The New York Post reported that New York City’s Comptroller Scott Stringer conducted an audit of grants to the New York City Leadership Academy and found no evidence that the city was getting what it paid for.
The city Department of Education has awarded contracts worth up to $101 million to the NYC Leadership Academy — but didn’t keep track of where the money went, a bombshell audit by City Comptroller Scott Stringer charges.
The Long Island City-based non-profit has collected $45.6 million from the contracts to coach “aspiring principals” and teachers. But the DOE failed to produce records to prove the $183-an-hour coaches did what they were paid for….
The contracts also require progress reports and meetings to monitor the vendor’s performance, but the auditors found none — raising the specter of “waste, fraud and abuse,” the report says.
“These failings point to a broken procurement system that allows the DOE to spend freely, devoid of oversight,” Stringer concludes. “Our principals deserve better than this.”
The DOE entered into three contracts with the academy since 2008, the first two under then-Mayor Bloomberg. The third, for payments up to $45 million from July 2014 to June 2019, was inked under Mayor de Blasio by Chancellor Carmen Farina’s chief operating officer. About $34.8 million available remains unspent.
Last month, de Blasio declared a “NYC Leadership Academy Day,” and declared the outfit “an important partner” in running city schools. Fariña praised the academy “for its tremendous work to prepare and support great school leaders.”
But the academy, founded in 2003, has also become notorious for graduating inept — and sometimes corrupt — principals with little teaching experience. Its “leadership coaches,” mostly retired principals, have also been hired in the mayor’s three-year-old Renewal program for struggling schools, which has shown meager academic gains.
The comptroller’s auditors reviewed $559,667 in DOE payments to the academy, including $394,007 for “leadership coaching.”
“Disregarding the safeguards in its own contracts and procurement rules,” the comptroller said, the DOE spent $385,612, or 98 percent of the coaching payments, without the required documentation.
This report is an indictment of mayor control, spanning both Bloomberg and de Blasio’s oversight, as well as the New York City Leadership Academy. Bloomberg and Klein announced the Leadership Academy with great fanfare as a way to fast-track “leaders” with a year of training. The original plan was intended to hire and train leaders from industry and aspiring principals from outside New York City, who would come into the school system and act as disruptors with fresh ideas. Neither of those approaches worked. Then, it became a way to jump from the role of teacher to principal while skipping the five-to-seven year apprenticeship of being an assistant principal. For a time, it was the latest new thing, like Tennessee’s Achievement School District, which has failed. It would be difficult to determine any benefit from the $101 million (actually much more, since Bloomberg raised $75 million for the LA’s first three years of operation).

“Last month, de Blasio declared a “NYC Leadership Academy Day,” and declared the outfit “an important partner” in running city schools.”
Hmm. Maybe my spidey senses about de Blasio aren’t so far off after all….
LikeLike
dienne77,
Instead of your nasty innuendos that sound remarkably like the anti-de Blasio campaign that the right wing pro-Trump billionaires are funding, why don’t you just come out and say what it is that you want to say.
Is it “My spidey senses tell me that Mayor de Blasio is one of those Democrats that is corrupt and in it to promote the desires of rich people and anyone who isn’t de Blasio is a better choice”?
Is it “My spidey senses tell me that Mayor de Blasio is such a liar that he better be defeated because even a right wing hater of public schools is at least less corrupt than this Mayor who I am certain (based on reading the NY Post) will sell us all out for a dime?”
Is it “I read the NY Post and I trust it just like I trusted all the Facebook articles I read that told me that Hillary Clinton was just as bad as Donald Trump and her election would have been a disaster for the US so I’m going to repeat all the nasty things about how she is one of the most corrupt politicians who has ever run for President with absolutely no redeeming qualitifes who will sell us out for a buck. And I know that Mayor de Blasio is just like her as my “spidey sense” and the NY Post tell me?
Interesting that you didn’t even seem to read the entire article before you jumped to the conclusion that a progressive Democrat was simply a corrupt tool of (insert whatever word will get people to vote for anyone but him).
“The DOE said it’s reviewing the audit. “We’ll continue our work to improve and reinforce the procedures we have in place that serve students, schools, and taxpayers,” said spokesman Will Mantell.
But officials said the DOE stopped using most of NYCLA services in June.”
dienne77,
I challenge you to come up with the name of ONE person who meets your high standards in which you are very quick to attack progressive politicians for not being progressive enough because you read something negative in the NY Post on planted by some right wing propaganda?
Is it Jill Stein? Bernie Sanders?
Because I can play the same game and come up with an innuendo about them that I claim my “spidey sense” tells me that they are evil and awful.
I guess you still trust that “spidey sense” that told you that Donald Trump was just another politicians and at least he isn’t as evil and corrupt as Hillary Clinton. I’m shocked you still trust that spidey sense of yours, but then again, lots of Trump supporters still adamantly believe he is terrific so why shouldn’t you adamatly believe you did the right thing in refusing to support the person that Donald Trump told you was “crooked Hillary”.
By the way, you are allowed to be critical of a politician without sliming them as corrupt because your “spidey sense” tells you they are. Here is how it is done:
I didn’t like that Bernie Sanders adamantly campaigned for the Virginia candidate that was a DFER Democrat who was trying to defeat the candidate who believed in public schools. My “spidey sense” didn’t tell me that Bernie did it because he wanted billionaires to give him lots of money to do their bidding.
I wonder if that’s what YOU think about Bernie’s actions because your “spidey sense” told you he was corrupt through and through?
Or did you just think he was misguided?
LikeLike
Oh good, just the reaction I was hoping for.
Anyway, rather than ranting about who I find acceptable, maybe you could justify de Blasio’s support for this “Leadership Academy” (sic)? Why is it okay for “progressive” politicians to throw public education to the wolves?
