Vouchers died in the Oklahoma legislature, for now. The sponsor of voucher legislation pulled the bill, saying he didn’t want it to squeak through. Probably, he didn’t have the votes.
No reference was made, apparently, to the research showing that vouchers don’t improve academic performance and often depress it.
“A divisive school-choice proposal that would create state-funded education savings accounts allowing students to attend private schools is off the legislative agenda, at least for now.
“Sen. Rob Standridge, R-Norman, pulled Senate Bill 560 from consideration on Wednesday, which appears to eliminate the possibility of school vouchers becoming law this session.
“The move was a bit of a surprise. Five senators had signed on as co-authors, and Standridge had collected letters of support from political groups and religious leaders.
“Up against the committee deadline, though, Standridge felt he didn’t have the votes.
“I don’t want to pass it by a thin margin,” Standridge told senators in an appropriations committee meeting Wednesday morning. “I want us to feel good about this.”
“The bill had squeaked through the education committee Feb. 20 by a vote of 9 to 7.
“An education savings account – or education scholarship account, as SB 560 called it – gives parents a portion of the state funding used to educate their child, and the parents can spend the money on private school tuition or other qualifying expenses. Critics of education savings accounts and other forms of school choice say such programs siphon money from district schools, hurting public education, and channel it to private schools, often religious ones.
“Oklahoma City Public Schools Superintendent Aurora Lora, in a written statement, urged senators to reject the proposal because it would compound budget cuts that public schools have already endured.
“Vouchers are not the answer to improving educational outcomes for all students, especially in the current budget crisis,” she wrote.
“The Oklahoma State School Boards Association also opposed the measure.
“I appreciate the Senate for not moving forward with a divisive bill that distracts from the most important issues facing Oklahoma’s nearly 700,000 public school students: a historic teacher shortage and severe budget cuts,” Executive Director Shawn Hime said.
“Standridge, however, said he’s not giving up, and like-minded legislators have encouraged him to reintroduce education savings accounts through another avenue, such as in the budget negotiation process. “We’ll see what tomorrow brings,” he said.
“Standridge’s proposal would have varied students’ fund amounts based on their families’ household income, and the total number of participants would have been capped at 1 percent of all public school students.
“Based on those parameters and others, Senate staff estimated public schools could see an estimated net loss of $16 million the first year. More than $5 million would have remained in the school funding formula for 7,000 students who were no longer in public school.
“The School Boards Association ran its own fiscal analysis, finding that the proposal would divert from public schools up to $30 million in the first year and $1.6 billion over a decade.”
I can’t understand the reasoning behind taking taxpayer money away from public schools to help subsidize children who attend private schools.
Public means open to all
Private means a select few
Can’t the legislatures tell the difference?
It looks like many of those in Oklahoma have an inkling that the idea of vouchers just doesn’t add up.
Hopefully this will be a trend across the other 49 states.
I wish I could say the same thing in TN.
It’s almost amusing how blatant it is:
Sam BrownbackVerified account
@govsambrownback
Follow
More
The time has come to equip parents of struggling students with educational choices to help their struggling students.
Ed reform guts public school funding and then offer vouchers as a substitute. People won’t be so stupid to fall for this, will they?
They know 1500 dollars is less than 7000 dollars, right? That’s a deal they should turn down? As always, follow the money.
We can’t afford to lose any more education money in Oklahoma.
What also didn’t make it out of committee is raises for teachers (some of the lowest paid in the nation). I have a feeling they are going to try and swap a teacher raise for vouchers during the budgeting process.
Which they wouldn’t be able to pay if they divert already sparse public funds to private education(?).