The Associated Press conducted a study of racial segregation in the schools and concluded that charter schools were responsible for intensifying segregation.
Charter schools are among the nation’s most segregated, an Associated Press analysis finds — an outcome at odds, critics say, with their goal of offering a better alternative to failing traditional public schools.
National enrollment data shows that charters are vastly over-represented among schools where minorities study in the most extreme racial isolation. As of school year 2014-2015, more than 1,000 of the nation’s 6,747 charter schools had minority enrollment of at least 99 percent, and the number has been rising steadily…
In the AP analysis of student achievement in the 42 states that have enacted charter school laws, along with the District of Columbia, the performance of students in charter schools varies widely. But schools that enroll 99 percent minorities-both charters and traditional public schools-on average have fewer students reaching state standards for proficiency in reading and math.
“Desegregation works. Nothing else does,” said Daniel Shulman, a Minnesota civil rights attorney. “There is no amount of money you can put into a segregated school that is going to make it equal.”
Shulman singled out charter schools for blame in a lawsuit that accuses the state of Minnesota of allowing racially segregated schools to proliferate, along with achievement gaps for minority students. Minority-owned charters have been allowed wrongly to recruit only minorities, he said, as others wrongly have focused on attracting whites.
But charter advocates respond that the segregation in charters is voluntary and therefore acceptable.
There is growing debate over just how much racial integration matters. For decades after the Supreme Court ruled in 1954 that segregated schools were unconstitutional, integration was held up as a key measure of progress for minorities, but desegregation efforts have stalled and racial imbalances are worsening in American schools. Charter schools have been championed by the U.S. education secretary, Betsy DeVos, and as the sector continues to grow it will have to contend with the question of whether separate can be equal.
National Alliance for Public Charter Schools spokeswoman Vanessa Descalzi said today’s charters cannot be compared to schools from the Jim Crow era, when blacks were barred from certain schools.
“Modern schools of choice with high concentrations of students of color is a demonstration of parents choosing the best schools for their children, rooted in the belief that the school will meet their child’s educational needs, and often based on demonstrated student success,” Descalzi said. “This is not segregation…”
Charter schools, which are funded publicly and run privately, enroll more than 2.7 million nationwide, a number that has tripled over the last decade. Meanwhile, as the number of non-charter schools holds steady in the U.S., charters account for nearly all the growth of schools where minorities face the most extreme racial isolation.
While 4 percent of traditional public schools are 99 percent minority, the figure is 17 percent for charters. In cities, where most charters are located, 25 percent of charters are over 99 percent nonwhite, compared to 10 percent for traditional schools.
School integration gains achieved over the second half of the last century have been reversed in many places over the last 20 years, and a growing number of schools educate students who are poor and mostly black or Hispanic, according to federal data.
The resegregation has been blamed on the effects of charters and school choice, the lapse of court-ordered desegregation plans in many cities, and housing and economic trends…
Howard Fuller, a prominent advocate of charters and vouchers whose organization was funded by rightwing foundations for millions of dollars said that “It’s a waste of time to talk about integration.”
He might have also said it is a waste of time to talk about charters and vouchers, which have not provided educational excellence for large numbers of black children. Boucher’s actually depress test scores, and the charter “successes” are those that winnow their students down to the survivors. There is no large-scale charter succcess story. School Choice has failed black and brown children.
The AP study gave breakouts for individual districts. I can’t find the link, but will keep looking. Here is the data for the schools of Jacksonville, Florida.
“Between the 181 public and charter schools in Duval County, 13 percent of them reported a black student population of 90 percent or higher in 2014, while none had a 90 or higher white population. Of the 10 most segregated schools in Jacksonville, seven of them were either charter or magnet schools; the other three being traditional neighborhood schools.
“Looking at the data a different way, 1 percent of white students attended a school that is overwhelmingly white while 23 percent of Duval County’s black students attend a school where at least 90 percent of the student body is black.”

Oh they care all right. It’s just that it’s a feature, not a bug.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Segregation is America’s dirty little secret, and privatization has exacerbated the problem. Our nation has an implied “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy about de facto segregation. The DOJ has failed to pursue court ordered desegregation and realtors continue to “red line” neighborhoods. We remain a society of separate and unequal treatment for minority residents. Rather than addressing the funding disparities between urban and suburban schools and integration, our country now pursues charters and vouchers as a way to address inequity. However, “choice” allows the schools to do the choosing, and the result is more segregation.
