Karen Wolfe, parent activist in Los Angeles, writes about a dramatic turn of events earlier today. Eli Broad wanted to open a STEM school in Los Angeles. Not with his money, of course, but with public money. He also wanted more autonomy for charter schools, so they have even less oversight than they now have. It is highly unusual for a billionaire to ask the Legislature to give him a school. The Los Angeles Times thought it set a bad precedent but they supported it because, well, he does give the Times $800,000 a year (their reporters are untainted by his money, fortunately, but $800,000 is real money). And if the powerful charter industry in California needs anything, it is more oversight, more accountability, more transparency, not less.
And guess what! ELI BROAD LOST!
Karen Wolfe writes:
Victory in California!
On the final day of the legislative session, a massive coalition of teachers & parents, activists & experts, unions & school boards, those Democrats and these Democrats, and Republicans beat big money!
AB 1217, a bill sponsored by Eli Broad, would have established a school in the middle of Los Angeles, and so much more. It would have created a law–and set a statewide precedent–to let charter school operators circumvent local districts, the County Office of Education, and even the State Board of Education. This has never been done in California, where “local control” is fiercely protected. Obliterating that is a top priority of the charter lobby.
But we won!
What an uprising. First, a couple of us button-holed some of our local delegates to the Democratic Party in Los Angeles. Especially on the heels of the recent school board election, they got it! And they got to work. Within two days, the matter was put on the Los Angeles Democratic Party Central Committee agenda as an emergency measure. It passed unanimously–and it put our state legislators on notice. They were not going to sneak this through.
Then we California BATs sent out an Action Alert and worked up and down the state asking public education activists to call their senators. BATS started tweeting. Diane Ravitch posted it, and our state senators were getting calls from activists across the country. They knew they were being watched.
Before one caller even started talking, a senate staffer said, I’ll put you down as opposing. She said, how do you know that? He told her, I can hear a child in the background.
Each day, it stayed off the Senate floor. Were they waiting for the right moment, or did they know support was crumbling?
Then the Network for Public Education sent an eblast to tens of thousands of Californians who care about public education. Los Angeles activist Lauren Steiner took our message to a whole new community of California activists, opposed to privatization in general.
All the while, the teachers unions were working the legislature, and getting more partners to join the fight. School boards, firefighters, the PTA, all against this bill.
Together, we spoke truth to power and MADE them listen. We will not let them sell off our schools in secret, pretending that it is putting “kids first”.
Thank you to everyone who made calls!
Diane Ravitch always says, “We will win, because they are few, and we are many.” Sometimes it is hard to remember that. Today, I believe!

Re: AB1217 Los Angeles STEM school (Broad). It’s not quite dead. Senator Portantino, the co-sponor, has pulled the bill….it can appear when the Legislature reconvenes in January….so watch for it.
LikeLike
Hannah,
It could have sailed through. It didn’t. Celebrate and fight again.
LikeLike
Monday To Do-
Thank you phone calls to Senator Portantino who, by pulling AB 1217, demonstrated his ability to stand up for public ownership of public education…With his gained insight of the real issues, we hope we can expect his moral leadership, to enrich our public regular and magnet STEM/STEAM schools.
…something like that.
LikeLike
STEM / STEAM in part, in my opinion, has been necessitated by the premature introduction of technology in the lowest grades. The insistence that the PARCC state test be taken on computer for grades 3,4,5 has robbed many of our youngest students one important early opportunity to learn how to “make” letters look graceful through cursive or script instruction. This instruction has been dropped in New Jersey districts to make room for PARCC preparation on computer. Precision is a great part of such learning – basic skills so necessary for effective engineering and design. Elementary schools in Germany place emphasis on learning with the hand – “Bastln” translated to “tinkering” is embedded in their schools as is the use of cartridge fountain pens and the learning of script writing. I believe German education understands this – and as a result the world sees evidence – Germany produces master designers and the finest products. There is also strong evidence, along with common sense, students will be more creative with technology when they have been exposed to hands on activities and learning prior to the introduction of computers.
LikeLike
Such an excellent point. Valid for every kid too, not just those whose talents, given time to develop, could lead them to design. Printing alone engages the tactile sense in expression/ communication. How important is that in developing one’s thoughts into effective communication? We won’t know (& don’t care) while we slash pre-3rd-gr time for writing so as to establish fluent keyboard skills in the name of efficient data-reporting to state. Ugh.
LikeLike
bethree5, You make an excellent point, too. Way too much time is being redirected to training our students to become efficient data reporters. Budgets are being completely reapportioned, too. California, with Silicon Valley’s power and influence, is enamored with all things tech.
