North Carolina is one of the states where the legislature has been working overtime to pass programs to harm public schools. Charters, vouchers, cybercharters, Teach for America, and regular assaults on the teaching profession.
That context makes it especially surprising and gratifying to see that the editorial board of the News-Observer wrote a strong critique of the GOP Tax Plan because it hurts public education.
This is a fantastic editorial:
There’s no doubt that tax-cut proposals in the House and Senate will increase income inequality today, but provisions in the bills could also weaken the earning power of many in the future by eroding the quality and the diversity of public schools.
One change that as approved by the Senate and also found in the House bill extends a tax benefit for college savings accounts to cover tuition for private elementary and secondary education. The change means that those who can afford to save money for non-public school tuition will be able to see that money grow tax-free.
Extending the tax break won’t mean much for families of modest incomes since they can’t afford to save large amounts for pre-college schooling, but it will have the effect of making high-priced private schools less costly to the wealthy. The Senate version of the change offered by Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas even allows those who home school to draw up to $10,000 annually out of the tax-favored accounts to cover loosely defined school expenses. In the end, the change reduces tax revenue to give the wealthy a break on private education costs.
This relatively narrow adjustment will be joined by sweeping proposals in both the House and Senate tax bills that limit federal deductions for state and local taxes. Those changes will make it harder for local and state governments to raise taxes to support public schools. Together, the changes will lighten the tuition bill at private schools while adding to the tax burden that supports public schools.
Of course, higher education is also threatened by provisions in the tax plans that would include levies on endowments and on tuition benefits provided to graduate students and children of college employees. But the plans’ broader threats are to public schools, which are already being undermined by Republican-backed efforts to increase the number of charter schools – publicly funded but privately run – and to expand the use of tax funds for private schools through voucher programs. Now that “school choice” movement has gained support at the federal level with the appointment of Betsy DeVos – a charter and private school advocate – as the U.S. education secretary.
Fueling re-segregation
As Republicans cut away at the financial foundation of public schools they are also accelerating the re-segregation of all schools at the elementary and secondary levels. Adding charters and using tax dollars to subsidize private and sectarian school tuition is leading to a great sorting by race. And that, rather than enhancing education, deprives children of learning through exposure to classmates of different racial groups and economic backgrounds.
In a recent report on charter schools, The Associated Press found the number of charter schools has tripled over the last decade and racial isolation has grown with them. Charters tend to be overwhelmingly white, or overwhelming one minority. The AP reported: “While 4 percent of traditional public schools are 99 percent minority, the figure is 17 percent for charters. In cities, where most charters are located, 25 percent of charters are over 99 percent nonwhite, compared to 10 percent for traditional schools.”
The trend worries even some charter school advocates. Pascual Rodriguez, principal of a Milwaukee charter where nearly all the students are Hispanic, told the AP: “The beauty of our school is we’re 97 percent Latino. The drawback is we’re 97 percent Latino … Well, what happens when they go off into the real world where you may be part of an institution that’s not 97 percent Latino?”
The AP report mirrors what an October News & Observer report found about racial segregation in North Carolina charter schools. The report found that the schools are more segregated and have more affluent students than traditional public schools.
Christine Kushner, a member of the Wake County Board of Education and a former chair of the panel, said that despite efforts to foster diversity in the Wake County school system, the state’s largest, minorities are the majority, largely because of an increase in Hispanic students and more white students enrolling in schools outside of the system. She said Wake schools remain strong, but their reduced diversity both in race and income is a setback.
“It’s troubling to me that we are going backward because I think diverse schools are what’s best for all children and economics and history affirm that,” she said. School choice is fine, she said, but public schools need to have the resources “to be the first choice for all parents.”
Good public schools and strong support through taxes are inseparable. But the tax bills in Congress are adding to the forces that are splitting that bond and jeopardizing public education.
Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article188972429.html#storylink=cpy

check out this piece on gulan schools financial misconduct in my home town of Greece just outside of Rochester NY http://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2017/12/09/terra-science-and-education-profits-rochester-academy-charter-school-deal-fethullah-gulen/919916001/?fb_comment_id=1493559864031784_1494920680562369&comment_id=1494920680562369#f27d49972ed9818
LikeLike
Of course I do not disagree . News flash the tax assault has passed the only question is just how vile the final product will be. But here is the bigger more important question . When Democrats take power in 2020 what will they do . I think we have a long history to know exactly what will happen. There are some of us who were outraged in 2013 when Obama caved on the Bush tax cuts.
Conservative representative Dave Camp (R-Mich.) summed up the situation by saying, “After more than a decade of criticizing these tax cuts, Democrats are finally joining Republicans in making them permanent.”
http://www.epi.org/blog/bush-tax-cuts-stay/
Don’t ask me Diane why I am blaming Democrats .
LikeLike
The corporate Democrats including Obama got their marching orders from their own plutocrats, Silicon Valley and Wall St. Democrats caved because they were not going to bite the hand that feeds them. The neoliberals are still running the DNC. Without a big shift in direction, they will continue to be “Republican lite.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed , which explains my despair. Without a true alternative it is hopeless. Perhaps Trump is a good thing ,in that the pain he causes may cause a “political revolution” . Of course it may not be in our lifetime . If the financial collapse did not cause it what will . .
LikeLike
Maybe you’re right. Maybe the absurd direction of Trump and company will force the Democrats to redefine themselves? The young progressives are actively trying to push the corporate Democrats to the left. If Democrats fail to see the bigger picture, some of the young are talking about a third party. If this happens, the Democrats will split their vote and lose for many years to come. We will be in the “Dark Ages” with the libertarian Republicans.
LikeLike
Dare we hope that the current mess these “progressive” leaders have made will be their undoing: Can we imagine that citizens will know how to demand truly relevant conversation in the 2018 primaries?
LikeLike
Joel,
I do ask you. Democrats created the programs to protect the environment, to protect civil rights, to protect our parks and wildlife refuges, our open spaces. Republicans are destroying the same programs. Democrats appointed federal judges to protect the Constitution, Trump is appointing federal judges who are bloggers and will destroy civil rights. Do you not see a difference? I do, and it is a vast difference. I criticized Obama almost daily, but I would prefer him to the ignoramus in the WH now. Wouldn’t you?
LikeLike
Nixon created the EPA. Teddy Roosevelt is generally credited with creating our national park system. Both parties have gone through substantial changes in terms of who they represent and their stated and actual values. I’m not sure it’s productive to try to credit or blame either current party with deeds done by the parties as they were constituted decades ago.
LikeLike
One bet I’m willing to take. Trump will tear down the accomplishments of his predecessors and leave nothing for his legacy. Other than a sky-high stock market.
LikeLike
I would prefer if Obama/ Clinton policy had not empowered the Republicans and propelled the moron into office .
The question is not whether I preferred Hillary to Trump . I voted for her. The question is why I had 16 years of Democratic Presidents pursuing essentially Republican policy . .
Do you think that those policies were essentially different in any area of the economy ,than they were in education.
Dismal Democrats get Republicans elected . Would I prefer that my pension was not thrown into jeopardy, along with Social Security , Medicare and Medicaid and the environment\planet…….. ? Yes.
Do I think what we have seen from Democrats has or will prevent those outcomes? No.
If now is not the time to rip that party apart and send it in a different direction , then when?
We have already had 8 years of vote for me I’m not them . It does not seem to be working. It took less than a month to know that “hope and change ” was hopeless and not change at all.
Nothing like reading an unabashed socialist to cheer you up on a Sunday afternoon. (NOT).
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/magical-thinking-keeping-people-off-streets/
LikeLike
I am delighted with the provision to assist home-schooling families. Exact statistics are difficult to obtain, but it is estimated that about 1.1 million children in the USA are home-schooled. And it is safe to assume, that (most) families which choose to home-school, are not wealthy, else they would enroll their children in expensive non-public schools.
This provision, may enable more families to home-school, if the amount in the provision will enable the secondary wage-earner in the family, to stop having to work outside the home for wages.
A terrific proposal.
