School choice produces segregation: racial segregation, religious segregation, socioeconomic segregation. That is why the idea of school choice originated with Southern governors in the wake of the Brown V. Board of Education decision. They were determined to defend racially separate public schools. Their strategy was school choice. They knew that if students could choose their schools, they could preserve segregation. The federal courts put a halt to that. For more on that, read Mercedes Schneider’s fine book School Choice, which provides a history of this idea in the United States.
But now along comes the Trump administration and Betsy DeVos telling us that school choice is the “civil rights issue of our time.”
This would be a sick joke if it weren’t so serious.
The latest evidence on this front comes from Michigan, where MLive, which is read across the state, reports that racial segregation has intensified as school choice took hold. The story focuses on Holland, Michigan, Betsy DeVos’s home town.
Mike Wilkinson of Bridge magazine writes:
For more than a decade, Holland Public Schools has watched its enrollment fall, prompting the closure – and demolition – of multiple schools.
The decline is not the result of an aging community with fewer, school-age children. Rather, it’s largely a reflection of Michigan’s generous school choice policies. Choice has, consciously or not, left districts like Holland not only scrambling for students, but more racially segregated as its white students leave, often for districts that are less diverse.
“When school choice started, that decline started,” said Brian Davis, superintendent of the Holland district. In 2000, Holland had 15 school buildings; it now has eight. About one-in-three students living within the district are now being educated in another district or charter school. Because state education dollars follow students to their new district or charter, Davis said that Holland’s white flight has shaken the district’s finances.
In the two decades since Michigan adopted school choice, Holland’s white enrollment has plummeted 60 percent, with 2,100 fewer white students. Today, whites comprise 49 percent of school-age children living in the district, but only 38 percent the school population (Hispanics make up 47 percent of Holland schools).
From Holland to metro Detroit, Flint to Jackson, tens of thousands of parents across Michigan are using the state’s schools of choice program to move students out of their resident districts and into ones that are more segregated, a Bridge analysis of state enrollment data shows.
Last week, Bridge showed how “choice” has made several metro Detroit districts less diverse, with white students moving to whiter districts and African-American students increasingly gravitating to almost-entirely-black charter schools.
Since the Brown decision of 1954, America’s public schools have strived, sometimes successfully, sometimes unsuccessfully, to bring together children from different backgrounds. This is part of the American project, to teach people of every race, religion, and ethnic heritage to live in peace as citizens of the same background.
We have a president and a secretary of education who do not believe in this project. When DeVos referred to Historically Black Colleges and Universities as “schools of choice,” it was not a mistake. She actually believes that segregation is just fine so long as parents choose it. Her only error was thinking that this was a choice, rather than a response to exclusion.
This is why we must all fight the Trump-DeVos agenda. It promotes the worst in us; it embraces segregation and separatism. What has made America great is not segregation but mutuality; not withdrawing to our enclaves, but joining together in a spirit of community that is large enough for all of us. The Trump-DeVos tent is too small. It is their tent. Most of us don’t fit in.
We need another Martin Luther King Jr. to lead us in singing “We Shall Overcome.”

The new mantra in ed reform is that “choice, carefully planned” is the key.
Except none of this is “carefully planned”. In fact, there is absolutely NO consideration of any downside at all.
DeVos is traveling the country telling people her privatization plans are all win/win. They expressly promise this- “ALL students will win”
She has absolutely no basis for this claim. None. It’s a fairy tale.
If these people were actually “agnostics” they would consider the effects on kids in public schools. but they don’t! In fact, there’s an insistence that kids in public schools will magically “win” – no one ever explains how gutting their schools leads to this “winning”.
They are ramming these voucher bills thru with no planning AT ALL- there isn’t even a discussion of systemic effects. Public schools kids and parents are simply excluded as a constituency they care about. It’s as if they don’t exist.
LikeLike
They never talk about transportation costs either. They belatedly realized that kids would have to be transported to all these schools. New Orleans spends 5X what they used to spend on transportation.
