Alan Singer pulls together the threads of charter school corruption across several states in this post. The corruption is pay-to-play. Give money to a politician and turn him or her into your advocate. Florida presents a different twist on the story: charter owners and employees and family members are elected legislators who shamelessly vote to enrich themselves. In Ohio, charter owners contribute to legislators who then turn on the money spigot and shower their benefactors with riches. In New York, Governor Cuomo accepts millions from billionaires who love entrepreneurial schools and hate public schools–and Voila!, Cuomo becomes a charter champion.
“In Arizona charter schools routinely receive exemptions from state oversight requirements, despite a history of misusing tax dollars. They also receive over 25% of state education funds, although they only enroll 15% of Arizona’s school age students. The right-wing Republican governor of Arizona was accused by the even further right-wing elected Superintendent of Arizona schools of establishing a “shadow faction of charter school operators” committed to “moving funds from traditional public schools to charter schools.”
“The reasons for the lack of accountability and the disproportionate state funding are examined in a report by Arizonians for Charter School Accountability. Among other things, they found that Benjamin Franklin, a for-profit charter school, is owned by Arizona State Representative Eddie Farnsworth (R). In 2016, the charter school spent $155,106 more on facilities than on classroom instruction. It leases its schools from LBE Investments, a for-profit real estate company also owned by Farnsworth.
“Arizona has a state board that grants charter status to “qualifying applicants” and is supposed to “oversee charter schools.” The President of the board is a political lobbyist who defines her role as promoting school “choice” and “sponsoring charter schools,” not regulating them. The Board Vice-President is founder of a charter high school. Other members include the operator of a charter school, a charter school teacher, a lawyer for charter schools, a building company CEO who also serves on the Board of Directors for the local Teach for America chapter, and the CEO of a charter school network.”
For the links, open the article.
In Atlanta, teachers were sentenced to prison under the RICO statute (racketeering) for cheating on tests and are out on appeal.
When, if ever, will public officials round up the criminals who are engaged in buying influence for the enrichment of charter schools? In too many states, the public officials who should enforce the law are charter operators or receive millions from charter operators. The charter industry starts to look like the Tweed Ring. Will it clean up its own act or is public corruption now woven into its fabric?

But yet, when Hillary Clinton accepts hundreds of thousands for a 20 minute speech to a bunch of bankers, we shouldn’t assume that she is then an “advocate” of those bankers. Got it.
LikeLike
dienne77,
Good question!
Asked that one many times. Hillary did oversee the standards and testing plan in Arkansas when Bill and she were in the Governor’s office in Arkansas. I refused to participate in Bill’s mandate that states write standards and test items. I know people who thought they were helping. Later a few told me: “You were right. WE WERE ROYALLY USED.”
LikeLike
dienne77,
Correct. We should not look at who donates and say “the person is in their pocket” until the person actually takes actions that demonstrate that they are in their pocket. When they start spouting the exact view of the person who just donated or – once elected – vote for exactly the policies that person wanted, THEN we say the person is in their pocket.
We don’t just say it because they made a speech.
It’s like the attempts to smear Bernie Sanders as being “pro-terrorist” because some of his supporters might be pro-Palestinian and anti-Zionist. Without getting into a discussion of the pros and cons of that issue, I can tell you that people were trying to use propaganda to convince voters that Bernie was going to be pro-terrorist and supported Israel’s destruction.
As someone who agrees with the J Street perspective of Israel/Palestine relationships, I can tell you that I didn’t believe for a second that Bernie was going to base his actions on what some donor wanted.
I agree that Hillary Clinton’s position on school reform was misguided in the 1980s but I do not think it was a completely unreasonable approach. And I absolutely do not believe she took that approach because she was paid to. I think she thought it made sense to have some guidelines.
I think Jimmy Carter as President did a whole slew of misguided things. I don’t think he did them because he wanted to please big donors.
I think everything Andrew Cuomo and Rahm Emanuel do is to please their big donors because I SEE what it is they are doing despite endless evidence that it is wrong.