LikeLike
Diane A moment of true gladness.
LikeLike
Yes!
LikeLike
I would like to take Diane’s words that “they are few and we are many” and direct them to the children of Los Angeles. This STEM school would have directed resources for the few at the expense of resources for the many.
Maybe the charter concept is losing its attraction so that Broad and his team had to come up with a new way to sell their idea. But, we were not fooled.
LikeLike
I agree.
LikeLike
This is great news! I hope that CA Virtual Charter schools are next to topple. They are a disaster but continue. Why CA would ever sign a contract for a virtual charter school is beyond me. But then money talks.
Eli Broad should give up and go back to building more museums in his name (already one in LA). Maybe Eli can actually build the speed train that CA has spent billions for and has not been built yet. We’ll name it in his honor. Stay out of education Eli!
LikeLike
All I can say is wow. Let’s take this nationally.
LikeLike
How California resisted could be helpful other states! However, for the many states dominated by conservatives what California did would not be replicable.
LikeLike
Retired,
Organize to elect legislators who are FOR you, not against you
LikeLike
This is FABULOUS NEWS!
LikeLike
Really nice story. I love the ending, too. Sometimes the news puts wind in your sails.
LikeLike
How wonderful to wake up and read some good news! It doesn’t happen often enough. Congratulations to all the people of L.A.!! I am proud for you.
LikeLike
LA Times reporters might not report directly to Broad, but they know who butters their broad…I mean bread.
LikeLike
I wish someone would question these college remediation rates.
If ACT/SAT scores are “flat” that means they haven’t changed in 20 years.
So why are so many students being forced to take expensive remediation or pre-credit classes when they weren’t forced to do so 20 years ago?
What explains the explosion in remediation? Why would remediation go up if SAT/ACT scores stay the same?
I get that remediation rates are a good political line for ed reformers, but why does everyone just assume colleges are correct to do this? What if colleges are wrong and they’re forcing students to take too many remediation courses?
They look at a problem with 2 possible causes, high schools or colleges, and they just settle on high schools as the problem because colleges say so? How is that science?
LikeLike
Chiara, I wonder if the “explosion” figures cited are conflating 2-yr & 4-yr college stats. Community colleges accept everyone & do not require SAT or ACT scores. A couple of cc sites I saw exempt enrollees from placement tests if they have at least a 500 on SAT math & same on Engl [pre-March ’16 scores].
Supposedly not many 4-yr colleges do this math/engl placement testing (natch, cuz they have SAT/ ACT scores on hand). However certain music-tech programs my sons applied to 10 yrs ago reqd them, tho some exempted for 500/500 min SAT score. They were schools that had converted from audio-tech institutes to 4yr music pgms. Probably because many applicants were older & had not recently or ever taken SAT.
So if I’m right, anti-ed advocates are using stats that actually reflect something other than nosediving achievement [as you say, SAT/ACT scores are ‘flat’]. Looks like it’s more about all those folks who 40 yrs ago were ‘not college material’– & had living-wage vocational options!– enrolling in college.
No doubt there’s also a bunch of scamming going on, i.e., a boondoggle new test-selling category for College Board, & a way for budget-pressed colleges to pressure students into sticking around longer to take those non-credit courses.
LikeLike
What if they looked at college remediation and discovered that the standardized tests colleges are using to determine tracking into remediation are garbage?
Then they’d have to ask colleges why they’re forcing millions of students to add additional debt taking remediation classes, which would not serve the political aims of ed reform, but might be a very good question.
They’re using a test called Accuplacer. Why is everyone assuming this test is a good measure? Did college remediation rates skyrocket when this test came into being? Why not just use ACT and SAT scores, which have remained “flat” and therefore would indicate remediation rates should have remained flat.
LikeLike
Chiara>>>
“Cal State plans to drop placement exams in math and English as well as the noncredit remedial courses that more than 25,000 freshmen have been required to take each fall — a radical move away from the way public universities traditionally support students who come to college less prepared than their peers.
“In an executive order issued late Wednesday, Chancellor Timothy P. White directed [Cal State] the nation’s largest public university system to revamp its approach to remedial education and assess new freshmen for college readiness and course placement by using high school grades, ACT and SAT scores, previous classroom performance and other measures that administrators say provide a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of students’ knowledge.”
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-cal-state-remedial-requirements-20170803-story.html
LikeLike
One could also look at the incentives around placing students into remediation. If it’s billions a year and colleges are getting this additional revenue for lowest level courses that can be taught by temps, are remediation classes a cash cow for colleges?
