Here is a terrific post by Steven Singer, documenting what the Founding Fathers said about education.
There was no public education when they wrote the Constitution. There was private education, Dame schools, church schools, and large numbers of children who were not educated at all. Some states funded charter schools, which were private academies for wealthy children. In the early nineteenth century, not much had changed. It was a great step forward when real reformers like Horace Mann and Henry Barnard began a national campaign to persuade states to take responsibility for creating public school systems, tax-supported and staffed by qualified teachers.
The curious thing about today’s reformers is they want to return us to the olden days, with the public paying for religious schools and private schools, subsidized by taxpayers.
Singer writes:
“One of the founding principles of the United States is public education.
“We fought a bloody revolution against England for many reasons, but chief among them was to create a society where all people could be educated.
“Certainly we had disagreements about who counted as a person. Women? Probably not. Black people? Doubtful. But the ideal of providing a quality education for all was a central part of our fledgling Democracy regardless of how well we actually lived up to it.
“In fact, without it, our system of self-government just wouldn’t work. A functioning Democracy, it was thought, couldn’t exist in a nation where the common person was ignorant. We needed everyone to be knowledgeable and enlightened.
“That’s why we have public schools – so that an educated citizenry will lead to a good government.
“Our founders didn’t want a system of private schools each teaching students various things about the world coloring their minds with religious dogma. They didn’t want a system of schools run like businesses that were only concerned with pumping out students to be good cogs in the machinery of the marketplace.
“No. They wanted one public system created for the good of all, paid for at public expense, and democratically governed by the taxpayers, themselves.
“Don’t believe me?
“Just look at what the founders, themselves, had to say about it.
“More than any other fathers of the Revolution, Thomas Jefferson preached the Gospel of education and its necessity for free governance.
“As he wrote in a letter to Dr. Price (1789), “Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government.”
“He expanded on it in a letter to C. Yancy (1816), “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.”
“James Madison agreed. As the author of the Second Amendment, he is often credited with giving gun rights primary importance. However, he clearly thought education similarly indispensable. In a letter to W. T. Barry (1822), he wrote:
“A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.”
Here is my favorite quote, which captures precisely what the Founders dreamed:
John Adams wrote:
“The whole people must take upon themselves the education of the whole people and be willing to bear the expenses of it. There should not be a district of one mile square, without a school in it, not founded by a charitable individual, but maintained at the public expense of the people themselves.”
Please open the post and read the links.
The ed tech industry is hugely excited about DeVos.
I don’t blame them. The only thing DeVos has offered parents and kids in public schools is more and more online learning. That’s her single idea. She seems to be convinced (with absolutely no “data”) that every public school should be buying this stuff so I suppose she’ll be selling it.
Get reliable and trustworthy and disinterested information before purchasing. Everyone wants to sell public schools something and we all know ed reform adores fads and gimmicks, particularly if they’re profitable
Recall that DeVos and Jeb Bush pushed Ohio’s “cybercharters” for 15 years, billions of dollars in public money invested in my state, with appalling ‘results’. They’re STILL pushing “cybercharters” in every state even though THEY KNOW their idea failed in Ohio.
Let the buyer beware. Find someone who can offer objective information before spending shrinking public school budgets on this stuff. Ed reform is NOT the place to look for that information. They’re captured by this industry. They will jam online learning into every public school because it’s the ONLY thing they offer public schools. Don’t be suckered into spending money you’ll regret. Do your own due diligence.
Betsy DeVos will be on to her next project and your public school will still be there. If public schools make bad decisions based on people pushing product the public won’t trust their ability to handle funds prudently. Don’t be pushed or bullied into buying.
https://twitter.com/EdSurge
President Grant and the Republicans of his era, 100 years after the founders, agreed with them and actually proposed a constitutional amendment for non-sectarian public schools :
“Resolve that neither the state nor nation, nor both combined, shall support institutions of learning other than those sufficient to afford to every child growing up in the land the opportunity of a good common school education, unmixed with sectarian, pagan, or atheistical dogmas,” Grant said. “Leave the matter of religion to the family altar, the church, and the private school, supported entirely by private contributions. Keep the church and state forever separate. With these safeguards, I believe the battles which created the Army of the Tennessee will not have been fought in vain.”
