In 1957, Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas, accepted nine black students, while white parents jeered and protested. President Dwight D. Eisenhower sent in the 101st Airborne to safeguard the students and to carry out the order of a federal judge.
That was sixty years ago.
How much has changed? Now Little Rock’s public schools are segregated again. At the behest of the Walton Family (which owns Arkansas), the public schools were taken over by the state. The man in charge is not, never was, an educator. The ostensible reason for the takeover was that six of the city’s 48 schools were “failing.” Since then, three of the 48 schools have been closed. More are on the chopping block, including schools with a long and honorable history.
Barclay Key, a historian at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, writes the sad story of the past sixty years here. (What! The Walton family forgot to buy the history department!)
It appears that the Walton family wants to turn Little Rock into the next New Orleans, the next Memphis. It wants to wipe out public schools and replace them with charters. It wants to silence the voice of local citizens and give them no role in determining the future of their schools.
Key writes:
The two most striking parallels between the past and present are the insistence by white leaders that they know what is best for Black families and students and the recurrent role that local white business leaders play in undermining the public school system and prioritizing their prerogatives for the city…
Sixty years ago Little Rock epitomized desegregation struggles in the South, but the city now follows a path worn by New Orleans, Memphis, and other cities wracked by the proliferation of charter schools. Like they have over the past sixty years, politicians and business leaders presume to know what is best for public schools, and their decisions reflect a preoccupation with the latest trends in business rather than research-based pedagogy. The replacement for the elected board, state education commissioner Johnny Key, was appointed by the new Republican Governor Asa Hutchinson despite having no experience as an educator. Key appointed a superintendent who was generally trusted by the city’s white elites, but that superintendent was promptly replaced when he openly criticized the inefficiency of expanding charter schools in a district that has been gradually losing students for years. With the exception of reconstituting one school, the state made no substantive changes at the distressed schools.
“Reflections of Progress” will serve as the theme for the sixtieth anniversary of the desegregation crisis. Things have certainly changed, but the standard is too low if we measure progress by events that unfolded in 1957. Reflecting on progress since 1967 would be more appropriate and sobering. White men again make all decisions for the school district. They act with the support of the Chamber of Commerce and, today, the Walton charter school lobby controlled by the state’s powerful Walton family. Since the state takeover, many of the same bureaucrats have their six-figure salaries. Many of the same children cannot read. Little Rock periodically commemorates the 1957 controversy, but it constantly relives 1967.
The Walton Family Foundation is engraved on this blog’s Wall of Shame. It doesn’t stand alone, but it has a place of pre-eminence on a wall that lists those who have used their money and power to betray democracy, public schools, and the American dream.
View at Medium.com
2016: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/walmarts-walton-family-backing-clinton/article/2601211
This is exactly why I don’t get why so many educators were enthusiastic about Hillary. I can understand feeling like you had to hold your nose and vote for her to defeat Trump, but enthusiasm for her? A lot of people are clearly ignorant (or at least dismissive) of her history.
Dienne,
Having watched Trump since Jan 21, I would vote for Hillary again, with even more enthusiasm and would knock on doors to get voters out, would fly to Wisconsin and Pa and anywhere else that was close.
Our president is a warmonger, a serial sex assaulter, a xenophobe, a goon, a menace to the world. He and his family are grifters out to destroy the country and stuff their pockets
Sigh. Yes, Diane, he is all of those things. Why does that make you so enthusiastic about Hillary? If your only two choices are a poop sandwich or a Spam sandwich, you’d probably take the Spam, but just because poop is worse doesn’t make Spam delicious.
Hillary is smart, knowledgeable, wise, experienced. She knows diplomacy. She would have been a great president.
She pledged to block for-profit charters.
She would have supported charters–unlike me–but there are issues of peace, security, civil rights, civil liberties, foreign relations, the economy, the Supreme Court, etc. that outweigh charters.
When Trump opens his mouth, I cringe, fearing whatever vile thing he is about to say. He is the apotheosis of greed, cruelty, crudeness, stupidity, and ignorance in our midst.
Hillary has dignity, intelligence, class, and compassion–all of which are lacking in Trump.
We are on the verge of a nuclear war with North Korea, as two little boys with horrendous toys, shake their…whatevers.. at each other. Millions of our fellow Americans in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands are without power, potable water, and food, and this fool is sneering about NFL athletes protesting racism.
Damn right I wish Hillary had been elected.
Peace?! Hillary never met a war she didn’t want to prosecute. She has famously smeared Obama – the man who declared the unilateral executive right to assassinate anyone, anywhere – for being too dovish.
And let’s not overlook her ties to Wall Street, the oil industry (for which she went around the world pushing fracking), private prisons, Monsanto and on and on and on.