LikeLike
“Oh good, just the reaction I was hoping for.”
If this was the reaction you were hoping for, then answer the question/s NYC public school parent asked before you use trolling tactics to change the conversation.
LikeLike
I noticed you avoided my question. I guess no Democrat can live up to the very high standards of the perfect Jill Stein who is so perfect that every single misstep she takes must be interpreted as being part of her perfection instead of “throwing every progressive cause to the wolves” as you are absolutely convinced that anyone who the right wing press fools you into hating is just waiting to do.
What exactly did your “spidey sense” tell you about Mayor de Blasio?
Should I assume from your answer that this NY Post article convinced you that Mayor de Blasio was “throwing public education to the wolves”? It doesn’t matter what I say because you are already convinced of it just like you were convinced that Hillary Clinton planned to throw every single progressive cause that was in her platform “to the wolves”.
Make sure you really denigrate Mayor de Blasio as just as corrupt as you were convinced Hillary Clinton was. I’m sure his replacement will undermine public education the way Bloomberg did but you can rest easy convinced that you got rid of the sell-out progressive so who cares if public schools suffer.
Mayor de Blasio made a MISTAKE in supporting the leadership academy just like Bernie Sanders made a MISTAKE in taking all the political capital he had and using it to defeat a Virginia candidate who supported public schools so Bernie’s candidate who was part of the edu-reform business could destroy more public schools.
Or maybe you think Bernie Sanders is evil, too. I’m sure the NY Post will write something soon that will convince you it is true.
It is typical of your thought process that reading that Mayor de Blasio supported the Leadership Academy is all you need to hear in order to be completely convinced that de Blasio is “throwing public education to the wolves”. I have posted endlessly of his positions on public education, but hey, you found something that convinces you he is utterly corrupt and worthless. Let’s work hard to make sure he is defeated. And the folks at the NY Post and all the other right wing haters of public schools are laughing their heads off at you for doing their dirty work for them, just like they did when you posted endlessly about how corrupt and worthless Hilllary Clinton was. Good work!
After all, a progressive politician made a mistake in supporting something that isn’t progressive so all the progressive stances he has and the work he has done for the last 20 years means nothing because you know from reading an article that that progressive politician is just as corrupt the right wing press tells you he is. Selling out public education as fast as he can. Good work! Keep it up and you can help defeat de Blasio and feel just as smug that you were doing the work of the angels.
LikeLike
I’m not the one who changed the conversation. Nothing on this thread is about Sanders or Warren or Booker. The question remains, why do we let “progressive Democrats” get away with this? This particular thread is about de Blasio, whom NYCPSP has assured me is the purest of the pure progressive Democrats. Yet here he is on record praising this “leadership” (sic) mill which is known to be corrupt! How does anyone reconcile that and remain sane?
Anyway, to partially answer the question of who might possibly qualify as progressive, I posted this article on the thread below: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/meet-the-democrats-running-on-single-payer-health-care-w494047?utm_source=rsnewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=daily&utm_campaign=073117_16 It’s too early to say for sure, but it’s looking like this Randy Bryce and Amy Vilela may be the real deals. It remains to be seen whether they continue that way or whether they sell out.
LikeLike
Incidentally, by “exactly the reaction I was hoping for” I meant, as you kindly provided, a substance-free, insult-ridden diatribe. Nowhere in your response did you attempt even a little bit to defend de Blasio (oh, well, you did a bit in your second response – he made a “mistake”). All you do is rant at the craven evilness or blatant stupidity of anyone who doesn’t share your view.
I understand that you don’t care, but that sort of attitude is not bringing anyone to your side. If you really believe in the Democrats and want them to win, you have to be able to explain what’s good about them, not just why they’re not Republicans. And it definitely doesn’t help to just tell someone that they’re stupid/evil if they don’t agree with you. That is, if you ever want Democrats to win any elected positions above dog catcher. If not, by all means, do carry on with your rants.
Just my free advice, worth every penny. You’re welcome.
LikeLike
No, your question is not “why do we let progressive Democrats get away with this?”
Your question is: “Why aren’t we jumping on the bandwagon to attack progressive Democrats for every mistake and interpreting that mistake as a complete sell-out of progressive values when that worked so well to defeat Hillary Clinton and bring us Donald Trump and Mike Pence?”
Mayor de Blasio made a mistake, just like Bernie has made MANY mistakes (voting against gun control, supporting DFER Democrats, sitting on the education committee and advocating for lots more “public” charters and never once mentioning the need for oversight.) Politicians make mistakes. I don’t doubt that he believed that the NYC Leadership Academy was a good organization.
It’s nice you thought Randy Bryce and Amy Vilela are the real deal just like you thought Jill Stein was. And when I read about Randy Bryce, I like him and I would love to have him defeat Paul Ryan.
And when I read the nasty anti-Randy Bryce articles that are sure to come out because there exists no person — including you and I — who is invulnerable to something that is portrayed as corrupt, I will not jump as you do to claim that my “spidey senses” told me that he was a sell-out and what’s so bad about Paul Ryan getting re-elected.
Instead, I will take that with a grain of salt and look at the ENTIRETY of that politicians’ work and life and decide whether he or she seems like she would support the progressive agenda.
It’s what I did with Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. They aren’t perfect and the right wing is certainly working hard to convince people like you that they are corrupt. Are you buying that too? Maybe not yet but I suspect you will in the future.
I’m not defending Mayor de Blasio’s mistake in thinking that the Leadership Academy was worthy of lots of taxpayer dollars. What I am defending is your very nasty innuendo that the Mayor did that because he is no progressive but just a corrupt politician like Hillary Clinton who can’t wait to throw over every progressive cause for the right price.
