ProPublica and USA Today teamed up to conduct an investigation of charter fraud in Ohio (although there is so much charter fraud in Ohio that this piece investigates only one aspect of it).
This story is about dropout recovery centers that collect large sums of money even if the students don’t show up.
It focuses on a “school” run by EdisonLearning, the latest version of the Edison Schools that were launched in the early 1990s with the goal of creating a network of 200 privately run schools.
It begins like this:
Last school year, Ohio’s cash-strapped education department paid Capital High $1.4 million in taxpayer dollars to teach students on the verge of dropping out. But on a Thursday in May, students’ workstations in the storefront charter school run by for-profit EdisonLearning resembled place settings for a dinner party where most guests never arrived.
In one room, empty chairs faced 25 blank computer monitors. Just three students sat in a science lab down the hall, and nine more in an unlit classroom, including one youth who sprawled out, head down, sleeping.
Only three of the more than 170 students on Capital’s rolls attended class the required five hours that day, records obtained by ProPublica show. Almost two-thirds of the school’s students never showed up; others left early. Nearly a third of the roster failed to attend class all week.
Some stay away even longer. ProPublica reviewed 38 days of Capital High’s records from late March to late May and found six students skipped 22 or more days straight with no excused absences. Two were gone the entire 38-day period. Under state rules, Capital should have unenrolled them after 21 consecutive unexcused absences.
Though the school is largely funded on a per-student basis, the no-shows didn’t hurt the school’s revenue stream. Capital billed and received payment from the state for teaching the equivalent of 171 students full time in May.
It is yet another charter fraud.
Another reform scam. It is not about “the kids.” It is about the money.
Do legislators care?
Question: How many charter scandals and frauds does it take to get the attention of the Ohio legislature?
Speaking of scandals, ECOT (the Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow) has threatened to close its virtual doors if the state doesn’t leave them alone and stop pestering them to provide a real education to real students. No doubt the owner William Lager is bluffing. But if he does close down ECOT, he will do everyone a favor by shutting down the nation’s biggest dropout factory. He has collected more than a billion dollars since he opened ECOT and given only a few millions to Republican (and a few Democratic) politicians (in Ohio, they sell their votes cheaply). How likely is he to walk away from his fabulous money stream?
I dare you! I double-dare you! Close your doors, ECOT! You won’t be missed.
Although the legislators and other elected officials will miss your campaign contributions.

The worse part of the story is how they’re actively recruiting students. It’s particularly damaging in the case of the online schools, because the truth is the students who are having trouble see this as a way out- they believe it will cure their problem – the problem being that they are failing high school. They say themselves that it’s easier.
The only people who are being fooled by this are policy makers and lawmakers. The students seem to be 100% clear on what’s going on.
I have an acquaintance who says her son’s older girlfriend did all the required work for an online credit recovery program. Her son did none of it. They think they’re gaming this system and I suppose they are but they’re the big losers.
It’s baffling because it’s so clueless- lawmakers MUST KNOW that these kids have working parents so have no supervision at home. If they aren’t in school and no one is home they’re just wandering around. How could they miss such an obvious practical problem with this? It’s like they live in some alternate world.
LikeLike
In Betsy DeVos’ imaginary “choice” world there is some caring, very well-informed adult carefully monitoring all of these “options” for teenagers.
In the real world both parents are at work, they have other children, they don’t understand any of this and the teenagers are handling the whole thing themselves. Unsurprisingly, they’re not doing a great job managing their own education since they were poor students to begin with an need MORE adult help, not less.
This imaginary self-directed 15 year old with engaged parents carefully evaluating “course choice” options exists, I’m sure, but that kid isn’t the norm. State policy can’t be designed around 1 kid in 100. MOST of them in these programs seem to be doing the absolute minimum to finish because they are too young to make these decisions.
LikeLike
Right in the center of the bullseye!
To riff off of a comment I read years ago, when it comes to the immensely wealthy rheephormsters like Betsy DeVos, there is a simple reaction to your query: “Well, even if the parents aren’t home, why don’t they ask the chauffeur or the butler or the maid to keep an eye on their children?”
😏
Remembering that the people inhabiting the highest levels of corporate education reform are clueless not just by their own upbringing and the circles they travel in but also by personal design and inclination.
And they’re not going to change on their own. Terms like “correction” are what THEY do to US aka the vast majority, while “self-correction” if and when it is applied to them seems like a patently insulting and illogical notion.
After all, who are they to argue with the divine scheme of things in which they have been entrusted (nay mandated!) with doing the thinking and ordering of everyone else? And the poor dears work so hard, and sacrifice so much of themselves, in carrying out their obligations.
😲
A toxic mix of noblesse oblige* and $tudent $ucce$$.
Thank you for your comments on this thread.
😎
P.S. Noblesse oblige: the inferred responsibility of privileged people to act with generosity and nobility toward those less privileged.
LikeLike
One of the online “course choice” offerings at my son’s school is “not recommended” by the school. That’s because it’s a cheap, easy replacement for a language credit- “world languages”.
They’re being forced to adopt this stuff by ed reform. The schools themselves know it’s BS. The students know it’s BS.
The only people who don’t know are the people promoting this nonsense. This is a game. They have to comply with whatever crackpot idea ed reform comes up and they all know it’s garbage.
LikeLike
I’m sort of curious about who, exactly, Betsy DeVos is imaging will provide all this “guidance” to these students as they “design” their schooling. Their already over-worked parents? In between shifts?
How does she plan on handling transportation for 30,000 students attending a “menu” of different courses in rural areas? The same parents who are at work will be driving them? We’re supposed to provide transportation to each one? Will anyone be supervising this or are we just sending 14 year olds out and telling them to put together a “playlist”?
They haven’t thought thru ANY of this. She says it herself- she has “no idea” what will happen. Great! Good work there, Betsy. Just blow it up and walk away.
LikeLike
Chiara, your son is to be commended for his BS radar. As a for-lang teacher I have been following studies on the achievement results for online for-lang-learning courses for 20 yrs. Dismal results compared to IRL lang courses. Anecdotally, in all those yrs I met exactly 1 person extolling their virtues [in that case, Rosetta Stone pgm]– he was a 35-y.o. who already spoke 4 langs in addn to Eng before embarking on the course…
LikeLike
Keep track of charter school fraud on Twitter at #CharterSchoolFail
LikeLike
There is no reasonable and logical reason why ECOT should get the contract to serve students at risk of dropping out. As we see more and more decisions like these, it is confirmation that “reform” is a gigantic “pay to play” scheme. If the company gives political donations to particular representatives, they will get the contract, even though ECOT has been an abysmal failure. These representatives are not good stewards of public funds, and they should have to pay the price in the next election.
LikeLike
Cannot imagine why Ohio taxpayers are so negligent as to support such obvious scams w/their hard-earned tax dollars?!
LikeLike
Tell me, Chiara: is it because Ohio taxpayers have no voice v-a-v spending their school taxes? Or is it because their school taxes have gone down & they don’t care why?
LikeLike