I don’t know but it seems like someone should ask. It seems crazy to me to look at remediation rates and ask colleges NOTHING, to just assume these rates are 100% valid. Colleges are placing many more students in remediation. Colleges should have to explain and defend doing this. Instead, ed reformers demand HIGH SCHOOLS explain it.
LikeLike
“We would expect our college-bound kids to master math and verbal skills, if not show major gains year after year,” Allen said. “Particularly recognizing they have not learned as much as they needed to in primary years, and these things are required in college.”
That’s the ed reform line. “They have not learned as much as they need to in the primary years”. This is true because colleges say it’s true.
If one were genuinely interested in this, wouldn’t one look at both the high school side and the college said? It’s IMPOSSIBLE colleges are wrong?
Boy, it’ll be earth shattering if they find out Accuplacer is garbage. They rely exclusively on it in community colleges and less selective colleges. That better be a VERY good test since all of ed reform have hung their hat on it.
LikeLike
At what point do responsible adults tell college students that the US Department of Education is not a reliable adviser on student loans? That they’re captured and not working in the interest of students?
Because it’s important. We’re talking about 18 year olds taking on lifetime debt loads based on advice and information from the student loan industry.
Should they assume they’re getting solid information or is there someone else they can turn to who isn’t bought and paid for?
“DeVos’s announcement postpones the effective date for the Borrower Defense rule, and sets up negotiated rule-making committees to revamp both regulations. As Pauline Abernathy with the Institute for College Access and Success notes, “Today’s action by the Trump Administration will be cheered by for-profit colleges and Wall Street but is terrible news for students, taxpayers, and anyone concerned about rising student debt.”
Maybe we could set up a network of volunteer advisers for young people to replace the government entity- advisers who aren’t captured. They need someone in their corner. They’re gonna get screwed. They’re paying what amounts to a “corruption tax”- they’re paying too much because the people who supposedly represent their interests are captured.
https://www.thenation.com/article/betsy-devos-moves-to-help-for-profit-schools-defraud-students/
LikeLike
The system is designed to exploit young people and their desire to get education. In the rest of the developed world, college is less expensive or sometimes free.
LikeLike
Congratulations to all. This was no small achievement.
LikeLike
Officially CeLeBrAtInG: GO CALIFORNIA BATS & FRIENDS!! I have to say, the California Caucus at the NEA Convention this summer were the rowdiest, most pumped group. Sure they are big, but they are UNITED!
LikeLike
Hi Lizzy,
I’m sending you this for 2 reasons:
1) It’s great news for public schools!
2) Karen Wolfe is now a Hamilton parent!
I may have told you this story, or maybe I just told Dad. A few weeks ago the counselors were in the library fixing schedules for students. There were also several boisterous seniors being “housed” in the library waiting to be assigned to a college and career class.
Suddenly I saw a woman raise her iPad and start filming the scene. I cautiously, but quickly walked over to her and her daughter and asked if I could help them. Her daughter had been there several times over a couple of days, but didn’t get any help with her schedule, so the mother was angry. I found out who her counselor was and went over to speak to her about the problem. She is a new counselor at Hamilton and a very nice person. Therefore, after I explained the iPad incident, she agreed to talk to the mother and daughter. Whew!
It turns out, that mother is the Karen Wolfe quoted on Diane Ravitch’s blog telling this story about defeating Eli Broad’s outrageous public school “money grab” to open a STEM charter school in Los Angeles, to put “kids first.” He and his education reformers almost did it, but the activists saved the day! Hooray!
(My friend, Joan Kramer, didn’t like Karen at first. I think Joan thought Karen was a phoney. But, Joan realized later that Karen was a true activist for public schools.) She should be at Joan’s Memorial tonight, in part because I printed the invitation for her when she was back in the library for a huge parent meeting with the principal Sept. 8, the last day to RSVP for the memorial. I’m going to share this post on Twitter and Facebook today.
Love you,
Mom ❤
LikeLike
I hope we do win the fight for public schools and direct our funds to their support solamentely.
LikeLike
A truly wonderful and empowering sentence: “California BATs sent out an Action Alert and worked up and down the state asking public education activists to call their senators.”
LikeLike
Celebrating with you!
LikeLike
Also in Los Angeles: http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-edu-rodriguez-money-laundering-20170915-story.html
The title is, “Why didn’t Rodriguez write himself a big check?”. The answer is, because he is a charter insider so lying is in his nature.
LikeLike
Amazing victory for our future generations. Thank you to all who fought hard on the nation’s behalf.
LikeLike