Psychologist Jean M. Twenge writes in the Atlantic that Smartphones have changed adolescence, and not for the better.
She calls adolescents today the iGen generation. Their lives are defined by their Smartphones:
“Why are today’s teens waiting longer to take on both the responsibilities and the pleasures of adulthood? Shifts in the economy, and parenting, certainly play a role. In an information economy that rewards higher education more than early work history, parents may be inclined to encourage their kids to stay home and study rather than to get a part-time job. Teens, in turn, seem to be content with this homebody arrangement—not because they’re so studious, but because their social life is lived on their phone. They don’t need to leave home to spend time with their friends.
“If today’s teens were a generation of grinds, we’d see that in the data. But eighth-, 10th-, and 12th-graders in the 2010s actually spend less time on homework than Gen X teens did in the early 1990s. (High-school seniors headed for four-year colleges spend about the same amount of time on homework as their predecessors did.) The time that seniors spend on activities such as student clubs and sports and exercise has changed little in recent years. Combined with the decline in working for pay, this means iGen teens have more leisure time than Gen X teens did, not less.
“So what are they doing with all that time? They are on their phone, in their room, alone and often distressed….
“The number of teens who get together with their friends nearly every day dropped by more than 40 percent from 2000 to 2015; the decline has been especially steep recently. It’s not only a matter of fewer kids partying; fewer kids are spending time simply hanging out. That’s something most teens used to do: nerds and jocks, poor kids and rich kids, C students and A students. The roller rink, the basketball court, the town pool, the local necking spot—they’ve all been replaced by virtual spaces accessed through apps and the web.
“You might expect that teens spend so much time in these new spaces because it makes them happy, but most data suggest that it does not. The Monitoring the Future survey, funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and designed to be nationally representative, has asked 12th-graders more than 1,000 questions every year since 1975 and queried eighth- and 10th-graders since 1991. The survey asks teens how happy they are and also how much of their leisure time they spend on various activities, including nonscreen activities such as in-person social interaction and exercise, and, in recent years, screen activities such as using social media, texting, and browsing the web. The results could not be clearer: Teens who spend more time than average on screen activities are more likely to be unhappy, and those who spend more time than average on nonscreen activities are more likely to be happy.”
These trends are not likely to change. Parents should know what is going on.

It’s also important to be aware of the effects of the radiation emitted from wireless devices. Independent scientists (not paid by the industry to produce results and findings they want) agree that there are harmful effects from chronic long term exposure to low levels of electromagnetic frequency radiation.
LikeLike
Citation?
LikeLike
I haven’t looked at this for a long time but my impression is that the science is inconclusive because long-term EMF studies haven’t been happening long enough. My first job as a lawyer involved litigation over excess umbrella insurance policies, and I quickly noticed that essentially every insurance policy carves out exceptions for EMF liability. High-level radio frequencies can cook meat. Long-term exposure to low-level EMF, I think the jury’s still out.
LikeLike
When I went to get my last eye checkup, I was asked how much time I spent watching TV and working on the computer. The assumption was that these activities were detrimental to vision.
What is the long term affect on teenagers who have spent their whole lives texting and reading small print on iPhones or iPads or computers? Will this affect not only their vision but their abilities to think about anything in depth? [Think about elderly Trump who only can Twitter. His small brain can’t think deeply on any subject.]
There are computer ‘games’ for very young children. What will be the long term affect on their minds, especially since there is a push in education for the ‘exultation of great learning’ that comes from technology.
Who needs live teachers anymore when technology solves all problems?
LikeLiked by 1 person
And who needs live human interaction when kids are leaning less and less HOW to interact with humans.
LikeLike
Well, again, there’s the issue of cause and effect. Are teens more depressed and isolated because they’re using their gadgets more, or are they using their gadgets more because they’re more depressed and isolated? I would expect there’s an interaction between the two, but we can’t overlook how the world has changed, especially since September 11 and the global crash of 2008. Those events themselves, combined with the media hype surrounding those and other issues, created skyrocketing rates of economic insecurity and social/personal anxiety. I have to believe that teens are picking up on their parents’ increased fears and worries for the future.