“Desegregation works. Nothing else does,” said Daniel Shulman, a Minnesota civil rights attorney. “There is no amount of money you can put into a segregated school that is going to make it equal.”
I believe that separate is never equal, and I know that acceptance of diversity is a healthier way for young people to grow up. Diversity contributes to understanding and acceptance, and the lack of it often leads to mistrust and bigotry. Most of Trump’s cabinet is made up of wealthy people that attended segregated private schools, and their world view is narrow and often hostile to those that are different from them.
LikeLike
“National enrollment data shows that charters are vastly over-represented among schools where minorities study in the most extreme racial isolation.”
Yes, many states’ charter school laws require charter schools to reach the most disadvantaged children, so the presence of charter schools in racially isolated neighborhoods is hardly surprising.
“ ‘There is no amount of money you can put into a segregated school that is going to make it equal.’ ”
The AP buried the lede here—wonder why this line from the segregation expert isn’t getting a lot of play!
“And on average, children in hyper-segregated charters do at least marginally better on tests than those in comparably segregated traditional schools.”
Another buried lede!
“Jamain Lee, 13, has seen his grades improve since he enrolled two years ago from a school where he was bullied and frequently got into fights. His mother, Alicia Lee, said teachers at the neighborhood school would stand by and even record fights.”
I will contribute a maximum of $500 for round-trip travel and overnight accommodations for Diane or her appointed representative to travel to Milwaukee, meet with Alicia Lee, and tell her to her face that it is bad and harmful for her family to have an option other than her traditional zoned public school. My only stipulation is that I receive a digital video recording of the conversation.
“an Associated Press analysis finds”
What the Associated Press didn’t analyze is the racial makeup of the traditional public schools that black and Latino charter-going children are zoned for. In the words of expert school segregation researcher Iris Rotberg, “The primary exceptions to increased student stratification are in communities that are already so highly segregated by race, ethnicity, and income that further increases are virtually impossible.” This dynamic certainly applies to children attending charters in Milwaukee, Chicago, Brooklyn, Harlem, the Bronx, Boston, Newark, Cleveland, Detroit, Philadelphia, Rochester, etc.
LikeLike
Is that why Eva has moved into predominantly white and affluent districts like District 2, Upper West Side, and Cobble Hill.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are 5,160 PreK-elementary children enrolled in D2 NYC DOE schools who are eligible for free or reduced price lunch. In D15, it’s 9,051; in D3 3,574.
To put those numbers in perspective, the entire PreK-12 enrollment of the Albany public schools is about 8,900. Poughkeepsie 4,500. Peekskill, 3,400.
there are more than enough disadvantaged children living in Districts 2, 3, and 15 to make them appropriate sites for charter schools. And it goes without saying that schools like PS 321, PS 6, and PS 199 are less accessible to the poor children living in D15, D2, and D3 than private schools like Dalton and Columbia Grammar.
LikeLike
a very important point
LikeLike
@Tim – I think you should just fly to Milwaukee yourself and tell her, since you seem to relish your role as self-appointed savior of black people. Maybe Dan Loeb can accompany you,
if he’s not busy harassing black public servants.
LikeLike
“And it goes without saying that schools like PS 321, PS 6, and PS 199 are less accessible to the poor children living in D15, D2, and D3 than private schools like Dalton and Columbia Grammar.”
No Tim, that’s not how it goes. The hedge funders and patrician WASP and Jew crusaders who spearhead this “charter movement” send their children to Dalton, Columbia Grammar, and the like. They do not want poor children living in D15, D2, and D3 attending their children’s schools. That’s why they created and support charter schools and fail to endow significant scholarships for poor children at their own children’s schools.
LikeLike
“Patrician WASP and Jew crusaders”! It’s a good thing that my and mine alone comments are moderated.
A lot has changed since you decamped for the leafy, racially restricted suburbs, Beth! PS 321, PS 6, and PS 199 are shockingly white and have virtually no poor kids–8, 6, and 7% low income, respectively.
Dalton, CGPS, and the rest have made diversity a key priority. The lower schools are much more diverse than the high-performing D2, D3, and D15 schools, and financial aid is given to 20% of the student body, most of that going to full tuition grants. A bright poor kid is welcome at Dalton. A bright poor kid not zoned for 321 and schools like it will literally be shown the door if his parents try to enroll him.