LikeLike
“Nowhere in your response did you attempt even a little bit to defend de Blasio ”
Defend him from your nasty innuendo that he was a corrupt sell out just like your spidey sense told you?
It’s pretty rich to see you plead ignorance of every fight Mayor de Blasio has had to try to protect public schools and fight for more resources for the public schools that serve the most vulnerable at-risk children.
Instead, I have seen you JUMP on every mild criticism of him in order to attack him as a complete sell-out. It’s just like you did with Hillary Clinton.
I have said over and over again that you can criticize EVERY progressive politician for not being perfect. I don’t argue that Mayor de Blasio is PERFECT.
What I do argue is that he believes in public education and progressive causes which is evident from many things he has done over the past 4 years. He is also a politician. He isn’t perfect just like Bernie and Elizabeth Warren and every other politician in history has not been perfect. You try to destroy the progressive ones for not being perfect enough. You use innuendo that attacks their CHARACTER.
And if anyone defends them as not being as evil and corrupt as your “spidey sense” has convinced you they are, you attack them.
LikeLike
Wow, dienne77 sounds like the perfect Alt-Right troll attacking anything that is left of extreme right to make sure there is no one left standing except some freak on the far right who wants to blow up the world.
LikeLike
Lloyd,
It’s interesting that you say that because when dienne77 was attacking Hillary Clinton in much the same way last fall there were times when I thought it was a right wing troll masquerading as a teacher. There are times when dienne77 makes some excellent points and I am convinced she is just a teacher who is just predisposed to believe every Democrat will sell out the progressive agenda.
But it will remain to be seen whether she supports any candidate when they are actually running directly against a right wing Republican. There were lots of fake pro-Bernie trolls happy to promote him when he wasn’t running against a Republican. They could pretend Bernie was perfect and corrupt Hillary needed to be defeated no matter what.
LikeLike
De Blasio is not a very strong supporter of public education. He’s no Diane Ravitch. But then, de Blasio is no Michael Bloomberg either.
It’s the same here. I’m not always happy with Los Angeles Mayor Garcetti, but I am always glad Antonio Villaraigosa is no longer in office. May it stay that way.
LikeLike
I disagree with you about that. I’m a NYC public school parent so I have some knowledge about what goes on here.
Obviously, I am comparing with the last 20 years with Giuliani/Bloomberg but anyone who says that Mayor de Blasio is “not a very strong supporter of public education” is completely ignorant of the reality in NYC. I can’t think of a Mayor who supports public education more than he does but I’d be interested to hear of any so I can donate to their campaigns!
LikeLike
De Blasio is a supporter of public education — relatively speaking.
LikeLike
De Blasio is not perfect. But unlike Bloomberg and Klein, he actually believes in public education. He served on a local school board, and both his children went to public schools.
LikeLike
There are no perfect politicians!
But the Mayor’s support of public schools has been very consistent and about as good as it gets. The DOE has the usual problems bureaucracies have and it is far from perfect. As a parent I am delighted when their feet (or the Mayor’s) are held to the fire and their mistakes or misdeeds are reported.
What I object to is when valid criticism is turned into some Mayoral-led corruption that demonstrates that he can’t wait to sell out public education to the highest bidder so he or his donors can get rich. That’s the propaganda the right wing has decided to use lately to defeat de Blasio and install a new Mayor who will be delighted to do the bidding of the rich. It certainly worked to defeat Hillary Clinton and they are chomping at the bit to destroy de Blasio as just as corrupt, money-hungry, and a sell-out. Anything to get progressives to turn against him. So it doesn’t surprise me when Hillary-hating dienne77 starts the same bashing of de Blasio. But it sure depresses me to see it working again.
Mayor de Blasio stood up to the billionaire’s pet charter operator in the most mild of ways and that was enough for them to fund a multi million dollar advertising campaign to undermine him. Not to mention an unknown amount paid to PR firms to push nasty stories and anonymous posts by supposed progressives about him selling out to the highest bidder. And despite that he has not totally caved, although there is certainly enormous pressure on him to do so. I fully expect that it will be an extremely close election with de Blasio playing the role of Hillary Clinton to whatever opponent in the primary or general election is willing and delighted to do the bidding of the very rich and generous (to politicians who kowtow to them) pro-charter lobby. And I don’t know if Mayor de Blasio or his pro-charter Andrew Cuomo-approved opponent will win.
I’m sure there will be lots of self-proclaimed “progressives” posting about how corrupt de Blasio is in attempt to suppress the vote and defeat him because they are just so concerned he isn’t ‘perfect’ they’d prefer any right wing Mayor to someone who lies as much as he does.
LikeLike
“The original plan was intended to hire and train leaders from industry and aspiring principals from outside New York City, who would come into the school system and act as disruptors with fresh ideas. Neither of those approaches worked.”
This post connects with a nice crit of the “What Works Clearinghouse” run by the Institute of Education Sciences on Larry Cuban’s website today.
The suggestion is that education might be improved if it had a dumpster for really bad ideas. You can find a lot of these at the IES What Works Clearinghouse and also at the Clayton Christensen Institute website where “disruptive innovation” is praised. Add your on bounty to the dumpster, and bring a lot more. Deliver the dumpster(s) to the purveyors of stupid ideas.
LikeLike
Good piece from the Columbus Dispatch on how the founders of ECOT have gotten rich off the schools:
“But once Lager inked that deal, his financial woes didn’t last long. ECOT — and his affiliated for-profit companies that provide instructional materials, services and marketing — have brought Lager a fortune.