LikeLike
You make a good point.
LikeLike
I remember the days when they said that TV was destroying America and turning our minds to mush. Oh, wait. The same was said of Rock & Roll and Elvis (Swivel Hips) Presley. There are negatives and positives with any new technology. Do the negatives outweigh the positives of the smartypants phones? In a way, these phones are like magic (to someone born before 1950), they are hand held computers with more computing power than was had by the onboard computers of the Moon missions. They can challenge and expand the mind depending on what you are watching or listening to. You can communicate with people in other countries, other continents, you have a virtual library at your fingertips. The same gloom and doom predictions were also made about phones, the dumb phones, and cars. Some of the predictions came true but there were also big positives and unexpected results that could not be predicted.
LikeLike
I just spent a good deal of time explaining why phones are not “smart”, and why watching TV and phone videos are wastes of time. My phone deleted the comment instead of posting it. Talk about painful irony! That’s enough. I have to cut this out and go put actual information up on my actual classroom walls. Technology stinks.
LikeLike
Tech is a double edged sword. On one hand, social media allows us instant access to information and contacts with others. How else would I have met all the great people who read this blog daily?
On the other hand, it fries your brain. I have trouble reading books. I do it, but it is hard to concentrate. Nicholas Carr wrote about this in “The Shallows.”
LikeLike
I have found the same thing, Diane, although I can still escape into a good mystery. I started experimenting with my phone while on vacation and learned how to take pictures and retrieve email (which I finally disabled as I watched it eat up my allowable data). With all of my children around, I got some valuable tutoring. I actually sent my first photo to my daughter the other day, and I texted one of my son’s to make sure he made his plane connections. Now I have turned the phone off. It is too attractive a time waster (like my computer!), and I find it much harder to focus on reading that requires more than a little thought.
LikeLike
…and not only that!:
“…this invention will produce forgetfulness in the minds of those who learn to use it, because they will not practice their memory. Their trust in writing, produced by external characters which are no part of themselves, will discourage the use of their own memory within them. You have invented an elixir not of memory, but of reminding; and you offer your pupils the appearance of wisdom, not true wisdom, for they will read many things without instruction and will therefore seem to know many things, when they are for the most part ignorant and hard to get along with, since they are not wise, but only appear wise.”
Oh, wait — that wasn’t about cell phones; that was Socrates speaking about the invention of writing & how it was going to destroy true learning. Guess we’re too far gone now…
🙂
LikeLike
Gotta love this post! Thanks, Lenny!
LikeLike
Any new technology has a profound effect on those who use it – Socrates was absolutely right. The use of the phonetic alphabet led to linear, sequential thinking and the rise of abstraction and rationalism. We are now in what McLuhan would call an “aural culture” – in other words a post-literate world in which everything is happening at once. All major changes in technology are stressful, but in my experience the smartphone is leading us into uncharted waters.
LikeLike
“Northanger Abbey” by Jane Austen is all about the dangers of reading trashy horror novels.
LikeLike
In addition to wasting time, smartphones and social media have provided another way to bully vulnerable young people. They provide another avenue for predatory behavior to torment the fragile and weak.
LikeLike
Agree, retired teacher. Another part in all this insanity is: “WHO PROFITS?” Think of the the personnel, who needs to be hired, servers going down, equipment purchase and updates. Omg….this costs tons of $$$$$. And for what? Answer: PROFITS for the FEW.
LikeLike
Yes! Cyberbullying is off the charts at my high school. The assistant principal spends much time dealing with this issue, and much of it occurs outside of school.
