When I read articles like this, I think I have lost all sense of reality.
The title is the same as this post but the pretentiousness is a mile deep.
Little children play with toys, and the adults who are watching them decide they are preparing for the new economy even though the adults have no idea what the new economy will be or what kinds of jobs will exist in 20 years.
“Technological advances have rendered an increasing number of jobs obsolete in the last decade, and researchers say parts of most jobs will eventually be automated. What the labor market will look like when today’s young children are old enough to work is perhaps harder to predict than at any time in recent history. Jobs are likely to be very different, but we don’t know which will still exist, which will be done by machines and which new ones will be created.”
Since no one knows, there is no time like the present to start pushing career readiness.
“To prepare, children need to start as early as preschool, educators say. Foundational skills that affect whether people thrive or fall behind in the modern economy are developed early, and achievement gaps appear before kindergarten.
“Nervous about the future, some parents are pushing children to learn to code as early as age 2, and advocates say it’s as important as learning letters and numbers. But many researchers and educators say that the focus on coding is misplaced, and that the more important skills to teach have to do with playing with other children and nothing to do with machines: human skills that machines can’t easily replicate, like empathy, collaboration and problem-solving.
“It’s a real misnomer that simply learning to code is the answer,” said Ken Goldberg, a chairman in engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. “We don’t need everybody to be extremely capable Python coders. It’s a way of understanding what machines are good at and what they’re not good at — that’s something everybody needs to learn.”
“It’s not that technology should be avoided; many researchers say children should be exposed to it. But we don’t know what machines will be able to do in two decades, let alone which programming languages software engineers will use. And children learn better, they say, by playing and building instead of sitting behind screens.”
Another way to say this is, let the children play.

Chilling. I had the feeling of Huxley, Orwell, Bradbury and Dürrenmatt all looking over my shoulder as I read the article. They were not amused.
LikeLike
Children need love and attention. Hugs are also helpful. They need to be exposed to all sorts of experiences. They need to be talked to so they learn the nuances of our language and develop a vocabulary. They need to be exposed to others to develop skills involving appropriate interactions with people in general. They need to be read to so they can hear stories from around the world as well as interesting tidbits of information.
They need to learn empathy so they don’t grow up thinking writing code is a viable activity for preschoolers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
excellent point — how do kids learn the complex nuances of tolerant, interactive human social behavior: NOT WITH A COMPUTER
LikeLike
One of the founders of Rocketship started a company where public schools buy a contract for online tutoring:
https://www.zeal.com/#!/landing
It continues to baffle me why public schools buy product from people who spend hundreds of millions of dollars lobbying AGAINST the existence of public schools.
They do absolutely nothing for public schools EXCEPT sell them product. There’s something wrong with this picture. If Google and Zuckerberg and former Rocketship executives want to sell product to public schools (and they do!) shouldn’t we insist they stop lobbying AGAINST the continued existence of our schools?
No other entity in the world would do this. No other entity would funnel their budget to the very organizations and companies who lobby against them. Only public schools fall for this. No one else.
Would Eva Moskowitz purchase a contract from a company or entity who lobbies against charter schools? Hell no, she wouldn’t. She’d find another supplier, one that SUPPORTS charter schools.
Don’t purchase products or contracts from organizations that fund political arms that lobby against your schools. That’s a no-brainer.
LikeLike
My eldest son is the only computer professional I know personally. He works for a big tech company and he disputes this whole theory.
He says that teachers can teach kids any of the following skills and he’ll take it from there: birdhouse building, knitting, French (or any language), or how to play the saxophone 🙂
He just thinks this whole “digital natives” theory is nonsense.
I agree. I’m just not persuaded that human beings LEARNING things changed dramatically with the entry of cell phones. They’re completely different organisms now?
Was that also true when we went to internal combustion engines? All of human learning prior to that point became completely invalid and irrelevant? That’s crazy. That isn’t what happened at all.
My middle son is an electrician. Guess what? He can ALSO code,just like his brother. He took the one skill (electrician) and used it in another area. No one had to tell him to do this. He can also install a screen door, although he is NOT a carpenter.
People are pretty amazing, how they adapt 🙂
LikeLike
Empathy, Collaboration and Problem Solving – back to the basics! Love it!
LikeLike
WDLLL-WHAT DOES LEARNING LOOK LIKE when skills are acquired?
Look at WHAT THE STUDETNS PRODUCE!
WHAT DOES LEARNING LOOK LIKE?WHAT DOES LEARNING LOOK LIKE? WHAT DOES LEARNING LOOK LIKE? WHAT DOES LEARNING LOOK LIKE?
