Paul Horton teaches history at the University of Chicago Lab School.
He writes:
Creating a Commonwealth: July 4th as a Concept
For most Americans July 4th is a celebration of American Independence. It is a day of music, fireworks, and grilling. We are bombarded with empty rhetoric about freedom from civic boosters who never learned much history. Many embrace a narrow version of American exceptionalism that claims that Americans are God’s chosen people and that the Declaration of Independence is a divinely inspired document.
Many of those who support our president believe that the Revolutionary war was fought over an effort to reduce high taxes. But this view is very short-sighted as historians from Jill Lepore to Gordon Wood have made clear.
The Declaration was written to gain the diplomatic recognition of France and other states that were hostile to the British global empire. The war had already begun, and the document that did more to unite the patriots than the Declaration, Tom Paine’s “Common Sense,” had already severed the cultural connection to the King by daring to question the royal family’s lineage.
When Teaparty advocates dress up as patriots, few of them understand that the tax on tea had been lowered and that the real patriots were more concerned with the monopoly on the sale of tea that had been given to the East India Company by Parliament. What the tea tax was used for was more concerning. These revenues were used to cover the costs of tariff enforcement and Vice Admiralty Courts that were held offshore, thus denying citizens accused of smuggling of their rights as Englishmen: the right to an impartial hearing; the right to a jury comprised of peers; the right to see and question accusers; and the right to an impartial judge. Vice Admiralty Courts were military tribunals that denied these rights and the officers who presided over them would receive a share of the value of seized property, tipping the scales of justice in favor of guilty rulings.
Teaparty followers also fail to understand that the revolution was motivated by land claims. Every colony claimed land west of the Appalachian mountains that were denied by the Proclamation of 1763 that the British established to maintain peace with western tribes following the War for Empire. Large eastern landowners who were indebted to British merchants wanted access to these lands to retire debt and small or landless farmers saw the west and cheap land as a way to establish independence in a world where dependence meant subservience.
My sixth great grandfather, Abraham Horton, fought at King’s Mountain and Cowpens for promised bounty land in what would become eastern Tennessee. He was cast out of his Quaker Meeting near Mount Airy, North Carolina, for joining the fight that would bring his family land in Cherokee country.
Unfortunately, victory in the revolutionary war for the patriots was a disaster for the Cherokee and other tribes.
Most importantly, those who subscribe to a presentist version of American exceptionalism claim that July 4th represents something about the freedoms that we must protect today as a justification for interventions in wars abroad. Wars abroad for revolutionary war patriots were wars in different republics. When the Intolerable Acts were issued in 1774, patriots began leaving colonial assemblies to form their own governments, republics based on the idea of creating a commonwealth. The Intolerable Acts suspended the assembly of Massachusetts and this served as a fire bell to those who saw a civil war approaching. When a Virginian went to Boston to fight the British, he was fighting in an allied republic that had cobbled together an allied army.
The term Commonwealth, not surprisingly, was a body where sovereign power resided in the Commons, the House of Commons, and in the idea that the Commons, land jointly owned, would be shared for the use and benefit of the people, not the crown, or those who possesses title. This idea extends back to the Magna Carta of the Forrest, the idea that the people have a right to subsist on the commons, to gather wood, hunt, graze livestock, and cultivate gardens on land not owned by those with title.
In short modern day neoliberals, tea party activists, libertarians, fail to understand why the concept of commonwealth was so important to the patriots. Parliament and crown had usurped the rights of Englishmen by attempting to destroy the right of the colonists to subsist for “the pursuit of happiness.” Patriots created commonwealths that reclaimed their rights and land that could be used for the common good. Commons meant public. Public buildings, meeting houses, courts, schools, alms-houses, and cultural institutions would be built on the commons.
By assaulting the very idea of the commonwealth: the idea that public authority, public space, and public institutions are legitimate; today’s neoliberals, tea party activists, and libertarians actively betray the ideal of freedom that was created when patriots formed state commonwealths.
The people should have the “right to pursue happiness.” To subsist in today’s world, they need a commons: good schools, a fair wage, fair access to due process, cheap good housing, and quality medical care.
America under Trump has betrayed the promise of the American Revolution. He and the Republican congressional leadership support monopolies and they support those without title who are creating a new plutocracy. They run roughshod over our rights as Americans and pollute the commons.