From 2001 to 2016, ECOT took in more than $1 billion from Ohio taxpayers, and of that total paid more than $170 million to Lager’s companies to run the day-to-day operations of the school and provide it with educational software. During that time, Lager amassed millions in real estate holdings and made $2.1 million in political contributions to influential state officials.
Two years after opening ECOT, Lager bought a $300,000 condominium in the Waterford Tower Downtown, property records show. In 2010, he purchased a $433,500 home on Senecaville Lake in Noble County. In 2013, Lager bought a $995,000 house in Upper Arlington where his daughter, Jessica Lager Harris, and her family now live.”
This online garbage is what ed reform and the US Department of Education are pushing into every public school in the country.
It is an absolute disaster in Ohio, but they don’t care.
http://www.dispatch.com/news/20170730/how-ecot-founder-william-lager-cooked-up-lucrative-charter-school
LikeLike
Let’s stop calling improved test scores Academic gains”
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seconded.
LikeLike
Thirded.
LikeLike
Well said: Eliminating the test-score scam means refusal of using it.
LikeLike
It’s easy to have your career ruined by an inept or incompetent principal. I am finding it hard to move on from my past experiences both in a professional way and spiritually. I wish more districts were aware of this problem.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is very true. I’m having similar experiences. I’m sorry you’re having to deal with them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah yes, and nobody wants to hear the real reason why you are no longer employed at your previous school. Someone needs to come up with a list of meaningless responses to the question of why you left. “My principal called me a liar in his written review with no attempt to speak with me before documenting that assumption,” just does not go over well with future employers. I aged out of any possibility of employment as a teacher. If you haven’t hit the ageism wall, keep up the fight. It is discouraging and depressing, but so many teachers are leaving now that you might find a place.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When I and other teachers faced what felt to be illogical attacks from the school “fixer” principal suddenly installed to run our low-income school, I found out after the fact that he had been given a mandate from our reform-money-dependent district’s superintendent: make outspoken and generally older teachers a target. Under the rules of R2T, there was (still is, I believe) money attached to the goal of dismissing targeted teachers.
LikeLike
Here’s my all-time favorite NYC Leadership Academy story.
Leadership Academy alumnus Andrew Buck, a middle school principal in New York City’s public schools, refused to give out textbooks to his school’s students.
When parents complained, Buck responded with an appalling letter that seems like it was written by mentally ill and/or sadly illiterate homeless person.
NOTE: Buck was hired by former NYC Schools Chancellor Joel Klein, an avid advocate of corporate reform and business model solutions to improve education. Buck was a product of Klein’s creation, the highly-touted “Leadership Academy”.
This was a program to train leaders outside of education —who no training, credentials, or school experience as a teacher, administrator, aide, etc.— who would then run schools with hundreds or thousands of students attending, and supervise fully-credentialed teachers who, unlike him, possess years or decades of experience.
How’s that working out, Joel? In this case, not so well.
Here’s the letter to the parents… with proofreader marks courtesy of the New York Daily News:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxueWRuZG9jc3xneDoyMTdjY2M3ZWQzOWJlNDA0&pli=1
Here’s the article about Buck, about his denying students textbooks, and about his insane letter defending this decision:
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/principal-writes-memo-full-typos-parents-teachers-give-f-article-1.188871
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS:
“A rambling letter from the principal of a Brooklyn middle school was so poorly written and full of grammatical errors that parents and teachers say he deserves a dunce cap.
“Principal Andrew Buck of the Middle School for Art and Philosophy was defending his policy of not providing textbooks in the email sent last week.
“Or at least he seemed to be.
CLICK TO SEE BUCK’S LETTER
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxueWRuZG9jc3xneDoyMTdjY2M3ZWQzOWJlNDA0&pli=1
“It was hard to tell because his logic was so bewildering, his language so stilted. His subjects and verbs didn’t always match. He repeatedly misspelled ‘textbook’ as two words.
“After Buck fired off the email to teachers, parents got a hold of it and passed out copies in front of the East Flatbush school. Many are calling for his ouster.
“ ‘Our principal denies us books and then he sends this nonsense,’ said Paulette Brown, a nurse assistant from Flushing whose daughter is in the eighth grade.
” ‘You can’t understand what he’s saying in the letter. He has to go.’
“Buck, who earns $129,913 as head of the C-rated school, noted in the email that “a few influential parents” have been pushing for more textbooks in the classroom.
“ ‘Text books are the soup de jour, the sine qua non, the nut and bolts of teaching and learning in high school and college so to speak,’ he wrote in one head-scratching passage.
“Buck appeared to switch positions midway through the document. After saying textbooks are useful, he went the other way:
“ ‘ [J]ust because student have a text book, doesn’t mean she or she will be able to read it . . . Additionally students can’t use a text book to learn how to learn from a textbook…’
“In one particularly bizarre section, Buck revealed that not being able to correctly answer questions at the back of many textbooks made him feel ‘dumb and inadequate’ when he was a middle school student.
“The missive contains about 50 errors of grammar and logic, said experts who reviewed it.
“ ‘The letter is a confusing mess,’ said Alan Ettman, who has taught English at Dewitt Clinton High School in the Bronx for 26 years.
“ ‘The grammar is horrible. The logic is tortured. I can’t figure out what he’s trying to say,’ said Ettman, who gave the letter a grade of F.
“ ‘It’s as though each paragraph is not related to the one that comes before or after,’ Ettman said. ‘I think he’s just trying to make excuses for not buying books.’
“Jack Wolkenfeld, a professor of English at Kingsborough Community College for 36 years, said the letter suggested a confused thought process.
“ ‘It’s hasty, like the author hasn’t thought it out,‘ Wolkenfeld said. ‘The writing and logic are so confused I thought it was a joke.’