LikeLike
Charles,
Do you think Fairfax County, where you live, should pay for private security guards for those who wish not to use the local police? Should you pay taxes to build swimming pools for those who don’t like the community pool? How about providing everyone with money to hire their own firefighters?
LikeLike
There seems to be an attempt to turn us into individual agents interested only in our own welfare and our own needs. I really don’t know what kind of country these people think we will have if everyone is out for themselves. What has happened to the idea of common good? We have a system of governance that at least has a fighting chance of making decisions for the common good rather than private interests, but it has definitely been subverted over the past decades. Do we really want to balkanize, “feudalize,” racialize,… ?
LikeLike
Your analogies are false, and pejorative. Law enforcement, is a legitimate function of municipal/county government. Providing rebates to individuals who would opt-out is ridiculous. Nevertheless, insurance companies often provide rebates to individuals, who install a home-alarm system (off their homeowners insurance).
And providing recreational opportunities for the community, is a legitimate function of local government. Providing subsidies to individuals who choose to install a pool, is ridiculous. I am delighted to support the network of bicycle paths here in Fairfax, even though I do not own a bicycle. I expect no rebate on my tax contributions. I gladly support the public library system here. Less than 3% of Fairfax residents have a current library card, but 100% of the residents support the library system. I always vote for the bond issues, to support recreational activities in Fairfax, because these increase the quality of life here, and add to property values.
As to firefighting: I once lived in Bedford county Virginia. The county does not spend money on a municipal fire department. The citizens have chosen to set up a volunteer fire department. Individuals choose to donate their time and expertise, to operate the fire department. They hold fund-raisers and accept donations. This is a form of “home-fire-protection” that is analagous to home-schooling. It is not fair to collect taxes from people, who have chosen to opt-out of a municipal fire department. The volunteer fire department provides adequate fire protection, and the fire insurance rates in Bedford, are just as low, as if the county had a professional firefighting department.
Many (not all) people who are opposed to school choice and giving parents more control over the educational spending on their children, cannot come up with legitimate reasons for their opposition. So, often, they work up “bogus” issues, like publicly-operated schools are a “bedrock of democracy” or other such drivel. Or the school is the “center” of the community, even though there are already non-public schools and home schooling going on, simultaneously. Or that there is a “war on children”, when no such combat exists.
It is interesting to me, how (many of) the people who fight the hardest against free choices in education, are the labor union bosses, and the administrators, and the people who have a vested interest in the status quo.
LikeLike
I am not a labor union boss. I do not belong to a labor union. I have never belonged to a labor union. I am a taxpayer. I do not want my taxes used to support home schooling, religious instruction or private schools.
LikeLike
I stipulate that you are not a labor boss, and do not belong to a union. (neither am I). I am a taxpayer as well. i do not especially like all of things that the government spends my money on, but I just “suck it up”, and go along with it. Things like the “Bridge to Nowhere”, and other such pork-barrel, boondoggles, are a fact of life.
I said in the post, that not all of the people who are opposed to school choice/vouchers are part of the education establishment.
LikeLike
“I said in the post, that not all of the people who are opposed to school choice/vouchers are part of the education establishment.”
Just those who fight the hardest. Who knows better than the ones who have a career in public education what we are in danger of losing? Funny how many non educators are fighting for their own neighborhood schools. I know some people on the south side of Chicago that would dispute your derisive dismissal of the role of the neighborhood school in their communities.
So you support some public services…police, libraries,…so shouldn’t people have tax supported choices to private security? What about tax supported private specialized libraries? Recreational choices? Why don’t we subsidize private recreational facilities, so people can have a wider choice? Where is the dividing line between public good and private choice?
LikeLike
Charles!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Where to begin with you? Just as regards volunteer fire departments: Who pays for the firehouses? Who pays for the fire trucks and all the equipment and the insurances for the vehicles and property and the subsequent upkeep of the vehicles/equipment? Who pays for the fire hydrants, the water mains to the hydrants and the maintenance of the latter? Who? The taxpayers. Volunteer fire departments are not free, that is a disgusting disingenuous libertarian lie, myth and deflection.
