Carol Burris has been conducting an investigation of charter schools in many states, beginning with her series on California. In this post, she analyzes the remarkable test scores of certain high-performing charter schools in Arizona.
Public schools are supposed to learn from the “innovative” practices of charter schools. So, what can be learned from Arizona’s best charter schools?
1. Choose your students carefully.
2. Give preference to students who are white and Asian.
3. Avoid students with disabilities and students whose English is limited.
4. Minimize the number of children who live in poverty.
5. Make the demands so challenging that the weakest students leave.
The top charter schools in Arizona are the BASIS chain, founded by Michael and Olga Block. The first was founded in Tucson in 1998, followed by one in Scottsdale in 2003.
BASIS Tucson and BASIS Scottsdale became top-ranked schools on Newsweek’s “America’s Most Challenging High Schools” list, and later flew to top spots on the Best High Schools list of U.S. News & World Report.
Advocates touted the Tucson and Scottsdale schools as miracles, holding them up as examples of what high expectations, combined with the freedom afforded charter schools, can do. BASIS exploded. There are now 18 BASIS charter schools in Arizona, three in Texas and one in Washington D.C., all managed by the for-profit corporation, BASIS Educational Group, LLC. The same LLC also manages five for-profit BASIS private schools in the United States and one private international school.
Pretty impressive.
But Burris examined the demographics.
In Arizona, 3% of the state’s students are Asian, but 32% in BASIS charters.
In the state, 5% are American Indian, but 0% in BASIS.
In the state, 45% of students are Latino, compared to 10% in BASIS.
In the state, 39% of students are white, but 51% in BASIS.
In the state, 3% are black, and 5% in BASIS.
In 2015-16, only 1.23 percent of the students at BASIS had a learning disability, as compared to 11.3 percent of students in the state. BASIS schools had no English Language Learners. And in a state in which over 47 percent of all students received free or reduced- priced lunch, BASIS had none. Although BASIS may have some students from qualifying households, it chooses not to participate in the free or reduced-priced lunch program.
There are economic barriers to entry:
Because BASIS provides no transportation, where it places schools — along with the lack of a free-lunch program — discourages disadvantaged students from applying. There are also hefty “suggested” parental contributions. BASIS requests that families contribute at least $1,500 a year per child to the school to fund its teacher bonus program. Enrollees must also pay a $300 security deposit, purchase some books, and pay for activities that would be free if the student attended a public school.
The curriculum is so rigorous that less than 50% of those who enter will remain to graduate.
Only the strong survive, and that boosts the rankings of BASIS in the various magazine rating systems.
And then there is the money!
As the empire grows, the management fees grow. The Blocks opened a private LLC to shield their finances from public views.
Salary and travel transparency disappeared in 2009 when the Blocks opened a private, for-profit limited liability company, BASIS Educational Group, LLC. Now the couple’s salary and expenses are hidden from the public. According to the 990 for 2009, BASIS School Inc. spent $3,902,122 in total on school salaries, and $1,728,000 on “management.” BASIS Educational Group, LLC, the for-profit that contracted with BASIS Schools Inc., received $4,711,699 for leased employee costs and $1,766,000 for management, indicating that there were also substantial fees that went to the Block’s LLC.
The latest 990 shows just shy of $60 million going from the non-profit to the for-profit corporation to provide services to BASIS schools.
These are publicly funded private schools whose “owners” generate huge income for themselves.
But as Secretary DeVos reminds us so often, this is child-centric education, and it is not about adult interests. Right.

BASIS is following the agenda to change education for the few while ignoring the many. Betsy DeVos was installed in the DOE to further that agenda.
LikeLike
“Like the “no-excuses” charter schools found in cities, the attrition rates at BASIS middle and high schools are extraordinarily high. Of a cohort of 85 students who began eighth grade in BASIS Flagstaff during the 2011-12 school year, only 41 percent (35) remained to enter twelfth grade in 2015-16. In the flagship school, BASIS Tucson North, a seventh-grade class of 130 became a class of 54 by senior year. The same pattern exists in every BASIS charter high school in the state.”
