The Denver School Board is supposed to be bought and paid for by Dark Money, so public education advocates rejoiced when they elected one person to the seven-member Board.
Jeannie Kaplan, a former member of the board and now a tireless activist, tells the story here. She says it was EXTRAORDINARY!
“Dr. Carrie Olson, 33 year DPS teacher, soundly defeated incumbent, “reformer,” Mike Johnson., and she did so with $33,747 in her campaign war chest and a completely volunteer “staff.” The dollars and vote totals cited in this post can be found here and here. As of the last campaign finance report Mr. Johnson had raised $101,336 on his own and was the beneficiary of $42,777 from Democrats for Education Reform( DFER) dark money and $6320 Stand for Children dark money. His 11,193 votes cost his campaign $13.44 each; Carrie’s 11,121 votes cost her $2.73 per vote. He spent almost 5 times as much per vote as she. Extraordinary.”
Jeannie’s underfunded (almost unfounded) Group is called ODOS (Our Denver Our Schools). In one race, it supported a dynamic high school graduate named Tay Anderson. The union, however, decided to support a candidate who is from TFA and works for the TFA leadership training program, which grooms TFA Teachers to get involved in political roles. The latter candidate swamped poor Tay, and now TFA has two seats on the Denver board.
As you can see, Denver is a hotbed of political intrigue and big money.
But ODOS is celebrating because it elected one member to the board.
Given the odds, that was quite an accomplishment.
That is great. Ed reformers shouldn’t fear it, either. No school board should consist of one set of opinions. They are supposed to represent ALL of the people in the district, to the extent that’s possible.
I only see the news so maybe it’s different “on the ground’ in Los Angeles, but I don’t think ‘a school board” is supposed to focus exclusively on charter schools, if charter schools are some segment of the whole. The only thing I see out of ed reform dominated boards is charter and voucher promoting. That’s “A Job”, I suppose, but it isn’t the sole function of a school board member. Who represents the interests of public school families in Los Angeles now? Shouldn’t they have an advocate?
The 18 year old, Zach Cheikho, who ran Dr. Olson’s winning campaign is an inspiring young man. Just a few months ago, he was shamelessly bullied and threatened with arrest–for distributing opt out information at his DPS High School. Glad to see the threats didn’t stop him. Way to go Zach and mom, Susan!
From Jeannie’s blog: “As the quintessential “reform” school district with a previously unanimous 7-0 board, this is a HUGE VICTORY. Congratulations to Dr. Carrie Olson and her amazing, grassroots organization, spearheaded by a mother/son team of Susan Johnson and her 18 year old (!) son Zachary Cheikho. They had never done this before but between them and candidate Olson, they were smart enough to take the best their volunteers had to offer and let them roll with it.”
I sure hope Coloradoans get their minds back and stop believing that choice for the sake of choice (not reallly choice at all) is not serving their child{ren)’s best interests or those of democracy.
Hope Coloradoans know that DARK $$$$$ will always pour money into elections and other “things” which support the $$$$$$ interests.
Brookings, which is supposedly a “think tank”, is holding yet another “debate” that is limited to “choice” ed reformers.
How is this a discussion? They don’t invite anyone who disagrees with them. They hold these “debates” that are really a group of people who agree on everything except minor regulatory issues. That’s not a “debate”- it’s a done deal. They’re debating within the narrow range of “now that we’ve all decided to privatize, what should that look like?”
I heard the “Reinventing Schools” guy the other day. It is REALLY DECEPTIVE to tell people in states that haven’t adopted privatization that privatization is “non profit”
This isn’t reality. It simply isn’t true in the following states- FL, OH, MI, PA, IN, NC and SC. That’s just the states I know about.
This is a HUGE chunk of the country! For this guy to be running around saying ed reform is “nonprofit” when hundreds of millions of people currently live in states where is ed reform is NOT “nonprofit” is outrageously deceptive. He shouldn’t be allowed to present his “vision” for ed reform when tens of millions of us live ed reform every day, and I don’t recognize this shangri-la he describes.
But not a soul in ed reform objects. They’re actually ramping up the for-profit charter sector in NC and SC. Ed reformers do NOTHING to stop this.
They need to choose. Either oppose the for-profit charter states or stop claiming this “movement” is non profit. Ohio is not now and will never be Massachusetts. Pointing to “high quality” charter chains and blithely ignoring the reality of ed reform is deceptive.
They can’t even shut down the wildly corrupt rip-off ECOT in Ohio. They’re traveling to other states to spread this marketing campaign disguised as “science”? Why?
Thanks, Chiara. Good information and questions.
Error in vote numbers above.
Correct numbers:
Candidate Vote % Votes
Carrie Olson 51.53% 10,237
Mike Johnson 48.47% 9,628
Saddest truth for Denver, and the reason things will simply not be changing there: “The [TEACHERS’] union, however, decided to support a candidate who is from TFA and works for the TFA leadership training program, which grooms TFA Teachers to get involved in political roles.”