LikeLike
@speduktr: You voice some valid concerns. The father of modern economics, Adam Smith, observed the same phenomenon, in the 1770’s. His classic treatise, “The Wealth of Nations”, postulated the “invisible hand”, which shows that when individuals work towards their own best interests, there is a societal benefit to the common good as well.
See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisible_hand
Our system of governance, is a highly diverse system, with a federal government split into three separate and co-equal branches. Additionally, we have state, county, and municipal governments. The citizenry controls all the various branches, because the people are sovereign.
Different laws exist in a thinly populated state like Alaska, from a highly urbanized state like New Jersey.
If you study the works of Adam Smith (and other classical economists), you will see how acting in your own enlightened self-interest, will benefit the common good.
LikeLike
Why don’t you read Nancy MacLean’s book “Democracy in Chains”? It is a very good explanation of why the common good benefits all of us, and we don’t reach the common good by acting only in our own self-interest. That’s what DeVos and the Koch brothers believe. They are billionaires, but very few people in this country benefit by their selfish actions.
LikeLike
Why don’t you read Nancy MacLean’s book “Democracy in Chains”? It is a very good explanation of why the common good benefits all of us, and we don’t reach the common good by acting only in our own self-interest. That’s what DeVos and the Koch brothers believe. They are billionaires, but very few people in this country benefit by their selfish actions.
LikeLike
Yeah right, we certainly have seen through history how the excess “trickles down” to the lower echelons.
LikeLike
Charles. Surely you are aware that homeschoolers do not want federal money because they do not want any gov’ment interference, data collection, accountability. That’s why homeschoolers have a legal and DC lobbying team. https://nche.hslda.org
LikeLike
I do not know any such thing. There are (approximately) 1.1 million families in the USA, who choose to home-school. Perhaps some of them do not want federal money, or a tax deduction. Perhaps some do. Who knows?
LikeLike
Home schoolers have a right to school their children at home. The government has no obligation to pay them for not using government services.
LikeLike
Home schooling is illegal in Germany, the parents can be fined for violating the law. I do not believe that tax dollars should go to parents who decide to home school. That’s a private decision and there are perfectly decent public schools that are available for the children. In many cases, parents home school for religious or philosophical reasons or these parents do not want their children to be exposed to “those people.”
LikeLike
I lived in Germany (1976-1978). It used to be illegal to be a Jew in Germany, it was a capital crime. Our nation has chosen not to emulate the practices of the Nazis. Home schooling is legal in the USA, because the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in the case of Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925). In the land of the free and the home of the brave, the state does NOT have “dibs” on the minds of our children!
I was an adjunct instructor for a home-schooling group in Kentucky. The parents chose to home-school, for a number of reasons. Some of the moms, just wanted to spend more time with their children.
I do not believe that tax dollars should go to a public school system, when the parents are providing the instructional services to the children.
LikeLike
The Pierce decision did not say the government should fund homeschooling or private schools. Stop referring to it. No one here is fooled
LikeLike
I stipulate that the Pierce decision does NOT require the public to provide funds to parents who opt-out of public schools. See
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-sosa/homeschooling-setting-the_b_6638900.html
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-349-95056-0_8
http://momsaddvalue.com/why-i-decided-to-homeschool/
The thrust of the Pierce decision is this:
Q Yes. The unanimous Court held that “the fundamental liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general power of the State to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only.” END Q
LikeLike
Your friends may homeschool. They may send their children to a religious school. But taxpayers are not obliged to pay for their private choices. That’s the Pierce decision.
LikeLike
Charles writes: “I lived in Germany (1976-1978). It used to be illegal to be a Jew in Germany, it was a capital crime. Our nation has chosen not to emulate the practices of the Nazis.”
What is the logical connection between those sentences? And you are factually incorrect about our nation emulating the practices of Nazis. We have a long history of selectively emulating many of their practices, especially today. It’s not just the practices we choose to believe; it includes things like demonizing minorities, denying facts for ideological convenience, inflaming mass hysteria to implement laws and policies, attempting to delegitimize a free press, creating an ideological education infrastructure, attacking the role of the judiciary, and on and on.
