Wherever there is a bipartisan consensus for charter schools, the Koch brothers see the state as ripe for expanding vouchers. Now they are targeting Colorado, where they have developed a strategic plan for the state.
Leading Democrats, such as wealthy Congressman Jared Polis and former State Senator Michael Johnston, have led the charge for charters and schiool choice (both have announced they are running for the Democratic nomination for governor.) Polis has opened two charter schools and fiercely supports them as a member of the House Education Committee. Johnston, former TFA, introduced legislation in 2011 to make student test scores count for 50% of teachers’ evaluation. The law has been an abject failure, although Johnston claimed it would guarantee that Colorado had great teachers, great principals, great schools.
DFER and Stand for Children have been active in Colorado, laying the groundwork for the Koch brothers.
And now they arrive with a plan to defund public schools and call it “opportunity.”
“COLORADO SPRINGS — In a nondescript office building on the north side of this conservative enclave, more than a dozen volunteers spent hours making calls to educate voters about a new initiative that will allow parents to use taxpayer dollars to send children to private schools.
“At the same time, just miles down the road, the political network behind the effort gathered hundreds of its wealthiest donors at a posh mountainside resort to raise money to support the campaign to remake the education system.
“The confluence of policy and politics epitomized how the conservative billionaires Charles and David Koch flex their organization’s muscle and spread an ideological agenda in states across the nation.
“The value of this network cannot be overstated,” said Stacy Hock, a Koch donor and conservative education advocate in Texas. “The ability to stand on the shoulders of the giant that is this network to make yourself more impactful and strategic changes the game.”
The Koch brothers plot a conservative resistance movement in Colorado Springs strategy session
Koch network to Trump administration: “You are never going to win the war on drugs. Drugs won.”
The phone calls to middle-of-the-road voters and presentation to donors in Colorado last week were part of the Koch network’s six-figure campaign to promote school choice and education savings accounts, or ESAs.
“The effort in Colorado involves the Americans for Prosperity Foundation and the Libre Initiative, a group focused on Hispanic community outreach. Together the organizations are making calls and sending flyers to voters this summer, two of which promote ESAs as a way to “give families the freedom to select schools, classes and services that fit the unique needs of their kids….
“The Koch network considers Colorado an attractive state for its message because public charter schools are a bipartisan cause. In the 2017 session, lawmakers equalized funding for charter schools with district schools.
“EdChoice, a conservative education advocacy organization aligned with the Kochs, commissioned a survey in 2015 to introduce Colorado to the ESA issue, finding strong support when cast in favorable terms.”
It is obviously time to borrow out a page from the French Revolution.
Ahhh, Colorado Springs, home of Focus on the Family. We were in CO a few weeks ago, beautiful state with lovely people. We thoroughly enjoyed ourselves in Boulder and Denver, and I looked at teaching jobs in Jefferson, Douglas, and Boulder counties. There is a teacher shortage in CO, but I’m not willing to uproot to a state that isn’t friendly to public education.
It’s horrid here in Colorado. This started years ago with the DEMs. Now it’s a free for all. Crazy. That’s why I took early retirement. The work environment was so repressive and dogmatic.
Even former Gov. Ritter (D) sent a letter to all Deans of Colleges of Education specifying what literacy text books are in his “APPROVED” and “DISAPPROVED” list. All my selections were on Ritter’s “DISAPPROVED” list.
Unbelievable, but not surprising.
To be using something on — or even BE on — a Deformer’s “disapproved” list is a badge of honor.
Congratulations!
Polis is not opposed to vouchers:
“Vouchers for private schools?
I would not be inclined to support a federal program that forces a local school district to have vouchers. Obviously, we have districts in the country that have chosen to go that route. That’s their prerogative. Fundamentally, education is a locally-driven enterprise. So I’d be against the federal government forcing schools to create voucher programs.”
It’s a silly answer to the question. The federal government could never “force” states to offer vouchers, which Polis knows. He’s dodging answering the question directly.
He doesn’t want to say he supports vouchers but he obviously does.
