It is no secret that everything in the public sector is under assault by the forces of privatization and greed. Public schools, public infrastructure, public libraries, public airport, everything that is funded and controlled by public authorities is up for grabs. Given that all three branches are controlled by the same party and that the Supreme Court will increasingly lean to the right, it is important that citizens take action.
Here is a manual for direct and nonviolent action written by a veteran of the struggles of the 1960s.
One thing is easier now: to create virtually instant mass protests, as was done by the admirable Women’s March the day after Trump’s inauguration. If one-off protests could produce major changes in society we would simply focus on that, but I know of no country that has undergone major change (including ours) through one-off protests. Contesting with opponents to win major demands requires more staying power than protests provide. One-off protests do not comprise a strategy, they are simply a repetitive tactic.
Fortunately, we can learn something about strategy from the U.S. civil rights movement. What did work for them in facing an almost overwhelming array of forces was a particular technique known as the escalating nonviolent direct action campaign. Some might call the technique an art form instead, because effective campaigning is more than mechanical.
Since that 1955-65 decade we’ve learned much more about how powerful campaigns build powerful movements leading to major change. Some of those lessons are here.
The manual is short. It offers valuable lessons about how to organize a resistance movement.
There are many fronts on which this current struggle will be and is being waged. For readers of this blog, the central issue is the survival of public schools, democratically controlled and governed.
The privatization movement is well organized and well funded. The entering wedge for privatization is the misuse of testing to defame teachers and schools. The entry point for privatization is charter schools. Then cyber charters, then vouchers. It is a continuum. The goal is to take tax money away from public schools and direct it to privately managed schools, private schools, religious schools, and tax dodges for the wealthy whose money is then used to support vouchers.
The Network for Public Education is dedicated to preserving and improving public schools. We are not satisfied with them as they are today. For one thing, they are burdened by the detritus of No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top, and the Every Student Succeeds Act. We must fight for them or lose them. The time is now.
Join NPE at its annual conference in Oakland, California, in mid-October. Meet your allies. We will join together to support our schools and our democracy.

Diane Just a few minutes ago on MSNBC, Eric Prince (Betsy’s brother) was “pitching” his plan to privatize the military forces in Afghanistan. Thanks for this booklet–I’ll read it with great interest.
LikeLike
His pitch was also published today…. in USA today
Mercenaries will do the job. The straight up conflict of interest from Eric Prince who is in the mercenary business was nicely disquieted.
LikeLike
Laura H. Chapman Prince was “nicely disquieted.” Glad to hear it. I cling to the basics of democratic capitalism; however, it so easily becomes a disease–that is, in its all-too common cancerous form, it latches onto what is good about the human spirit (creativity, growth, progress) and steers its host’s focus towards its lowest and most spiritually-bereft form and expression: mere acquisitiveness and power accumulation. Presently, the cancer cells are colonizing.
Here is a poem written by Frederick Seidel and quoted in a recent New Yorker magazine (p. 69 July 31):
“And you could say we’ve been living in clover
From Walt Whitman to Barack Obama.
Now a dictatorship of vicious spineless slimes
We the people voted in has taken over.
Once we’d abolished slavery, we lived in clover,
From sea to shining sea, even in terrible times.
It’s over.”
LikeLike
Catherine, I know there are businesses who hold to high ethical standards that don’t necessarily qualify them for the Social Darwinistic tendencies of the “free market,” but can you define the term “democratic capitalism” for me?
LikeLike
speduktr “. . . but can you define the term ‘democratic capitalism’ for me?
It’s not a technical term in anyone’s political philosophy that I know of. But since you asked, I mean by it a kind of high-level hybrid: “Capitalism with a well-developed conscience, working under the umbrella of a constitutional democracy with (again) well-developed educational, social, and cultural institutions whose missions and mandates are aimed at the common good.” . . . since you asked.
LikeLike
Sounds good to me.
LikeLike
You mean like they actually care about the communities in which they operate!? That is the tradition from which I came. Ethics and profits do not have to be mutually exclusive terms.
LikeLike
speduktr File the article below under “funny you should mention it” about ethics, profits, and the idea of “democratic capitalism.” The picture of the farmer in his spoiled soybean field (midway in the article) tells the whole story of those “capitalists” who don’t make the grade. And BTW, the idea puts the responsibility of developing well-grounded citizens on the institutions of education and on the leadership in a democratic culture, including the leadership of those in business who live in one.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scant-oversight-corporate-secrecy-preceded-us-weed-killer-crisis_us_598b6e7ae4b0d793738c62bd?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=__TheMorningEmail__081017&utm_content=__TheMorningEmail__081017+CID_d5ea1f842916de17544b5c56f2808fd2&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=Reuters&ncid=newsltushpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__081017
LikeLike
Makes you sick doesn’t it?
LikeLike
Afterthought Would you want your son or daughter in uniform, risking their life for a private company and contractor? The analogy for education is walking into a school and feeling like you are walking into a store, where you are only welcome if you have money to spend . . . rather than being in a place where everyone belongs, has a stake in its quality, and is welcome, regardless. Hidden but powerful is the “sense” that the people who work there work for you and your children, and for the good of the community, and not for some corporate profit-making entity.
This whole movement is corrupt–and it’s a BIG DEAL. It’s scary because most who are involved seem to take for granted what will, no doubt, completely change and go away as the privatization movement takes its course.
LikeLike
If you are so displeased with the direction that policy is taking, you should make your concerns known at the local level. Federal Education policy has failed to make any real impact, since 90% of education funding is provided at the state/municipal level.
The feds are not able to impact communities who wish to be “sanctuary cities”. The feds are not going to spend a lot of time, impacting public education.
“All politics is local” – Thomas P. O’Neill, former Speaker of the House
“Fight the battles you can win” – Sun-Tzu, in “The art of War”
LikeLike
I’ll be sure to remember that federal testing mandates haven’t had any real impact the next time my students (the ones left after federal funding of charter segregation) all have to waste weeks of English and math instruction clicking on bubbles. Thanks, Charlie! Always good for a laugh and a cry.
LikeLike