Shouldn’t people be told this? That they’ll be plowing huge amounts of money not into schools but into getting “choice” kids from Point A to Point B?
Maybe they want to spend it, maybe it’s worth it, but shouldn’t this reality be mentioned when they’re all out there selling this fairy tale that all this is “free” and comes with no risk and no sacrifice?
LikeLike
Choice is bad for the environment. Instead of wasting time and money on extra transportation costs, they should be spending their money to improve community schools that value opportunity for all.
I also agree that few people understand the financial implications of “choice.” They do think its free.
LikeLike
Sorry: it’s
LikeLike
This is the kind of nonsense they recite:
“The more choices there are, and the more parents can access them, the more public education is strengthened.”
Really? So any number of schools in any area necessarily means that public education is “strengthened”? It’s NEVER fragmented or weakened or chaotic? No set of schools or kids EVER lose under these schemes? No chance of that? Zero? No re-allocation of funding, no negative changes to strong existing schools, no risk AT ALL?
I can’t believe this flies, but it does! They all recite it.
Boy there is gonna be a harsh reckoning when people realize the inevitable downside and trade-offs that come with this. They were lied to. It was all hearts and flowers and no one in power even CONSIDERED a possible downside.
It reminds me of when they deregulated the financial sector. That was all upside too. Everyone wins! No money down! No risk! What a crock that was.
https://www.the74million.org/
LikeLike
People can test the ed reform claim of “agnostic” themselves. Go to your state legislative website and search for bill or pending legislation that “strengthens” existing public schools.
80% of the stuff they’re churning out promotes and expands charters and vouchers. Often they will actually CUT public school funding while expanding vouchers and charters.
Yet they all appear daily and piously claim they are “agnostics”. It’s baloney.
Look at what they do, not what they say.
The top bipartisan k-12 issue in the US Congress is charter funding. They can’t do jack for public schools, but they always manage to increase charter funding. That’s because charter funding is their PRIORITY. If public schools were their PRIORITY we would see different ACTIONS, not different rhetoric.
LikeLike
End of Innocence
“O beautiful, for spacious skies
But now those skies are threatening
They’re beating plowshares into swords
For this tired old man that we elected king
Armchair warriors often fail
And we’ve been poisoned by these fairy tales
The lawyers clean up all details
Since daddy had to lie…” Hornsby/Henley
“America now chokes on its claim to innocence. Up until now, it has been successful in both evading that fact and covering up its lies—lies about its history, about social mobility, about freedom, about justice, about the end of racism, about spreading democracy abroad, and so it goes. The era of hiding behind this mythical innocence has passed…” Henry A. Giroux
LikeLike
http://theconversation.com/tax-credits-school-choice-and-neovouchers-what-you-need-to-know-74808?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20April%2016%202017%20-%2072045455&utm_content=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20April%2016%202017%20-%2072045455+Version+B+CID_df05b46079628e1eff1b38120a578ce0&utm_source=campaign_monitor_us&utm_term=Tax%20credits%20school%20choice%20and%20neovouchers%20What%20you%20need%20to%20know
LikeLike
If Trump and DeVos start offering these “neo-vouchers,” more school districts should sue for lost funding.
LikeLike
The lawsuits cost money that many districts do not have. And the pushers of segregated schools know this.
LikeLike
The self-announced billionaire oligarchs like Donald Trump, the Malignant Narcissist in the White House, knows that justice is expensive and most winners have deep pockets.
That’s why Malignant Narcissist has been involved in more than 4,000 court cases over the last 50 years or so.
LikeLike
Nevada’s voucher program was universally hailed among the big hitters in ed reform as “a win for kids”.
Except it does absolutely nothing for kids in public schools. Apparently those kids are once again excluded from ed reform interest or consideration.
The politics of this is pretty amazing. Nevada politicians so take public school kids and parents for granted they feel they have to do NOTHING for them. They offer them absolutely nothing.
