The New Yorker has a long and incisive article about the Sackler family and how they became one of the richest families in America. Their net worth is somewhere in the neighborhood of $13 billion and growing. They are notable philanthropists who have endowed major institutions.
It is called “The Family That Built anEmire of Pain.”
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/10/30/the-family-that-built-an-empire-of-pain
The Sackler fortune derives from their pharmaceuticals company, which created and marketed OxyContin and minimized its risks. Now the country is ravaged by the opioid crisis. And the Sacklers have never been held accountable.
What you will not learn from the article is that the Sacklers are major supporters of charter schools. Jonathan Sackler funded ConnCAN, then 50CAN. His daughter Madelyn Sackler made a hagiographic documentary about Eva Moskowitz called “The Lottery.”
The Sackler opioid money is used to killpublic schools.
To read it all, you can buy a short-term subscription to the New Yorker for $6. It is worth every penny.
The article begins like this:
“The north wing of the Metropolitan Museum of Art is a vast, airy enclosure featuring a banked wall of glass and the Temple of Dendur, a sandstone monument that was constructed beside the Nile two millennia ago and transported to the Met, brick by brick, as a gift from the Egyptian government. The space, which opened in 1978 and is known as the Sackler Wing, is also itself a monument, to one of America’s great philanthropic dynasties. The Brooklyn-born brothers Arthur, Mortimer, and Raymond Sackler, all physicians, donated lavishly during their lifetimes to an astounding range of institutions, many of which today bear the family name: the Sackler Gallery, in Washington; the Sackler Museum, at Harvard; the Sackler Center for Arts Education, at the Guggenheim; the Sackler Wing at the Louvre; and Sackler institutes and facilities at Columbia, Oxford, and a dozen other universities. The Sacklers have endowed professorships and underwritten medical research. The art scholar Thomas Lawton once likened the eldest brother, Arthur, to “a modern Medici.” Before Arthur’s death, in 1987, he advised his children, “Leave the world a better place than when you entered it.”
“Mortimer died in 2010, and Raymond died earlier this year. The brothers bequeathed to their heirs a laudable tradition of benevolence, and an immense fortune with which to indulge it. Arthur’s daughter Elizabeth is on the board of the Brooklyn Museum, where she endowed the Elizabeth A. Sackler Center for Feminist Art. Raymond’s sons, Richard and Jonathan, established a professorship at Yale Cancer Center. “My father raised Jon and me to believe that philanthropy is an important part of how we should fill our lives,” Richard has said. Marissa Sackler, the thirty-six-year-old daughter of Mortimer and his third wife, Theresa Rowling, founded Beespace, a nonprofit “incubator” that supports organizations like the Malala Fund. Sackler recently told W that she finds the word “philanthropy” old-fashioned. She considers herself a “social entrepreneur.”
“When the Met was originally built, in 1880, one of its trustees, the lawyer Joseph Choate, gave a speech to Gilded Age industrialists who had gathered to celebrate its dedication, and, in a bid for their support, offered the sly observation that what philanthropy really buys is immortality: “Think of it, ye millionaires of many markets, what glory may yet be yours, if you only listen to our advice, to convert pork into porcelain, grain and produce into priceless pottery, the rude ores of commerce into sculptured marble.” Through such transubstantiation, many fortunes have passed into enduring civic institutions. Over time, the origins of a clan’s largesse are largely forgotten, and we recall only the philanthropic legacy, prompted by the name on the building. According to Forbes, the Sacklers are now one of America’s richest families, with a collective net worth of thirteen billion dollars—more than the Rockefellers or the Mellons. The bulk of the Sacklers’ fortune has been accumulated only in recent decades, yet the source of their wealth is to most people as obscure as that of the robber barons. While the Sacklers are interviewed regularly on the subject of their generosity, they almost never speak publicly about the family business, Purdue Pharma—a privately held company, based in Stamford, Connecticut, that developed the prescription painkiller OxyContin. Upon its release, in 1995, OxyContin was hailed as a medical breakthrough, a long-lasting narcotic that could help patients suffering from moderate to severe pain. The drug became a blockbuster, and has reportedly generated some thirty-five billion dollars in revenue for Purdue.