“Nobody’s laughing at the Lenox St. school where only 13% of eighth-graders passed state reading exams last year.
“Students have no books at all for some classes, forcing teachers to pull material off the Internet or make copies of books to distribute in class. Pupils also don’t have computers or a library.
“Buck, who has worked for the Department of Education since 1997, has been principal since the school opened in 2007. He is not tenured, officials said.
“He was voted the ‘least trustworthy’ principal in Brooklyn by the teachers union in 2008.
“In an email to the Daily News, Buck insisted the school has ‘plenty’ of textbooks and said all the fuss is unwarranted.
“ ‘I often correspond with teachers on educational issues to enhance communications and generate discussion,’ said Buck.
“ ‘If any parent has concerns, I am available to speak with them.’ ”
LikeLike
Joel Klein created the Leadership Academy, and in 2008 granted it a $50 million contract, in a so-called “competitive bid” one month after taking himself and Chris Cerf off the board. See https://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com/2008/07/joel-klein-devises-plan-in-which-he-can.html
And:
http://www.nysun.com/new-york/citys-leadership-academy-secures-public-contract/80932/
The Leadership Academy has done much damage, by graduating legions of abusive and dysfunctional principals many of who have wreaked havoc on our schools. It is sad that cronyism and waste lives on at DOE.
LikeLike
Buried in the NY Post article was this comment:
“But officials said the DOE stopped using most of NYCLA services in June.”
and this comment:
“The third, for payments up to $45 million from July 2014 to June 2019, was inked under Mayor de Blasio by Chancellor Carmen Farina’s chief operating officer. About $34.8 million available remains unspent.”
It is interesting that the organization only received a fraction of the money it could have from the current Mayor over the last 3 years — certainly not even close to 3/5 of what the contract allowed.
It is also interesting the the NY Post completely overlooked that while the current Mayor provided them with 10.2 million dollars, they claim that NYCLA received over $100 million dollars. I wonder who provided all the other funding to them?
LikeLike
Chancellor Fariña told me directly that NYC is finished with the Leadership Academy.
LikeLike
Leadership Academy in doubt! How joyous. Laughing Out Loud!
LikeLike
Here’s an interesting case study of the Leadership Academy — which thankfully is in its death throes,
In its existence, the Leadership Academy has fallen far short if the claims made in this slick promotional video BELOW. This puff piece includes an introduction from arch corporate ed reformist and former Mayor Bloomberg, and then some gushing from then-Chancellor Joel Klein, a fellow corporate ed. reformer appointed by Bloomberg:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
MAYOR MICHAIEL BLOOMBERG:
“The Leadership Academy is the cornerstone of the city’s educational reforms. It reflects out beliefs that great principals are the keys to great schools.”
CHANCELLOR JOEL KLEIN:
“When I became chancellor, it was clear to me that we would need a new generation of principals, principals that could lead our public schools to a different level of success.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
After a description of the program by its then-leader Sandra Stein, the video profiles new Leadership Academy Principal Daysi Garcia, of P.S. 65. She seems competent enough, and comes off as articulate and effective. This isn’t surprising as one would assume that the Klein probably did his best to choose an especially high quality principal to represent the Leadership Academy.
Well, in this case at least, NYC lucked out with Daysi Garcia. A totally inexperienced person with zero classroom experience turned out to be a good principal …
… or did she?
It turns out that, in the opinion of her school’s teaching staff, Principal Garcia ain’t all the video cracks her up to be. They have successfully filed grievances and even one lawsuit against Garcia. These arose from the tactics employed by Garcia, tactics which she learned at the Leadership Academy.
One such situation concerns veteran teacher Lucienne Mohammed. From the beginning Garcia took a dislike to Mohammed, then engaged in a Stalinist purge to run Mohammed out of the school, in the process employing despicable tactics out of a corporate melodrama… including ordering P.S. 65 teachers to shun Mohammed, and then culminating in police showing up at Mohammed’s apartment to investigate Garcia’s false complaint to the police that Mohammed had stolen student funds from the school. (soon dismissed by the police as “ridiculous.”)
You can read Mohammed’s story here — from a piece responding to THE RUBBER ROOM, Steven Brill’s hatchet job on teachers assigned to NYC’s Rubber Room. Brill’s article, published in THE NEW YORKER, ncluded distorted rendering of Mohammed’s story to bolster Brill’s anti-teacher, anti-union screed.
(you have to scroll down many pages to get to the part about Mohammed … look for the picture of Principal Garcia to find the part quoted BELOW)
http://nycrubberroomreporter.blogspot.com/2009/09/rubber-rooms-and-misinformation-of.html
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
BETSY COMBIER:
Lucienne Mohammed has one of the most interesting cases that I have observed.
I have attended almost all of her 30+ hearings, so I know her case and the people involved quite well and can say unequivocally that Steven Brill misinformed the readers of his biased article “THE RUBBER ROOM” published in the New Yorker magazine at the end of August, 2009. He could not have been more wrong about the facts in Lucienne’s case.
…
Lucienne Mohammed is a beautiful person, inside and out. When I first met her more than a year ago, I thought that she must be a model. She is African- American and has the most beautiful smile I’ve ever seen. She is also beautiful inside, a person of intelligence, character, and integrity. I am proud to say that she is my friend. The case against her is false, and the Principal is motivated to get rid of her because of Mohammed filing grievances.
I asked Lucienne to give me the information she would like to publish, so here it is:
From LUCIENNE MOHAMMED:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x
“I have taught at PS 65 for a little over 17 years and have only received satisfactory ratings.
“Ms. Daysi Garcia became Principal in 2004, and, by the end of her first term, two Black Assistant Principals and guidance counselor lost their positions. The two administrators were demoted to their previous positions and the guidance counselor was sent to the Rubber Room.