LikeLike
Greg Richmond is the “reinventing government” guy that ed reformers all parrot- whether they know it or not that’s where a lot of this “privatization is awesome! came from
He’s supposedly an “agnostic” on schools. So here’s his work: Look for a public school.
Ask yourself- is this person an “agnostic” in any ordinary meaning of the term?
Of course not. He promotes charters. He ignores public schools.
LikeLike
This all started with Reagan. I would love to read that ‘PLAYBOOK” being implemented to destroy public education.
So, can we just, “SAY NO!” and then “DRESS FOR SUCCESS”???????
LikeLike
Michigan’s schools were among the most segregated in the nation long before the invention of charter schools and inter-district choice. When the real estate “market” didn’t sort kids appropriately, districts took matters into their own hands: https://www.tc.columbia.edu/faculty/ate11/faculty-profile/files/Highsmith&Erickson_AJE_2015.pdf
That the Bridge report would omit any mention of the shocking segregationist past and present of Michigan’s traditional public school districts is disappointing.
LikeLike
Tim,
Betsy’s charters intensified segregation.
Read the article.
Every district has a segregationist past.
We are supposed to reverse it, not intensify it.
LikeLike
Michigan’s large urban districts grew more segregated in the 1970s, via the busing resistance that followed white flight in the late 1960s. But small towns (like Holland) and many suburban areas were moderately integrated, following employment patterns and opportunities. Growing up in the 1960s and 1970s, in one of MI’s larger cities, our local high schools were integrated.
Remember: the DeVos family was promoting vouchers as far back as 1978. The Bridge report is right–it was opening the door to charter schools in the early 1990s that changed the demographic balance of MI public schools, combined with a pro-privatization, 3-term governor.
LikeLike
Off topic- In the news, a Wall Street banker (Gary Conn) is working to convince Trump that Bannon’s nationalism is the wrong direction for American policy. It’s ironic because it was the bankers’ unpunished abuses that led, in part, to the growth of public anger with the resulting appeal of nationalism.
LikeLike
I have a difficult time putting the word populist and Oligarch in the same sentence . Was anybody surprised that the swamp got murkier.
LikeLike
We need King indeed , the most infuriating thing for me is the absence of outrage in the Black community on many issues from education to voting rights . I am sure there are sociologists who can explain to me why an anti Trump tax march in NYC is Lilly White . Why the occupy movement was Lilly White . Why Democracy Awakening in DC which had as a central theme voter disenfranchisement was Lilly White, except for possibly the Reverend Barber . The Black community needs leadership that brings it into the fight and education is only one of the issues . Trump was absolutely correct in asking what the Democrats have delivered. The Black political class so tied to the Clinton political machine have delivered Trump and DeVos and Sessions and Bannon and the RESISTANCE needs every group in the fight.
LikeLike
I could be wrong. My guess is that most black people are generally indifferent, to the issues you raise. Many (not all) black people stayed home, in the last election, and this helped deliver the presidency to Trump.
LikeLike
“Many (not all) black people stayed home, in the last election”
And what was the REAL reason they “stayed home”?
“Trump’s Alt-Right Network Illegally Suppressed Millions of Minority Votes to Force a GOP Victory
“This strategy involved a 3-pronged approach. The first involved voter purging. The second involved voter suppression. And the third involved voter intimidation. All three practices, while widely applied and uncontested at the state and local levels, are illegal. Not only are they illegal, but they are criminal.” …
“For their direct parts in depriving millions of minorities of their Constitutional right to vote in the Election of 2016 through voter suppression, criminal charges can and should be filed against Charles Koch, David Koch, Bert Rein, Ed Blum, the Donor’s Trust, the American Enterprise Institute, Wiley Rein, the Project on Fair Representation, and any organization, individual or government official that participated in the strategic efforts to suppression minority votes.” …
“Their primary target was the Voting Rights Act of 1965. …”
“All the white supremacist network behind Donald Trump needed to win the election was the same thing they have needed since the Confederacy fell to the Union – to prevent minorities from voting.”
http://strategycampsite.org/1/post/2016/12/trumps-alt-right-network-illegally-suppressed-millions-of-minority-votes-to-force-a-gop-victory.html
LikeLike
Indifferent to voting rights . Indifferent to economic injustice, Indifferent to Police brutality and the racial demagoguery that Trump promised to bring . Indifferent to the destruction of public services and the social safety net, also high on his agenda.