It baffles me how they get away with this. It’s not that it happens- it’s that they claim “100%” graduation when they lose 60% of the entering class!
The question I always have is where did the kids go? Wouldn’t you want to know that if you were planning a school system? If the lower performing kids go from BASIS to a public school then what’s the effect on the public school and why wouldn’t that matter?
LikeLike
They get away with it because they had an agenda in place that repeated lies designed to mislead the public and the opposition is way behind in organizing to get the truth based on real facts out to the same public.
When I was in an urban residency earning my teaching credential in 1975-76, my master teacher told me it was important to always reach the parents first of a child that got in trouble for disrupting the learning environment in your classroom before that student got home.
“Parents tend to believe who they hear first,” my master teacher said.
Inf act, Too many people tend to believe what they hear first. It is a long-term struggle to change the message once it is imprinted, and the corporate education industry has had decades of repeating the same lies and misinformation.
The privatization industry launched is misleading propaganda campaign under Reagon with the release of the misleading and fraudulent “A Nation at Risk” report in 1983. The resistance to save the public schools didn’t get started until Diane Ravitch launched her Blog in 2012 and soon followed with Anthony Cody, the co-founder, with The Network for Public Education.
The corporate pirates have had 34-years to control the message. The Network for Public Education has had about 5-years and it takes time to organize and build an organization.
LikeLike
Can’t you just see Sean Spicer arguing that you are not to believe the statistics. The only news that counts is what we want you to believe. If Betsy says they are better they are. But worse more than half the editorial boards will report the same story line .
LikeLike
My granddaughter goes to Basis and is learning much more than in the regular dumb public schools. There is so much information about Dumbing Down of the public education and the stupid Common Core. Google Deliberately Dumbing down with Charolyte Iserbyte and you will see what is behind the American Schools. Schools won’t change because citizens aren’t standing up for them. the cost of college tuition is crazy!
LikeLike
Judi, our public schools were created to provide equal educational opportunity for all children, even kids with disabilities, kids of every race, religion, ethnicity, and condition. BASIS is a highly selective School for the very smartest kids.
LikeLike
Public district magnet schools with admission barriers like essays, applications, and examinations do not “provide equal educational opportunity for all children.” At least charters take on all students via choice or lottery.
LikeLike
Wrong, Cynthia Weiss. Public schools are required to enroll all children. They may not get into the one school they want, but they will get into a school.
In charter and voucher schools, if they don’t get in, or if the school decides it doesn’t want them, they are thrown out on the street. Where do they go? To the public schools, where they will always be accepted.
It is simply a fact that charter and voucher schools choose their students and they don’t choose students with serious disabilities (the public schools take them), and many exclude students who don’t know English (public schools take them). Charter schools are private schools that get public money. When sued by a parent or teacher, or hauled before the NLRB, they always say that they are not “state actors,” they are private contractors with contracts and thus not subject to state laws. They are right. They are not public schools.
LikeLike
Judi Flanders
These are the top 10 colleges attended by the 1900 dumbed-down graduates of my local Public High School . A graduation rate of 97% With a reported post secondary attendance rate of 95% . 85 % attending a four year schools .
Of course Diane could tell you why. It isn’t the school, the teachers(no offense) or the curriculum
Carol Burris knows the answer as well .
She was the Principal of a district almost as wealthy . Of course I live in the little quarter acre zone , in a district with enormous wealth and one of the largest tax bases in the State due to the largest Commercial Office district in the state inside of it. We are asking our schools to solve our economic problems and that won’t happen.
.
A-
Binghamton University, SUNY
96 Students
A+
New York University
90 Students
A-
Stony Brook University, SUNY
72 Students
A+
Boston University
59 Students
A+
Columbia University
57 Students
A+
Cornell University
57 Students
A
Syracuse University
56 Students
A+
Penn State
51 Students
A
University of Delaware
48 Students
A+
University of Pennsylvania
47 Students
LikeLike
Wow. I’m surprised by the ignorance.
