David Safier writes in the Tucson Weekly about well-funded efforts by the billionaire Koch Brothers to promote their anti-government, free-market libertarian views into local high schools.
“The course was created by the University of Arizona’s Center for the Philosophy of Freedom, which designed the curriculum, wrote the textbook and offers workshops for high school teachers instructing them on how to teach the class. The Freedom Center, which has been at UA since 2011, gets a majority of its funding from the Koch Brothers and a wealthy Arizona donor couple who are big contributors to and play an influential part in the Koch network.
“The course is also being offered in the Amphitheater, Vail and Sahuarita school districts and at least seven private and charter schools in Pima and Maricopa counties.
“The Center for the Philosophy of Freedom at the UA and similar centers at ASU are the latest in a continuing effort by the Koch Brothers to infuse institutions of higher education with their libertarian-fueled philosophy. The Koch’s long term goal is for their economic and political views to filter down from the university into mainstream public opinion, and to use their influence with politicians to create legislation favorable to their ideological and economic interests.
“A part of that effort is to create curriculum, class materials and entire courses to be used in high schools around the country.
“In the 1980s, the Koch Brothers began buying their way into universities by setting up departments and think tanks. The Koch-funded centers lend scholarly credibility to the brothers’ libertarian philosophy by teaching courses, writing papers for academic journals and conducting seminars for like-minded academics. The first serious funding venture began in the mid-1980s at Virginia’s George Mason University. At the time the university wasn’t known for the quantity or quality of its scholarship. Since then, it has grown, due to the Koch’s money and influence, into the largest research university in the state.
“Ground zero for the Koch’s efforts at George Mason University is the Mercatus Center. The Washington Post described it as a “staunchly anti-regulatory center funded largely by Koch Industries Inc.” A fellow at the Cato Institute, which was founded and funded by the Koch Brothers, referred to it as a “libertarian mecca.”
“Over the years, the Koch Brothers expanded their academic reach until they were subsidizing programs at more than 300 institutes of learning. From 2005 to 2015 alone, the Koch Foundation gave $145 million to universities, including $95 million to George Mason University and the Mercatus Center. Unlike most major university donors, the Kochs often maintain direct or indirect control over the departments their money creates and the professors they hire.
“Scholarly work tends to be too detailed and complex for public consumption, so the Koch Brothers also fund institutes and organizations outside of universities to shape the academic material into more easily digestible form (the Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation are two well known examples). Members of their staff generate position papers, write articles for magazines and newspapers, and appear on television news programs. They also work with sympathetic politicians to formulate and draft legislation.
“University of Arizona’s Center for the Philosophy of Freedom began in 2011. The Koch Brothers put in a million dollars to help start the center, though the largest portion of the funding came from Ken and Randy Kendrick, as well as another donor who remains anonymous. Ken Kendrick is the owner of the Arizona Diamondbacks. Randy Kendrick is a lawyer who is deeply involved in right wing causes. Because of their million-dollar-plus donations to the Koch’s donor network, including support for the Mercatus Center, the Kendricks are charter members and influential players in the Koch network.
“From its inception in 2011, UA’s Freedom Center had its eye on Arizona’s high schools. That year David Schmidtz, the founding director of the Center, spoke of his plans with Tim Vanderpool of the Tucson Weekly: “Schmidtz says the center plans to offer a degree program in economic instruction for high school teachers, and to generate texts for K-12 education. ‘We aim not only to produce the teachers, but the materials that are getting taught.'”
“Schmidtz is one of the three co-authors of ‘Ethics, Economy, and Entrepreneurship’, the textbook used in the high school course.
“The Koch Brothers began their efforts to make inroads into high school education with Youth Entrepreneurs, which was founded by Charles Koch and his wife Elizabeth in 1991 as a program to teach basic business skills to young people. It expanded its mission in 2009 when it created what the organization referred to as “a high school free market and liberty-based course,” complete with course materials and training for teachers. By 2014, more than 1,000 students were taking the course in Kansas and Missouri. YE has expanded into other states as well. It has a regional office in Phoenix.”
The goal of the Koch brothers is to install their free-market ideology in high schools across the country.

“The Center for the Philosophy of Freedom” is a euphemism for libertarian brain washing compliments of the Koch Brothers. They intend to create a vehicle for inculcating their free market unbridled capitalism ‘values” on future generations.
LikeLike
Good point. Just like their “Americans for Prosperity” has nothing to do with improving the prospects for prosperity for Americans. It would be fun to compile an Orwellian list of names of organizations that having nothing to do, or the opposite intent, of their titles. Fun as in interesting, not amusing (now ain’t that ironic?).
