Jack Schneider is a historian of education at the College of the Holy Cross and research director of the Massachusetts Consortium for Innovative Education Assessment.
He explains here why billionaire Laurene Powell Jobs is on the wrong track in her effort to “reinvent” the American high school. She commandeered four major networks to present a glitzy television program showcasing the ideas she is funding. While none of them is fundamentally wrong, the premise of her project is, writes Schneider.
Americans expect more of their schools than just “college-and-career-readiness.” They see them as places that develop the full spectrum of their children’s social, emotional, academic, aesthetic, cultural, and physical needs. And besides, it is a silly myth that high schools have not changed in a century. Only someone who has not spent much time in high schools believes that.
He writes:
“XQ might highlight some exciting innovations. Unfortunately, however, the project is rooted in fiction. The schools themselves may be real, and some might even turn out to be “super.” But the assumptions underlying the project are false. And given that, the entire XQ extravaganza threatens to do more harm than good, by undermining what we know to be true about our schools.
“The first falsehood of the XQ narrative is the claim that a dramatically changed world requires us to rethink public education. Students today, they argue, need a totally different kind of education because, as the XQ website puts it, “we’ve gone from the Model T to the Tesla and from the switchboard to the smartphone.”
“Do new technologies require us to rethink the purpose of American education?
“If the primary goal of school is to teach students to build products, the answer might be yes. But interviews my research team has conducted with educators and parents show that Americans maintain broad and complex aims for education. They want students to develop interpersonal skills and citizenship traits. They want schools to teach critical thinking and an array of academic skills. They want young people to be exposed to arts and music, to have opportunities for play and creativity, and to be supported socially and emotionally.
“Many would also like to see students leaving high school with some job-ready skills. But as the latest Phi Delta Kappan poll indicates, Americans continue to support the broader purpose of education. That’s why students have always done far more in school than train for work.
“If Laurene Powell Jobs and her friends at XQ want an answer for why the Tesla and the smartphone haven’t transformed our schools, the simplest one is this: Our students don’t spend their days building cars and designing phones. Instead, they’re developing their full human potential, across a wide range of activities.”
It would have helped if anyone associated with the XQ project had any understanding of the history of American schools. They might have known of past attempts to redesign or reinvent the schools. I recall the first Bush administration’s $50 million project in 1991 to design “Break the Mold Schools.” Several teams won millions to create innovative models. Did you remember that? Neither does anyone else.

His last paragraph is wonderful:
“The American educational system isn’t perfect. Yet we might recall that our public schools serve every child in the nation, from kindergarten through the end of high school. And they have helped produce the dynamic, literate, diverse, entrepreneurial nation we live in. Can we improve the existing system? Absolutely. In order to do so, however, we need to be firmly grounded in reality.”
LikeLike
The virtue of historical knowledge
LikeLike
I’m under the impression that I fairly recently saw the XQ project listed as a sponsor of the PBS Newshour. When I tried to confirm that, I found out that it’s virtually impossible to obtain a list of Newshour sponsors. You can get as far as a PBS site that’s supposed to provide that list, but when you click on it you enter into one of the most labyrinthine run-arounds I’ve ever encountered on the Internet. It almost seems that PBS doesn’t want you to know who’s paying for its reporting these days. Anyone else want to try?
LikeLike
Next step – get rid of Liberal Arts at the college/university level, including those pesky Humanities Courses and that time wasting distribution requirement. In fact, why do we need those campuses when the students can download their assignments and upload their answers. Heck, even midterms and finals could be done offsite. The again, why do we even need professors? Let billionaires hire lackies to do the work at minimum wage and then rake in all that tuition money. To top it off, internships will provide free labor in return for a piece of paper saying You Graduated.
Just think about all the untapped resources higher education provides and how those in the know can finagle a piece of the pie.
Next stop – The athletic department – there’s really big money in college sports that’s already being exploited. Time to get in on the action.
LikeLike
I went to a vo-tech high school for junior and senior years. That is literally what the high school was called “vo-tech”.
I just think it’s nuts that they think they invented this. I can’t be the only person in the country who went to one of these schools. The school was fine- I graduated and went to a community college and got a 2 year technical degree, along with TENS OF THOUSANDS of other people. No one paid a bit of attention or claimed it was in any way revolutionary.
35 years later the (public) school is still there. They teach some different things- ceramics (materials for engineering) are big in my area of the country so they added that and a plastics section maybe a decade ago but the students do apprenticeships in local businesses and always have. My middle son went there. I think he would be surprised he went to a “reinvented” school since it’s the same school his mother attended.
LikeLike
“But as the latest Phi Delta Kappan poll indicates, Americans continue to support the broader purpose of education.”
And what might that “broader purpose of education be”, and no, I’m not hinting at Eli Broad’s opinions on education of which this XQ made for TV show is an extension.
Where might we find that broader purpose and what is it?
That discussion is in Ch 1-The Purpose of Public Education of my book “Infidelity to Truth: Education Malpractice in American Public Education”. Here is what I discerned (for the whole discussion read the chapter, please):
“The purpose of public education is to promote the welfare of the individual so that each person may savor the right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the fruits of their own industry.”
Any educational practice that is shown to hinder, block and/or otherwise cause an individual to not be able to indulge in any of aspect of his/her rights as stated has to be considered as harmful and unjust not only to the individual but also to society and therefore must rightly be condemned as educational malpractice and ought to be immediately discontinued. Trampled rights are rights that are non-existent and the educational malpractice that tramples any right is unjust and as noted in Alabama’s constitution “is usurpation and oppression” and as Missouri’s declares “. . . when government does not confer this security, it fails in its chief design.”
LikeLike