Where, Judi is this “much information about Dumbing Down of public education” coming from? Where are you obtaining this information*?
You should cite it here, so people can read it.
Did you by chance support Agent Orange?
You do have one thing right though, and that’s that too many citizens are not “standing up” for public schools. And far too many are completely unaware of their historic mission in promoting citizenship, and how that has been degraded.
So too – as our recent election proves – waayy too many American citizens are not committed to the core values on which our nation is based.
The BASIS schools and others like it reflect all of that nonsense, and the country (not to mention public schooling) is all the worse for it.
LikeLike
” BASIS Charter School”
The BASIS of success?
Selection at its best
Cuz Darwin’s fittest cases
Got nothin’ on the BASIS
LikeLike
I haven’t been to Basis. My granddaughter is taking advanced courses that are not always available in public schools. A friend of hers (from India) asked how is a white girl like you so smart?
LikeLike
To Judi Flanders:
Next time, please teach your granddaughter to ask the Indian friend that why the majority of color people are typical A personality [= very aggressive, obnoxious, jealousy, insecure and back-stabber (harm others who help them to be civilized!).]
Please note that I am a color person and an immigrant. Yes, I admit that I am used to be like what I told you. Yes, it took me 40 years in living near to many life and death situations, and most of all, I was lucky to marry with the white, civilized, and very considerate spouse who is completely selfless in all aspects at work and at home.
It is worth to be twice in the shipwreck in order to be transformed to be civilized, considerate person who lives with appreciation for the meaningful life = sharing, caring and being considerate for both the lesser in material and the arrogant in fame and fortune. Back2basic.
LikeLike
Charters like BASIS are basically the latest manifestation of Social Darwinism
LikeLike
Reblogged this on BLOGGYWOCKY and commented:
If I were to start a school (charter, or private school receiving vouchers) and I could cherry-pick the students I admitted, as well as get rid of any students not living up to the academic standards expected, then sure, the stats for my school would look great.
But what about the special needs children, the ELL’s, the children with behavior problems, the children who come from very poor families in very poor neighborhoods who come to school hungry, or with inadequate clothing during cold weather?
Are we to forget about these children?
While I have some sympathy for the parents whose kids attend these charter schools and are happy to have their children their because the local public school was not doing well by them, I also have to say that we are all in this together. All schools should be promoting the general welfare and the common good. And we should all be working toward that goal, and supporting and voting for candidates who are on that page with us.
We cannot only think of our own families, we should be thinking about everyone. Unless the people who promote these types of charters believe that their kids and families are going to live in a bubble, without having anything to do with anyone else in our society (and dream on if you believe this), you are being incredibly naive and I feel sorry for you.
LikeLike
This link does not take me to the story, but to a WP subscribe link.
>
LikeLike
Does the link work?
LikeLike
These have always been the “secrets” of high performing schools of every level. But now, public money is being used to support it.
LikeLike
Cross posted at OpEd News https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Carol-Burris-The-Secrets-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Carol-Burris_Charter-Schools_Diane-Ravitch_Investigation-170331-962.html#comment652514
with this comment:
Carol Burris in which she explains that charters are the leading edge of the privatization movement. Corporate education reformers are scrambling to make a distinction between charters and vouchers, but the reality is that charters clear a path for vouchers. Once you sell the public on the idea of school choice, it is increasingly difficult to say that parents may choose a corporate charter chain but can’t choose a religious school. Once you erode the principle of public education as a public good, open to all, responsible for all who enroll, you turn citizens into consumers. Whether they choose a charter or a voucher, their choice diverts public money away from public schools.