LikeLike
Americans for Prosperity (of the Very, very Rich)
Education Reform Now (by Privatizing Public Schools)
Democrats for Education Reform (Whose Members Are Actually Hedge Fund Managers)
Families for Excellent Schools (Who Send Their Own Children to Elite Private Schools Where Tuition is $50,000 a Year and Your Children Are Not Welcome)
LikeLike
I’m sure it’s a pain, but given the number of stories you have posted on Arizona, would it be possible to add an “Arizona” tab to your “Blog Topics” link? I use that link a lot when sharing your posts with people around the country.
LikeLike
There is a Blog category for Arizona
LikeLike
Perhaps I am missing something. When I click “Blog Topics” above, the only category that begins with A is ALEC.
LikeLike
Greg,
Try categories, not topics. Or google my name and the category name.
LikeLike
Libertarian philosophy of “freedom”: I’m free to do whatever the hell I want until and unless someone more powerful than me stops me. If you don’t like it, you’re free to cry about it.
LikeLike
It’s a Darwinian way to view the world. “Hooray for me! To hell with everybody else.” There’s no concept of collectivism; it’s all about self over all else.
LikeLike
What’s next? A libertarian curriculum for pre schoolers and kindergarteners? The kids will be issued Milton Friedman and Steve Forbes dolls, Koch brother crayons and Walton backpacks. Repeat after me children: limited government, personal responsibility, cut taxes on the rich and no more hand outs for moochers. Ugh!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Koch lesson: the world consists of makers and takers.
Makers should never pay taxes.
Takers are on their own.
LikeLike
But the KochBros are takers.
Takers of whatever they can get their greedy hands on.
LikeLike
They think are the makers and that you and your kind are takers because you expect Social Security, Medicare, etc., which billionaires are forced to pay for.
LikeLike
(and EVERYBODY not like you is a moocher…)
LikeLike
I am NOT speechless, just upset. Typical grab for insuring their profits. The awful thing is that there are suckers.
LikeLike
I’m hard-pressed to allow the word “scholarship” to be applied to anything David and Charles Koch underwrite. Serious scholarship, which is to say scholarship that is worthy of the name itself, is a mostly solitary and disinterested affair. The Kochs and their minions in academia are clearly far from disinterested, and centers like Mercatus at George Mason are really just ideological echo chambers designed not for free inquiry, but for simple indoctrination.
This in many if not most respects undermines the Western tradition of inquiry, and may well imperil it. It was fun–and edifying–while it lasted.
LikeLike
You make it scholarship by tacking on the word Science.
‘We aim not only to produce the teachers, but the materials that are getting taught.’” the University of Arizona’s Center for the Philosophy of Freedom, which designed the curriculum, wrote the textbook and offers workshops for high school teachers instructing them on how to teach the class.
The High school textbook title is: ‘Ethics, Economy, and Entrepreneurship’ Wow, ethical lessons enabled by the deep pockets of the Koch brothers.
Department of Political Economy & Moral Science
The Arizona Board of Regents has approved a new Department of Political Economy & Moral Science
within the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences.
The new department will support two academic degrees, a currently available BA in Philosophy, Political Science, Economics, and Law, and a future MA.
Ethics, Economy, and Entrepreneurship (a college-level course for high school students) the flagship journal, Social Philosophy & Policy, will round out the department’s immediate structure.
The Freedom Center will most likely be under the umbrella of the new Department as well. Stay tuned…new updates to follow soon.
Published Date:
10/09/2017 – 11:17am
As far as I can tell, “Moral Science” is a legacy from more than a century ago, in Germany. It morphed into psychology, more generally social sciences.
LikeLike
Moral science nets one eugenics.
LikeLike
The Koch’s “Philosophy of Freedom” is neither, but instead an effort to gain and legitimize their license to do whatever is best for them and their fellow members of the Overclass.
LikeLike
If the People’s Republic of China through its Confucius Institute can ‘indoctrinate’ our students, why can’t other organizations?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Confucius_Institutes
Confucius Institute
ASU Confucius Institute
“The Confucius Institute at Arizona State University collaborates with Arizona K-12 schools to offer Chinese language and culture programs that match each schools’ unique strengths. To date, we have established fourteen affiliated Confucius Classroom partnerships with Bogle Junior High School, Boulder Creek High School, Cactus Shadows High School, Cooley Middle School, Coronado Elementary School, Diamond Canyon School, Gavilan Peak School, Hamilton High School, Horseshoe Trails Elementary School, Lone Mountain Elementary School, Rhodes Junior High School, Sonoran Trails Middle School, Tarwater Elementary School and Williams Field High School.”
