Trump has assembled a group of friends and family to review the nation’S intelligence agencies.
Trump has criticized the intelligence agencies relentlessly. Recently he criticized them for leaks. This appears to be Trump’s plan to break up the CIA and NSA. Maybe he is doing this to curry favor with Putin.
“President Trump plans to assign a New York billionaire to lead a broad review of American intelligence agencies, according to administration officials, an effort that members of the intelligence community fear could curtail their independence and reduce the flow of information that contradicts the president’s worldview.
“The possible role for Stephen A. Feinberg, a co-founder of Cerberus Capital Management, has met fierce resistance among intelligence officials already on edge because of the criticism the intelligence community has received from Mr. Trump during the campaign and since he became president. On Wednesday, Mr. Trump blamed leaks from the intelligence community for the departure of Michael T. Flynn, his national security adviser, whose resignation he requested.
“There has been no announcement of Mr. Feinberg’s job, which would be based in the White House, but he recently told his company’s shareholders that he is in discussions to join the Trump administration. He is a member of Mr. Trump’s economic advisory council.
“Mr. Feinberg, who has close ties to Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s chief strategist, and Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law, declined to comment on his possible position. The White House, which is still working out the details of the intelligence review, also would not comment.
“Bringing Mr. Feinberg into the administration to conduct the review is seen as a way of injecting a Trump loyalist into a world the White House views with suspicion. But top intelligence officials fear that Mr. Feinberg is being groomed for a high position in one of the intelligence agencies.
“Mr. Bannon and Mr. Kushner, according to current and former intelligence officials and Republican lawmakers, had at one point considered Mr. Feinberg for either director of national intelligence or chief of the Central Intelligence Agency’s clandestine service, a role that is normally reserved for career intelligence officers, not friends of the president. Mr. Feinberg’s only experience with national security matters is his firm’s stakes in a private security company and two gun makers.
“On an array of issues — including the Iran nuclear deal, the utility of NATO, and how best to combat Islamist militancy — much of the information and analysis produced by American intelligence agencies contradicts the policy positions of the new administration. The divide is starkest when it comes to Russia and President Vladimir V. Putin, whom Mr. Trump has repeatedly praised while dismissing American intelligence assessments that Moscow sought to promote his own candidacy.”

Great, more unqualified people to f*&k up our country! Information will always come out, Trump is a lying bastard that will hopefully get impeached soon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Like! (And your “wicked sense of humor”.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. I recognize something in this national game which I have seen take down so much in public education over the past decade: unqualified, inexperienced, thin-skinned but money/power hungry people taking on jobs that they cannot hope to do well. Soon enough they puff up, begin to bluster, and ultimately screw up royally — calling each other names as they go.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seconded
LikeLike
It is totally in Bannon and Trump’s interest to have a Reichstag fire type event occur which could be used as a pretext to seize emergency powers. See Krugman’s column on this. What better way to guarantee that this happens then to imsure that the intelligence agencies are in turmoil or afraid to report the results of their intelligence.
LikeLike
Yes…it is going from bad to worse, minute by minute. It would not be beyond these oligarchs to produce an orchestrated disaster in order to put the military in charge. Again, look to the Military Commissions Act.
LikeLike
We already had a Reichstag fire in this country, on September 11th, 2001.
LikeLike
Michael F,
Are you suggesting that George W Bush was behind 9/11?
LikeLike
I don’t know who was behind 9/11 but I trust over 2,800 architects and engineers who believe and have proven that the buildings that day could not have come down they way they did without controlled demolition involved. Don’t trust me go to the architects and engineers site and enlighten yourselves to what more likely than not happened with the THREE WTC buildings that day:
http://www.ae911truth.org/
the ae stands for, you guessed it, architects and engineers. You know folks who have worked on these types of structures and understand the SCIENCE and ENGINEERING behind them.
LikeLike
Most definitely not, only that he and the Republicans (with many, many complicit Democrats, including Barack Obama, who voted to renew the Act in 2008) opportunistically used 9/11 as a pretext to hollow out our rights and liberties under the Patriot Act. Our democracy was already weak, and has never recovered.
As you probably know, there is disagreement among historians over whether the Nazis themselves set the Reichstag fire, and put up a patsy to take the blame for the Communists. While I’m inclined to believe that’s the case, it’s almost irrelevant compared to the aftermath of the event. Likewise with 9/11: while I don’t believe Bush et. al. were either directly involved or “let it happen,” he/they unquestionably used the fear engendered by that day to take a big step toward creating an authoritarian state, to be called upon when needed. In that sense, we already had our Reichstag Fire.
Which is not to say that Trump/Bannon couldn’t find it in their interest to conjure another one.
LikeLike
Both Bush and Obama not only introduced and then strengthened the Patriot Act, but they both did similarly with The Military Commissions Act which had never been used since antebellum times. And now the prez, or even the ‘so called’ prez, can order the military to police our streets and put down protest and rebellion.