“In the 2005-2006 school year, a teacher who supported the UFT and associated with me and the only other classroom teacher of African descent in our East New York school was advised to stop associating with us. When she continued the friendship she was harassed and then terminated in 2006. However, in a subsequent lawsuit the NYC BOE had to award costs to this teacher and clear her record.
“Ms. Garcia (pictured at right) is openly anti-UFT. She promptly disposed of our newly elected UFT representative in the beginning of the 2006 school year. He was sent to the Rubber Room along with the remaining Black Guidance counselor.
“Ms. Garcia began an OSI investigation against me in October 2006 for taking part in the filing of a grievance regarding teachers’ contractual right to have a menu of choices for their professional development period.
“Ms. Garcia prosecuted me for supporting a boy whom she maligned in an open lunchroom by stating that the student’s religion (Islam) ‘cant be tolerated because it starves children”.
“I reported Ms. Garcia to OEO in April 2007 for allowing a racist act to occur during a professional development conference, wherein I and the only other teacher of African descent in our East New York school were told to play the role of ‘Big Ugly Negro’.
“In April 2007, I gave a character reference to a teacher in defense against slanderous and discriminatory actions made by Ms. Garcia against him. This was followed by a slew of misleading, embellished, and fabricated events put into letters placed in my file.
” After a series of attacks and harassment at the hands of Ms. Garcia, I filed an Article 2 Grievance in December 2007.
“Since Ms. Garcia came to our school in 2004 I had never been given a U rating. My first came after the retirement of the Assistant Principal. Immediately following this, Ms. Garcia put in her place a teacher of only 4 years’ experience who was elevated rapidly to do her bidding, which included harassing me and another teacher.
“The new Assistant Principal was ordered to perform observations in the last 6 weeks of the school year. I and another teacher of African descent received U ratings for the first time. I filed with the DOE’s OEO office, and filed another Article 2 grievance prior to my knowing that I had received a U rating.
“Ms. Garcia admitted to making negative and derogatory remarks about me in the open office, as was brought out during the arbitration hearing. I attempted to find some resolution for the constant harassment I was subjected to during the 2006-2007 school year, and followed proper, recommended procedures: grievances, attempted dialogues, grievance, Special Complaint, OEO, and even a meeting with the Superintendent, which was facilitated by State Assemblyman Darryl Townes.
“The UFT validated my allegations of harassment and retaliatory behavior by accepting my case as a Special Complaint. Nothing has yet been resolved and Ms. Garcia made no attempt to compromise or have a dialogue. Instead, her harassment became more vicious and I was placed the following year in a new grade (5th) which had students at different cognitive levels and a different curriculum than that for which I was trained. I was given no training.
“The 2007-2008 school year saw me in a small classroom with one of the largest, diverse ability group of students in the grade. The room was isolated from any other classroom. I had no desk, no file cabinet, student computers, or even closets. These conditions persisted until I was removed in June, 2008. I was the only teacher in the school who was required to hand in 18 lesson plans every Monday prior to the start of the school day.
“Contrary to the UFT contract and the BOE agreement, I was told to sign up to be in the PIP+ program, even though I had only one U rating, not two. The PIP+ peer evaluator was not competent to observe me: she had not taught in NYC since 1968; she had no supervisory certification or experience, no knowledge of the required curriculum and was not in a position to advise or mentor me. She did not follow the time allotted for pre- and post observations, and I never received her recommendations in a timely fashion.
“She stated for the record that she was told by the administration to support a U rating.
“In June 2008 I was told to leave the school by the secretary, and not allowed to retrieve any personal belongings such as books, my digital camera, games I had bought for the children. These items have never been returned to me.
“Not satisfied with removing me from the school, Ms. Garcia sent police officers to my home after accusing me of theft of student funds, The police called this ridiculous.
“I was ordered to sign for letters to my file weeks after being interned in the Rubber Room. Then, after being in the Rubber Room for 6 months, the administration again tried to file a charge against me, with OSI. The charges were unsubstantiated.
“Mr. Brill was never given permission by me to see my file, and the NYC BOE will be held accountable for giving my file to a reporter without my knowledge or consent, especially given the fact that Mr. Brill took liberty to alter all the facts for his article. The letter, by the way, mentioned in Brill’s article, was NOT given eleven days earlier. It was from my doctor, written the day before it was given I had been in the hospital with viral and bacterial bronchitis the Sunday and Monday of the previous week.
“I was never asked questions about any ‘enforcer student”’ nor have I ever chosen a student to be an ‘enforcer’. Furthermore, it was during the 3020-a that I first heard of such charges.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x
BETSY COMBIER:
That’s from Lucienne.
This is from me: I will be a witness for Lucienne Mohammed in any venue, at any time, and I will discuss the despicable sabotage of a beautiful, talented and dedicated teacher by the NYC BOE as represented in this case by Principal Daysi Garcia and Dennis De Costa, TPU Attorney at Law. I will try to remember to buy Mr. De Costa a package of gum before I speak.
LikeLike
Here’s an interesting case study of the Leadership Academy — which thankfully is in its death throes,
In its existence, the Leadership Academy has fallen far short if the claims made in this slick promotional video BELOW. This puff piece includes an introduction from arch corporate ed reformist and former Mayor Bloomberg, and then some gushing from then-Chancellor Joel Klein, a fellow corporate ed. reformer appointed by Bloomberg:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
MAYOR MICHAIEL BLOOMBERG:
“The Leadership Academy is the cornerstone of the city’s educational reforms. It reflects out beliefs that great principals are the keys to great schools.”