You finally got something right when you wrote, “I do not know any such thing.” No need for you to include the word “such.”
LikeLike
Since this is an education blog, I’ll just take this moment to tell you that you are abusing the comma, Charles. In your comment here, for example, you shouldn’t have commas after the words “assume,” “home-school,” or “provision.”
LikeLike
I know what a comma splice is. My mistakes. I should know better.
LikeLike
These aren’t comma splices. Comma splices happen when commas are used to join independent clauses. That’s not what you were doing.
LikeLike
I’d like to know the details of how the average home-schooled kid is receiving a decent education. I am a certified teacher of K-12 classroom and I wouldn’t consider myself qualified to teach a child in my home. [My expertise is teaching elementary music.]
How many parents are doing home schooling and are not at all qualified? Where are they getting materials and what curriculum are they following? How many hours a day are the kids receiving educational instruction? This is an area that is putting children at risk. It definitely should not be receiving tax money. It should not be encouraged. What happens to this money after it is sent to the parents?
LikeLike
Carolmalaysia,
It is necessary to understand that there is a segment of the population that doesn’t give a hoot about the quality of education. They will assail the public schools because everyone did not get an A on tests, then demand that government send money to charters with unprepared teachers, religious schools that teach lies and hatred, and Home schoolers where the parents are poorly educated.
LikeLike
Carol, I have some acquaintance with home schooling. I was an adjunct instructor, and a close friend won a national award from the home-schooling association. She received a phone call from the late Phyllis Schlafly, congratulating her for winning the award.
The laws vary from state to state. In Kentucky, the only requirement is that the parents keep a journal, of their activities. The group I was involved with had monthly meetings where the moms would exchange ideas, and get updates. The parents would trade off the children, sometimes, so that the kids would get different educational experiences from the different moms. The group organized field trips to museums, farms, newspaper offices, etc. And the group leaders provided the membership with accurate information on how to get the kids prepared for SATs, etc. The group exchanged information with other groups and the state headquarters, to insure that all applicable laws were being followed.
There are no precise statistics, as to how many families in the USA are home-schooling, because there is no national data base, and not all families participate in home-schooling groups. The qualifications of the parents vary wildly. Curriculum and materials vary all over the map. The hours per day, vary, some parents conduct home-schooling on weekends, when the father is home, and can contribute. How can you claim there is a “risk”? Some states have provisions where the family can use their own money, through an ESA, to purchase computers, and other educational materials. Some states permit home-school children to participate in extra-curricular activities at the local school. (This provides the home-school children the opportunity to socialize and interact with other children).
LikeLike
I know a family here in Fairfax, that has nine(9) children. All of the school-age children are home-schooled. Fairfax does not permit home-school children to participate in any extra-curricular activities, nor receive any administrative support from the local public schools. This family pays the same property taxes as other families, but cannot take the SAT at the local public school.
The public schools here have a “take it or leave it, but we still get your money” attitude. Shame on them!
LikeLike
Charles,
All 9 of those children are welcome to enroll in the excellent Fairfax County public schools.
The teachers are experts in many subjects. Very few parents have the education background to compare to a good public school.
Not one penny of public money should go to parents who choose not to use public services.
LikeLike
I support you totally, Diane. Those parents knew when they decided have home schooling that the public schools would receive tax money and they wouldn’t. It was their decision. I do NOT want my tax dollars to go to people who decide to home school. Most parents cannot teach nearly as well as educated professionals. It takes years of practice and years of education to become a good teacher.
LikeLike
Q Not one penny of public money should go to parents who choose not to use public services. END Q
Fair enough. If parents choose to withdraw their children from receiving academic instruction at the local public schools, and home-school their children, they accept the responsibility of financing the cost (for the home schooling). There was never any promise of payment.
BUT- Since parents who home-school, are still paying taxes to the public schools, are they not entitled to have their children participate in the extra-curricular activities that the parents are paying for? And should not home-schooled children be permitted to take the SAT’s etc. at the public school?
Denying home-schooled children access to the non-academic services at their local school, is “taxation without representation”.