LikeLike
Tim,
I see you have changed your online ID from the Shanker Institute to nysut.org, the New York State United Teachers. What’s with the lies? Why don’t you make up a server that says “Success Academy”?
LikeLike
District 2 takes in chelsea and the east side. in 1990 a “magnet’ middle school was begun on the top floor of a 100 year old building which housed an elementary school, on York Ave between 78th and 77th. we had a sixth and seventh grade that first year and 77 students who applied from all over the city. They sat in our classes for a week, took a test and if they were interested, involved that week, and could read our since text books, and had acceptable scores on our tests, they were admitted.
Yes, we had toe valuate their skills, and we admitted children with some doubtful reading skills, knowing that they wanted to learn, and we could give them what they needed before they hit high school.
Did we take kids from Manhattan’s East Side 60% were local kids. Some traveled from Brooklyn and the Bronx. All wanted to learn, and we were committed to offering a curriculum that met the objectives for all subjects, and a see, happy place to do some hard work.
We teachers were a team. We knew every kid, even when the population rose to over 400. We had clear expectations regarding respect and hard work,, and there were rewards for achievement, for real learning. BUT, the PARENTS were on board, whether they came from the tony neighborhood, or from Harlem.
MY kids learned to write with me, because I knew what learn looked like when I saw it, and how to motivate them to do the work. Sure they aced the NYC tests (third in the STATE) and put the school on the map, and made me famous, but they are adults now, and they find me on the web and tell me what they learned from ME, and why I made a big difference in their choice of professions. many are writers and artists.
I wrote the curriculum from scratch based on the state objectives, and those big ideas and essential questions that I felt literature revealed. This was grade 7. and stories needed to be engaging, but they were a step up from “Sarah Plain and Tall”. Mark Twain, Saki, Guy De Maupassant offered stories with irony, and “The Yearling” offers d a glimpse humanity and exquisite detail.
We read and talked, and wrote and watched the Movie The Yearling, and compared the screenplay to the book. Thinking skills, like all skills take practice.
Those of you who know my story, and who at the pinnacle of success the core curricula crap was behind the curtain.
My school was an experiment that worked.
My school was studied by Harvard when PEW researched teal STANDARDS FOR LEARNING– which was ‘ third level’ *research by The Univ of Pittsburgh’s LRDC.
* the results of 3rd level research had to work everywhere.
New Standards were published. Have the huge volumes that DISTRICT 2 PUBLISHED for all subjects. WANNA SEE THEM?
Let me be clear.. All children learned. There was a clear standard for teachers and for the ADMINISTRATION if LEARNING was the goal.
Notice the ABSENCE of the word “teaching.’
gates made it all About teaching to the test, wo kids who fail demonstrated the the teachers couldn’t teach. They changed the national conversation, and NYC schools, the largest in the 15,880 bit the dust.,The Inconvenient Truth Behind Waiting for Superman on Vimeo
soon to be followed by the second largest system LAUSD: http://www.perdaily.com/2014/06/lausds-treacherous-road-from-reed-to-vergara–its-never-been-about-students-just-money.html
and the rest is history… which I read here.
It could have worked in district 2. It worked in many schools in District 2, when teachers were encouraged to do their thing… show kids what they knew.
Educated dedicated professionals who could be trusted to meet clear objectives. Professionals at the bottom, in the classroom THE PRACTICE– talented, experienced people who did not need a mandate from the top to tell them HOW to ‘teach’ or what to use in order to create skilled learners… in SMALL CLASSES.
CLASS SIZE MATTERS… but the money is stolen… it is GRAND THEFT — the austerity that they used to demolish our wonderful NYC public schools, so they could give ti ‘Lil’ Eva’ ”
We had it. The American Educator wrote the story of the research in District 2 (although my name as the cohort appears no where, even though Iw as The NYS Educator of Excellence a the end — Sigh)
Watch this and the videos that follow as teachers tell their stories.
https://www.classsizematters.org/video-leonie-haimson-on-class-size-matters-october-2-2015-2/
DON’T MISS THIS ONE… THE TRUTH, NOT GATES “ALTERNATIVE FACTS”.
and hear this teacher talk about who class size affects teachers.
read this:
http://parentsacrossamerica.org/what-we-believe-2/why-class-size-matters/
We did it. raised student achievement across all student populations in the schools that participated.