Yes, Hillary is better spoken than Trump in many ways. She’s less crass (although “we came, we saw, he died” was pretty crass, as was “superpredators”). But underneath she’s largely the same package, with slightly less racism, sexism and homophobia. Or, at least less obvious.
But as I’ve said many times before, in some ways Trump is preferable specifically because he’s so blatantly odious. With him in the Oval Office, a lot of people have been forced to get off their backsides and work for positions they wouldn’t even have taken under Hillary. Under Hillary neoliberalism would have continued to expand and the world would have collectively shrugged.
I had a friend–a college sophomore, a gifted photographer– on that plane full of Syracuse University students that Ghadafi destroyed in midair over Scotland. I would have killed him myself if I had the chance.
I know lots of people will disagree with me, but I believe Hillary would have been better than Obama for public education. I know her history with Podesta and TFA. I also worked in New York when she was a senator, and she never made a hostile move against public schools. In fact, she never bashed them in public. I think Hillary would have been swayed more by evidence and public opinion. She would have been more responsive on the issue than Obama, and she was a product of public education. Who knows what really would have happened? However, it would not have been a fringe character like DeVos with vouchers.
Hillary went to public schools. She has never bashed teachers or public schools.
If I had 30 minutes with her, I could have set her straight. She listens.
Hillary has a long history of working to improve the quality of life for women and children. That by itself, regardless of her alleged flaws, (with an emphasis on alleged) was enough for me to vote for her.
What has Trump done for others —- NOTHING unless it benefits him. Have you read the piece about Puerto Rico where he is blaming them for the damage caused by the hurricane, and what is his motivation for bashing Puerto Rico – the bankruptcy of one of his gold courses in 2015. It wasn’t’ his fault even though his family business managed the golf course, it was the fault of Puerto Rico.
Meanwhile, list all of the PROVEN allegations that have been made against Hillary Clinton in her life. When I say PROVEN, I mean found guilty in a court of law.
How many court cases has Trump lost and how many has he settled out of court?
You can find the answer here:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/01/donald-trump-lawsuits-legal-battles/84995854/
Trump and his deplorable followers made a big deal out of Hillary using her private e-mail account to conduct State Department business, but yesterday I read that five of his staff are doing or have done the same thing including his children. They are or were conducting government business with private e-mail and mobile phone accounts.
Dienne, you migth consider reading: “Hillary vs. the Hate Machine: How Clinton Became a Vessel for America’s Fury
“Decades of right-wing attacks turned a crusader of women’s rights into a major target of hate”
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/how-hillary-clinton-became-a-vessel-for-americas-fury-w440914
On a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the best president, Trump is less than ONE and Hillary would have been ranked higher than a SIX.
Lloyd,
We now know that the Russians paid for ads on Facebook to stir the anti-Hillary mania and had troll farms churning out anti-Hillary tweets. Many of the attacks on Hillary were fomented by one V. Putin. Some Americans fell for it. So now we have a Putin puppet in the WH.
In addition to the Russians, we had the hate-filled, racist, conspiracy theory Alt-Right media slinging tons of mud at Hillary.
Two examples: Richard Mercer finances Steve Bannon’s Breitbart, and then there is Alex Jones.
Diane, Barclay Keys teaches history at the University of Arkansas, Little Rock, as his link shows. That’s not the same as the University of Arkansas. Please correct.
A few years ago I recall seeing the documentary, “Little Rock Central: 50 Years Later.” It told the story of Little Rock, a city, that was still divided along racial lines. Little Rock was never really supportive of integration so they went through the motions. While some students left for segregated Christian academies, other students remained in the public schools which used tracking to separate the students by race. The Waltons intend to continue this tradition of separate and unequal, only now they expect to use public funds to resegregate the schools through charters.https://www.renaudbrothers.com/little-rock-central-50-years-later
The Waltons will be successful if Arkansans don’t wake up.
DeVos has ruined many Michigan schools with her privatization schemes and a goal of destroying all public education.
Thanks to WALMART, segregation is back and Governor Faubus has won! Shop at Target.
Amen, that is exactly what is happening. Keys, the Legislatures rewrote the law so that he could get that job. Mike is being paid under the table by the Waltons. Administration don’t give a dam. Central High only offering regular classes to black students and not Pre-AP or AP. There is alot of politics going on in the District and its not about educating students. Blacks haven’t come any further than 1957!! Just have a different leader. Mike can only get the Zoo as a business partner for Henderson, really? So are you saying that Henderson students act like animals? The Zoo? What about businesses such as Banks, Windstream, Verizon, Axicom, Steel companies, there is more businesses than the Zoo to have as a partner for Henderson. Please give me a break!! The Zoo? Just don’t understand why the Zoo.
We’ve seen it over and over – anyone with integrity, heck, anyone with an ounce of common sense, who questions the obvious motives of the individuals pushing their pro charter agenda, is booted out and replaced with a more malleable “leader” (See bootlicker).