LikeLike
The phones aren’t necessarily the culprit – just the vehicle. Cyberbullying has been prevalent pretty much since the introduction of the internet. 10 or 20 years ago the problem was on MySpace or Facebook, especially if kids had computers in their rooms that Mom and Dad had a hard time monitoring. Now there are so many more social media platforms. Granted, it’s even harder to monitor a kid’s phone, and kids are spending even more time on phones than they did on their in-room PCs, but the problem lies more with social media, not to mention the nature of tween and teen kids.
LikeLike
“Cyberbullying has been prevalent pretty much since the introduction of the internet.”
Yes, it has. When I first moved out here 13 years ago with my youngest son to the countryside and started teaching at the high school, fairly close to after the beginning of the school year, we held an all-school internet safety assembly in the gym. The state highway patrolman who was presenting started out the presentation with an example of the dangers of the internet-a girl being bullied from information gleaned off her myspace/fb page, or whatever it was, I don’t remember exactly which of the two or if was some other site/place, even though I am the father of the girl the officer mentioned. Yes, when he started talking about the incident my son, who was a freshman at the school turned to his classmates and said “That’s my sister who he’s talking about”. I turned to the other teachers standing with me and said “That’s my daughter he’s referring to”.
Needless to say it was a rather surreal experience. And yes, cyberbullying has been around since the beginning of kids using the internet as a social medium.
LikeLike
I retired before smartphones existed. How the heck do teachers deal with smartphones in the classroom, especially a classroom of 30 kids or more?
What’s coming down the pike is truly frightening: smart alec phones, sarcastic phones that lord it over you, make snide and sarcastic comments and which are very judgmental. (just kidding, I think)
LikeLike
I didn’t care what the adminimals said about students being able to have cell phones in class, my rule was off and put away. Most students were fine with it but every now and again one would get sassy. I had one girl say that she wasn’t using her cellphone and “Why are you looking at my crotch?” (which drew audible moans from the class) where she had been typing away at it, no not her crotch but the cell phone. I had to bite my tongue because my first reaction to that question was “Why are you playing with your crotch in class?” I didn’t ask that, obviously, but I did tell her to get up and go put the phone on the desk. To which she balked until everyone else in the class let her know she was caught and to do as requested.
After she put it on the desk and returned to her seat, before she sat down, I told her to not sit down but to pack up her bag and head to the office. I felt the other students deserved to see I wasn’t going to tolerate her nasty insinuation. Now I averaged maybe one student a year that I sent to the office so when she got to the office they knew it must have been something bad to get me riled up. That was four years ago!
Now, I generally forgot about those incidents as soon as I write them up because I didn’t want the incident to “cloud” my thinking in regard to the student. I’ve been retired for two years which even buries those incidents that much further into the background.
But I took my niece and her two little ones camping, floating and fishing the other weekend-it’s a popular place on summer weekends-hundreds of rafters, canoers, kayakers, especially on Saturday. I was talking with a bunch in a raft as they were going by and they asked where I was from and I told them. One said they were from here also and that so and so, a former student of mine was right over on the beach. It was the girl from the cell phone incident, which I still didn’t remember about until I went over to say hello and she said I had kicked her out of class over her cell phone. I laughed and said she must have done something really obnoxious-she didn’t volunteer any details. It wasn’t till later on that the tape started to replay in my brain over what happened.
I think the cellphone had already gotten to her brain when she was a freshman.
LikeLike
Oh, Duane, I would have been so tempted to voice your unspoken comeback. I might have gotten away with it since I am a “mature” female I don’t know if I ever said it or just dreamed it, but I at least imagined myself saying the following, “You are doing one of two things, and I don’t think you want to admit to one of them. Put your phone away!” I do know that my fast reflexes allowed me to swipe numerous phones . The class and student always laughed since I just kept them until the end of class. It was hard in tight quarters to follow the “best practice” of roaming the classroom, but I did it enough to catch them off guard with their phones.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great story. I have a nuanced view of the matter, however. One of my best classes in geometry was the group of girls I had that constantly took pictures of the problems on the board, then went home and worked on them. One of the worst was another group that wanted tell me they were answering their mother every time they were on the phone, and they were telling the truth. I would have killed for a few deviants who actually thought for themselves instead of asking mommy.