I believe Hillary Clinton is far closer to Diane Ravitch than either of you believe. She took some positions because they seemed like reasonable positions to take at the time. She doesn’t stick to them and deny the reality of their failures because a big donor is paying her to keep pushing a policy that is wrong-headed.
And truly, I have no idea if President Obama is like Andrew Cuomo or like Jimmy Carter but when it came to public education, he ignored every bit of evidence that his policies were wrong and one can’t help wondering if he was truly deluded about what happens when you abandon any regulation of private charter schools or believed his big donors so much he couldn’t be bothered to read anything that might question their beliefs.
LikeLike
^^By the way, what you describe is exactly how the right wing plans to smear progressive Mayor de Blasio.
Mayor de Blasio gets donations from the teachers’ union. Ergo, every action he takes will be to promote the interests of the union over the interests of the kids.
Alan Singer’s article was about politicians’ actions. It wasn’t just that they took the money, it was that in exchange they actually did their bidding.
Remember, that the Mayor is getting excoriated — just like Hillary did — for “meetings” that donors had. I am reserving my judgement because it is unclear that the donors got anything they wanted from the meetings. Or if – in a few cases – they did get what they wanted was it sound public policy or corruption.
If a Democrat meets with an environmental group that donated money to her campaign, so what? The question is whether the Democrat enacted bad policy as a favor to the donor.
LikeLike
Posting this link again.
https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2016/04/27/here-are-corporations-and-right-wing-funders-backing-education-reform-movement/210054
LikeLike
Excellent
Sent from my iPad
>
LikeLike
Cross posted Alan’s article itself at https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/How-Charter-Schools-Buy-Po-in-General_News-Billionaires_Charter-School-Failure_Corruption_Cuomo-170810-880.html#comment669333
with this comment
Peter Greene identifies the dirty secret of the charter industry . Two words. Real estate. In Ohio, a charter lobbyist wrote the charter law for the state. When a charter operator insisted that he owned everything the charter bought with public money, the courts upheld him. It was in the law. http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2017/08/charter-real-estate.html
In Pennsylvania, charter schools own the property where the charter school is housed, and they charge rent. They charge rents above the market rate. The state doesn’t ask questions. The state doesn’t even notice that the charter operator owns the property and pays himself rent.
Buying and Selling Charter Schools as Investment Properties: A Repellent Practice https://dianeravitch.net/2017/08/07/buying-and-selling-charter-schools-as-investment-properties-a-repellent-practice/ writes Diane Ravitch in this post. and gives us this link: https://www.cpexecutive.com/post/colliers-closes-sale-of-florida-charter-schools/
“A school should be the anchor of its community. It should be a place where children and families feel welcome, a place where they learn to work and engage with others who are different from themselves but share common concerns. A public school is a mainstay of our democracy, because for many people, it is the first place where they have a chance to learn and work with others to achieve their goals for their community.But read this story, and what do you see? Two charter schools were sold to an eager investor.”
Submitted on Thursday, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:20:53 PM
LikeLike
AND I ADDED THIS ONE Incredible corruption as our PUBLIC SCHOOLS GO DOWN, AND THEY ROB THE TAXPAYER. Please read the NAACP report on charter schools.Ever since it was released, charter supporters have complained bitterly about the report and accused the NAACP of being paid off by the unions.
This is ridiculous. It is a sound and sober report. https://www.scribd.com/document/354791057/Task-ForceReport-final2-1#from_embed
LikeLike
Buying access has become the MO of charter schools. Wealthy billionaires and hedge fund managers either donate directly to politicians or through one of many foundations. This is all a quid pro quo arrangement that works with our plutocracy. We need to work to get the money out of politics as it is the only way government can reflect the will of the people. We know this will never happen under kleptocrat, Trump.
LikeLike
“When, if ever, will public officials round up the criminals who are engaged in buying influence for the enrichment of charter schools?”
Not as long as ALEC, the GOP, and neo-liberals rules the United States.
LikeLike
AMEN, Lloyd.
LikeLike
The privatization plot was a Gates’ vision and is a Walton GenNext goal.
LikeLike