Fred Hiatt, editor of the Washington Post editorial page, notes an interesting and welcome development that he calls the “Trump Boomerang Effect.” Whatever Trump is for seems to boomerang the other way. Orrin Hatch defends transgender rights because Trump caused for the expulsion of transgender members of the military. After Trump and Brexit, European elections swing decisively against Trump-style politicians. In reaction to Trump’s war on Obamacare, more people see the logic of single-payer healthcare.
We have a long three-and-a-half-years to go, but the Trump boomerang effect seems to strengthen opposition to everything he supports.
Did your head spin when Utah’s Orrin Hatch, a true conservative and the Senate’s longest-serving Republican, emerged last week as the most eloquent spokesman for transgender rights? Credit the Trump boomerang effect.
Much has been said about White House dysfunction and how little President Trump has accomplished in his first six months. But that’s not the whole story: In Washington and around the world, in some surprising ways, things are happening — but they are precisely the opposite of what Trump wanted and predicted when he was sworn in.
The boomerang struck first in Europe. Following his election last November, and the British vote last June to leave the European Union, anti-immigrant nationalists were poised to sweep to power across the continent. “In the wake of the electoral victories of the Brexit campaign and Donald Trump, right-wing populism in the rich world has appeared unstoppable,” the Economist wrote. Russian President Vladimir Putin would gain allies, the European Union would fracture.
Meanwhile, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, whom Trump belittled for having allowed so many refugees into her country, has grown steadily more popular in advance of a September election…
It turns out that Americans really don’t like the idea of poor people not being able to see a doctor. We don’t feel right cozying up to a dictator whose domestic opponents are rubbed out and whose neighboring countries are invaded and occupied.
And even if some Americans don’t know all that much about transgender people, it turns out we are less comfortable treating anyone as a “burden,” as Trump said in his tweet, than in valuing every individual’s service, a spirit that Hatch captured in his straightforward, humane response.
“I don’t think we should be discriminating against anyone,” Hatch said. “Transgender people are people, and deserve the best we can do for them.”
And Americans aren’t unique. Millions of people in Europe and around the world are just as appalled by the scapegoating of minorities and the celebration of police brutality.
Maybe even Fred Hiatt might begin to see the dangers of privatizing public schools and see the value of strengthening them instead of replacing them with private management.

“… more people see the logic of single-payer healthcare.”
Yes, and it’s such a shame that virtually none of those people are in the leadership of the Democratic Party…
LikeLike
Ding, ding. We have a winner.
LikeLike
Give that man a Kewpie doll!
LikeLike
“https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/healthcare-congress-bernie-sanders-single-payer-obamacare/533595/
“For the first time ever, a majority of House Democrats have signed up to support “Medicare for all” single-payer legislation, a threshold crossed in the aftermath of the presidential election. A number of influential Senate Democrats have also expressed support for single payer in the midst of the current Republican health-care push, which is now in doubt as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell pushes for an Obamacare repeal vote.”
But let’s remember that Trump won by attacking Hillary Clinton and saying she wanted “single payer”!
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/09/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrongly-says-hillary-clinton-wants-go/
“We previously asked the Trump campaign if they had seen any statements from Clinton or Kaine indicating that converting Obamacare into a single-payer system was their eventual goal.
Kowalski responded that “Hillary has committed fully to the public option,” and as evidence he directed us to comments Clinton made in 1994 when she was first lady.
At the time, she predicted that if Congress didn’t pass health care reform soon, “I believe, and I may be totally off base on this, but I believe that by the year 2000 we will have a single-payer system. I don’t think it’s — I don’t even think it’s a close call politically.”
Maybe healthcare and politics are just a little more complicated than saying “if only ALL Dems embraced single payer we can win over the voters who voted for Trump because they believed him when he accused Hillary of wanting single payer health reform.”
In that article Kamala Harris pointed out the truth — it’s easier to say “single payer” than figure out the very hard job of how to make the real details of the plan acceptable to Americans.