I have perhaps a different explanation having to do with the failure to deliver and the frustration of false expectations. And yes “Poor people don’t vote” or not in the numbers they should. But I suspect one is not motivated to go out and vote when you see little change in your circumstances.
Go ahead Barrack have another glass of water in Flint . And while your there tell the people of that once great manufacturing town about all the bennifits of Trade and the TPP.
LikeLike
To some extent, poverty in the U.S. has always been criminalized. The ALEC (Koch’s) harsher sentencing guidelines put the abuse of the poor, on steroids. In my state, jury pools are taken from the election department’s voter lists The notices to report for jury duty are sent out by the county sheriff’s office. I’m doubting that if Charles understood that the justice and enforcement systems were working against him that he would want his name on the voter roster. It’s so easy to feel superior when you don’t walk in someone else’s shoes.
LikeLike
I do not get your comment about poverty being “criminalized”. If poverty were a crime, why are there so many poor people in the USA? Some states get their jury pools from the voter rolls, some do not. So what?
I do not get your comment about the justice and enforcement systems working against people. Black people marched from Selma to Montgomery, to get voting rights, The constitution abolished the poll tax, to get more low-income people on the voting rolls. Some (not all) black people are upset, that states are requiring all voters to show government ID, to vote. It should be obvious to anyone, that more minority people want to have the franchise.
“Motor-voter” laws, and polling-place registration, have made it easier for more minority people to register and vote. This is good!
In spite of all the progress made to extend the franchise to all Americans, regardless of race, minority participation in our electoral process, continues to be low. Sad.
I do not feel superior to anyone, based on race.
LikeLike
We probably shouldn’t forget the significant efforts in many states to make voting harder for poor and minority groups, not that cynicism hasn’t played a large role, too.
LikeLike
Charles,
Your deficit, which you describe as “not getting it”, has a diagnosis. It’s called a lack of empathy. There are unfortunately some people who have to live an experience before they have the capacity to understand it. Others are more evolved. D.C. and state capitols have filled with predators like the Koch bros., Walton heirs, and tech tyrants like Gates, Marc Andreeson, Peter Thiel and Sean Parker.
LikeLike
“It’s called a lack of empathy.”
Charles must spend a lot of time watching TV and staring at the computer and smartphone screens.
LikeLike
Charles
Poverty has been criminalized . The war on drugs, broken windows policing and stop and frisk target poor and minority communities with tactics that would be greeted with a Bundy Ranch style reaction in the ‘suburbs’ . 6 million voters are disenfranchised due to felony conviction , 1/13 blacks compared to 1/56 non blacks.
http://www.sentencingproject.org/issues/felony-disenfranchisement/
But I was talking of a lack of mobilization and outrage that goes beyond voting. The attempts by the right to disenfranchise Black and minority voters in it’s self, should be enough to bring millions to the streets. That was prior to the election of the Demagogue and Chief of the neo fascist party..
LikeLike
Some of it could be a rejection of what people perceive as the social attitude or cultural identity of “the movement.” A sense that “Eh, that’s just not my scene.”
LikeLike
We are living through the white-billionaire oligrach funded Balkanization of the United States.
The evidence SHOUTS that this is all deliberate. Was this the original reason ALEC was formed?
https://www.thenation.com/article/hidden-history-alec-and-prison-labor/
Definition of balkanize
balkanized; balkanizing
balkanizationplay \ˌbȯl-kə-nə-ˈzā-shən\ noun, often capitalized
The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) describes itself as the largest “membership association of state legislators,” but over 98% of its revenue comes from sources other than legislative dues, primarily from corporations and corporate foundations.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/American_Legislative_Exchange_Council
ALEC = greed, fascism and racism.
