys itself and humanity in this late, toxic stage of capitalism. Woe is us!
You might find interesting another piece of mine, published at Alternet earlier this fall: https://www.alternet.org/billionaires-early-childhood-education
I was in Oslo in June, researching my next book, on play as the foundation of democracy and civil society. I did not want to leave to return to the U.S. Norway is fighting the Global Education Reform Movement (GERM), but the “virus” is tenacious.
Here in the U.S., in the early childhood community, we are just beginning to recognize the profound repercussions for young children. My blog ECE Policy Matters, has been abuzz with all of this:
http://ecepolicyworks.com/when-all-else-fails-we-must-protect-childhood-a-call-to-action-from-denisha-jones/
http://ecepolicyworks.com/baby-pisa-is-just-around-the-corner-so-why-is-no-one-talking-about-it/
We are terrified—and with good reason. As you acknowledge, our very humanity is at stake.
LikeLike
Susan,
Thank you for your note. Contrarily and respectfully submitted to you, I do NOT accept the dystopia in the USA and try to fight as I can. But it will be largely up to Americans to find themselves and develop and evolve. They need to grow up, but I have seen signs of that in the past and I see it now presently in so many amazing ways. While not easy, all growing pains usually lead to something wondrous and beautiful. But this will test many.
Then again, necessity becomes the mother of most invention, and for that, I am comfortable in having quite a bit of hope.
LikeLike
I agree that children are not blank slates –our brains come with built-in capacity to analyze, synthesize, infer, etc. which is how I read Kant –but that does not mean that children don’t respond to reward and punishment, as Ochshorn implies. I don’t understand people’s blanket condemnation of reward and punishment. The threat of punishment (detention) keeps my most difficult class orderly and safe for the quiet kids. It’s what I use to prevent kids from uttering racial slurs when we do a unit on Islam or China. Without it, kids’ talking in this class would go unchecked, kids would bully and harass each other and little learning would occur. Have I sullied myself for stooping to threaten punishment? I don’t think so, but clearly others do. In a perfect world with infinite time and energy, I would reform the soul of each and every one of my students through talk and reasoning, so that they would not want to bully, insult or disrupt. But this is not a perfect world. I do exhort and reason with kids, but I find this is not enough: reward and punishment is an indispensable ingredient in classroom management for some groups of students.
LikeLike
There is a difference, as I am sure you know, between punishment and discipline. Even the behaviorists recognized the negative effects of punishment on behavior (even if they only recognized the overt signs, which in rats might be defecating while children might “only” cry or hang their heads). Depending on the age of the student, methods of discipline are different. Once I had established a rapport with my students, middle school and high school students were able to handle a more direct approach to nipping objectionable behavior in the bud. They generally knew when they were stepping over the line. I loved the discussions that could arise out of “teachable moments, but there were times, such as breaking up or preventing a physical fight, where nobody was “using their words” to express their anger.
LikeLike
Punishment is a type of discipline, no? Getting your phone taken away or getting a detention are forms of punishment. There are recognized to have negative effects on behavior? Does fining people for speeding have negative effects on driving?
LikeLike
We are coming from different places and different ways of looking at the words. If we ignore Skinner and the roots of the word discipline, then, yes, in the vernacular, people tend to use discipline and punishment interchangeably and have for a long time.
LikeLike
Here is my take on where we are currently headed. From my Chinese friends I’ve found out a lot about how things really are there. Most people are only educated through middle school and the methods are very harsh. They bring to mind the no excuse model. I believe the powers that be are grooming our children to be just cogs in the system to fill the needs of big business. I’m very concerned with the mandates limiting the use of specific words and ideas. Giving person hood to businesses and allowing one’s religion to impact others doesn’t seem very democratic in the sense I was taught in school.
LikeLike
Q There is a story, often told, that upon exiting the Constitutional Convention Benjamin Franklin was approached by a group of citizens asking what sort of government the delegates had created. His answer was: “A republic, if you can keep it.” The brevity of that response should not cause us to under-value its essential meaning: democratic republics are not merely founded upon the consent of the people, they are also absolutely dependent upon the active and informed involvement of the people for their continued good health. END Q
Democracy/Republics are always in danger.
LikeLike