LikeLike
^^ sorry here is a better link:
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/healthcare-congress-bernie-sanders-single-payer-obamacare/533595/
LikeLike
“But let’s remember that Trump won by attacking Hillary Clinton and saying she wanted “single payer”!”
Oh for pity’s sake! You still think Trump won because Hillary was too liberal??? Apparently you want four more years of Trump….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Please explain why during the campaign and during the Presidential debates when most Americans were more tuned into the election Trump tried to paint Hillary Clinton as someone who wanted single-payer health insurance for all, when it wasn’t true.
For Pete’s sake, if there ANYTHING that Trump is gifted at it is recognizing what to say in order to close the sale.
He intentionally painted Hillary Clinton as pro-single payer because he (apparently correctly) believed that saying that would get more Americans to vote for him.
I believe Americans will come around to single payer but then again that’s what Hillary Clinton was saying would happen by 2000. So just because you believe it doesn’t make it so.
And just because the American public did not just reject Hillary Clinton, but they rejected the liberal Bernie Sanders type Senators like Russ Feingold in favor of right wing Republicans, I am willing to state for the record that having some Democrats being slow to completely embrace single payer doesn’t make them the corrupt tools you so want to believe. You will give Trump a million breaks (he’s not really that bad) but when it comes to any Democrat, you jump on the smallest of things to condemn them as utterly corrupt.’
I am watching Bernie’s “free college for all” happening in NY with a version that turns out not to be well-thought out and perhaps not helping the students who need it most.
http://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/ny/2017/08/01/among-ny-students-seeking-new-excelsior-scholarship-potentially-many-who-arent-qualified-or-could-pay-a-price-later/
Life is complicated. People are complicated. Politics are complicated. But even within their complications, intelligent people can usually distinguish those who are completely bad actors whose prime purpose is to please their donors or promote themselves or get richer (Trump, McConnell, Cuomo, Eva Moskowitz etc.) and those who are trying to make things better within a flawed system in which no one is perfect (Bernie, Warren, Hillary Clinton, Bill de Blasio).
LikeLike
Diane Trump, it seems, is a twisted kind of anti-leader leader? Oddly, the “winner” in all of this is democracy itself.
LikeLike
“We have a long three-and-a-half-years to go. . .”
Two bits says the SSM won’t last that long. Then we’ll have the “moderate and reasonable” Pence on the throne. And the Dims still won’t have figured out what the eff to do to win the presidency back.
LikeLike
Pence is no moderate and he’s not very reasonable. Pence is a very scary man! I’ll stick with SSM for the next 3 1/2 yrs because he is an open book….Trump is like a 3 yr old having a temper tantrum with his very fancy phone connected to the twitterverse.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m suggesting that the Lame Stream Media will portray him as a moderate and reasonable in contrast to the Trumpster. I don’t agree, like you with that analysis, but I’d bet a dime to the dollar that is what will happen.
LikeLike
Worse still, they’ll present him as the person who saved the Republic from that Awful Man, while Shumer and Pelosi will get the booby prize for helping put in place someone who might actually be able to implement his fascist policies.
LikeLike
Exactly Michael!
Why is this show so easy to foresee?
LikeLike
How about the midterms Duane?
LikeLike
The dims don’t stand a chance if they continue with the identity politics favored by the Clintonista cabal. Well, maybe they stand a chance only because the rethugs are so amazingly bad. Then if the dims gain control they will see it as a validation of the Clintonista cabal thinking and will go into 2020 with the same losing policy ideas starting with identity politics.
LikeLike
The winner may well be democracy and it will be curious to see how this all plays out if Trump lasts the next 3 1/2 yrs. Not a single politician wants to be on the other end of a Trump tweet storm. They are running like rats from a sinking ship! If they want the public to view them with any kind of respect, they are catching on that they need to keep their mouth’s shut and portray themselves as moderate. McCain has been the only one to do the right thing and NOT get blasted by Trump. I think there have been slapped faces and the dueling will commence at daybreak.