It is a very dangerous time in our country yet many if not most Americans remain engrossed with ‘The Bachelor’ and have no idea where Crimea and the Ukraine and the Baltic nations are, and why Putin wants to own the American president.
And why we should be very afraid of Rex Tillerson who Trump mentioned repeatedly in his press conference this AM….a truly vomitus display from him, yet again.
LikeLike
“Maybe he is doing this to curry favor with Putin.”
Can’t let it go, can you?
https://www.thenation.com/article/kremlin-baiting-president-trump-without-facts-must-stop/
LikeLike
Dienne, the mainstream media are all over this story, like it or not.
Even a Michael Moore acknowledges that Putin won, we lost.
Please don’t go into a rant about how much you hate Hillary. Hillary looks good from the vantage point of Feb 2017. Actually she looked good to me from the minute she won the Dem nomination. Unless you like having an incompetent fool dismantle all the social reforms since 1933.
LikeLike
so-called “Real One,”
Keep spewing bile and you will never appear on my blog. Start your own.
LikeLike
So Flynn resigned because of a non-story?
LikeLike
When I read this article earlier this AM, I was taken aback that it was published by The Nation. Seemed like something from National Review, but not that well written. Comes across as claptrap journalism more in line with BuzzFeed, even though the authors are identified as academics.
The 39 page expose report on Trump and Russia has now been validated by many sources including the US and British spy and intel agencies (which are beyond my area of knowledge, but which have been reported on by many media sources).
The speculation that Putin has much info on the activities of Trump while he was in Russia, where he has traveled frequently for many years and where he does much provable business, as his son stated publicly in 2009 (see the Rachel Maddow show last night) is believable to many in our government, The Brit spy who wrote this dossier has now disappeared and many wonder if he has been eliminated or if he is in hiding in fear of his life.
LikeLike
Ellen, please link to where we can find documented, “validated” proof of Russian involvement. I have yet to see anything but thinly-sourced “assessments.”
LikeLike
Michael…here is a long detailed history of Trump and Russia…with many citations by the university professor author.
The Trump Resistance Plan: A Timeline — Russia and President Trump
Investigative reporters have begun to flesh out the Trump/Russia timeline. To keep everything in one location, here’s an updated summary (so far).
By Steven Harper | February 15, 2017
The Trump Resistance Plan: A Timeline […]
Composite: Former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images); National security adviser Michael Flynn (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images); President-elect Donald Trump (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
This post was updated on Feb. 17, 2017.
The last installment of the Trump Resistance Plan began with Thomas Paine’s 1776 observation in Common Sense, “Time makes more converts than reason.”
Sometimes it doesn’t take much time at all. Russia interfered with an American presidential election; Congressional Republicans unwilling to convert and seek the truth no longer have anywhere to hide.
Putin’s 2016 Ticket
Investigative reporters have begun to flesh out the Trump/Russia timeline. To keep everything in one location, here’s an updated summary (so far):
Trump’s efforts to develop business in Russia date to 1987. In 1996, he applied for his trademark in that country. Discussing ambitions for a Trump hotel in 2007, he declared, “We will be in Moscow at some point.”
Oct. 15, 2007, Trump said: “Look at Putin — what he’s doing with Russia — I mean, you know, what’s going on over there. I mean this guy has done — whether you like him or don’t like him — he’s doing a great job.”
September 2008, Donald Trump Jr. said: “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets… we see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.”
June 18, 2013, Trump tweeted: “Do you think Putin will be going to The Miss Universe Pageant in November in Moscow — if so, will he become my new best friend?” While at the pageant, Trump said, “I have plans for the establishment of business in Russia. Now, I am in talks with several Russian companies to establish this skyscraper.”
Nov. 11, 2013, Trump tweeted: “TRUMP TOWER-MOSCOW is next.”
November 2013, Trump said: “[Putin’s] done a very brilliant job in terms of what he represents and who he’s represented.”
Mar. 6, 2014, Trump said: “You know, I was in Moscow a couple of months ago. I own the Miss Universe Pageant and they treated me so great. Putin even sent me a present, a beautiful present.” On the same day, President Obama signed an executive order imposing sanctions on Russia for its unlawful annexation of Crimea.
June 16, 2015: Trump announces that he is running for president.
Sept. 15, 2015, Trump told Bill O’Reilly: “I will tell you in terms of leadership he [Putin] is getting an ‘A,’ and our president is not doing so well.”
Nov. 10, 2015, Trump said: “I got to know [Putin] very well because we were both on 60 Minutes. We were stablemates, and we did very well that night.”
Dec. 10, 2015: Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn, who would become Trump’s national security adviser, sat at Putin’s table for the 10th anniversary gala of Russia’s state-owned television propaganda network, RT. Flynn had made a paid appearance on the network.
Feb. 17, 2016: As questions about Russia swirled around Trump, he changed his story: “I have no relationship with [Putin], other than he called me a genius.”
April 20, 2016: Paul Manafort became Trump’s campaign manager. Reports surfaced about his 2007 to 2012 ties to Ukraine’s pro-Putin former president, whom Manafort had helped to elect.