Confucius Institute | At The University of Arizona
Accelerated Learning Laboratory (Charter School)
Sunrise Drive Elementary School Chinese Immersion Program (CFSD)
Mesquite Elementary School Chinese Immersion Program (VSD)
Sahuarita High School (SSD)
Walden Grove High School (SSD)
Toltec Elementary School
Arizona Elementary School
Anza Trail k-8 School
LikeLike
So, Mrs. Weiss, you favor political and religious indoctrination, as well as unregulated charters where the owners can steal millions so long as no one catches them. Nice to know.
LikeLike
I don’t favor it all, I favor schools choosing the best curriculum, but frequently administrators choose them because thy are lazy and these ‘institutes’ provide them a cheap and easy path.
LikeLike
What exactly–hell, I’ll even settle for approximately–is your point? That two wrongs make a right?
LikeLike
if schools are going to accept money\curriculum materials from the communist, than it should be no surprise they are accepting it from political activists.
I think schools should choose the best curriculum for their students, not one that is free.
LikeLike
The federal department of education is funding an Islamic indoctrination program in public schools. It is called “Access Islam”. see
http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2017/apr/05/volusia-county-republican-party/did-us-department-education-introduce-islamic-indo/
LikeLike
It’s a problem in Australian universities, too:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-09/universities-warned-to-resist-chinese-communist-party-influence/9030372
LikeLike
I had no idea that Confucious’ thoughts were considered “communist”.
LikeLike
See here…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Confucius_Institutes
“Many such concerns stem from the CI’s relationship to Chinese Communist Party authorities, giving rise to criticisms about undermining academic freedom at host universities, engaging in industrial and military espionage, surveillance of Chinese students abroad, and attempts to advance the Chinese government’s political agendas on controversial issues such as human rights, Taiwan and Tibet.[1][2] Additional concerns have arisen over the institutes’ financial and academic viability, teaching quality, and relations with Chinese partner universities.[3]”
LikeLike
The Chinese Communist Party does not equate to Confucious’ writings.
LikeLike
Further, the Chinese Communist Party is not Communist.
LikeLike
dienne77 Political orders based in communism or democracy or religious doctrines, ALL differ when they emerge in and are applied to concrete varieties of cultures and histories.
LikeLike
It’s all very Confucing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As I understand it, they are talking about the Confucious Institute, not Confucious, proper, or his writings.
LikeLike
And I wasn’t.
LikeLike
We wouldn’t be having these problems if we had a rational education policy in this country. I wish we had a curriculum created by wise, disinterested educators as it used to be in France when they had a national, knowledge-rich curriculum. Creating a high-quality, coherent, sequential curriculum is hard, long work. Most teachers don’t have the time –it’s a full time job. Teachers are full time classroom managers. So the job for creating curriculum is up for grabs. Enter the dairy council, Dow Chemical, the Confucius Institute, the Koch Bros. –these well-funded, interested parties are happy to fill the vacuum.
LikeLike
I am too stupid to figure out where else to post this comment, which is sort of off the subject. All this talk about libertarians strikes me as interesting given the turn of the country to the hard right.
Last weekend, there was a White Power rally in Shelbyville, my county seat. About 400 right wingers were confronted by about 600 counter-protesters. Thousands of dollars brought police from all across the state to keep the thing peaceful. Thankfully, no one was hurt, and the protest took so long that the second part, which was to be held in Murfreesboro, never happened.
I feel that there is a link between this push toward Ayn Rand conservatism and the rise of Nazi groups. The thing it has in common is the me thing. Interviews with the White Power People had them talking about me, not about us. Conservatives like Paul Ryan are interested only in what can help the few, not the many. The Koch money seems to be able to sell philosophy, the philosophy that the me is important.
I fail to understand how this can sell to an American public. What part of We the People have We the People forgotten?
LikeLike
Roy Turrentine Your post is exactly on point. I didn’t read it until after I posted my own to Diane about moral theory in this thread.
There is a perfect relationship between the libertarian (Randian) underpinnings and the concrete expression of Nazism today. Nazism just “morphs” that same low-level moral philosophy to apply not only to ME but to MY GROUP; and that group as however I want to define it: race, gender, religious, social/economic, or just some really stupid meaning of “whiteness.”