LikeLike
posted at
https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/US-charter-schools-put-gro-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Charter-School-Failure_Charter-Schools_Education_Racial-Discrimination-171205-946.html
LikeLike
and this was my comment WHICH HAS EMBEDDED LINKS TO POSTS HERE , so go there:
Some links to help you grasp the truth about ORWELLIAN “CHOICE”, but for a real eye-opener, HEREis the link to The Diane Ravitch search field on CHARTER SCHOOLS.
https://dianeravitch.net/?s=charter+schools
Jut a few below:
Thomas Ultican writes that it is time to give up on the failed charter experiment. He reviews Carol Burris’ Charters and Consequences.
Stephen Dyer, a fellow with Innovation Ohio and former legislator, explains how the charter funding system in Ohio takes money away from students who are not in charters.
ANDdrea Gabor writes here about the dark money campaign to persuade voters in Massachusetts to lift the cap on charter schools last November. The dark money came pouring in, but suffered a crushing defeat when voters weighed in.
Los Angeles: Charter-Controlled School Board Eases Rules for Charters
*Laura Chapman on the Failure of Charter Oversight in Ohio
AND THE SCANDALS:
The founder of a group of prominent charter schools admitted to stealing millions of dollars and lying to the FBI.
*Arizona: Is This the Worst Charter Scandal Ever?
Finally, let me end with this: Carole Marshall is a retired high school teacher in RI frustrated by the Providence Journal’s relentless cheerleading for charter schools. When she complained, she was told that as a retired teacher with a pension, she has a vested interest and lacked standing to comment. After much back and forth with an editor, she finally got her letter published. It turns out that the charter school beloved by the newspaper has entrance requirements. Guess what? The school gets higher scores because students with low scores are not admitted!
LikeLike
In 2015 these were the segregation numbers in Denver:
Resegregation of Denver Public Schools: Three-quarters of DPS schools are what the New York Times has termed “demographically homogenous.”
I have the 90% figures somewhere. If I find them I will repost.
Choice has helped to make segregation worse than the 1970’s in Denver when the courts stepped in and enforced busing.
LikeLike
Found it – the 65% represents 100 schools. Of those 60 are populated by 90% or more students of color. WOW
LikeLike
Charter schools certainly do not address the problem of segregation. On balance, as this study shows, they intensify it. But charter schools are not the reason why American schools are so segregated. Traditional public schools are.
LikeLike
Could you elaborate on that?
LikeLike
Just that charter schools are a drop in the bucket. If they all vanished tomorrow, it would barely move the needle on how segregated American public schools are. You’d be left with nothing but traditional public schools, and almost identical segregation levels. I don’t have the figures in front of me but I’m confident this is how the numbers play out.
LikeLike
FLERP,
African Americans are 13% of the population. Is there any reason why it is impossible to reduce school segregation if we tried?
What if Arne had used the $5 billion Race to the Top to reward states that reduced segregation?
He blew away $5 billion for nothing.
LikeLike
In the absence of court orders, school integration is impossible due to the preferences of white parents and property owners. You only need to look as far as PS 191/199 on the UWS, PS 8/307 in Brooklyn Heights, or the ferocious, rabid resistance to affordable housing in Westchester County for examples, and these are ostensibly very Blue areas that are receptive to integration!
LikeLike
I don’t know of any reason that would make it impossible. I do know that the issue becomes extremely touchy when parents are told that they may not be able to send their children to their neighborhood school. Probably the biggest cause of segregation is the link between residential addresses and neighborhood schools. To reduce school segregation, you either have to sever (or make conditional) that link or make neighborhoods less segregated. Middle-class parents will tend to try to protect their unconditional right to send their kids to local schools (full disclosure: I would, too). So it’s tricky, to understate it. But I’m no expert and I wouldn’t say “impossible.”
LikeLike
@Tim The integration of 199 happened without a court order.
LikeLike
PS 199 isn’t integrated and is predictably becoming much less so after its zone was reduced.
LikeLike
No, FLERP, public schools do not cause segregation. Residential patterns cause school segregation.
Read Richard Rothstein’s THE COLOR OF LAW. Residential segregation is the result of federal, state, and local laws.