THIS was THE question posed to all teachers who were participating in the REAL national standards –3RD LEVEL– research, conducted by Pew, on THE PRINCIPLES OF LEARNING, out of Harvard. (3rd level research means that the principle has to work EVERYWHERE, not just in some town in California, or some charter school owned by Eli Broad.
WDLLL—I heard this every day when my NYC practice was chosen as the NYC cohort, because of the success in writing and reading, by my students over the 8 years of my tenure.
I gave no tests… ironic– in the light of today’s article in the NY Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/11/nyregion/mastery-based-learning-no-grades.html?emc=edit_tnt_20170812&nlid=50637717&tntemail0=y&_r=0
“Mastery-based learning requires a great deal of coordination and teacher time.”
You bet! It did!
Oh my…gotta watch this… wanna bet they bring computers into this.
“To make the system work, teachers used New York State curriculum guidelines and Common Core standards to develop a rubric of every skill students needed before they could move to the next grade. ”
Well, YES, this reveals the method I used to evaluate my students skills… I assessed their writing in their portfolio, in order to see to know if they had learned how to write. WHAT DOES LEARNING LOOK LIKE?
You see, kids who wrote 50 words about a book, in disconnected sentences in September, then wrote 1000 words– organized into interesting sentences in coherent paragraphs00 in their Reader’s Letters to me, .in June… and they won every writing contest in the city and…when the new ELA writing test came out… they had the high set scores IN THE STATE when 3/4 of NYC failed.
THUS< When Pew was searching for the final cohort for the research, they RECOGNIZED What Learning Looked Like,, when they passed the kid’s writing posted in the hallway. “How old are these kids?” they said, wondering how they could write like that. They were 12 & 13 years old.
…. and then they asked me..HOW DID YOU DO THIS?
For 2 years, they studied and filmed my classroom practice, and I can assure you they were not looking at pretty decorated bulletin boards or banks of high tech, — things that give the impression to parents that learning is ongoing in that room.
Recognizing that THE ACQUISITION OF SKILLS is the goal, not a score on a test,is the basis of SKILLS BASED LEARNING.
So, what happened to me.
Well, after NY State’s English Council awarded me the top honor of EDUCATOR Of EXCELLENCE, it was difficult to charge me with incompetence (although eventually, when all else failed, they did) I was removed from my practice, sent to a rubber room on false allegations of corporal punishment, and MORE!
My classroom was dismantled, the 1000 books I HAD PURCHASED FOR MY KID’S READING LIBRARY was distributed to other teachers, and my research was TRASHED… while the UFT did not a thing… until my husband contacted Randi herself; that was on the day they alleged that I wanted to kill the principal… someone said that they heard me says that, and in lawless workplaces like schools, anything goes.
I LEARNED a lot about corruption, and about who runs education in NYC…
Now, my former students in their thirties find me on facebook and linked in , and tell me that I WAS THE TEACHER WHO MADE THE DIFFERENCE and they LEARNED THE SKILLS THEY NEEDED.
LikeLike
Wow. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLike
I recently spoke to someone working for a non-partisan tax/budget accountability group, &, in defending the premise of a funding fix, used the mantra that “we have to make kids college & career ready.” I found this extremely disturbing.
This came from that group’s collaboration w/Stand for Children, Teach Plus, E for E & another school privatization group.
Which begets the following advice: to those non-partisan bean-counters working on state budgets:
TALK TO PUBLIC SCHOOL EDUCATORS & PARENTS!!! (& do your research, KNOW who you are getting education advice from.)
&, yes, I AM yelling.
LikeLike
“human skills that machines can’t easily replicate, like empathy, collaboration and problem-solving.”
So let us talk problem solving . The problem is not that the wheel displaced a hundred laborers dragging a stone up the road . Or that the gasoline engine revolutionized modern farming displacing millions in the farm belt . Or that the production line increased manufacturing productivity (automation) producing multiples of what could have been produced before Henry Ford popularized that model of production .
Each of these advances one can argue has resulted in increased standards of livings with less labor being required .
The problem is how the fruits of that technology are distributed and who owns that technology . Bill Gates did not invent the PC the internet nor even the software that bares his name . Technology is evolutionary one advance built on the next . 17 people were working on the light bulb at the same time ,that is not a coincidence.The same goes for the airplane and the automobile, Windows and Apple .
Many of the technological wonders we have today were and are being funded by public investment . There is a potential Zika vaccine like the polio vaccine before it funded by public dollars .
Unlike the polio vaccine.