LikeLike
Lisa M I am glad about McCain also, even though he has little to lose by “doing the right thing.” But he does have a reputations for doing that anyway. But this morning on MS-NBC there was a Republican Congressman who was saying out loud that the Republicans in Congress were “in denial.” There’s some hope in such criticism, especially when it comes from within.
LikeLike
Senator Jeff Flake from Arizona just published a book critical of Trump and the GOP. Unfortunately, he has voted straight party line.
LikeLike
dianeravitch Ditto for Lindsay Graham–a really sharp critique of the health care bill, but yet he voted for it. Mitch McConnell must have some kind of arm-twisting and bribery going on?
LikeLike
I don’t believe the republicans are in denial at all! Republicans don’t want to be on the receiving end of a twitter war with the Donald. If nothing else, once Trump tags you, he is coming at you with a knife and he is hell bent on using it. He has no impulse control and everything just flies from his lips….he doesn’t have time to lie when he does this. All of these politicians have something to hide and Trump knows it and knows what it is. The man is ruthless, but infantile and stupid to boot.
LikeLike
Lisa M I think you are right, but also that the Republicans see Trump as their gateway to get the policies they want to pass and have the votes for. And that’s why there is some denial going on in that camp–denial about just how bad and even dangerous he really is.
LikeLike
McCain knows he is dying. He can do what he wants.
LikeLike
CNN’s 7-20-17 article “Sen John McCain has brain cancer” says almost 10% of glioastoma patients live 5 years or longer. It also says brain scans show affected tissue completely removed.
LikeLike
Almost 10% is a slim hope, especially for a man in his 80s. My point was that McCain has no further ambitions and can say whatever he wants
LikeLike
Glioblastoma is a very aggressive brain cancer.
LikeLike
There is a bipartisan attempt to protect “dreamers” from the immigration round up. Senators Lindsey Graham and Dick Durbin are co-sponsoring the bill that most feel Trump with oppose, but at least more reasonable Republicans are pushing back against Trump’s draconian White House.
LikeLike
We can only hope that Fred Hiatt will see the light re: privatization and charters. Maybe we’ll have Betsy DeVos & Trump to thank for that.
LikeLike
DeVoomerang.
LikeLike
I wonder if you can hunt grizzly bears with a DeVoomerang.
LikeLike
LeftCoastTeacher “I wonder if you can hunt grizzly bears with a DeVoomerang.” I want one. Where do I get one. Pullleeeeessse.
LikeLike
DeVoomerangs are cool, but you can’t have one, Catherine. They’re only for billionaires to play with.
LikeLike
LeftCoastTeacher “Devoomerang.” Oh, well (sigh . . . ). The rich still get richer.
LikeLike
“Did your head spin when Utah’s Orrin Hatch, a true conservative and the Senate’s longest-serving Republican, emerged last week as the most eloquent spokesman for transgender rights? Credit the Trump boomerang effect.”
While I’d like to convince myself there is going to be a silver lining to all the damage that Donald Trump has done so far and will continue to do — including the fact that Gorsuch is now a Justice with more Gorsuchs to come — Orrin Hatch’s support of transgender rights has nothing to do with Trump. He spoke out for transgender rights over a year ago:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/orrin-hatch-ben-carson-transgender_us_578f650ee4b04ca54ebf87e3
LikeLike
I am reminded of Gandhi. He made the British see for themselves how wrong their occupation of India was. Trump and DeVos are behaving like oppressors. “First they ignore you. Then, they laugh at you. Then, they fight you. Then, you win.”
LikeLike
LCT,
TRUMP and DeVos seem unwilling and unable to learn.
LikeLike
It’s called accelerationism. Zizek and Jimmy Dore come to mind as they made this argument back in the fall. Trump not only puts an ugly face on ugly policy, he highlights the ugly policies that have been pushed by more conventional politicians. More and more are attracted by left leaning policies now (single payer and free higher education being big ones) as well as leftist political organization (Democratic Socialists of America has seen a jump in membership). Generally speaking, accelerationism is incredibly dangerous, but thankfully Trump and the GOP are so stupid and incompetent that they can’t get anything done.