LikeLike
I was going to say something similar, but I think residential patterns and public schools interact. People choose (those who can choose, that is) to locate in a certain area largely because they have good public schools. Good schools in turn drive up real estate costs which closes out less affluent people. People of color have less wealth and access to less income than whites, so the higher rent areas with the good schools end up being predominantly white.
LikeLike
The common denominator, I think, is choice. People choose where they live, to the extent they are able, based in part on where they want their kids to go to school. They also choose where to live (again, within the constraint of their means) based on a bunch of other factors, and I don’t think I’m going out on a limb by saying that the racial makeup of a neighborhood is one (a very significant one) of those factors.
Add to this that the constraints on people’s ability to exercise choice in these areas are created by institutional forces designed to maintain segregation.
LikeLike
“. . . with their goal of offering a better alternative to failing traditional public schools.”
More pure bovine excrement from the pens of the scribes of the AP, spreading the lies of the edudeformers and privateers. The least the AP could have done was to charge them for the advertising.
LikeLike
The actual study seems to have no citation of authors or path to check the credibility of what is reported. Of course the charter-loving 74 million is howling, reducing the issues to matters of parental choice.
LikeLike
institutional forces designed to maintain DIVISION
Division, that bright star at the center of the ‘merican solar system.
Division, the cultural capital of the ruling elite.
Division, sorting the ranks, by test scores.
Division, the ‘Merry-go-round that leaves you where you started, divided.
Division, concocting a bulls-eye on another human, by turning him/her into the other.
Division, the cornerstone of hierarchies which maintain themselves by debasing
and marginalizing others.
Division, the doctrinal blinders of exceptionalism.
Division, the din of concocted notoriety.
Division, “A more perfect formula for social dissolution has rarely been conceived.
Focusing on social divisions rather than class solidarity is a gift to the ruling class.”
LikeLike
That’s because charter leaders are obviously racists even if they deny or ignore it.
LikeLike
Do you mean racist like the KKK, which pushed through legislation in Oregon compelling children to attend nothing other than residence-determined traditional public schools?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Compulsory_Education_Act
LikeLike
Tim,
That was neatly 100 years ago. At long last, air, have you no sense of decency? The KKK wanted to ban all private and religious schools. How would that have affected Success Academy charters?
LikeLike
Tim, if I were to back up an allegation like that with a Wiki link, it would be shot down.
Did you hear that shot that was just fired?
Let’s see, that took place in 1922 decades before the Civil Rights movement. It was also challenged in court and struck down by the United States Supreme Court Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925) before it went into effect.
So that legislation the KKK was involved in never went through.
Wiki says, “The law, which was officially called the Compulsory Education Act and unofficially became known as the Oregon School Law, did not just require that children between the ages of eight and sixteen had to attend school; it required that they attend only public schools. By prohibiting children from attending private or parochial schools, the state thus forced such schools to close.”
LikeLike
The Pierce decision, is the “bedrock” of the home-school movement. The government does not have “dibs” on our children’s minds.
LikeLike
The Pierce decision does not support government funding for private schools or home schooling
LikeLike
Listen closely.
That slow grinding, moaning noise that you hear is Thurgood Marshall turning in his grave.
“Separate can never be equal.”
— Thurgood Marshall, 1954, in his argument before the U.S. Supreme Courth
LikeLike
LOL!
LikeLike
Is that thunder I hear rumbling in the sky? Is the Earth shaking? Is that God waking up to discover what the f–k is going on and how an orange haired Satan became president of the United States and his demons had taken over the Republican Party?
LikeLike
Many of those young adult racists who marched in Charlottesville are products of that portion of America’s school system that has been re-segregated by the charter schools movement that became widespread at the beginning of the 1990’s…and there are tens of thousands more of them in the segregated charter school pipeline that keeps churning them out.