Arthur Camins writes: The problem with publicly-funded charter schools goes far beyond the lack of oversight, transparency, and accountability. Most fundamentally, they are an assault on democracy. Individual choice is no substitute for democratic governance (See:https://goo.gl/lKAIKT). In addition, they drain limited resources from remaining public schools, exacerbate racial and socio-economic isolation, and undermine public investment in socially responsible solutions for all in favor of “saving” a select few.
LikeLike
It’s easy to think that the corporate education reform movement, in tandem with the Malignant Narcissist in the White House rolling back food safety, work safety, clean air and water standards, that public education once it is gone we will be taken back to the ancient Greeks when only those that wanted to go to school went. The children who didn’t go end up working for less than poverty wages in harsh, unsafe working environments, even prostitution, sometimes as young as 5.
When will the GOP and Trump go after the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act.
I will not be surprised if the GOP and Trump eventually also go after the 1865, 13th Amendment that abolished slavery. Trump will claim slavery should be left up to each state. If they succeed, the racist descendants of southern families that once owned slaves will be allowed to enslave the descendants of the slaves their families once owned.
LikeLike
I wish someone would tell Jay P Greene this; he is constantly promoting the Arizona charters. In the Washington DC gentrification (and in other cities — promote the residents of brownstones with names from the local law firms for their great test scores; that is how Jay P Greene does it.) Jay P greene had a news release this week about interpreting test score gains for special education students. I would like to tell him he is way off base but he has blocked my comments at the blog.
LikeLike
REaders of this blog may be interested in three PBS programs scheduled this month under the title of Schools, Inc. Here are some of the teaser clips with one infamous US charter school in California in the middle of two high cost options elsewhere in the world.
http://www.pbs.org/show/school-inc/clips/
LikeLike
I taught suspended students and pregnant teens for thirteen years so I am familiar with at risk students also. New York State spends the most of any other state for education per pupil. I don’t think money is the answer as I saw so much wasted money when I taught. I learned the true history as an adult (book companies make a lot of money). I talk to many students and most are not excited about school. I believe these issues should be looked at more than they are.
LikeLike
Judi,
Why do you think most kids drop out of BASIS?
LikeLike
You are right, Judi, throwing money at schools is not the answer to solving society’s problems. We may provide some support services through schools, but schools should not be expected to overcome the myriad of problems that are created or exacerbated by poverty. Homelessness, joblessness, physical and mental health problems are all factors which can impact a child’s ability to learn. To hold schools responsible for overcoming these problems is sheer lunacy. Community based schools that provide wrap around services have provided a model that has met with some success, but it involves the cooperation of the entire community and its ancillary services. All that being said, there aren’t too many schools that are suffering from overly generous school budgets.
LikeLike
I don’t know why. I just know that my granddaughter wasn’t challenged in regular school and that is why my daughter took her out. I taught special ed students and at risk students also so I am familiar with their situations. Some public schools are better than others, I believe that they all should be great for all students (I believe they are not all that beneficial to students). The common core needs to be gotten rid of (teaching for the test). The opt out rate in Rochester was high for some schools in the area.
LikeLike
To Judi Flanders:
Please let me know that your grand-daughter’s public school has program for gifted children, or IB program (international Baccalaureate), or AP program (Advanced Placement)?
If your daughter has money to pay for the private institution, then your grand-daughter can attend any typical classes.
However, public school is for the mass, the public where all learners will have the same chance to grow and to learn to be civilized and to appreciate the multicultural environment. Back2basic
LikeLike
Basis is free and costs nothing. Students are from China, India and other places.
LikeLike
A private school with public money
LikeLike
I want someone….anyone…to tell me I am on the wrong track with my perception of the damage being wrought by charter schools upon public education. In general, there are two different approaches to success with charter schools. This article by Carol Burris does an excellent job of showing the cherry picking side of the problem, which is real. One of the highest performing schools in St. Louis is something called Gateway, and because of the refusal of the St. Louis media, primarily the Post Dispatch, KMOX, and public radio, we are not presented with a clear picture of how charter schools operate. Gateway was supposed to be one of the Gulen schools, and though there are still some Turkish administrators, they might have pulled away…they are still a concept school. They say they are a charter school, but some charters are closer to the district in which they exist than others. They manage to have white majorities in student population, in a district which is 80% black.