“This vaccine has been in the news because the current plan is for the Army to now give Sanofi exclusive rights to market the drug for seven years. In other words, even though the Army put up the money and took the risk (Sanofi still got paid even if its efforts went nowhere), Sanofi is still getting a government-granted monopoly on the vaccine… Sanofi may price the vaccine out of the reach of many people in the developing world.” . Dean Baker
The last thing the oligarchy wants is an educated populace capable of having the discussion of “who gets what ,when and how ” They not only know this they have been consciously acting on this for almost 50 years.
They have attacked those who would threaten their domination of that discussion “collaboration and problem-solving.” . Starting in the Universities. translating down to k-12 .But of course when economic domination and subjugation of the masses is your goal . You never can start to young.
The problem is not automation ,not a skills shortage, those discussions muddy the waters .
The problem is economic and thus political domination .
LikeLike
Well stated, Joel, well stated!
LikeLike
off topic
Watching what is happening in Virginia . I am now with you and Lloyd .
I hate to enrich gun manufactures but if those 5,000 anti fascists were locked and loaded the 1000 fascists would not be on the streets .
I would like to know where is the National guard ,the tanks. . Doesn’t look like Baltimore or Ferguson to me .
Think I will ask Andrew to make NY an open carry State . Can you picture 400,000 protesters with AR15s and clubs being allowed to march past Trump tower.
For gods sake I watched the police clear a public Sidewalk with a peaceful Move on / occupy rally in front of the State Supreme court at Foley square . Declaring the protestors were blocking access to a public building at 3pm on a late November Sunday And that was after directing them to that sidewalk rather that the park across the street. . The only other presence other than police and protestors . Pigeons
Again who decides who gets what.
LikeLike
I understand your frustration, Joel. But I do not agree with concealed or open carry. I believe in using guns for hunting and target practice and properly taking guns to and from those activities. Properly being unloaded, and/or magazine out and empty.
While in fantasy it sounds feasible for all to carry, in reality it would be a blood bath with many dead and seriously injured. That’s not a good policy outcome.
I have not seen footage of the protest nor have I read much about it yet. My question is where were the police in all of this? Maybe they did what they could but it seems when concerned citizens of the left persuasion attempt these types of protests they are put in isolated cages so as to not disrupt things, the Ferguson riots not withstanding.
I like your last question: “Again who decides who gets what (police treatment)?
LikeLike
Second.
LikeLike
Duane E Swacker
I do not agree with what I am saying on guns and am well aware how it will end . It rarely if ever ends well as Hedges points out in “Days of Rebellion.” (confessions only read his discussions on the book.) But the fantasy works or there would already be an AR15 in the basement
One of my life long retorts to second amendment advocate has been a rifle does you no good when you would need a cruise missile,
But where were the police there should have been a line of police between the opposing groups and overwhelming force waiting to move in at a moments notice . The guns may have been legal were the clubs
bats ,brass knuckles and knives.
.
LikeLiked by 1 person
bears / not bares
LikeLike
I’m with Duane.
LikeLike
Second second.
LikeLike
Joel – you are so right.
It’s my 45th high school reunion this weekend and I had a nice conversation with an old classmate who moved to Arizona. Both he and his son ran for public office and lost. I follow him on Facebook and he’s on the right side of the issues and was running for office to try to make things better for his community but politics as usual won.
Anyway, we were talking about many of the issues mentioned on this blog and he made a comment similar to yours. In effect he basically said: those in power want to keep the populace ignorant. If the masses don’t question their actions, them they can get away with all sorts of shenanigans and still be re-elected.
My mind keeps going back to Lincoln:
You can fool some of the people some of the time but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.
LikeLike
Second.
LikeLike
“I think I have lost all sense of reality.”
No, Diane, you haven’t lost all sense of reality. You’re fine!
It’s the people who believe in and promote that horse manure posing as thought who are the ones who have “lost it”.
That article deserves a 1,000 font size in bold with multiple exclamation points WTF!
LikeLike
I am offended. How could you insult horse manure that way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In 2004, Achieve,Inc, the Education Trust, and Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, and William and Flora Hewett Foundation started marketing the myth that specific high school requirements would provide the necessary “college and career readiness” for “high-performance, high- growth jobs.”
The report: Ready or Not: Creating a High School Diploma that Counts was designed to say that American education had one main mission, preparing students for those jobs—projected to “ support a family well above the poverty level, provide benefits, and offer clear pathways for career advancement through further education and training. (p. 105).”
The writers relied on the 2002–03, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook, and course taking patterns and transcripts of a cohort of students who graduated from high schools in 1992 in order to make absurd claims about the “proper curriculum content” for entry into high-growth, well-paying jobs.