The biggest elephant in the room, however, is that the Democratic party continuously wants to ignore this shift to the left rather than get out in front. It took how long for Chuck Schumer to even get the words “single payer” out of his mouth? The GOP has hobbled itself Kathy Bates style, but the Dems seems to timid to try and push their own legislation. Sanders has the drug bill, but I haven’t seen much evidence from others on the hill. If they were smart, they’d pull a Labour and come out with their own leftist manifesto and draft legislation based on that.
LikeLike
I agree with some of your points, but let’s remember what is happening in Britain:
Labour won more votes but not ENOUGH votes. The result is that the conservatives are making deals with some of the most reprehensible right wing parties instead of drifting more to the center.
Now if the next election Labour takes over completely and can make changes, that would be great. I certainly hope so. But in the meantime the far right has more power than they imagined.
LikeLike
You’re correct on that they didn’t get enough to take control, but they severelly hobbled May and the tories and the coalition with the DUP was/is extremely unpopular and May specifically has taken a hit in popularity for that. Which bring us to the effect if/when there is another snap election. Then it’s very possible Labour takes even more seats as it’s increasing in popularity. If it doesn’t work out, it will be bad. If there is another election and Labour or other leftish parties don’t take more seats or if there isn’t another election then that could severly mess up Brexit negotiations. And the EU has no intention of going light on the UK,
However, I think my point still stands in the US because of the exact reason that it isn’t the UK and that the two party system dominates. I personally hate that system, but it is what it is and I think such a tactic would behove the Dems. They are whispering progressive points, but are still, more or less, kowtowing to big corporate donors.
LikeLike
I’ve been hearing about how stupid Republicans and conservatives are for my entire adult life. Meanwhile, these “stupid”people have taken control of all three branches of the federal government and two-thirds of the state governments.
Maybe it’s time we had more knowledge of and respect for our enemies, who’ve successfully been kicking our butts for decades. Not “respect” as in admiration or emulation, but the basic strategic need to understand the reasons for their success, and ways to counteract them.
LikeLike
Fair enough on the GOP in general, they were smart enough to gerrymander the system under the Dems noses after all. However, I was speaking specifically about the current crop. I used to chock it up to politicians being generally disingenuous or misleading (especially after growing up in the W era). However, after hearing the discourse on healthcare, I genuinely think there’s a good dose of ignorance. Over and over again, conservatives lamented the healthy paying for the sick without the seeming to understand they just described insurance. And I first heard that “wonkish” Paul Ryan and the now infamous ppt.
Oh, and Trump is stupid. I mean severely stupid. Like broken brain stupid. However, he’s dangerously stupid. But you don’t have to be smart to gain power in politics, it is a popularity contest after all.
Also, I don’t neccessarily agree that the GOP has been kicking butt for decades. You can see the ebbs and flows in elections particularly in the last thirty years. One party gains presidency, usually with control of the house and/or senate. Then midterms come around, they lose some seats to the other. Usually the party keeps the presidency, then the second midterm they lose more seats. The other party gains the presidency. Even Trump and the current crop of GOP fits that cycle, they will probably lose with 2018 (hard to tell with gerrymandering and Dems insisting on being GOP lite lime). Also, Trump very well and probably will lose the presidency if he doesn’t resign or be impeached (which is a bad move for the Dems because of this “boomerang effect”, but that’s a different conversation).
LikeLike
Diane and Dat Guy The NYBook Review article below is remote-related to this discussion–related because it draws together (1) the recent use of hyper-propaganda in elections (2) who and what multi-billionaires are listening to/reading; and (3) the uptick of different kinds of manipulations the manipulators are using to influence our minds, e.g., our decisions and choices.
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/04/20/kahneman-tversky-invisible-mind-manipulators/
LikeLike