But there are a larger number of charter schools which thrive on the lack of public oversight. They have a license to try “different approaches” which translates into high management expenses, convoluted corporate deals on properties, and avoidance of attention to how poorly they try to educate. Lots of teacher turnovers, which is a cost advantage. In essence, they become dumping grounds for students not wanted—-dumping them makes the main district look better in test results. In St. Louis, after the takeover in 2007, the student population in the non charter schools, dropped by close to ten thousand in the last decade, while charter population is now up around 11,000. 34 schools….there are a few performing well….many of the remaining are in the dumping ground category….even praised by some for the service they perform. A can academy and several thousand Imagine students were abandoned….taking nice profits in the wake of their collapse.
It is very difficult to generalize about charters….because the overall public relations department….(Doug Thaman in Missouri) has examples to refute every possible criticism.
Somebody please….tell me how far off track I am with what I feel like I am seeing. I am willing to look closer and learn.
LikeLike
To joe prichard:
IMHO, how difficult do we have practical examples to reject PRIVATIZED SCHOOLS that LOOT tax payers’ FUND that is for PUBLIC?
I am all for whatever privatized Charter Schools operate BUT not to be subsidized by tax payers’ fund.
However, if “privatized” charter schools WANT TO BE CALLED “PUBLIC” charter schools, then the owners of these so called public charter school MUST FOLLOW the SAME rules and regulations that impose on PUBLIC SCHOOLS, like:
-Transparency
– Certified teaching Staff
– Having librarian, nurse, counselor
– NO cheery picking on students.
– Most of all, be reliable and responsible to teachers and students. (= NOT bully teacher by firing without reasons, and NOT bully students by closing schools down due to loss of profit.)
That is all for examples to reject any PRIVATIZED charter schools that LOOT TAX PAYERS’ fund. Back2basic
LikeLike
I thought all charter schools were public, at least to some extent(often difficult to pinpoint) and try to justify how they are not hurting the schools losing the funds they collect.
LikeLike
Private sector and/or corporate owned charter schools are only public to get paid with public dollars. Once those dollars are in a bank account, then those autocratic charter schools are private sector schools so they can be opaque and secretive to hide how they spend the public’s money.
LikeLike
joe,
I am in Newark and I know nothing about your city. However, the picture looks the same in my district. Furthermore, you are more on track than most people. Never mistrust
your instincts.
LikeLike
Another way to look at the demographics is by parent education level. Sometimes you can have situations where the demographics can look favorable, but then you realize that the parents have college degrees. Nothing wrong with college degrees, but the lesser privileged adults in today’s economy are often lacking college education.
Standardized test scores probably track best with parent education level, even better than race/ethnicity, income level, or English Language Learner status.
Public education should be about providing opportunities for social mobility — the opportunity for all who dream it to become a first generation college student and graduate without being indentured by heavy debt.
LikeLike
I just posted about the SCHOOL, INC. television programs on PBS. I did not do enough research. Here is what you really should know about the programs.
These programs are pure propaganda for so-called free market education. They have been produced courtesy of Free to Choose, a promoter of all things that the late Milton and Rosa Friedman would love.