This effort, called the American Diploma Project, morphed into the Common Core State Standards, with math and ELA the be-all and end-all of education and the meme of “college and career readiness” implanted as if the only thing that mattered in education.
There was not an ounce of reliable information in that report. The economy tanked in 2008. It has not yet recovered.
Now the tech industry is pushing computer everything into school. Here is a recent account of who is doing this and how well. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/27/technology/education-partovi-computer-science-coding-apple-microsoft.html
Here are the Bureau of Labor statistics job projections for the next 10 years 2014-2014. These projections are modified every two years. A typical US worker has held 11 jobs before the age 44.
People who say that career planning should begin in pre-school and kindergarten are really doing damage to education. The “college and career” meme has been marketed as if there is nothing more that matters, and that these two emphases will guarantee a great future for students and the economy. NOT, NOT, NOT.
FASTEST GROWING OCCUPATIONS
Bachelors degree or higher required
Number of new jobs in thousands and median salary
Physical therapists 71.8 $85,000
Nurse practioners 44.7 $100,900
Physician assistants 28.7 $101,480
Statisticians 10.1 $80,500
Operations researcher analyst 27.8 $78,300
SOME POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION REQUIRED
Web developer 39.5 $ 66,310
Physical therapy assistants 31.9 $56,610
Occupational therapy assistants 14.1 $59,010
Commercial drivers 1.6 $49,090
FASTEST GROWING JOBS OVERALL
Home health aides 348.4 $22,600
Physical therapy assistants 31.9 $56,610
Occupational therapy assistants 14.1 $59,010
Physical therapy aides 19.5 $25,680
Wind turbine service technicians 4.8 $52,260
OCCUPATIONS WITH THE MOST JOBS

Personal care aides 458.1 $21,920
Registered nurses 439.3 $68,450
Home health aides 348.3 $22,600
Food services, fast food 343.5 $19,440
Retail sales 314.2 $22,680
LikeLike
Pretty much why economists who study the labor markets don’t see the same things that the Plutocrats do . The hard economic data does not support their claims .
There is a line used in the construction trades . To describe this phenomenon:
” A good line of $-it is worth two tool boxes” .
Chomsky would phrase it a little different
“propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state”
The noise is deafening and repeated ad nauseam . So much so that the self serving memes are believed by those pushing them as a distraction from what our real problems are.
LikeLike
Thank you, Laura.
LikeLike
The problem is that too many people believe these opinions are verifiable truths that are backed up by viable research. Not enough of us are asking – How did you come up with that? Or even Huh? We just accept the BS they are giving us.
I’m as guilty as anyone else. I used to buy into the rhetoric but between Diane and the others who contribute to this blog I have gotten a real education.
Thank you Laura.
LikeLike
“Ms. Umaschi Bers developed the Kibo robot that Declan was using and ScratchJr, a programming language for the under-7 set. But she says the bigger point is to teach computational thinking. That essentially means breaking down problems into smaller parts and creating plans to solve them — with prototypes, feedback and revisions — in all parts of life.”
Well, computational thinking necessarily means algorithmic thinking and algorithmic thinking necessarily means analytical thinking and analytical thinking represents not at all a new way of thinking, and so neither does computational thinking.
Computational thinking is but old wine in the new bottle labeled technology of robotics, or machines. To deeply inculcate young children in computational thinking is to fix in their minds never to see to solve system problems, and to believe system problems can always be solved mechanistically.
When grown up, such children will create more educational problems, more societal problems, more social problems, more environmental problems, more sustainable resource problems, etc., than they solve. Earth’s carrying capacity will be stressed more than ever. But, of course, there is Mars, the opportunity to do it all over again.
LikeLike
Ed,
You wrote: “When grown up, such children will create more educational problems, more societal problems, more social problems, more environmental problems, more sustainable resource problems, etc., than they solve.”
AGREE! AGREE! AGREE!
LikeLike
Thanks for that post, Ed!
LikeLike
There are too many groups predicting a predominantly robot future. Isn’t it more common practice in science to publish the results of a study than to publish the predictions on which the study was, well, predicated? As I recall, twenty years ago, some people were predicting flying cars in twenty years. As I recall, ten years ago, people were predicting a never ending stock market boom. It’s good to make predictions. It’s human nature and an evolutionary advantage. Predicting when to plant and when to harvest is good. Quarter century-spanning economic forecasts are kind of ridiculous, though. Don’t rely on predictions of a robot future.
LikeLike
Preparing for a future not yet written. Children need to develop curiosity. Children need to learn empathy. Children need to learn that failing is not the end of the world. We have to stop trying to make them into small and shorter adults.
LikeLike