Politico discusses the state plans to implement the Every Student Succeeds Act and raises the question:
Why are these uninformed, distant, unqualified people allowed to tell schools what to do?
Betsy DeVos and everyone she has appointed hates public schools. Why should they be trusted to give them instructions? Left to her own devices, DeVos would cripple public schools with regulations and mandates intended to drive students to unregulated charters and religious schools. Nothing qualifies this woman for the position she holds. She knows nothing about public schools, nothing about instruction, nothing about teaching. She was put there by Trump and Pence to destroy our public schools.
“HOUSE TACKLES ESSA IMPLEMENTATION TODAY: The House Education and the Workforce Committee this morning will hear from federal, state and local officials on their efforts to carry out the Every Student Succeeds Act. “Given the monumental shift in education policy represented by ESSA, it is important that we hear how implementation is progressing,” Chairwoman Virginia Foxx is expected to say . “We know the law will not fully take effect until the coming school year, and we will need time to assess its impact on schools and students. However, I look forward to hearing from today’s witnesses about the progress states, school districts, and the Department of Education are making.”
– While the hearing will primarily focus on state and local implementation of the law, Foxx is also expected to say that the committee will be watching the Education Department for any signs of overreach. The hearing comes as Secretary Betsy DeVos’ agency is under fire for its feedback on state ESSA plans. Some advocates and state education chiefs believe federal officials haven’t been consistent in their feedback or they’ve been reading the law too strictly, limiting the flexibility that was promised to states since ESSA’s passage in 2015. Senate HELP Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander said last week that Jason Botel, acting assistant secretary for elementary and secondary education, “hasn’t read the law carefully.” Botel should nix the back-and-forth with states over their plans, Alexander said.
– GAO will release a report in conjunction with the hearing, called, “Early Observations on State Changes to Accountability Systems.” Jacqueline Nowicki, director of K-12 education policy at GAO, is expected to say that some states are using the law’s flexibility “to significantly change their accountability systems while others are making more limited changes,” according to prepared testimony obtained by POLITICO. The Education Department is also trying to determine “whether there is a need for additional guidance to states on aspects of ESSA implementation,” Nowicki will say. Democrats and some advocates believe additional guidance is sorely needed, since Republicans earlier this year scrapped the Obama administration’s ESSA accountability regulations.
– A lack of “clear regulations” has presented “challenges,” Phillip Lovell, vice president of policy and government relations for the advocacy group Alliance for Excellent Education is expected to say . The Education Department’s feedback to states on their plans has proven “confusing” and “insufficient.” This isn’t good because “the quality of ESSA state plans is uneven,” Lovell will say, stressing that the department should play a stronger and more consistent oversight role. “There are certainly some strengths” in state plans, he’ll say, “but there are missed opportunities and many weaknesses, including proposals that are inconsistent with the law.”

We asked the same thing when I was in high school. Maybe you will remember the 1980s. You guys started the tradition of telling schools what to do.
LikeLike
Mitch, who are “you guys”? I was an adjunct professor at Teachers College in the 1980s. When I worked for Bush 1 from 1991-93, nothing we proposed ever passed Congress.
LikeLike
Thank god, eh!!
LikeLike
While I appreciate Senator Alexander’s quote, the law was written in a way that left the door open for misinterpretation and easy return to problems from Race to the Top and NCLB. I hope he does more than comment.
LikeLike
Not that you’re denying this but I do think there’s a role for the federal government in protecting civil rights for students. If they just wanted “data” to ensure children weren’t being treated unfairly on race or language or gender or something I would be fine with it. They DO need some measures or they would just be taking the state’s word on it.
I think they run into trouble when they start with stuff like not “ambitious” enough. I don’t even know what that means. Also, of course now they bash public schools and promote charter and private schools while insisting they are “agnostic” and pretending they are working on “guardrails” so that’s a problem, but it’s a different problem.
LikeLike
I understand the need to collect data for future planning and for understanding the needs of the population. IMHO data that identify individuals have the potential to be misused to pigeonhole or discriminate against certain types of people. Our privacy laws lag behind our systems to collect data, and parents have a good reason to be concerned about the mass collection of data that may follow young people for their whole lives under the guise of depersonalized learning.
LikeLike
Q Betsy DeVos and everyone she has appointed hates public schools. Why should they be trusted to give them instructions? Left to her own devices, DeVos would cripple public schools with regulations and mandates intended to drive students to unregulated charters and religious schools. Nothing qualifies this woman for the position she holds. She knows nothing about public schools, nothing about instruction, nothing about teaching. She was put there by Trump and Pence to destroy our public schools. END Q
I cannot believe you would post such statements. Why do you think these things?
LikeLike
Because of the words that come out of her mouth.
LikeLike
Perfect response.
LikeLike
“Why do you think these things?”
Why would you not think these things? Please refute any one of those statements you are apparently so apoplectic about. What experience does DeVos have? What does she know about schools, instruction, teaching? What evidence do you have that DeVos in any way supports public education? Please enlighten us, specifically, about what’s wrong with what Diane said.