CHANCELLOR JOEL KLEIN:
“When I became chancellor, it was clear to me that we would need a new generation of principals, principals that could lead our public schools to a different level of success.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
After a description of the program by its then-leader Sandra Stein, the video profiles new Leadership Academy Principal Daysi Garcia, of P.S. 65. She seems competent enough, and comes off as articulate and effective. This isn’t surprising as one would assume that the Klein probably did his best to choose an especially high quality principal to represent the Leadership Academy.
Well, in this case at least, NYC lucked out with Daysi Garcia. A totally inexperienced person with zero classroom experience turned out to be a good principal …
… or did she?
It turns out that, in the opinion of her school’s teaching staff, Principal Garcia ain’t all the video cracks her up to be. They have successfully filed grievances and even one lawsuit against Garcia. These arose from the tactics employed by Garcia, tactics which she learned at the Leadership Academy.
One such situation concerns veteran teacher Lucienne Mohammed. From the beginning Garcia took a dislike to Mohammed, then engaged in a Stalinist purge to run Mohammed out of the school, in the process employing despicable tactics out of a corporate melodrama… including ordering P.S. 65 teachers to shun Mohammed, and then culminating in police showing up at Mohammed’s apartment to investigate Garcia’s false complaint to the police that Mohammed had stolen student funds from the school. (soon dismissed by the police as “ridiculous.”)
You can read Mohammed’s story here — from a piece responding to THE RUBBER ROOM, Steven Brill’s hatchet job on teachers assigned to NYC’s Rubber Room. Brill’s article, published in THE NEW YORKER, ncluded distorted rendering of Mohammed’s story to bolster Brill’s anti-teacher, anti-union screed.
(you have to scroll down many pages to get to the part about Mohammed … look for the picture of Principal Garcia to find the part quoted BELOW)
http://nycrubberroomreporter.blogspot.com/2009/09/rubber-rooms-and-misinformation-of.html
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
BETSY COMBIER:
Lucienne Mohammed has one of the most interesting cases that I have observed.
I have attended almost all of her 30+ hearings, so I know her case and the people involved quite well and can say unequivocally that Steven Brill misinformed the readers of his biased article “THE RUBBER ROOM” published in the New Yorker magazine at the end of August, 2009. He could not have been more wrong about the facts in Lucienne’s case.
…
Lucienne Mohammed is a beautiful person, inside and out. When I first met her more than a year ago, I thought that she must be a model. She is African- American and has the most beautiful smile I’ve ever seen. She is also beautiful inside, a person of intelligence, character, and integrity. I am proud to say that she is my friend. The case against her is false, and the Principal is motivated to get rid of her because of Mohammed filing grievances.
I asked Lucienne to give me the information she would like to publish, so here it is:
From LUCIENNE MOHAMMED:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x
“I have taught at PS 65 for a little over 17 years and have only received satisfactory ratings.
“Ms. Daysi Garcia became Principal in 2004, and, by the end of her first term, two Black Assistant Principals and guidance counselor lost their positions. The two administrators were demoted to their previous positions and the guidance counselor was sent to the Rubber Room.
“In the 2005-2006 school year, a teacher who supported the UFT and associated with me and the only other classroom teacher of African descent in our East New York school was advised to stop associating with us. When she continued the friendship she was harassed and then terminated in 2006. However, in a subsequent lawsuit the NYC BOE had to award costs to this teacher and clear her record.
“Ms. Garcia (pictured at right) is openly anti-UFT. She promptly disposed of our newly elected UFT representative in the beginning of the 2006 school year. He was sent to the Rubber Room along with the remaining Black Guidance counselor.
“Ms. Garcia began an OSI investigation against me in October 2006 for taking part in the filing of a grievance regarding teachers’ contractual right to have a menu of choices for their professional development period.
“Ms. Garcia prosecuted me for supporting a boy whom she maligned in an open lunchroom by stating that the student’s religion (Islam) ‘cant be tolerated because it starves children”.
“I reported Ms. Garcia to OEO in April 2007 for allowing a racist act to occur during a professional development conference, wherein I and the only other teacher of African descent in our East New York school were told to play the role of ‘Big Ugly Negro’.
“In April 2007, I gave a character reference to a teacher in defense against slanderous and discriminatory actions made by Ms. Garcia against him. This was followed by a slew of misleading, embellished, and fabricated events put into letters placed in my file.
” After a series of attacks and harassment at the hands of Ms. Garcia, I filed an Article 2 Grievance in December 2007.
“Since Ms. Garcia came to our school in 2004 I had never been given a U rating. My first came after the retirement of the Assistant Principal. Immediately following this, Ms. Garcia put in her place a teacher of only 4 years’ experience who was elevated rapidly to do her bidding, which included harassing me and another teacher.
“The new Assistant Principal was ordered to perform observations in the last 6 weeks of the school year. I and another teacher of African descent received U ratings for the first time. I filed with the DOE’s OEO office, and filed another Article 2 grievance prior to my knowing that I had received a U rating.
“Ms. Garcia admitted to making negative and derogatory remarks about me in the open office, as was brought out during the arbitration hearing. I attempted to find some resolution for the constant harassment I was subjected to during the 2006-2007 school year, and followed proper, recommended procedures: grievances, attempted dialogues, grievance, Special Complaint, OEO, and even a meeting with the Superintendent, which was facilitated by State Assemblyman Darryl Townes.
“The UFT validated my allegations of harassment and retaliatory behavior by accepting my case as a Special Complaint. Nothing has yet been resolved and Ms. Garcia made no attempt to compromise or have a dialogue. Instead, her harassment became more vicious and I was placed the following year in a new grade (5th) which had students at different cognitive levels and a different curriculum than that for which I was trained. I was given no training.