The PBS website says that funding for these programs has been provided by the Texas-based Rose-Marie and Jack R. Anderson Foundation. See http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Rose-Marie_and_Jack_R._Anderson_Foundation
The Anderson Foundation s one of several ultra conservative funders, but the series is also sell-funded by being part of the Free to Choose Network. That Network is a non-profit set up by the one of the Executive Producers Bob Chitester
Bob Chitester is chairman, president and CEO of Free To Choose Network, a 501-c-3 public foundation housing Free To Choose Media, an award-winning, global entertainment company which produces and distributes thought-provoking public television programs and series. In 1977, Chitester and economist Milton Friedman and his wife, Rose, undertook a film project which became Free To Choose, an award-winning PBS TV series and an international best-selling book based on the series. You can learn more about the connection of this non-profit to the Friedman doctrine of market-based education here and elsewhere on the internet. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Free_to_Choose_Network
Among the others responsible for the series is Andrew Coulson. Coulson is the Creator, Writer, and Director. His bio, posted on PBS, says Coulson studied mathematics and computer science at McGill University and worked as a Microsoft software engineer. In 1994, he became ” troubled by the fact that teaching and learning were being left behind by the relentless progress in other fields. His book, Market Education: The Unknown History, received endorsements from Washington Post columnist William Raspberry, Nobel laureate economist Milton Friedman, Harvard political scientist Paul Peterson, and University of Chicago education psychologist Herbert Walberg. His 2009 paper for the peer-reviewed Journal of School Choice was the most comprehensive review of the worldwide scientific literature comparing alternative education systems. In 2011 he conducted a statistical study titled “The Other Lottery: Are Philanthropists Backing the Best Charter Schools?” Coulson has ….testified before the United States House and Senate on the state of American education and co-authored amicus briefs for the United States Supreme Court. He was senior fellow in education policy at the Washington, D.C.-based Cato Institute, and contributed chapters to books by the Hoover Institution and Canada’s Fraser Institute. Prior to his death in February 2016, Coulson made arrangements to ensure School, Inc. would be completed for broadcast television.”
There are many reasons why I support my local PBS broadcasters. This programing is not one of them.
Overall, I think that PBS has done a miserable job of seeking spokespersons for public education, especially parents, students, administrators and politicians. Diane Ravitch has appeared on Tavis Smiley, Charlie Rose, Bill Moyers and a few other programs, but I have seen no real coverage of the issues facing public education right now.
I wonder if PBS scheduled this series to coincide with the Betsy DeVos/Trump agenda that will pour money into vouchers and set in motion market-based education as if the new norm for American education. I wonder if Milton and Rosa Friedman smiling. Did PBS intend to insult many of their supporters, including me, by scheduling this series now?
Please be aware that this PBS series is a propaganda machine for market-based education. The programs are not presented in a context that makes that obvious.
I intend to let my local PBS stations know that this series looks like a well-planned and perfectly timed promo for the DeVos/Trump agenda.
I will also ask for them to take affirmative steps to support public education and the public schools in their viewing areas.
PBS seems to be satisfied with educational programming for use by teachers and cartoony programs for children. Sesame Street is hosted after it has made money elsewhere. Unless I am mistaken, Trump’s proposed budget for PBS will bring a 20% cut, not total elimination.
PBS needs all the support it can get. This is not a way to support the public schools who serve the majority of our students and with uncommon ingenuity and devotion in the midst of budget cuts and unwarranted, unsupported attacks from billionaires, including the funders of these programs.
LikeLike
Laura H. Chapman: Diane Ravitch has appeared on Tavis Smiley, Charlie Rose, Bill Moyers and a few other programs, but I have seen no real coverage of the issues facing public education right now.
For a while the News Hour had John Merrow who didn’t appear to advocate the way that Ravitch does, but I perceived that he tilted in favor of public education over the alternatives.
LikeLike
I very much appreciate Carol Burris’ work, but there is a glaring oversight. And that’s Advanced Placement (and thus, the College Board) and its role in this educational charade.
[Note: There’s only one mention of AP in the comments, and it’s in the context of it being associated with “gifted.” Bogus.]
Besides being a cherry-picker charter, selecting a pre-selected population, the core of BASIS is to focus on “high-level content standards” in order to prepare students for the high school curriculum, which is centered around “a plethora of AP course options.”
The crux of BASIS is right here, straight from the BASIS website:
• “High-stakes, summative tests that assess content mastery and learning skills (BASIS.ed Comprehensive Exams and the College Board Advanced Placement Exams for example) are foundational for learning.”