LikeLike
I am not apoplectic. I have not heard Ms. DeVos come out and say “I hate public schools”. I am not satisfied, that “everyone” she has appointed, “hates” public schools. When she took the helm at the DoE, there were many senior people (as well as mid-level, and lower echelon) staff at the DoE, which were, and are supportive of the public education system.
The USA has the best public schools in the world. (My genuine opinion, no sarcasm). The top public high schools send nearly all their graduates on to college, and many to the most selective colleges. Faculty and parents are dedicated to the educational task, and most students graduate with college credit already in hand.
The USA also has the worst public schools in the industrialized world. In about 1,200 or so of these (high) schools, a third of the attendees (I will not call them students) do not graduate. This is a national disgrace. According to the NAEP (National Assessment of Education Process), In 2013, 66 percent of U.S. fourth graders and 64 percent of eighth graders could not read at their grade level.
Ms DeVos, and the DoE should be trusted to give direction to national education policy, because that is their job, and that is the function of the DoE, as set in the legislation which authorized the DoE, in 1979. (The creation of the DoE, was a big mistake in my opinion)
I am not convinced, that the current EdSec would “cripple” existing public schools, and “drive” students into alternate schools.
She is pre-eminently qualified to hold the post of SecEd, precisely she does not have the kind of extensive in-school experience that liberals so angrily attack her for lacking. If she were an administrator/bureaucrat/educator/teacher/principal,etc she would not have the kind of objectivity, which a SecEd should have.
I disagree strongly, that she knows “nothing” about schools/instruction/teaching. This woman has been involved in these topics for over a decade. Her experience in the education field, is wide and diverse. She is the daughter of a public-school teacher. ( I am the grandson of a public-school teacher, and the brother of two public-school teachers)
I am not satisfied that she was nominated by the Pres. and confirmed by the Senate, to “destroy” publicly-operated and publicly-financed education in this nation.
According to a 2013 Luntz Global Public Opinion Survey, 64 percent of American parents said they would send their children to a different school if they could. Similar studies, conducted all across this nation, reflect a similar dissatisfaction with the “status quo”. And when it comes to minority parents, and individuals in low-quality inner-city schools, the percentage increases.
Into this mine-field, comes Ms. DeVos. I wish her well.
Read more about it, at
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/444260/betsy-devos-school-choice
LikeLike
And actions. Actual actions that have been documented for decades.
LikeLike
Oh Charles….why don’t you just dry up and fall into a hole somewhere. This is really not the website/blog site for you. I really think that the only reason you comment here is because you like to argue for the sake of arguing….whether you’re right or not. You, sir, are simply what people refer to as a troll…..with too much time your hands! Sorry in advance Ms. Ravitch for posting this, but every time he posts, it just makes me want to vomit.
LikeLike
Lisa,
I try to be civil. It is not easy.
LikeLike
Lisa,
I try to be civil. It is not easy.
LikeLike
like !!!!!!, except the vomit .
LikeLike
I apologize sincerely, if I have caused you (or anyone) gastric distress. I only write the truth, and post what I see. I do enjoy reading what the left has to say about the public schools, which they claim to love so much, while sending their own children to private/parochial schools. It is no fun, to be in an “echo chamber”.
LikeLike
Good post, Chas! Getting that subtle sarcasm down, eh!
LikeLike
I never use sarcasm. My first wife was Chinese, and my current wife is Russian. I have to use a simple, basic vocabulary (at home), and it carries over in my personal and professional communications. I say what I mean, and I mean what I say.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought I had detected a hint of sarcasm, that’s all. I guess my sarcasmometer needs some adjusting, eh!
LikeLike
I DO wonder why the last 4 secretaries of ed have spent so much time scolding public schools. That’s not a good relationship. They really see their role as taking public schools to task every day? It seems to assume bad faith.
People really work at public schools because they want bad schools? All of them?
DeVos says “putting children first” as if it’s some kind of bold position. Before her everyone was putting children last? That’s an amazingly negative view of a huge group of people she doesn’t know.
I was really struck by how Duncan took the worst possible view of the parents in NY who objected to the Common Core test. He assumed the absolute worst about them- ALL of their motives were BAD. It was crazy to me. He ignored what they said, read their minds and determined they were all bad or deluded or spoiled people. Wow. That’s really hostile.
LikeLike
I can think of two reasons, Chiara:
1.) By denigrating the public schools, they (attempt to) absolve themselves from anything negative with regards to our schools.
2.) They are sticking to the plutocratic Ed Reform message. I continue to search for a public figure who has paid any price for maintaining these views.
LikeLike
In Newark, the mayor switched to the ed reform side. I agree with you about the lack of consequences.
LikeLike
Ohio Algebra II Teacher,
You are SOOOOO RIGHT ON re: your two reasons.
I was full of ‘HOPE,” then Obama named Duncan. and then King. I knew then that public schools, public school teachers, public school students and their parents/guardians would take the “RAP” while the weasels made back room deals and money off our backs. So SAD and plain BAD.
When someone does not attend any public school (elementary, middle school, high school, and college/university, that person has NO CLUE about the POWER of a PUBLIC SCHOOL EDUCATION. These private school preppies mostly live in bubbles of entitlement.