“The 2007-2008 school year saw me in a small classroom with one of the largest, diverse ability group of students in the grade. The room was isolated from any other classroom. I had no desk, no file cabinet, student computers, or even closets. These conditions persisted until I was removed in June, 2008. I was the only teacher in the school who was required to hand in 18 lesson plans every Monday prior to the start of the school day.
“Contrary to the UFT contract and the BOE agreement, I was told to sign up to be in the PIP+ program, even though I had only one U rating, not two. The PIP+ peer evaluator was not competent to observe me: she had not taught in NYC since 1968; she had no supervisory certification or experience, no knowledge of the required curriculum and was not in a position to advise or mentor me. She did not follow the time allotted for pre- and post observations, and I never received her recommendations in a timely fashion.
“She stated for the record that she was told by the administration to support a U rating.
“In June 2008 I was told to leave the school by the secretary, and not allowed to retrieve any personal belongings such as books, my digital camera, games I had bought for the children. These items have never been returned to me.
“Not satisfied with removing me from the school, Ms. Garcia sent police officers to my home after accusing me of theft of student funds, The police called this ridiculous.
“I was ordered to sign for letters to my file weeks after being interned in the Rubber Room. Then, after being in the Rubber Room for 6 months, the administration again tried to file a charge against me, with OSI. The charges were unsubstantiated.
“Mr. Brill was never given permission by me to see my file, and the NYC BOE will be held accountable for giving my file to a reporter without my knowledge or consent, especially given the fact that Mr. Brill took liberty to alter all the facts for his article. The letter, by the way, mentioned in Brill’s article, was NOT given eleven days earlier. It was from my doctor, written the day before it was given I had been in the hospital with viral and bacterial bronchitis the Sunday and Monday of the previous week.
“I was never asked questions about any ‘enforcer student”’ nor have I ever chosen a student to be an ‘enforcer’. Furthermore, it was during the 3020-a that I first heard of such charges.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x
BETSY COMBIER:
That’s from Lucienne.
This is from me: I will be a witness for Lucienne Mohammed in any venue, at any time, and I will discuss the despicable sabotage of a beautiful, talented and dedicated teacher by the NYC BOE as represented in this case by Principal Daysi Garcia and Dennis De Costa, TPU Attorney at Law. I will try to remember to buy Mr. De Costa a package of gum before I speak.
LikeLike
That’s it: data.
LikeLike
Bogus Leadership Academy – like the Broad Supes Academy. I guess if you want to dupe people into believe you have educational value – you name your gig something Academy. Think Success Academy too – that place is the real deal. I wonder why Relay Graduate School didn’t call itself Relay Academy.
I don’t understand how any of these places stay in business, or how their “graduates” get hired, other than they get appointed.
LikeLike
In the case of Relay, “graduate school” is as fake as “academy.”
LikeLike
Isn’t “Relay” a chain overpriced store found in many airports across the U.S.?!
Perhaps there’s a classroom/backroom that allows travelers (between flights) to take courses, hand out graduate “degrees” & render fliers certified!
LikeLike
Leadership Academy was created by business billionaire Bloomberg and his trusted lawyer sidekick, Klein.
They wanted to bust our union and privatize our educational system.
It was very much to an applicant’s advantage to have an MBA on his or her resume. Teaching experience and longevity were not necessary and, in some cases, disadvantageous.
It was a school to teach managerial techniques used in the business world. People were told not to maintain eye contact with teachers or form personal relationships. I know some former teachers who were told to end their past relationships with their colleagues. Principals were instructed on how to instill fear in the minds of teachers.
This “Academy” got very used to doing whatever it liked under 8 years of Bloomberg. I know Bill, personally. He’s very pro public education. No BS. He’s also in politics and has to be a politician in order to survive in that world. He had a LOT of work to do after 12 years of Bloomberg. Education was and still is one of many very large areas that the mayor is responsible for. He’s been stonewalled and slandered by Albany and the NY Post from the start. I think this facet escaped his oversight and attention and am glad it’s been uncovered. Thank you, Scott Stringer.
LikeLike
The first leader of the Leadetship Academy was a businessman from Colorado whose computer company had just collapsed. He brought his own large staff and personal coach (!) with him. The head of the board initially was the infamous Jack Welch of GE. It was the purest application of corporate reform to education: leadership training with no educators welcome.
LikeLike
That was a while back.
Seems like only two weeks ago.
Time flies when you’re having fun. Or fighting for your lives.
LikeLike
I teach in a campus setting within the Bronx. After years of witnessing 6 or 7 separate schools in the building with 6 or 7 principals, I realize that the leadership academy is a thriving business that pumps out pathetic losers who actually become administrators. The leadership bosses all get kickbacks to come “coach” the pathetic bastards they place. It’s all about adults with jobs here in NYC. Not much has to do with the kids. In fact I predict that within 3 years there will be more administrators than teachers. They should cut the schools in half and have 14 principals and 14 schools in each campus. Let’s really laugh our asses off. You can have a principal and 3 assistant principals for 150 kids. Hysterical!!!! Only in NYC.
LikeLike
Just like they didn’t know where NYC pension money was going . I am a Retired NYC Correction Officer who got attacked on Rikers.Filled out all affidavits sent them in all these years. Five years ago. pension decreased to 5 dollars. Now a Mother with Daughter homeless as a result. I put my life on line and this is what I get?!! Think the politicians don’t care bout teachers or law enforcement!!! Some of the hardest jobs and until they do the right thing will never b a democrat again!! What does this say for my daughter having me help her out with College!!! I need my 3/4 pension. My disability has gotten worse. Then I have to deal with Scott Stringers office making fun of my disability over phone. There’s a law against that!!!!! During!!!!
LikeLike