Racist re-segregation being fostered charter schools is clearly an issue that isn’t even on the radar of Senators Sanders and Warren, and none are at all aware of the racist roots of charter schools or how they are re-segregating the education of America’s children. But the NAACP is, and it has called for a total moratorium on charter schools. For your ready reference, here’s a thumbnail background on the racist roots of charter schools, “choice”, and vouchers:
The racist roots of charter schools traces back to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision that required the racial integration of public schools. That triggered “white flight” from public schools and into private schools. But white parents found the cost of private schools was expensive, so the call went out for vouchers to enable white parents to have a “free choice” of schools. In 1959, just before the Court’s deadline for racial integration of public schools, a prominent newspaper in Prince Edward County, Virginia, published the outline for the charter school scheme to resegregate education: “We are working [on] a scheme [with members of Congress] in which we will abandon public schools, sell the buildings to corporations, reopen them as privately operated schools with tuition grants [vouchers] from [the State of Virginia] and from Prince Edward County. Those wishing to go to integrated schools can take their tuition grants and operate their own schools. To hell with [the Supreme Court and non-whites].”
At the same time, a prominent Virginia attorney who was an advisor to Virginia politicians announced a corollary scheme for resegregating public schools by means of standardized testing: “Negroes can be let in [to white schools] and then chased out by setting high academic standards they can’t maintain. This should leave few Negroes in the white schools. The federal courts can easily force Negroes into our white schools, but they can’t possibly administer them and listen to the merits of thousands of bellyaches [from white parents].” That was the conceptual beginning and foundation of all the standardized testing we see today, many of which tests are are designed with built-in racial and cultural biases to manufacture failure. The test results were and still are used to “prove” that traditional public schools are “failing” — a claim abetted by drastic underfunding of public schools so that they lacked the resources to teach effectively. The “failing” test scores were and are also used to “prove” that unionized public school teachers are “ineffective”.
That’s the beginning of charter schools, vouchers, and testing. That conceptual foundation remains the same today, which is why the NAACP has called for a moratorium on charter schools, which are openly practicing racism. For more details, read the UCLA-based Civil Rights Project report “Choice without Equity: Charter School Segregation and the Need for Civil Rights Standards.”
But charter schools are even more insidious: They are also a financial scam. The thoughtful person must ask why hedge funds are so interested in expanding the number of charter schools. It certainly isn’t an altruistic concern for children. Here’s a hint: The Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Education has issued a warning that charter schools are a risk to the Department of Education’s goals. The report says: “Charter schools and their management organizations pose a potential risk to federal funds even as they threaten to fall short of meeting the goals” because of the financial fraud and the skimming of tax money into private pockets, which is the reason why hedge funds are the main backers of charter schools.
For example: One of the profitable charter school scams is to have the puppet private school boards lease buildings that are owned by real estate investment trusts (REITs) held by the hedge funds. The charter school board members, in exchange for kickbacks, pay lease rates far above the market rate, and the profit goes to the hedge funds. Another incredible scam is that in many states when a charter school buys things like computers for the students, the computers — even though purchased with taxpayer money — become the private property of the charter school. At the end of each school year, they sell the computers, pocket the money, and receive more taxpayer money to purchase new computers…and repeat the process year-after-year.
The Washington State Supreme Court, the New York State Supreme Court, and the National Labor Relations Board have ruled that charter schools are not public schools because they aren’t accountable to the public since they aren’t governed by publicly-elected boards and aren’t subdivisions of public government entities, in spite of the fact that some state laws enabling charter schools say they are government subdivisions. There is simply no such thing as a “public charter school” because no charter school fulfills the basic public accountability requirement of being responsible to and directed by a school board that is elected by We the People. Charter schools are private schools, owned and operated by private entities. Nevertheless, they get public tax money.
Charter schools should (1) be required by law to be governed by school boards elected by the voters so that they are accountable to the public; (2) a charter school operator must legally be a subdivision of a publicly-elected governmental body; (3) charter schools should be required to file the same detailed public-domain audited annual financial reports under penalty of perjury that genuine public schools file; and, (4) anything a charter school buys with the public’s money should be the public’s property. These aren’t “burdensome” requirements for charter schools — they are simply common sense safeguards that public tax money is actually being used to maximum effect to teach our nation’s children.
Hedge fund groups, such as “Democrats for Education Reform”, provide money for Democratic Party campaigns and President Obama has long ties to the DFR, so the Party is not going to willingly push for financial accountability for the charter school gravy train. But teachers and retired teachers who vote in high percentages are going to continue to sit on the sidelines until the Party actually brings genuine financial accountability to charter schools and ends charter school racism. Teachers and retired teachers know that if charter school operators are required to actually reveal what they are doing with public tax money, the gravy train will grind to a halt and hedge funds will move on to other schemes to get their hands on public money, leaving the charter school movement to wither away.
LikeLike