Get that? Learning is based on high-stakes tests. Like the AP tests.
And this:
• “The evaluation of teacher performance must be based…on student learning results on high-stakes assessments.”
Which means teacher worth and student worth are measured by AP exam scores.
Now, I’ve written here – a lot – about the research on Advanced Placement courses and tests. Suffice it to say that AP is more hype than it is “foundational” to learning. And yet, it and ACT and SAT tests are pervasive in American public education. They are – in essence – a big hoax, but people believe in them, subscribe to the myths about them, and perpetuate those myths.
Meanwhile, we had a presidential election that was influenced greatly by fake news, much of which was created and disseminated by Russian intelligence agencies, and the rubes of the republic got duped. And the cover-up of collusion between the Russians and Agent Orange is under way.
I’m gonna say – and this is an understatement – that we’ve lost our way, that we’ve forgotten what the purpose of public schooling is, and that we — in public schools and in the nation-at-large — have forgotten what matters, and why it matters.
LikeLike
I get your posts in one daily feed… and couldn’t help but note that it is bloggers who are digging into the scandalous behavior of charters while the editorial boards of newspapers and reporters on mainstream television continue to promote “reform” and “choice” as the solution to “failing public schools”…
LikeLike
“The Fort Estate”
The Fort Estate
Protects the rest
Behind a gate
Of corporate-ness
The Fort Estate
Is not a check
On crooked State
And public wreck
LikeLike
SDP,
You are on a roll today!
LikeLike
Schools like BASIS must be divested from public monies … they are not public schools. And public schools must reinvent themselves so that their main purpose is to love the children as they are and to teach them joy and wonder.
LikeLike
We cannot settle for less.
LikeLike
Democracy google Deliberately Dumbing down with Charolyte Iserbyte who was in the Education Department under Reagan and saw the agenda of our government for education. She speaks on the website so look it up. Most other countries have a better educational system and don’t give massive amounts of homework like the U.S. does (starting in kindergarten). You believe in Agent Orange, I don’t. I was at a meeting today with many black parents and they are so angry on haw they are treated by the Rochester city Public Schools. I can tell you so much about money waste that I have seen.
LikeLike
Iserbyte is a rightwing ideologue who has said the sky is falling for almost 40 years.
Judi, read “Reign of Error”
LikeLike
Judi,
American public education is better than many give it credit for, and that’s a fact. Try looking that up.
We have – however – lost our way, focusing way too much on standardized tests (which BASIS does) and on “college and careers” rather than democratic citizenship. which is what we ought to do.
There is now a healthy segment of the population in this country that doesn’t really believe in the democratic ethos – and that’s scary.
I don’t believe in the TrumpMan (Agent Orange). He’s a product of racism, xenophobia, stupidity, and Russian intelligence agencies. He’s antithetical to everything this country is supposed to be based on, and he’s been doing things that are blatantly unconstitutional.
By the way, if you want to see waste, check out the supply-side tax cuts, or defense spending, or corporate welfare and tax loopholes.
LikeLike
To Judi Flanders:
Are you against American Public School? Your expression is very vague and no example to show and to indicate what you criticize certain regional Public School(s)!
Is it WASTEFUL TO YOU that permanent CERTIFIED teaching staff are paid more than teaching for a while TFA staff ?
Is it “NOT” WASTEFUL TO YOU that “RICH” parents must pay for “privatized” Charter school’s OWNERS who LOOTS public tax payers money but they do not follow rules and regulations transparently?
What kind of “WASTEFUL” expenses in Public Schools that you see but cannot give us, readers in this blog some examples?
I sincerely look forward to receiving your “eye opening” and true reply, “NOT ALTERNATIVE FACT” REPLY. THANK YOU. Back2basic.
LikeLike
There is a bigger endgame in mind for charters beyond making huge profits. That endgame is the elimination (or social redefinition) of the teacher. Charters = unlicensed teachers = reduction in professional status of teachers = teachers being no more than testers = the teacherless classroom. Why do our unions not fight this scheme with more ferocity?