LikeLike
I’m no Luddite, but he have inundated classrooms with so much “technology” that we have taken away the hands on, engage the brain in many fashions, and methods that have worked for many eons in mankind’s history. Everything new and shiny my glow for a while but it tarnishes quickly and the whole teaching and learning process is tarnished at the same time.
As I’ve said before, if a teacher can’t get up in front of a class (talking at least middle and high school, elementary is different) with a chalkboard and chalk, or a white board and marker and engage the class then they shouldn’t be in the classroom. Yeah, old fuddy duddy thinker that I am! Hell all ed majors should have to take a course where the only thing they do is to prepare a class and teach for 15 minutes or so without any aids other than paper/pencil, chalk/marker/board. Have 4-5 do so each class, and have all write up critiques. The way to an “A” is to have participated in all of the classes and everyone’s presentations.
LikeLike
I agree with Joe that technology (smartphones in particular) is a double-edged sword. However, the two biggest changes I have observed in my students over the last few years are their decreased attention spans and an overall lack of curiosity and willingness to engage. Not that these factors were nonexistent prior to the widespread use of phones, but they have certainly been exacerbated by the instant visual, social, and biochemical gratification phones provide to students. I teach high school English, and even my AP students question whether they have to read an entire novel since it’s time-consuming and requires sustained focus. I have to work harder each year to keep their attention, but with 40+ kids in each class (standard in LAUSD), there are always a few who simply cannot stop texting or pursuing other activities on their phones. One cannot dispute the convenience of having a limitless supply of data at one’s fingertips. However, without the skills necessary to use that information critically, my concern is that many of my kids will simply become mindless consumers of whatever they’re fed through their screens.
LikeLike
I noticed that same trend as we introduced high stakes testing.
LikeLike
“the two biggest changes I have observed in my students over the last few years are their decreased attention spans and an overall lack of curiosity and willingness to engage”
Could that be a result of the standards and testing regime that is so common these days and have made learning into a boring process for so long that by the time they get to high school they say “screw this shit”. They know they are being used.
LikeLike
“…the two biggest changes I have observed in my students over the last few years are their decreased attention spans and an overall lack of curiosity and willingness to engage.”
While those are concerns, observation of my daughter, while anecdotal, suggests there’s a positive side also. Disclosure: We’re a highly tech-savvy family, early adopters of computers (my wife bought her first in 1986; I’m an amateur programmer). Our daughter, who has ADHD & other learning disabilities, is about to begin college this fall. While she does spend more time gaming & watching entertainment on her phone & other devices than we’d like, there are many times it’s encouraged her curiosity. She’ll often look up something that catches her interest, just because she wants to learn more about it; not because it’s required, but because she chooses to. I’m sure she wouldn’t bother to make her way to a library to research these items, (the ADHD makes that even less likely), but when it’s available instantly, she’ll do it, & reap the rewards. She’s also benefitted greatly throughout primary & high school from various assistive tech devices & apps that made it possible for her to learn in ways that work for her, fulfilling & even excelling in course requirements. A couple of years ago, we weren’t certain she’d even be able to earn a local diploma (NYS non-Regents diploma for IEP students); ultimately she earned a 3.4 GPA. She’ll be attending Guttman Community College, part of CUNY.
Yesterday we had a meeting with her advisor at Guttman’s AcessAbility (accommodations) office. The advisor discussed with her various accommodations she could use, including assistive technology, some of which could be used on her phone or iPad.
For us, & many families like us, the positives of this technology far outweigh the negatives.
LikeLike
The assistive technology that has been and continues to be developed to ASSIST children with their learning has made a tremendous difference in the lives of a lot of students with special needs. It is determining the balance between assisting and hindering the learning process that is under discussion. Just like cell phones have allowed for much greater flexibility in how we connect with others, the driver who insists on talking or texting while driving may be significantly impaired in their ability to drive safely. Who hasn’t seen someone blithely sail through a stop sign while fielding a phone call? I know that is not the best of examples for a rebuttal, but I’m sure we could crash the blog with far better examples of tech abuse.