There’s just not much difference between DC Democrats and DC Republicans on public schools. Neither Party does anything for kids in existing public schools. Our schools are barely mentioned in DC debates.
I feel sorry for kids in public schools. It’s like no one told them their schools had been deemed unfashionable. They don’t have any advocates in the federal government.
http://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/co/2017/03/06/congressman-jared-polis-is-more-worried-about-congress-than-betsy-devos-heres-why/
Can Democrats in Congress point to something specific they’ve done for public schools in the last decade?
They purport to be the “public education Party”- they shouldn’t have any trouble showing what they have done for kids in public schools, right?
I haven’t seen anything positive from DC for public schools in a decade. Longer.
Actually, I would challenge anyone to find anything positive Polis has ever said about public schools.
He raves about charters. The only time he mentions public schools is when he is vowing to “hold them accountable” – it’s a very punishing attitude, and it is applied ONLY to public schools.
This is a constant in ed reform- the really unrelenting negativity towards public schools.
They offer absolutely nothing that is positive or supportive to public school students and parents. It’s so baked into the ‘movement” they aren’t even aware of how biased they are.
http://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/co/2017/03/06/congressman-jared-polis-is-more-worried-about-congress-than-betsy-devos-heres-why/
I doubt whether this ed-reform attitude has to do w/any bias other than the neolib/Repub/conservative enthusiasm for moving public $ into private hands– an anti-99% economic scheme disguised as ideology. Nothing to do w/best educational practices, as evidenced by natlly widespread reluctance to close charters w/piss-poor ed performance.
As for Polis, he seems to have a mixed record. Altho he founded 2 charter schools, both serve older kids, so are not necessarily beneficiaries of closing ‘failing’ publics so as to usher them into charters. And he was responsible for a nearly-$300mill pubsch facilities-improvement in 2007, & has championed anti-lobbying/ ethics in govt measures (not that that will stop Koch/ DFER’s anti-publicsch manipulations).
DeVos is another voice that continues to assert that the public money belongs to the child and should follow the child. This view is favored by the Kochs and DeVos because it puts the decisions about public funds in the hands of elected representatives that can be bought by those that seek to crush public education. Taxpayers pay the tax, not the children, so they should have a say in where the money goes, which is exactly what happens in public schools. I have been to board of ed. meetings in which local taxpayers request more information on line items in the budgets, or in which the taxpayer had a specific complaint about the budget. When taxpayers provide for common schools, they have access to public meetings and budgetary information. The 1% want to separate citizens from their tax dollars. People should wake up to this fact.
No, the money that you and I pay in taxes belongs to the government not the child or the family.
If that were the case, I want my money back that is spent on war.
To me, the Koch/DeVos claim that school funds belong to the student/family is move #1 in a 1-2 punch. Punch #1 sets up charters & privates as alternatives to publics, which forces publics to serve the most expensive-to-teach on a depleted budget, causing them to fail/ close. Punch #2, further down the line: the end of school taxes: keep the $ for yourself & buy whatever lousy ed fits the bill. By then, folks will have entirely forgotten ‘the public good’ & the days when all citizens & corporate entities contributed to schools etc., having become resigned to their lot as due nothing but what the measly living left to them by the 1% can buy.
Folks might be interested in this interview with Charles Koch on the Freakinomics podcast.
Part 1: http://freakonomics.com/podcast/why-hate-koch-brothers-part-1/
Part 2: http://freakonomics.com/podcast/why-hate-koch-brothers-part-2/
I think there will be a surprising number of issues where posters here are in agreement with Charles Koch, though obviously not all issues.
TE,
Yesterday, you challenged my statement about District-controlled charters. I said that Virginia has nine district-controlled charters. You said my statement was “false” and offered Kansas as an example. I asked how many charters exist in Kansas, and what % of the nation’s 6,000 charters they represent.