LikeLike
“Why do our unions not fight this scheme with more ferocity?”
What level of “ferocity” are you talking about?
Labor Union Violence in American: A Brief History
“And nearly 150 years, it’s apparently no mere misunderstanding or shop-worn cultural stereotype: The United States has had the “bloodiest and most violent labor history of any industrial nation in the world”—so concluded Philip Taft and Philip Ross for their oft-cited study, American Labor Violence: Its Causes, Character, and Outcome.”
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2011/11/07/labor-union-violence-in-america-a-brief-history/
Now imagine the members of teachers’ unions taking to the streets with this level of bloody and violent history.
“In 2011–12, some 76 percent of public school teachers were female, 44 percent were under age 40, and 56 percent had a master’s or higher degree.”
https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=28
Then there is this:
Among adults aged ≥20 years during 2009–2010, 35.5% of men and 35.8% of women were obese. (NOTE: When I was still teaching, Most of the teachers at the schools where I taught for thirty years were fat or obese.)
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6107a5.htm
What should we title that: Mostly Women and a few Men Waddling to War? Americans in the early years of labor unions were not as fat and obese as they are today.
The U.S. isn’t the fattest country in the world – but it’s close
The U.S. comes in 27th with 66.3 percent of its population being obese or overweight.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/04/22/youll-never-guess-the-worlds-fattest-country-and-no-its-not-the-u-s/?utm_term=.2a50e32e9f80
LikeLike
Examples of wastes are books ordered and never used (I saw this), a principal get $250,000 in the city school district, paying over $100 an hour to teach a suspended student and more. I was just at a meeting with mostly black parents who are upset that they are not welcomed in schools when they are having issues or want to talk with someone. I have seen these and they are true. Over $20,000 is spend per child and the results could be better (graduations rates etc).
LikeLike
Judi,
In a complex system as large as the community-based, democratic, transparent, non-profit, traditional public school system, there are always going to be examples haters of public education will find. It is impossible, I repeat, impossible, for any system large or small not to have flaws.
Even a small private sector mom-and-pop hot dog stand can have problems that haters can discover and use in an effort to destroy that mom-and-pop family business.
There about 15,000 public school districts in 50 states with more about 3.5 million teachers and 49-million students in about 100,000 public schools.
I reject what you think about the traditional public schools. Problems like the few you point out can be resolved through the democratic process but in the private sector, fraud and abuse often go unchecked forever as long as the business keeps making money for the few who profit the most.
Parents, children, and teachers in the public sector education system are protected by the U.S. Constitution and state constitutions but not so much in the private sector. In a community-based, democratic, transparent, non-profit public school district with an elected school board, parents can attend school board meetings and speak out with their complaints. Try that with a private sector corporation and see how far it gets you if your complaints of fraud and abuse end up hurting profits.
In the first sentence, I used the word “complex” to help describe the traditional public schools. The reason I used that word is because the public schools in the U.S. are not one-huge organization controlled by one corporate CEO. America’s public school are not a monopoly. Instead, those 15,000 + or – public school districts operate independently of each other and most of them have their own elected school board, school boards elected by the voting taxpayers in the same community the schools operate out of. Those voting taxpayers who are mostly parents or grandparents have the power to throw out one school board and replace it with another if they are not happy.
Try that with the CEO of an autocratic, opaque, for-profit, often child abusive and inferior corporate charter school chain.
Just because you might be unhappy with an experience you had with one public school in one public school district out of about 15,000 public school districts in 50 states does not justify destroying the entire public education system and turning 49 million children, who also have parents with opinions, over to autocratic, for-profit, often fraudulent and child abusive corporations where every parent will lose the power of their vote for change in the public education system.
Instead of parents using their voices and votes to bring about change in the community schools where they live and their children go to school, the decisions will be made by someone like Bill Gates or Betsy DeVos who cares nothing for what you think unless you agree with them.
LikeLike