LikeLike
My impression was that the topic was the negative aspects of cell phones in general: based on the title, “Are Smartphones Destroying a Generation?” Of course any technology can be used irresponsibly or even maliciously (e.g., even a relatively ancient technology, knives can be used as tools or weapons), but I see that more as a problem with society &/or individual persons, as opposed to any particular piece of technology itself.
LikeLike
“Of course any technology can be used irresponsibly or even maliciously …but I see that more as a problem with society &/or individual persons,” That’s like the argument against gun control. The problem isn’t guns but the people who use them. My response has always been that the argument is really a solid reason for careful regulation since we can’t rely on individuals to use them responsibly. The same with technology. Kids and even adults don’t seem to be able to always use the tools responsibly. Does a day go by when some idiot doesn’t cause a traffic accident while on the phone or even texting? I have enough trouble limiting my usage of the computer; I will admit that there are frequently more productive uses for my time.
You are right that the title of the post would indicate a certain topic. I suppose I was more reacting to the ongoing discussion we have had on the blog around technology and it use and/or abuse, which you got into in your comments. We are very much on the same page on the uses of assistive tech in special ed and there are certainly many valid and useful applications of technology in the mainstream classroom. There is also a lot of junk out there as well as a real danger of losing the strength of direct interaction between human beings within the classroom.
LikeLike
I understand your point about guns. However, I don’t think it’s a real equivalent as, unlike smartphones, guns are designed specifically as weapons, for the sole purpose of doing damage to the objective; smartphones are designed as a tool, with harm being a side effect unintended by the creators. Regulation restricting irresponsible or malicious use of smartphones & related technology is developing; as with any new technology, it takes a while for legislation to adjust & catch up. There was a time that a license wasn’t required to drive a car; drivers of the time objected to the restrictions. Many states now have laws regarding distracted driving & online harassment. Enforcing such laws is yet another issue, but it is being addressed. One positive difference is that smartphone regulation isn’t tied up in the politically-charged atmosphere surrounding gun legislation.
I agree that the problem is really some people’s difficulties with self-regulation, but because of that, restrictions on any particular piece of technology will only be a band-aid, addressing the symptoms only as they relate to that item. Before smartphones, such people had damaging attachments to other activities; if all smartphones vanished tomorrow, those people would latch onto something else. It’s certainly appropriate for there to be laws regulating responsible use of smartphones & other tech, but technology itself isn’t the root of the problem.
LikeLike
“Of course any technology can be used irresponsibly or even maliciously …but I see that more as a problem with society &/or individual persons,”
I think what bothers me the most is the seemingly headlong rush to incorporate more and more high tech into daily existence. I didn’t mean to imply that gun regulation and tech regs are equivalents. Instead I was responding to the implication that because it is our own fault that we cannot control our own impulses any attempts to control excesses are futile. I think you did not mean that. However, even though I have been out of the classroom for awhile now, I saw the obsession with phones take over and the totally inadequate response of administrators in my district. Since it was a poor district, overuse of more advanced tech tools was beyond their reach although I am sure they would have bought into it if they had the resources with little thought or planning. Coupling the heavy marketing of tech solutions to education problems, I am very leery of tech cheerleading.
LikeLike
You’re far more qualified than I to comment on schools’ response to students’ classroom use of unauthorized personal technology. My guess is, like legislation, that too is catching up to the tech. The school from which my daughter just graduated enforces strict rules regarding such devices, complicated by the fact that by its nature as a special-needs school, some students’ IEPs specify use of certain technology. My daughter did experience disciplinary consequences from occasional inappropriate use of a computer (doing work from another class, an infraction that could have occurred without technology), even though use of the computer itself was permitted, within specified parameters. So it seems it is possible for schools to take effective action in this area.