I googled and found this:
“Charter schools in Kansas are public schools operated independently of public school systems, either by nonprofit or for-profit organizations. Although they are largely publicly funded, charter schools are exempt from many of the requirements imposed by state and local boards of education regarding hiring and curriculum. As public schools, charter schools cannot charge tuition or impose special entrance requirements; students are usually admitted through a lottery process if demand exceeds the number of spaces available in a school. Charter schools generally receive a percentage of the per-pupil funds from the state and local school districts for operational costs based on enrollment. In most states, charter schools do not receive funds for facilities or start-up costs; therefore, they must rely to some extent on private donations. The federal government also provides revenues through special grants. As of March 2017, 44 states and the District of Columbia had approved legislation authorizing the creation of public charter schools. Six states had not.
“HIGHLIGHTS
“According to the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, a charter school advocacy group, there were an estimated 10 total charter schools in Kansas in the 2015-2016 school year. These schools enrolled approximately 2,800 students.
“Overall, charter school students accounted for 0.57 percent of total public school enrollment in Kansas in 2015.”
So, of 6,000 charter schools in the US, Kansas has 10, and that tiny number includes “for-profit” charters. Which district operates a for-profit charter school?
10 out of 6,000 charters is a tiny percentage. You are an economist. The 10 charters in Kansas represent what % of charters in the US? How many of the 10 operate for profit?
In Chicago–seeing lots of Koch Industries commercials lately–they feature happy-looking Koch workers in normal settings. Also, was just watching PBs’ “Nova” (first time in a long time), & preceded by “Funding from David S. Koch Science Foundation.”
OxyMORONic, at best. Downright evil, at worst.
I believe the most important sentence in the Denver Post article is this one:
The ESA model is relatively novel in Colorado, and (the Koch Brothers’ strategist’s sees his) work as a “race to who defines the issue first.”
Here’s the problem for those of us who support public education overseen by eleected school boards: The arguments against ESAs are harder to sell than the argument for ESAs which boil down to “choice” and “lower taxes”…. and the political reality is that the Democratic Party will not be making an effort to mount an opposition to ESAs. If the unions are the only voices in opposition the Koch brothers will likely prevail.
https://waynegersen.com/2017/07/11/essa-creates-opportunity-for-esas-and-koch-brothers-network-is-ready-to-seize-the-opportunity/
This is how far Right ed reform has moved:
“Is anyone really for accountability? Everyone says they support it in principle, but in practice, it seems almost everyone in the system, from school boards and administrators to teacher unions and anti-testing zealots, finds ways to dodge it.
Lately, resistance to accountability is coming from some on the political right who, after decades arguing for school choice based on low test scores in traditional public schools, are now arguing that choice alone provides pretty much all the accountability we need. Moreover, they add, test scores aren’t a very good measure of school quality or linked to better outcomes in life.’
They no longer bother to defend public education. Now they’re just begging for SOME regulation of a privatized system.
They’ve retreated so far! The assumption is the system will be privatized and now the two sides are left to bicker over whether it will be regulated or not.
They abandoned their entire public education argument. They’re reduced to negotiating the contract terms – and they’re losing even that narrow, cowardly argument.
Democrats got absolutely rolled in ed reform. They embraced privatization and got absolutely nothing in return. They traded “public education”- EVERY public school- for 350 million in charter funding. It’s the worst deal in history.
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/knowledge-bank/articles/2017-07-10/dodging-school-accountability-does-a-disservice-to-students
Try to find a public school on the US Dept of Ed Twitter marketing:
They only promote private and charter schools. The schools 90% of US kids attend are excluded from the US Department of Education.
And we’re all paying for this.
Remember when we were told ed reformers would oppose cuts to public schools in the Trump budget?
.@HouseAppropsGOP will propose $157.9B for Labor, HHS & Education. That’s about $3B below current allocation of about $161B for FY 2017
They’re doing a bang-up advocacy job, I must say.
Public schools are going to bear the brunt of this “choice” agenda. Our schools are going under the ed reform bus. Again.
There is a word for the form of government where a small elite exercises power for often selfish and corrupt reasons…what is it again?
Oh, yes: oligarchy.
Funny, I don’t remember consenting to an oligarchy.