“But OxyContin is a controversial drug. Its sole active ingredient is oxycodone, a chemical cousin of heroin which is up to twice as powerful as morphine. In the past, doctors had been reluctant to prescribe strong opioids—as synthetic drugs derived from opium are known—except for acute cancer pain and end-of-life palliative care, because of a long-standing, and well-founded, fear about the addictive properties of these drugs. “Few drugs are as dangerous as the opioids,” David Kessler, the former commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, told me.
“Purdue launched OxyContin with a marketing campaign that attempted to counter this attitude and change the prescribing habits of doctors. The company funded research and paid doctors to make the case that concerns about opioid addiction were overblown, and that OxyContin could safely treat an ever-wider range of maladies. Sales representatives marketed OxyContin as a product “to start with and to stay with.” Millions of patients found the drug to be a vital salve for excruciating pain. But many others grew so hooked on it that, between doses, they experienced debilitating withdrawal.
“Since 1999, two hundred thousand Americans have died from overdoses related to OxyContin and other prescription opioids. Many addicts, finding prescription painkillers too expensive or too difficult to obtain, have turned to heroin. According to the American Society of Addiction Medicine, four out of five people who try heroin today started with prescription painkillers. The most recent figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggest that a hundred and forty-five Americans now die every day from opioid overdoses.”

Jonathan Sackler funded ConnCAN, then 50CAN. ”
You would not believe how many kids are in foster care because of prescription pain med addiction which leads to heroin addiction.
The Sacklers should stop paying adult lobbyists for 50CAN and send the money directly to the families they destroyed. States could generate lists for them. There would be hundreds of thousands of names on them.
LikeLike
50,000 people die every year from drug addiction
More than car accidents or any other cause of non-natural death
LikeLike
The State of Kentucky sued and got them to admit wrongdoing, but unfortunately they made a deal and the Sacklers bought their way out of trouble.
This has cost states billions of dollars, so every single one of you is paying for the Sackler’s “philanthropy”- it may cost the federal government 50 BILLION dollars.
To put that into perspective RTT was 4 billion.
Whatever the Sacklers donated it wasn’t worth the cost. They got the much better end of this corrupt deal-making.
We got some museum funding, Harvard got a gift and we got still more charter lobbyists for 50 BILLION dollars in taxpayer costs to fix this disaster they created. We were robbed.
A REALLY bad investment for the United States.
LikeLike
They have to start holding these companies and people accountable with more than fines. They get off and go on their merry way. They need to actually punish them.
The Sacklers have been pushing addictive drugs since 1974. They have NEVER been held accountable. They’re still not being held accountable. They’ll do it again.
LikeLike
Pushing addictive drugs is their business. They should be individually sued by families who have suffered.
LikeLike
Sackler is actually on the board of 50CAN
Just shameless.
They put him on the board for what? To reward this family for costing the US 50 billion dollars and ruining millions of lives?
I wonder how much “educational opportunity” 50 billion dollars would buy? That’s what we’ll end up paying.
https://50can.org/about-us/board/jonathan-sackler/
LikeLike
As indicated in the article, The Perdupers just settle with any who sue them before the cases go to court.
Most people do not have the money to fight a billion dollar corporation and even class action suits will settle if the payment offered is enough because court cases (and appeals) can go on forever and people need help now, not ten or twenty years down the road.
The real problem in this case is that many American doctors were in bed with the drug makers.
LikeLike
Chiara
You are correct fines are written off . Knowingly pushing death is not a civil issue it is a criminal issue and should be treated as such.
LikeLike
The only way they will be able to touch them is for bad marketing practices. That’s the way the tobacco companies had to be taken down in order to expose all the other really dirty details. It will be hard to do to a drug company since the FDA has a say in what drugs are allowed onto the market. If the drug company gets exposed, the FDA (govt agency) will have to come clean. I’m surprised that Oxy hasn’t magically disappeared off the shelves….the Sackler family is certainly pushing the limits on this one! Chutzpah.
LikeLike
Suggest that there were claims made that they had minimized risk of opioid use without actually minimizing the risk. (Less than 1% of users would develop addiction; time-release would allay any
addiction concerns…)
LikeLike
The problem with our country today is that corporations and billionaires are in charge, and our representatives do their bidding. We have seen this same scenario play out. The corporation is at fault. There is a lot of outrage in the press. The company pays fine, and nobody is held accountable or goes to jail other than a few underlings. Then, it is business as usual. Whether it is the financial services, Wall St, Big Pharma, or Big Oil, they are all “too big to jail.”
