This is an inspiring story about the successful efforts by parents in Douglas County, Colorado, to save public schools from a far-right faction that gained control of the local school board and began an assault on the principle of public education.
Newly elected school board members in Douglas County, Colorado unanimously voted this week to rescind a controversial voucher program. Despite a $100,000 media ad campaign by the Koch-funded Americans for Prosperity asking voucher supporters to show up to the board meeting, not a single public comment was made in support of maintaining the program.
The end of the voucher program marks a dramatic end to a years-long battle that began in this affluent suburban community with the election of a GOP-backed slate of school board candidates in 2009. On the one side was a vast network of deep pockets, including Americans for Prosperity, the American Legislative Exchange Committee and the GOP, pushing a divisive and ideological agenda for the local schools. On the other was a group of moms with no experience running political campaigns. These grassroots activists struggled to out-maneuver big dollars and slick marketing, but their hard work finally paid off. On November 7, 2017, voters swept in a slate of candidates who believe in public schools. The Dougco election results should give hope to activists across the country who are fighting to put the “public” back in public education.
The newly installed board in 2009 not only supported vouchers but it bullied teachers and principals and drove many of them away from the district.
With a GOP political operative in charge of the Douglas County School District communications department, it was increasingly difficult to remember this was a school district. As teachers and parents were intimidated, and fear settled in, teachers began to leave—by choice or force—what was once considered a “destination district.” Teachers left in the middle of the day. They were escorted out of their classrooms by police in front of children. One teacher was pulled out of a school in front of his own children. Principals were intentionally targeted and told, “You are going to do this and when parents ask we can say, ‘The principal said so.’”
Parents found it hard to believe that their elected school board wanted to undermine the public schools. But activist parents joined with the ACLU and sued to block the voucher program.
The resistance built slowly. The privatizers retained control in an election in 2013. The parent coalition won three seats in 2015. The parent resistance swept the board in 2017 and abolished the voucher program.
The story of Dougco proves that organized grassroots resistance can prevail over big money.
As the Network for Public Education says, “We have the numbers. They have the money. They can hire people to carry their message. But we can beat them if we work together and bring people out to vote for their public schools.”
We must not ever lose hope. Dougco is proof that resistance can succeed.

Definitely need more stories like this. Still frustrating that “victories” mean undoing their damage. They’re still creating problems faster than we can undo them. Most concerned that they’ll push us past a point of no return. Praying that the numbers >>> money point is true.
LikeLike
Numbers=our trump card (forgive reference to trump). We can never match their money. They can never match our numbers.
LikeLike
It is inspiring. It sounds like what eventually became clear to voters was not just that they were promoting private schools, it was that they were actively harming existing public schools in order to reach the ideological goal:
“Back in 2009, few in DougCo believed that their locally elected school board would intentionally undermine a system that exists to serve children. The idea that a school board wanted to do something bad to public schools, to teachers who work with children, did indeed sound crazy, as Barnard described it”
It seems odd but this does happen in ed reform. Ed reformers focus so completely on charters and vouchers that I suspect many public school parents don’t even tune in- initially the plans don’t seem to involve them, because they are public school parents.
I suspect that’s why it took so long for there to be any criticism or analysis of the plans in Ohio. 90% of parents saw them as irrelevant to their schools, which is understandable- public schools are rarely mentioned in ed reform campaigns. We went door to door to campaign for a local levy to replace state funding in 2011 and we found out people believed charters WERE private schools and we’ve always had private schools so they didn’t tune in at all UNTIL it became apparent that these are systemic plans and public schools were being negatively affected by the lock-step, state level adherence to “choice”. That’s what it takes.
LikeLike
Kudos to Douglas County school board, parents, students, and teachers.
I LOVE Public Schools and Public School Teachers. Both ADD VALUE. And Public School Teachers are smart and good people … they have to be.
LikeLike
I think ignoring existing public schools is in many ways essential to ed reform political campaigns, because if they DON’T ignore they’ll get hard questions on what happens to them in this brave new world.
DeVos is the best at this. There’s no possible downside of privatization in her fantasy- it’s all “winners!” – it’s delusional. No matter how they redesign these privatized nirvana’s they are still SYSTEMS. She can pretend they aren’t but they are because they actually do have geographical boundaries. It’s not all like colleges. Children live in homes with their parents. They don’t relocate to go to school.