Nazism is only a morphed group expression of the singular ME FIRST principle. There are not just “we the people” who all fall under the same POLITICAL and MORAL order; but rather DIFFERENT SPECIES defined by what can only be the shallowest of “special” identities. And the simplest of logical order of unused mindsets: Me white. You black (or whatever). Therefore, You don’t count or even “you die.” Period. It’s like talking to a brick wall.
LikeLike
Diane I wonder if the Kochs even KNOW the difference between education and propaganda; truth and sophistry; teachers and pied pipers.
LikeLike
CBK, The Koch’s pay people to blur the differences so they can be tricked into giving up their future.
LikeLike
Diane writes: “The Koch’s pay people to blur the differences so they can be tricked into giving up their future.”
That may be so, but my question is whether they are AWARE of the differences with any clarity, or if they just think everyone else is ALSO involved with propaganda, sophistry, and hiring pied-piper puppets (with less and less education themselves). If that’s the case, then the whole “power game” becomes Ayn Randian.
In this case, it would mean that it’s just a case, not of WHAT they are doing, but of WHO is doing WHICH propaganda, etc., because that’s ALL THAT CAN BE DONE, and not whether anyone even CAN BE in involved in education, truth, and authentic teaching, on principle.
I ask this as a rhetorical question here; but also to suggest just how the problem we are dealing with in education (and then across the board) is, at a deeper level, about being at cross-purposes with people who cannot even THINK or discuss issues at the level of our founders or of educators who understand the above differences, at least implicitly, much less be involved in developing and implementing curricula that purveys a clear understanding of those differences–a serious part of anything called A CIVICS EDUCATION. Under that view, the only thing the Kochs CAN DO is to merely play a “power game.”
BTW I cannot find the article, but I read a couple of days ago that CALIFORNIA was adding a formal “CIVICS CERTIFICATE” to their HIGH SCHOOL graduations.
LikeLike
The Koch brothers believe that everyone acts in their own self interest so they must convince the little people that what’s good for the Koch’s is good for everyone
LikeLike
dianeravitch “Everyone acts in their own self-interest.” <–Straight-up Ayn Rand.
Well, it’s true, but far from enough. What is NOT true is that we all think the same way about how we define or act in terms of that self-interest. Ayn and the Koch’s should have read Aristotle. Even HE, way back then, gave a scale of DEVELOPMENTAL views and values which only START with the Randian view–ALL FOR ME FIRST–for Aristotle, this is the lowest level and the most narrow horizon. Poor Ayn forgets that people develop morally (duh) and so don’t necessarily reflect HER OWN LOW-LEVEL VIEW of self-interest. Never has a moral philosophy been so telling of a writer’s own short-comings.
But a highly moral person defines their own self-interest as identifying with and actually doing what is the best for all concerned, and on a high moral principle. This includes themselves, but not as FIRST in a zero-sum game. Rather, they see themselves as a person among other persons. As IDENTIFIED with that higher view, however, highly moral people in history have actually and willingly died for others when put in a situation where they had no other choice. Whereas in that same situation, Randians would just say “they’re on their own; too bad for them; I got mine.”
Concretely this is the infected, weeping wound at the center of the Freedom caucus. And it has infected politics and policy thereby spreading the infection so that they are now setting up the conditions for their “me first, zero sum game” to be a ruling and unquestioned doctrine.
I wonder what the ethics professors who will work in this circle of infection will do with the moral-politics of their funders–probably rest their arguments on the equally-infected philosophical “ground” of relativism.
LikeLike
From my experience in dealing with a number of successful (meaning having made a lot of money) businessmen, I’d say that no, they don’t know the difference and perceive those dichotomies as single unities. They have convinced themselves that everyone is only self-interested, self-motivated (the “me” aspect with little regard for the “we” aspect-other than their immediate family as pointed out by Roy above) and SHOULD only be interested in the “me” way of being, that the correct mode of being is taking care of “me” and to hell with everyone else. And if everyone focuses on “me” then the world will be a better place for that thinking/being. Needless to say it’s a very narcissistic mode of being.
LikeLike
Duane E Swacker Yes: narcissism.
Since no one strangled Ayn Rand in her crib, we are all victims of it.
LikeLike
“I wonder if the Kochs even KNOW the difference between education and propaganda; truth and sophistry; teachers and pied pipers.”
This child got a pretty good education https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Koch_(publisher)
LikeLike
Clearly, there is a general problem of what donations universities accept. State universities fall for the following two step schemes:
1) The state cuts budget.
2) Universities seemingly have no choice, but accept loaded donations.
LikeLike
Mate Wierdl What a nice succinct term: “loaded donations.”
LikeLike
Thanks, Catherine. 🙂
LikeLike