Congress is holding hearings the Russian interference in the 2016 election. Politicians are scolding the social media companies for their negligence. The CEOs are all diffident and respectful while the cameras are rolling, but nobody is using the dirty “R” word, regulation. The CEOs were told they have to regulate themselves or Congress will force them to do it. Big deal! That’s all they have to say, and we’re stuck sociopath narcissist and his amateur band of kleptocrats for years.
LikeLike
No need to pay $6 for a New Yorker subscription
You can read about the Sackler family in an earlier Esquire article
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a12775932/sackler-family-oxycontin/
LikeLike
“To read it all, you can buy a short-term subscription to the New Yorker for $6. It is worth every penny.”
Or try entering the title of the article or first words of it in Google, because Google has agreements with news outlets to allow users free access to articles from search engine results. Alternatively, you can get a paywall buster extension for your browser. I have several and they work fine on the New Yorker website, but they have stopped working on the NYTimes and WaPo sites. Those websites also disable your ability to highlight and copy the title, so you have to type it directly into Google. (Supposedly, there are browser extensions which over-ride that and enable copying on those sites, but none have worked for me.)
LikeLike
So the museum benefits from their contributions, while many suffered.
LikeLike
Museums have been benefitting at others’ expense for ages.
Many of the artifacts you find in museums (eg, from pyramids) were stolen by “archeologists” who claimed to be preserving history.
And even some of the ones that were not stolen by the museums were purchased from those who had stolen them.
Museums only care about this stuff when it becomes impossible to deny.
LikeLike
A perfect example is Yale’s Peabody Museum, which fought tooth and nail to keep artifacts taken from Machu Picchu and only agreed to return them to avoid the public relations nightmare that their ongoing battle with the Peruvian people was causing.
But even after that, they continue to take the position that as long as no one makes a formal claim on stolen artifacts, Yale is free to keep them.
http://www.newhavenindependent.org/index.php/archives/entry/yale_faces_new_artifact_theft_claims/
LikeLike
Art museums, libraries, and other sites of “rare” cultural activity have long been named for donors who contribute to their creation, expansion, or preservation.
Naming rights in exchange for donations are really out of hand.
A local theater has been rehabbed. Donors were given the right to name particular upgrades. Some donors were around to have their names on a plaque as you enter the new bathrooms. Corporate naming rights for stadiums are now routine. Some schools allow their rooftops to be painted with ads. And so it goes.
For those with an interest in how donors think about having their names attached to contributions–and how cultural institutions are dealing with this problem, I suggest the discussion in the following link.
The link includes a discussion of the Koch brothers and their decision to have museum facilities named for their contributions “expire” in 50 years, reasoning that by then the institution should be free to sell “fresh” naming rights. It also includes a reference to the Broads, who have two art museums. The Sackler, wealth, clearly multigenerational, is not the only example of really god-awful associations of destruction and death with “high minded” pursuits. So the youngest generation with killer-wealth calls herself “social entrepreneur.”
Rockefeller and Carnegie worked hard to save their reputations after exploiting humans who worked for them and having little regard for the damage they had done to lands and waterways.
http://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/topic/excellence_in_philanthropy/whats_in_a_name
LikeLike
Sackler’s daughter, Madelyn (sp) “directed” the Eva Moskowitz ad, “The Lottery” (too nauseated to look up the spelling).
LikeLike
OMG 😮! Lotteries are SCAMS.
LikeLike
A cousin of a friend joined the OD crowd in his death some two years ago. The highway patrol now reports opiates cause more traffic accidents than alcohol.
Two things come to mind. The first is Claude Brown’s novel, Manchild in the Promised Land. The second is the British use of Opium to pry open the Chinese market in the early 1800s. The 1833 Opium War is taught in every world history class. Swacker is right. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
LikeLike
What is perhaps most disturbing about the opioid crisis is that the government agencies (FDA and DEA) that could have actually done something about it did not and in some cases actually thwarted action. A recent Sixty Minutes revealed how members of the DEA were prevented by their superiors from taking action.
And the non action was not party specific
See Barack Obama & the Opioid Crisis
My President’s Worst Failure
View at Medium.com
There appears to be a prevalent pattern: corporations literally get away with murder with little more than a slap on the hands.
As Senator Dick Durbin said about big banks: Frankly, they own the place.”
Apparently, the same can be said of Big Pharma.
LikeLike