U.S. Grant had the right idea in 1875. The Republican Party and this country sure have changed for the worse since. Democrats need to wake up. Why not propose Grant’s amendment again and start a conversation?
Our government is influenced by right wing evangelicals. With Pence as vice president they are having more say than ever. I think this is how we got stuck with DeVos. We need to continue to resist and fight back.
“Meanwhile, in an interview with a conservative news site, DeVos was also quick to offer her ideas about why teachers struggle — and criticize some of the first public school teachers she encountered on the job. (Cue her critics, who are concerned that she does not have any experience as an educator or working in schools.)
Here’s how she described the discussion she had during her one of her first school visits in Washington, D.C.:
I visited a school on Friday and met with some wonderful, genuine, sincere teachers who pour their heart and soul into their classrooms and their students and our conversation was not long enough to draw out of them what is limiting them from being even more success[ful] from what they are currently. But I can tell the attitude is more of a ‘receive mode.’ They’re waiting to be told what they have to do, and that’s not going to bring success to an individual child. You have to have teachers who are empowered to facilitate great teaching.”
A half an hour in her first public school and she’s read their minds and diagnosed the problem.
Wow. Ed reformers really ARE the Best and the Brightest. A mere mortal might have to spend a little time learning something before diagnosing The Problem.
The parents who objected to the visit might have been on the right track.
When does ed reform offer something of positive value to public schools? If they have nothing to offer why should we welcome them into our schools? So we can be used as political props in conservative media? Thanks but no thanks. Stay in DC. We don’t need that kind of “help”.
http://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/us/2017/02/17/secretary-betsy-devos-on-first-school-visit-teachers-are-waiting-to-be-told-what-they-have-to-do/
It is ironic that DeVos sees public education as teacher directed. What could be more authoritarian than no excuses charters where some student wet their pants because they are afraid to ask to go to the bathroom. What could be more teacher directed than a dummy script that staff members read to students? The students respond to the robotic prompts. Computer instruction is all based on stimulus-response, reductionist ideology. There is nothing innovative or even remotely innovative in any of it. A good, trained public teacher is resourceful and creative in preparing engaging content that activates various learning styles. I have seen it and done it.
“There are two educations. One should teach us how to make a living and the other how to live.” — John Adams
Compare that to
“There are two educations. One should teach us how to code and the other how to debug” — Bill Gates
Gates’ second recommendation is even more appropriate now that de bug is de (un)Precedent(ed). The Ringling Brothers, Barnum and Bailey circus may have folded up its Big Top, but it has been raised over what had been known as the White House and the Gold Plaque proclaims it The Trump Family, Bannon and Conway Circus.
With Gates, the emphasis has always been on debugging.
Microsoft’s entire business model is based on “release garbage and then debug it into a mimimally usable form”
So, effectively, for Gates there is only one Education: how to debug.
His approach to education is exactly the same (surprise)
When DeVos visits a charter or private school will she run to conservative media outlets to criticize the teachers?
I’ll be watching. These folks keep insisting they are “agnostics” but it’s blatantly obvious to anyone outside their echo chamber that they are ideologically opposed to public schools.
That’s fine, it’s a position and they’re allowed to hold it, but they can do us the favor of skipping our schools on their next political tour. Stop using public schools to promote privatization. I don’t want to be part of a DC political campaign to privatize public schools and I don’t want my son used in one. I find using public schools as political props to promote their agenda unacceptable behavior on the part of “the adults” in ed reform.
Thank you for the history lessons.
No one can doubt that federal and state educational policies put in place since “A Nation at Risk” have damaged public education.