Home-school opponents often criticize home schooling, because the children do not get to socialize and interact with other children.
Is this not a double standard?
LikeLike
Your assumption is incorrect. Home schooled children are generally above the line financially. How many single working parents home school? Almost by definition, schooling your child at home gives up a salary. The only people who have the money to do this are married to a single breadwinner. Some of my homeschooling friends do so because of a difficult schedule, often because they are entertainers. Some are certainly not wealthy, but all have made a choice to go this direction. I am not opposed to this practice, but many of my friends who do this are choosing for their children to go in some unique direction. Many are avoiding school for fear their children will learn ideas they have rejected.
LikeLike
No one denies that home-schooling has financial costs. If one parent is at home, teaching, that means that the other parent must be the sole breadwinner. No dispute at all.
All the more reason, for providing financial support to home-schoolers through vouchers or ESAs. By reducing the financial burden on home-schoolers, more families can afford to eschew one wage-earner.
We are in agreement!
LikeLike
One of the best summations of home schooling, if not the best, I’ve ever read. I’ve been trying to articulate your last two sentences in a coherent way for years.
LikeLike
@GregB I am deeply touched by your statement, and I must admit that I am flattered. I have known many home-schoolers over the years, and I am impressed by their dedication, and the sacrifices they make for their children.
LikeLike
I was referring to Roy’s comment. The other one is Looney Tunes.
LikeLike
@GregB : I thought your comment was directed at me. May I suggest that you use “@Roy”, to clarify which comments you are referring to.
LikeLike
Charles: supporting home schooling with tax breaks is, in some cases, tantamount to supporting extremism. Do we really want to give tax breaks to those who feel that their child should not be exposed to multiracial mixing of population? Do we want to give tax breaks to people who feel that one scientific idea or another violates their religion? Do we want to give tax breaks to a person who wishes to teach their children that we are all created by a monster who spit us out upon the sand? I am not opposed to ideas, but government subsidies for fringe thinking strikes me as a disunifing influence on society.
LikeLike
Greg: Thanks for the compliment. Due to my interest in music, I have had contact with many home schooling musicians. Their schedules make traditional school for their children problematic, so I have always understood when they chose to sort of live their lives differently. Due to my social contacts with people on the right side of the political spectrum, I have met a bunch of them too. These folks mostly are scared their kids will be exposed to ideas they do not aprove of. I have less regard for this group, as they seem to me to attempt a sort of religious Timothy Leary, they turn on, tune in, and drop out of mainstream society. Thirty years ago, most of my friends that home schooled were old liberals who were afraid their children would be taught hatred and bigotry in schools. I never had much regard for this view. Seems to me that the best way to fight bigotry is to involve your children in a social situation that teaches them to understand everybody. Finally, home schooling was what I did for myself over and above the curriculum. It is not honest to think that merely doing what is asked of you is enough.
Recently, the emphasis we are required to place on testing has made me much more sympathetic to those who reject modern education in favor of home schooling. That is why, as a teacher, I feel it my job to fight against testing that hurts public education.
LikeLike
@ Roy: Some of your points are valid. And I am more in agreement, than you realize. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously, in the Pierce decision, that parents are the ultimate arbiter of their children’s education. The state does not have first “dibs” on children’s minds.
With this control, obviously parents will sometimes be making wrong and misguided choices. No doubt about that. Some parents are racists, and do not want their children in public schools with children of other races. Which is more important, Pierce or Brown?
The concepts presented in the Holy Bible, and the Holy Qu’Ran, and other religious texts, can be construed as “extreme”. So what? Do we have freedom of religion, or don’t we?
When the waves of immigrant children from Catholic nations like Italy and Ireland hit our shores, the public schools used the King James Bible, to “protestantize” the children. When parents objected, some of them withdrew their children from the public schools, and the Roman Catholic churches set up schools.
Our nation gives tax subsidies to individuals who attend Notre Dame, Southern Methodist, Yeshivas, Madrasses, etc, and no one objects. Is it not the same, to give financial assistance to parents who teach religious concepts in their home-schools?