LikeLike
As that Segregation and racism are two sides of the same coin.
An analysis of the election from today’s Washington Post . Yup it was the deplorable’s
but why?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/04/17/racism-motivated-trump-voters-more-than-authoritarianism-or-income-inequality/?utm_term=.bcbc239f65a0&wpisrc=nl_most-draw16&wpmm=1
LikeLike
“But now along comes the Trump administration and Betsy DeVos telling us that school choice is the “civil rights issue of our time.”
The “civil rights issue of our time” for the most innocent of society, the children, is the state sanctioned and mandated sorting and separating and ranking of students due to inherent mental conditions through completely invalid standardized testing regimes.
The state is not allowed to discriminate against a person due to other inherent conditions such as gender, sexual orientation and/or skin color and even social conditions such as religious beliefs or no religious beliefs. Why is the state allowed to discriminate against some students denying benefits or desired programs of education while at the same time rewarding others with benefits-scholarship monies, preferred academic placement, etc. . . .
WHY???
Someone please tell me why this discrimination isn’t seen for what it is and why we continue the standards and testing regime malpractices!!!
LikeLike
Duane,
You saw it for what it was. I have. Most who follow this Blog have. It’s a safe bet to say that millions have seen it for what it is. But more are clueless because they don’t read or they don’t care. Then there are the biased and the racists that want it.
The power is in the hands of the racists and haters. It will take years or decades to stop them if it is even possible.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“. . . it embraces segregation and separatism.”
Which is exactly what the educational malpractice of standards and testings does. That is the exact purpose of standardized testing.
WHY??? Someone please tell me why this discrimination isn’t seen for what it is and why we continue the standards and testing regime malpractices!!!
LikeLike
Charter schools are the profit-making part of the “education reform/choice/voucher” movement that has from its very beginnings been rooted in racism. The movement has always had resegregation of America’s schools as its core agenda.
The deceptive call for “choice” and school vouchers was the first racist response to the 1954 Supreme Court ruling on Brown v. Board of Education in which the Court declared that “separate but equal” public schools are inherently unequal and ordered racial integration of the public schools. That ruling triggered “white flight” from public schools to private schools — but parents quickly realized that the tuition cost of private schools was more than they wanted to pay out-of-pocket. That realization led political and private resegregationists to the concoct the “reform” of vouchers, and to sell it to eager parents by deceptively marketing it then —and still today — as merely giving parents a “choice.”
Reports from the NAACP and ACLU have revealed the facts about just how charter schools are resegregating our nation’s schools, as well as discriminating racially and socioeconomically against American children, and last year the NAACP Board of Directors passed a resolution calling for a moratorium on charter school expansion and for the strengthening of oversight in governance and practice. Moreover, a very detailed nationwide research by The Center for Civil Rights Remedies at UCLA shows in clear terms that private charter schools suspend extraordinary numbers of black students.
The 1950’s voucher crusade faded away when it became clear that because of school attendance boundaries no more than a few token blacks would be attending formerly all-white public schools. In 1972 when the Supreme Court finally ordered busing to end the ongoing de facto segregation, the reform movement rose from its grave and has been alive ever since then trying new tactics to restore racial segregation because it’s unlikely that the Court’s racial integration order can ever be reversed. When it became clear in the 1980’s that vouchers would never become widespread, the segregationists tried many other routes to restore racial segregation, and the most successful has been charter schools because charter schools can be sold to blithely unaware do-gooder billionaires as well as to unscrupulous profiteers who recognized charter schools as a way to divert vast amounts of tax money into their own pockets and into the pockets of supportive politicians at every level of government.
An essential part of the strategy to mask their underlying motives has been for segregationists to sell the public on the necessity for charter schools because public schools are allegedly “failing.” With all manner of “research” that essentially compares apples to oranges against foreign nations’ students, and with the self-fulfilling prophecy of dismal public school performance generated by drastic underfunding of public schools, and with condemnation of public school teachers based on statistically invalid student test scores, the segregationists are succeeding in resegregating education in America via what are basically private charter schools that are funded with public money.
The Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Education has issued a warning that charter schools posed a risk to the Department of Education’s own goals. The report says: “Charter schools and their management organizations pose a potential risk to federal funds even as they threaten to fall short of meeting the goals” because of the financial fraud, the skimming of tax money into private pockets that is the reason why hedge funds are the main backers of charter schools.
The Washington State Supreme Court, the New York State Supreme Courts, and the National Labor Relations Board have ruled that charter schools are not public schools because they aren’t accountable to the public since they aren’t governed by publicly-elected boards and aren’t subdivisions of public government entities, in spite of the fact that some state laws enabling charter schools say they are government subdivisions. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A “PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL” because no charter school fulfills the basic public accountability requirement of being responsible to and directed by a school board that is elected by We the People. Charter schools are clearly private schools, owned and operated by private entities. Nevertheless, they get public tax money.
Even the staunchly pro-charter school Los Angeles Times (which acknowledges that its “reporting” on charter schools is paid for by a billionaire charter school advocate) complained in an editorial that “the only serious scrutiny that charter operators typically get is when they are issued their right to operate, and then five years later when they apply for renewal.” Without needed oversight of what charter schools are actually doing with the public’s tax dollars, hundreds of millions of tax money that is supposed to be spent on educating the public’s children is being siphoned away into private pockets.
Charter schools should (1) be required by law to be governed by school boards elected by the voters so that they are accountable to the public; (2) a charter school entity must legally be a subdivision of a publicly-elected governmental body; (3) charter schools should be required to file the same detailed public-domain audited annual financial reports under penalty of perjury that genuine public schools file; and, (4) anything a charter school buys with the public’s money should be the public’s property. These aren’t onerous burdens on charter schools; these are only common sense requirements to assure taxpayers that their money is being properly and effectively spent to educate children and isn’t simply ending up in private pockets or on the bottom line of hedge funds.
These aren’t “burdensome” requirements for charter schools — they are simply common sense safeguards that public tax money is actually being used to maximum effect to teach our nation’s children.
LikeLike
Diane, a friend of mine knows DeVos from growing up with her and attending school through college with her and members of her family. Further, his dad was an educator in Michigan, and specifically in Holland. He has offered a very different perspective on Betsy, on the private religious schools they both attended, and, most recently, comments regarding this post on segregation. Here is his first comment after I shared your post on Facebook:
“Be careful with this, Deb. This article neglects to mention that the district consolidated many schools and that the buildings closed or demolished were mostly over 100 years old. The high school was built in the mid 60s and recently underwent a 20 million dollar renovation. The demographics are due to the fact that the city of Holland has changed significantly over the years. The “white” population has aged. The Hispanic population has increased by 200% and other minorities were non existent. They aren’t anymore. The surrounding districts have been growing, primarily because of the growth of minorities, but the nicest, newest housing is also there. Only one charter school of note there. There are two traditional parochial school systems there, one of which had it’s first graduating class in 1902, and the other in the early 80s.
And to put it into perspective, my dad worked for the district for at least 15 years. And at other Michigan schools for another 15 or so.”
I responded, and he sent a second response:
“They didn’t so much merge schools as consolidate them into e.g. all K-3 are in one (almost) brand new building. Their building program has been extensive and expensive. Davis has been under fire for his inflammatory comments and many in the community question his competence. And the learning community, while smaller than Waukegan or Stevenson [I work at Waukegan, IL, and his kids went to Stevenson High School in Lincolnshire, IL], still has some 2500 in Holland, 3500 in West Ottawa, 4000+ in Zeeland, and 1500 in Hamilton High schools. All of these districts send students to the parochial systems and the charter schools.”
I’mean curious how you would respond.
LikeLike
My family and I left the district because of two reasons:
1. I got into an abusive relationship and feared for my safety
2. A humiliating, disgusting, and false rumor was spread about my brother who was only twelve at the time
It had nothing to do with diversity, and I’m sure I can say the same for many other students.
LikeLike