American must reclaim the idea of the commons, the idea of the republic, the idea of the public. To do so is to reclaim the true spirit of July 4th.

We need to reaffirm our rights to our common wealth. We must protect our national parks and resources. We must protect the vulnerable through shared social safety nets. We need to reaffirm our rights for our young to attend free, public common schools that are answerable to the local community they serve. We must assert our collective rights that should include more than serving in our nation’s many wars and paying taxes.
LikeLike
I often ask myself to define the meaning of humanity.
I am stunned at all global leaders from savaged (communist and fascist) to the utmost civilized (democratic) countries that how government treats its OWN citizens and tourists.
It seems that most of leaders do not have FOUNDATION in humanity, except the spoken and written word without the its true meaning in actions, or in aids, or in allies.
The best solution to all people on earth is that people need to sharpen their own body, mind and spirit in order to truly FEARLESSLY live in contentment.
If people are not sick (= sleep well, eat well, rest well, and work well.), no manufacturers and insurers can prey people on buying their CRAPPY products.
If people believe in goodness, decency, dignity, and transparency, no politicians and media corporate can seduce them in ALL FAKED NEWS, or ALTERNATE FACTS.
If people truly respect human race, their spirit will inspire others to unite with them as a humanity love in whole. Back2basic
LikeLike
This is a very good explanation of where the enclosure fights of the previous centuries that racked the British isles and sent huge numbers into London and thence to America continued to be the bone of contention in the Americas. The interesting thing is how the Jeffersons and the Madison’s joined this fray despite having more in common with the English. I guess Thomas Jefferson spent too much time fox hunting with Patrick Henry in his youth.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Lloyd Lofthouse and commented:
America under Trump has betrayed the promise of the American Revolution.
LikeLike
https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/07/04/on-american-revolution/ I prefer this contemporary observation. And we can always talk Howard Zinn or Alice Walker. https://www.amazon.com/Why-War-Never-Good-Idea/dp/0060753854
LikeLike
I’d hope that all involved with this site read Counterpunch!
LikeLike
Thank you stiegem for the link:
https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/07/04/on-american-revolution/
From this link, I would like to copy three paragraphs:
1) …Millions of new European immigrants crowded into giant tyrannical mines, mills, factories, and slaughterhouses owned by Robber Baron capitalists who joined with leading financiers in buying up national politics, resources, and media, and turning government into their own private for-profit fiefdom.
2) …The leading American philosopher John Dewey noted in 1932 that U.S. politics was “the shadow cast on society by big business.” Things would stay that way, Dewey prophesied, as long as power resided in “business for private profit through private control of banking, land, industry, reinforced by commend of the press, press agents, and other means of publicity and propaganda.”
3) ..The comparatively egalitarian trends of postwar America were reversed by the capitalist elites who had never lost their critical command of the nation’s core economic and political institutions. Working class Americans have paid the price ever since. For the last four decades, wealth, income, and power have been sharply concentrated upward, marking a New or Second Gilded Age of abject oligarchy. Along the way, and intimately related to the neoliberal regression, US and global capitalism have pushed the environment to the edge of a grave, possibly irreversible catastrophe..
In short, Frederick Douglass’ quote is: “It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men.” This quote has proven to me that Trump, his administration, and the education in privatized curriculum have one common GOAL to destroy peace and harmony in natural life as in:
“business for private profit through private control of banking, land, industry, reinforced by commend of the press, press agents, and other means of publicity and propaganda.”
Thank you stiegem again for the link. There is nothing to call American Revolution. Commoners are blinded and misled by twisted meaning in words in which crooked authority and press intentionally misuse to control people’s living. Back2basic
LikeLike
Thank you, m4potw, for the appreciation of the article linked. Paul Horton states in his article, “The people should have the right to ‘pursue happiness’.” How those words (yes, words) “pursuit of happiness” that found their way into the Declaration of Independence is also interesting: https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/06/30/the-pursuit-of-happiness-2/ You say, “Commoners are blinded and misled by twisted meaning in words in which crooked authority and press intentionally misuse to control people’s living.” Oh so true. Even ONE word can make a difference to intentionally control lives. We believed the elusive word of “happiness” in the Declaration of Independence, when the actual quote was from philosopher John Locke: “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Land.”. Like Land and Happiness equate! The American Dream holds that true – owning land is happiness. But really you’re a slave to the bank that owns the land… you just have to pay of the mortgage!