LikeLike
“Teens who spend more time than average on screen activities are more likely to be unhappy… .”
Why are those teens likely to be unhappy. This is my thinking – because studies also show that 70 percent of communication is non-verbal and if you do not have physical face-to-face time with friends and family, that is missing from your life in affect stripping 70-percent of what makes living life worth while.
Interaction with friends includes non-verbal cues and without those cues, it makes sense that unhappiness reigns.
How do they know that their virtual friends are actually friends unless they meet them on a regular basis and pick up the non-verbal cues that those friends actually like them.
Actually, maybe it is much more than 70-percent.
“Dr. Albert Mehrabian, author of Silent Messages, conducted several studies on nonverbal communication. He found that 7% of any message is conveyed through words, 38% through certain vocal elements, and 55% through nonverbal elements (facial expressions, gestures, posture, etc).”
http://www.nonverbalgroup.com/2011/08/how-much-of-communication-is-really-nonverbal
What happens to a person when they lose 93-percent of their ability to communicate and connect with others in the real world?
Maybe the tech industry will make up for that when they start selling affordable holographic smartphones so people can see the nonverbal elements. Then instead of walking around not paying attention to where they are walking while texting, they will spend all their time staring at a hologram of their virtual friends that the almost never meet in the real world.
LikeLike
Ahhh…a life without smartphones! I always tell the kids how bad they have it with their phones. I used to be able to take off for hours without mommy and daddy knowing where I was (of course, they had a general idea). Kids now are attached to their parents at every moment. I didn’t have to answer texts or emails. I wasn’t perpetually bombarded by garbage info. It was great. I played “Charlie’s Angels” with my friends and rode my bike and stayed out late at night (9:00 – Wow!) in the summer playing under the stars. Sure, I was bullied at school, but my parents actually KNEW who the kids were, and I wasn’t invited to commit suicide by people on social media who I didn’t know. My parents could actually take steps to take care of a lot of it. Those of us who grew up without this technology think about it. Isn’t there a part of you that would have those days back? I know I would. I feel sad for kids today. Their lives are filled with meaningless crap on their phones and worrying about what people they don’t even know think of them. They can’t focus. They are already addicted to technological heroin. Unfortunately, the parents are usually the facilitators. Adults are just as addicted and probably just as clueless about how to wean themselves off of it all. So, my answer is yes. Tech is destroying a generation.
LikeLike
Great points, Mamie!!
Yes, it is still very nice to not be connected for the very reasons you mention. Everyone and their brother want me to get a device. I have no desire, even when driving cross country.
LikeLike
It’s a sad commentary on our society but smart phones do impede the young person’s ability to develop proper communication skills . These devices foster an expectation of immediate gratification that causes a person to develop an intolerance to the normal stresses that a person should be able to endure in their daily lives.The art of conversation is indeed fading.and along with it the good feeling that accompanied a positive interaction with another human being . Sad indeed !
LikeLike
On the bright side, whatever’s coming down the pike is going to be even more horrifying, and these will be the good old days.
LikeLike
😉
LikeLike
Como siempre, eh.
LikeLike
I really struggle with articles/analyses like these. As I’ve aged I have tried to keep in mind how often those of us who age claim the sky is falling with the younger.
With my kids I’ve also seen the benefits of phones. Excellent communication on tough issues using text has often been far more useful than in-class essay assignments according to strict Common Core standards.
And text communication by phone is excellent training to COMMUNICATE with writing as opposed to getting good grades with writing. (This is an epidemic out of colleges – college writing leads students to develop styles to show off themselves rather than to communicate.)
As to the shift in activity… At least locally here we are continuing to see the loss of school sponsored activities at the high school level. They have often been driven by federal and state mandates which have shifted funding with NCLB, RTT, emphasis on testing, changes in testing, and imposition of CCSS.