Aided by billionaires and with bipartisan support in Congress, the purposes of education have shifted from sustaining “informed participation in a constitutional democracy” to “economic competition in a global economy.”
This zero-sum game has put the whole enterprise of education on life support. In Ohio, nothing is worth teaching or learning unless there is an obvious link to Ohio’s economy. I kid you not.
Ohio Governor John Kasich wants to require all teachers to have one professional development day devoted to job-shadowing a person in business. He seems to think this will be a “corrective” of some sort for whatever ails the economy. He has stated that Ohio’s higher education programs must contribute to Ohio’s economy.
There is nothing new about economic rationales for education, but the idea that the public school system should subsidize businesses (through tax credits and abatements) and be governed by economic considerations is out of control.
This is what this administration wants, and, frankly, not that much different from the neo-liberals. They want to shift public money into private pockets. This move has nothing to do with serving the greater good. It is another form of corporate welfare masquerading as “choice” and small government.
Excellent article and information except that I can’t agree with the title as the concept of “school choice” as it is used today was not in use then. I don’t believe it is right to assign that meaning to the founding times of this nation. It would be better to say that the founders firmly supported, believed in public education for all.
i find myself in agreement. The men who developed our system of government, understood all too well, the danger of an uninformed citizenry. This is one of the reasons that Jefferson was staunchly in favor of a free press.
The concept of widely available public education was revolutionary at the time, and in some respects it still is.
Jefferson’s theory that a well-informed citizenry can govern itself might well continue until we admit to the other side of the coin: A poorly-informed citizenry will blindly follow fascist leaders who bluster that they can govern ALONE.
Jefferson and Adams both extoll knowledge. But our education schools do not. Ask any teacher at random, what are you teaching? I betcha 99% will say “skills”. We are NOT informing the citizenry except haphazardly. We are NOT attacking ignorance, except as an aside. We ARE having kids give their “mental muscles” workouts in the belief that this, not INFORMING, is the real heart of education. Our public schools are dangerously misguided. The flawed theories at their root are more deleterious than De Vos or any reformer could be.
I disagree, Ponderosa.
DeVos is an Existential threat to the very existence of public education.
Yes, but public education has given itself a giant self-inflicted wound. Jefferson and Adams talked about dispelling ignorance. We don’t talk that way anymore. We talk about building reading skills, writing skills, thinking skills. This is dangerous. Jefferson and Adams understood that imbuing minds with knowledge is the raison d’etre of schools. We have lost that understanding. The barbarians have taken control and cast the education establishment into the Dark Ages. Wake up teachers! Dare to challenge the ed school authorities.
I can’t speak for other states, but in NY I proctored many Regents exams where students were required to master a lot of content for the exam. The high stakes tests of our current “reform” crazed systems have made schools narrow their curriculum so our young people are exposed to less coherent content. That is why we should work to eliminate unnecessary standardized testing.
We should work to eliminate “unnecessary standardized testing” because it is completely onto-epistemologically invalid. No amount of psychometric fudging can refute that fact. Crap in, crap out and that describes exactly what standardized testing is
I read the whole piece with a cup of coffee. Thank you for sharing. It is extremely sad that we have landed so far off from the vision that our Founding Fathers had for our country. Having read about DeVos & her family for years, I am not only saddened but scared about about the potential outcomes for our public schools. I am part of the resistance b/c the inhumanity of the privatization of our public schools is not something any of us should tolerate..the harm to students..the harm to teachers..the segregation based on income and/or race…the shredding of the fabric of our entire public education system must be mended…stitch by stitch..collectively we must weave together a fabric so strong, that it will weather all the potential get rich quick schemes and other possible storms.
Amen. I agree that the resistance ought to be more than just opposing Trump –it needs to be about renewing the social fabric.
I agree as well. The opposition should PROpose as well as OPpose.
Deliver new ideas, which will serve the cause of education.
Choice of private options is the way to go! After all, it’s been working great in Pakistan, Afghanistan, etc. You know, madrassas…