LikeLike
“But really you’re a slave to the bank that owns the land… you just have to pay off the mortgage!”
So true a statement is rarely uttered!
I don’t call them “banksters” for nothing.
LikeLike
Although Common Sense had the powerful impact, as described, the Declaration’s announcement of a formal break, signed by representatives of each of the 13 colonies, added legal arguments to Paine’s Common Sense arguments. It would not just be angry farmers with pitchforks and muskets and sailors and stevedores with buckets of tar; together with Paine’s arguments, the Decl. created the formal basis for a structured and coordinated struggle across class and colony lines. Thus, American colonists were arguably the first “audience,” complementing Paine’s recently published reasoning with arguments to strengthen the resolve of patriots and challenge the uncertainty of “fence sitters.”
After more than a decade of protests followed by compromise, repression or both, GB’s foreign adversaries (Fr, Sp, Holland) needed to know that this wasn’t another “family squabble” that would end within the empire, but it was a resolve for final break with GB.
The English people as well as allies or potential allies in Parliament were another targeted audience. In fact, Parliament is intentionally named euphemistically: “He (the king) has combined with others …” Not mentioning Parliament by name intended to reinforce their view that Parliament had no right to institute internal taxes, which they had repeatedly argued only their elected legislatures could enact.
It wasn’t just an anti-tax revolt; it started in opposition to internal taxes. Several of the clauses reflect this opposition to distant legislatures, an idea that would lead many as anti-federalists to oppose the Constitution and would later be called “popular sovereignty.” These are the seeds of states’ rights, anti-Federal Gov’t., anti-tax protests.
In fact, until the 16th Amendment was approved in 1913, federal taxation, like representation in Congress, was tied to the distribution of population in the states.
The American Revolution and the Declaration contained the seeds of both the national common good and the primacy of localism, i.e. rejection of “distant authority” or “distant legislatures.”
LikeLike
“Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Property” (not land). Property meant many things back then, including slaves. Sorry for the misquote of the word, Even one word makes a difference!
LikeLike
For Locke and Spinoza Property with a capital P meant the right to sustenance.This was a “natural right” that could not be denied by a sovereign. See Matthew Stewart, Nature’s God: The Heretical Origins of the American Republic, 356-7.
LikeLike
I neglected to mention in this piece the fact that the principal author of the Northwest Ordinance, Thomas Jefferson, supported western land sales not only to pay for the national government, but also to support public education. The fact that separate commonwealths gave up their western land claims to support a national government is very significant. Jefferson’s vision for the American Republic was closely tied to the sustainable land use and the availability of cheap land. Land meant economic and intellectual independence in a world where access to land for the “small fry” was made difficult by scarcity and speculation. Farmers in the younger republic cultivated literal and cultural sustenance and the whole idea of Democratic-Republican citizenship was tied to land. The quad at the University of Virginia is modeled on Jefferson’s idea of a public civic common.
LikeLike
Paul,
As I previously wrote here, the Northwest Ordinance laid out model towns and set aside one plot for public schools. The Ordinance was adopted before the Constitution, showing clearly that the Founding Fathers anticipated that public schools were an important part–a vital part–of the new nation as it grew.
LikeLike
I’m catching up on July 4. I spent most of the afternoon yesterday lounging on a high rock cliff above the Upper Delaware River.
Nice piece. Real interesting.
LikeLike
A fellow “river rat”??
I too spent the 4th on the banks of a river-the “Big Muddy” Missouri up in Northeastern Nebraska (near New Castle) towards the end of the Missouri National Recreation River!
Caught my first pickerel 40 years ago or so out of the East Fork of the Delaware River in New York. Beautiful river!!
LikeLike
Thank you for sharing this article.
Also see this, by Paul Street, a history teacher:
On American Revolution
https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/07/04/on-american-revolution/
LikeLike
The final lines of this article:
There is one piece of good news here: young adults. A recent Harvard University survey finds that 51 percent than half of U.S. Millennials (18-to-29-year-olds) “do not support capitalism.”
This is good news?
LikeLike
No, Chas, it’s not good news, it’s great news!
Hope you enjoyed a nice 4th!
LikeLike