With research background, I’ll offer a thought (without proof) that it’s possible what this guy recorded was the result of changes in schools NOT changes in phone usage.
So…call me skeptical. It CAN be a problem. But it also might be just fine if we could see how some things are lost but others are found – and on balance that’s just what happens with generations.
LikeLike
Doug, r u kidding? Phones vs CC essays. Rlly?! Not fair comparison.
As you can tell, I am not skilled in text speak. It took me awhile to figure out what one of my latina students was saying when she wrote IDK on everything. She legitimately did not have the English to respond well. After two years someone realized that she had been entitled to actual ESL classes (not mine).
LikeLike
My phone will not let me post my anti-phone comment. Let’s try it in pieces:
I just pedaled back home from class. OK, back to it! I agree there are good uses of phones. I visit this blog on my phone every day. This blog is the best use of technology in existence. It’s the public education savior site. The Answer Sheet, Curmudgucation, Deutch29, and the other blogs that work in conjunction with you, Diane, are very close seconds. Third, I like being able to read newspapers like the Huff and Wa Posts, Guardian, Times of India, Mainichi Shimbun, etc. that are not widely distributed to the left coast on paper. (Although they were more widely distributed when there were newsstands.) But I must take exception to the idea that I have a virtual library at my fingertips. Most of internet content is corporate, and not the informative kind. Most of the internet has never been submitted to an editor or a publisher with a reputation on the line. Most of cyberspace is polluted with junk.
LikeLike
It won’t let me add the second paragraph. Let’s try 3 and 4:
Phones and tablets are sold as “smart”, smarter than TV, and marketed to consumers (and school districts) as products that make people smarter and more powerful. Talking on an actual telephone is now considered “dumb”. Is visiting an actual library also dumb? I wonder. I don’t think downloading the polluted junk of cyberspace makes people smarter or more powerful, generally speaking. I would like to think I am relatively smart, and I spend much more time looking at paper than at screens. Just saying.
Working as a teacher, I see students using phones and experience administrators insisting that tablets and websites are going to revolutionize education. Technology is sold as a panacea instead of as a Pandora’s box. Maybe it’s not Pandora’s box, but let me tell you what those kids are doing with their phones: they’re taking selfies and overlaying cartoons over the pictures, then texting about them, “Bro, u sea dat fleeky pic of me with rabbit ears.” They are still just watching cartoons, really. (Duane, that thing where the student puts her phone between her legs and says, “Why are you looking between my legs,” is ubiquitous.)
LikeLike
And 5:
And that brings me to the worst part of technology, the school administrator who sees it as just the best thing ever, way better than actual face to face interaction. John Deasy: “iPads are the Civil Rights of the 21st century”. OK, I have written (on my little cellphone) a very long comment, and you all probably don’t need to read a multifaceted explanation of why believing in tech as a panacea is so wrong and so dangerous. Deasy’ comment probably says it all. But let me just say this: Be careful believing that buying phones and tablets is better than having libraries and newsstands. You might end up paying for corporate cartoons of rabbits and ducks instead of keeping me in the classroom.
LikeLike
I wish you could get Paragraph 2 to come through. The others are spot on!
LikeLike
My phone is too “smart” to let me post paragraph 2. I tried too many times. It was about television ruining my generation.
LikeLike
And that’s the problem with the internet. Bill Gates decides what you can and cannot read.
LikeLike
Sister Honoria used to say, “If at first you don’t succeed try try again”. Can you send it via the old-fashioned desk/lap top? LOL!
LikeLike
I am now trying one sentence at a time. The first sentence doesn’t go through. Here’s the second sentence:
Television delivered important sights and sounds from around the world to our living rooms, but most of what we watched were cartoons and sitcoms.
LikeLike
Paragraph 2, sentences 3 and 4:
The positive was outweighed by the negative. Wouldn’t it have been better if more people voted for American Congressperson than for American Idol?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Weird. OK, paragraph 2, last sentence:
Maybe when my parents warned me that watching TV was harmful, they were right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just can’t get that sentence to go through in any form. I tried a different username, but not a different device. All that sentence did was question watching TV versus reading…
LikeLike
Try scrambling the sentence or rewording it to say the same thing.