Our nation is currently subsidizing students at Bob Jones university, and Liberty university, and other religious institutions, which teach creationism, the subjugation of women, the slaughter of non-Muslims, the infallibility of the Pope, and all types of religious concepts. If we can do it for a college, or a religious K-12 schools, how can we not do it for home-schoolers?
As far as a “disunifing influence on society” this is the society that we live in. Our nation was founded on religious freedom (see the first amendment) . Our nation encompasses people from a whole rainbow of faiths. Hindus, Zoroastrians, Jews, Muslims, Mormons, Wiccans, are all part of our society.
LikeLike
Charles,
One of the great features of American Society is that we strive to live together as one people. The public schools have been a major part of that striving. We don’t live in separate states, separate villages based on race and ethnicity. Some do. Most don’t.
LikeLike
Thanks again, Roy, for your thoughtful explanation. It helps knowing there are teachers like you out there!
LikeLike
@Diane: Of course it is a laudable goal, for our nation to live together as “one people”. Sadly, the public schools, are not able to deliver us to your version of Nirvana. see
http://www.newsweek.com/race-schools-592637
LikeLike
Charles,
From my own experience, I can assure you the public schools are still successfully integrating a very diverse people.
Newsweek is not my Bible
LikeLike
I am not necessarily a fan of Newsweek, but I found that article disturbing. Here is another article from the WashPost:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2016/05/17/on-the-anniversary-of-brown-v-board-new-evidence-that-u-s-schools-are-resegregating/?utm_term=.f15734728ee6
The current system of neighborhood schools, when neighborhoods are segregated, just exacerbates segregation. Wealthy families can locate into areas with excellent schools, and pay the high taxes to support the schools.
Lower income families (minorities) are stuck in economically depressed areas with an eroding tax base, and the poorly-financed schools that result.
Economic segregation results in racial segregation, and the public schools are growing more segregated.
This is “educational apartheid”. and the public schools are not working to bring wealthy children, into the schools with poor minority children.
You say Q From my own experience, I can assure you the public schools are still successfully integrating a very diverse people. END Q
How can you say this? Do you have any facts or reports to back this statement?
LikeLike
Public schools are responsible for accepting all, regardless of race, language or disability status. This is not the case with religious or private schools
LikeLike
Took the News-Observer a little long to observe this news.
LikeLike
I wish they would say it about NC General Assembly
LikeLike
Q Public schools are responsible for accepting all, regardless of race, language or disability status. END Q
OK, I stipulate this. Of course, publicly-operated schools must accept all applicants. (Kentucky [and other states] have specialty schools for the deaf, blind, learning-disabled, etc).
The thrust of my question is: Are not publicly-operated neighborhood schools, which restrict their student base, solely on residence, working to exacerbate segregation? As neighborhoods gentrify (like Chicago, and Alexandria VA), it follows that the neighborhood schools will reflect the demographics of the newly-segregated communities.
This is exactly what is happening in Chicago now, with the closing of schools in minority areas.
I found the WashPost article
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2016/05/17/on-the-anniversary-of-brown-v-board-new-evidence-that-u-s-schools-are-resegregating/?utm_term=.f15734728ee6
most disturbing.
Regardless of the public schools policy of accepting all applicants, the flight of whites into all-white enclaves, and the relocation of minorities into all-minority areas, will result in more segregation.
Is this not true? Please convince me otherwise.
LikeLike
Resegregation is not caused by public schools. It is caused by the courts retreating from enforcing desegregation orders. It is caused by public policy that is indifferent to segregation. Black people are only 13% of the population. Integration is not beyond our reach, if we care to pursue it.
Don’t blame the public schools for actions that they did not create.
LikeLike
I agree 1000%, that resegregation is not caused by the public schools. The public schools (and the students) are the victim, not the perpetrator.
The courts share much of the blame, as you state. The Supremes ruled in Swann v. Mecklenburg, that cross-town bussing was constitutional. Courts have retreated from this.
I still feel, that as long as neighborhoods are segregated by class, and income, the the schools located in the segregated neighborhoods, will be segregated (through no fault of their own).
LikeLike