This idea she has that everyone gets exactly what they want from a school off the schools menu and there will be no trade-offs or risks is just nonsense. She’s peddling a fantasy. There’s HUGE risk. We know there’s huge risk because we have a private health care system that is NO WAY equitable or even practical. Our health care system isn’t “the greatest in the world”. It’s wildly inequitable, wildly inefficient and we get lousy bang for the buck as far as public health outcomes.
COULD they create a privatized system that is better than the public system? Sure. I guess so. They could also create a privatized system that is bad as the health care system and then spend the next 50 years ineptly “reforming” it while the rest of the world “solved” health care decades ago.
There’s RISK. They’re lying to you if they tell you there’s not. These folks lived the downside risk. They saw the existing system harmed.
LikeLike
The part that kills me about voucher proponents is how they claim they are offering the same “choices” that wealthy parents make.
That’s simply in no way true and they must know it because presumably they can read.
Vouchers aren’t AT ALL like what wealthy people get. They’re not enough money.
At best they’ll get a voucher that can only be exchanged for the lowest tuition private schools and wealthy people will get a subsidy for the expensive private schools they already attend. Everyone says “gosh, I wonder why all these vouchers go to religious schools?” They go to religious schools because they are the low tuition schools and the schools are subsidized by churches. Arne Duncan’s private school isn’t accepting a 7k voucher for 30k tuition. It’s more nonsense arguments like “k12 schools will be like the college system” when obviously they won’t because UNLIKE college students children don’t move away and reside at their school.
LikeLike
No one thinks that a $5k voucher will pay the costs of a $50k school. but a family might be able to come up with $2k, and then send their child to a $7k school. A $5k voucher might enable a family, to have the secondary wage-earner, quit working outside the home, and the begin home-schooling. Also a family receiving a voucher could possibly obtain a partial scholarship from a third party, to help meet tuition costs. Also, a non-public school could offer a partial scholarship. A non-public school, could charge tuition on a sliding scale.
An ESA, can enable parents to obtain tutoring, etc.
Vouchers/school choice, open all kinds of possibilities for parents, to direct the education of their children.
LikeLike
Charles,
You missed the point of what happened in Douglas County. Parents organized and swept every seat on the board that endorsed vouchers. That’s called democracy.
LikeLike
I did not miss the point. The election was held, fair and square. The opponents of school choice won, and the school choice program was dismantled. This is democracy in action.
LikeLike
An affluent county was an advantage in the fight. Highly educated community members who had the time and means to fight. And it still took 8 years. This fight was long, but incredible talent pooled together to create the road map to fight these reformers. Truly an amazing effort. Just heartbreaking that some kids’ entire elementary education was impacted.
LikeLike
I just watched Kuhn’s two-minute video on 2 high schools in one county. Can someone explain why one school gets $1000 more per/pupil from TX legislature than the other? Does poorer school get more federal money than the other? What are total school budgets? I didn’t see any stats comparing classroom size or # of teachers or test results. I’m baffled.
LikeLike
Sandra, my guess is that the difference in spending between the two districts reflects the importance of property taxes. The state of Texas inflicted draconian tax cuts (over $5 Billion) in 2011 and has never restored the funding that was cut. As you know, state funding is supposed to equalize rich and poor districts. Kuhn points out that this is not happening in Texas. My personal guess is that the white men who dominate the Legislature don’t care about the Hispanic and black kids in the public schools. If they did, they would make sure their schools are equitably funded. Instead of adequate funding, they want vouchers.
LikeLike
I bring the unique perspective as a former consultant for private schools, and current public school educator. When vouchers come into play – the wealthy flee. Dual income families who work hard to put food on their table and pay tuition for their children, dislike the fact when lazy families (especially those with stay-at-home moms) want the same private education for families. The majority of Indiana’s Catholic schools financial stability declined, when high income earners fled to either suburban public schools or wealthy private schools, to avoid the free hand-outs and voucher moochers. It cost Catholic schools a great deal of funds. And, the test scores in the majority of the Catholic schools slid by 60 points.
LikeLike