LikeLike
LCT, none of your comments are in spam or moderation.
LikeLike
…a book,…
LikeLike
…doing arts and…
LikeLike
…crafts, or playing…
LikeLike
(backwards spelling)
… tnemurtsni lacisum a…
LikeLike
That was it. The backwards words were the ones that wouldn’t post. How would it have been if, when drafting the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson’s quill developed a glitch that wouldn’t let him write the word ‘happiness’.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting, eh. How bizarre is that?
But your parents were right. As were mine as the TV set was only on when someone was in the room watching it and that was not a daily occurance. But back then there were like 5 stations and we only had a black and white tv.
Ah, to be free from the screen. (as I sit here and type on one-LOL!)
LikeLike
LCT,
Your backwards words did post
LikeLike
Instrument.
LikeLike
Thank you, Diane and Duane. I could tell it was not moderation because the site usually tells me, “Your comment is awaiting moderation” when I don’t have cookies blocked. Instead, when I hit ‘post’ I was just taken back to the top of the post with my comment in neverland, without the moderation warning. Bizarre indeed! It just won’t let me post the word (backwards) ‘lacisum’. Maybe (sarcasm alert) my pilfered metadata-based social-emotional learning profile predicts I am planning a Luddite-style attack on the Big Brother Server whenever I mention playing the piano.
LikeLike
Sometimes that has happened to me and I’ve hit the send again and it says it’s a duplicate post. And then a while later the post shows up. WordPress can be a little “finicky” at times. You’d think it was human or something and not a machine!
LikeLike
Duane,
When I woke up this morning, I was thinking about your wondering why I didn’t try typing paragraph 2 on a laptop or desktop. I didn’t because I don’t have one (except for class, but that’s just for class (I am not dumb enough to use a device for blogging against reformies AND for LAUSD (not that Rafe Esquith was being dumb, well, maybe))). I just have the phone with unlimited data for personal use (never for school). No computers. No internet connection. No wi-fi. When I say there are better uses for dollars than tech, I mean it. I just felt compelled to explain that so you see there’s a (albeit unique) method to my madness.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And I have just the opposite situation: no cell phone while having a laptop and internet connection, with wifi.
LikeLike
Exactly. Too many people waste too much money on tech they don’t need. Schools are exceptionally good at buying excess devices instead of books, staff, and hands-on materials. The worst part of that is “planned obsolescence” by tech companies, so you have to upgrade to be cool every couple years.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Right on, LCT!
LikeLike
A school division in central Virginia that routinely touts itself as “innovative” and “cutting edge” has had some expensive and disastrous problems with technology, especially a fiasco with SchoolNet, which later was purchased by Pearson (and for which the superintendent and school board are still withholding 268 SchoolNet-related emails from any public scrutiny).
The division has gone hog wild over technology, pushing it relentlessly on teachers. It has now – like other divisions – embarked on a one-to-one program, equipping students with tablets (which, apparently, according to comments on a non-tech-related survey, seem to break down often).
Meanwhile, this same division has routinely short-changed teachers on pay, linking division pay to a ‘market’ it created, comprised primarily of poorer and much poorer localities, even though this particular division is one of the wealthiest in the state. And, this division turned all of its high schools into STEM ‘academies,’ even though there is a nationwide glut of STEM workers.
The school division ‘leadership’ says it is preparing kids for the future.
And we wonder what might be wrong with public education.
LikeLike
democracy,
I’m not sure what you mean by “division”. Will you please explain what that means. Gracias, Duane
LikeLike
As I read this, and the attached article, on my smart phone, I also worry about myself and other generations lost in the cloud.
LikeLike
An article to go to and refer to. Thanks!
LikeLike
Another in that vein: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/reading-paper-screens/
LikeLike