LikeLike
Sounds like those who get to offer testimony have been handpicked to favor the kind of micromanaging that Senator Alexander did not want.
I don’t pay fees to PoliticoPro but the regular Politico kept linking to (so and so) “is expected to say.” I am fairly sure the speakers will not raise questions that might be embarrassing to Alexander and others who cobbled together ESSA. ESSA reads like a lightly edited patchwork of ideas from legislative briefs prepared by lobbyists.
Ohio’s ESSA plan offers evidence for having “consulted with stakeholders.” The evidence was manufactured by the Ohio Philanthropy Group, aided by person who described herself as “the Ohio representative of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.” The manufacturing began with an online survey with prepared questions along with some regional convening of “stakeholders” with the agenda structured around the same questions.
OFF the table was any discussion of the absolute need to ensure ESSA funds do not enrich the charter industry in Ohio where there is industrial-strength graft.
LikeLike
Why are these people allowed to tell public schools and teachers what to do?
In a declining empire – see Trump, Donald John – the citizens of the Homeland are the last to be colonized.
LikeLike
How much are Bill and Melinda Gates and DFER hedge funders paying in taxes for my rural school district? Nothing. Where do they live? Nowhere near my neighborhood.
If they lived in my community they would have the same influence I have. They could run for school board or vote for school board members.
Since their behavior has corrupted the nation’s democracy, they should be forced to be men without a country.
LikeLike
You got this right, Linda.
LikeLike
They are the men who own the country . The differences between them pale in comparison to what they have in common and to the influence they collectively yield to maintain their power and wealth.
LikeLike
From Town and Country magazine, June/July 2017, about Laura and John Arnold, “They gave to …education last year and partner with the Pew Trusts to …research and enhance COMMUNITY SUPERVISION SYSTEMS (my caps) and electronic monitoring”. Earlier this year, the Baltimore Sun reported that the Arnold’s funded aerial surveillance conducted by the police without the knowledge of community leaders.
This summer Nancy MacLean’s “Democracy in Chains” was published. The following quote from a book review explains MacLean’s research into the radical right’s plan for a hostile takeover of American governance. The plan, decades in the making, followed the Koch’s recognition that “Desegregation would tilt power away from privileged white men and toward a more diverse, egalitarian America….. a blueprint was sketched to undermine constitutional protections and to usher in a permanent ruling class.”
LikeLike
Possibly a bit more subtle but I think I’ll join Lisa M and go vomit now.
LikeLike
Arnold’s passions are charter schools and getting rid of public pensions, which he believes are bankrupting the country.
He doesn’t need a pension, why should anyone else?
LikeLike
Pensioners increased GDP. What did John Arnold of Enron and hedge funds contribute?
LikeLike
Not so much bankrupting the country, just impossible for the local jurisdictions to pay. Here is a good example from California: http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2012/12/18/167265874/episode-424-how-much-is-a-firefighter-worth
LikeLike
I think this post illustrates a fundamental dilemma for orthodox posters here. This post, along with previous posts, laments increased state and federal oversight of education at the expense of local control. Other posts lament the inequality of local finance and argue for a larger federal and/or state role in paying for K-12 education. I don’t think you can have both. Federal and state money will always come with federal and state oversight, give up the outside money to retain local autonomy.
LikeLike
No oversight for charters or vouchers, other than whistleblowers.
LikeLike
Dr. Ravitch,
Do you have any thoughts about the point of my post? It was that generally you can choose higher state and federal funding at the cost of a loss of local autonomy or you can choose more local autonomy at the cost of reduced state and federal funding and the inequality that will create.
Which horn do you choose?
LikeLike
TE,
I don’t think that’s a necessary choice. Until NCLB, the Feds made no effort to control every public school in the nation. The Feds need to reassess their role: equitable funding, civil rights protections, research, data collection. Congress and the US Department of education lack the knowledge to tell every school what to do.
LikeLike
Dr. Ravitch,
Until NCLB the federal government did not have much of a role in financing K-12 education. If you truly want equality in expenditures across states, the federal government will have to pay more, and with that have will come more regulation.
The reason that the proverb “he who pays the piper calls the tune” is a proverb is that it is generally true. You might pop into NYU’s Office of Compliance and Risk Management to learn about the list of federal regulations connected with taking federal money.
LikeLike
TE,
You are wrong. The federal government has had a significant role in funding K-12 education since 1965 with the passage of ESEA.
The funding since NCLB was tied to disastrous mandates. No one would miss the mandates.
LikeLike
Dr Ravitch,
Do you think that he who,pays the piper does not get to call the tune?
LikeLike
The federal government pays for scientific research without telling researchers how to do their work.
The federal government has subsidized public education since 1918 without “calling the tune.”
The federal government gave billions to public schools from 1965 to 2002 without “calling the tune.”
The past 15 years of federal micromanagement have been disastrous. The disaster continues under ESSA.
LikeLike
Federal government put many billions into public schools since passage of ESEA in 1965. No fiddler. No tune. Until NCLB.
LikeLike