July 18, 2016: The Washington Post reported that the Trump campaign worked behind the scenes ahead of the Republican Convention on a plank of the 2016 Party Platform that gutted the GOP’s longstanding support for Ukrainians’ popular resistance to Russia’s 2014 intervention.
July 22, 2016: On the eve of the Democratic National Convention, WikiLeaks released its first trove of emails stolen from the DNC.
July 27, 2016, Trump said: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.” At the same press conference, he insisted: “I never met Putin. I’ve never spoken to him.”
July 31, 2016: Manafort denied knowing anything about the change in the Republican platform. That afternoon, Boris Epshteyn, Trump’s Russian-born adviser, spouted the Kremlin’s party line telling CNN: “Russia did not seize Crimea. We can talk about the conflict that happened between Ukraine and the Crimea… But there was no seizure by Russia. That’s an incorrect statement, characterization, of what happened.”
Aug. 6, 2016: NPR confirmed the Trump campaign’s involvement in the Republican platform change on Ukraine.
Aug. 19, 2016: As reports of Manafort’s financial connections to Ukraine intensified, he resigned from the Trump campaign.
Oct. 1, 2016: Six days before WikiLeaks released emails that Russians hackers had acquired from Clinton campaign manager John Podesta’s email account, Trump’s informal adviser and surrogate, Roger Stone tweeted: “Wednesday@HillaryClinton is done. #Wikileaks.”
Oct. 4, 2016: Trump tweeted: “CLINTON’S CLOSE TIES TO PUTIN DESERVE SCRUTINY.”
Oct. 7, 2016: In a joint statement, the Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence said, “The US Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations… We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.” But two other stories dominated the news cycle: WikiLeaks began publishing stolen emails from the account of Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, and Trump’s infamous Access Hollywood tapes became public.
Oct. 12, 2016: Roger Stone told NBC News, “I have back-channel communications with WikiLeaks.”
Oct. 19, 2016: During the third presidential debate, Trump dismissed the Oct. 7 US intelligence findings: “[Clinton] has no idea whether it is Russia, China or anybody else… Our country has no idea.”
Nov. 9, 2016: After Putin announced Trump’s election victory, Russia’s Parliament erupted in applause.
Nov. 10, 2016: Russia’s deputy foreign minister admitted that during the campaign, the Kremlin had continuing communications with Trump’s “immediate entourage.”
Dec. 9, 2016: In response to a Washington Post report that the CIA had concluded Russia had intervened in the election to help Trump win, he said, “These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. The election ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. It’s now time to move on and ‘Make America Great Again.’ ”
Dec. 11, 2016: Trump praised Rex Tillerson, chairman of Exxon Mobil and recipient of Russia’s “Order of Friendship” Medal from Vladimir Putin in 2013, as “much more than a business executive” and a “world-class player.” Trump said Tillerson “knows many of the players” and did “massive deals in Russia” for Exxon. Two days later, Trump nominated him to be secretary of state.
Also on Dec. 11, 2016: Asked about the earlier US intelligence report on hacking, Trump said, “They have no idea if it’s Russia or China or somebody. It could be somebody sitting in a bed some place. I mean, they have no idea.”
Dec. 13, 2016: NBC News’ Richard Engel reports from Moscow on Trump’s secretary of state pick, Rex Tillerson. Former Russian Energy Minister Vladimir Milov told Engel that Tillerson was a “gift for Putin.”
Dec. 29, 2016: On the same day that President Obama announced sanctions against Russian in retaliation for its interference in the 2016 election, national security adviser-designate Lt. Gen. Flynn placed five phone calls to the Russian ambassador.
Dec. 30, 2016: After Putin made a surprise announcement that Russia would not retaliate for the new sanctions, Trump tweeted, “Great move on delay (by V. Putin) — I always knew he was very smart.”
Jan. 3, Jan. 4 and Jan. 5, 2017: Trump tweeted a series of attacks on the integrity of the US intelligence community’s findings that Russia had hacked the election.
Jan. 6, 2017: The CIA, FBI and NSA released their unclassified report, concluding unanimously, “Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election.” The three intelligence agencies agreed that “the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible.” The report also stated that WikiLeaks had been Russia’s conduit for the effort.
Jan. 11, 2017: At his first news conference, Trump said, “As far as hacking, I think it was Russia. But I think we also get hacked by other countries and other people.”
Also on Jan. 11, 2017: The final question of Trump’s first news conference came from Ann Compton of ABC News: “Mr. President-elect, can you stand here today, once and for all, and say that no one connected to you or your campaign had any contact with Russia leading up to or during the presidential campaign?” Trump never answered her. Away from cameras and heading toward the elevators, he reportedly said, “No,” his team didn’t have contact with Russia.
The Flynn Affair
Jan. 13, 2017: In response to The Washington Post’s article about Flynn’s Dec. 29 conversations with the Russian ambassador, press secretary Sean Spicer said it was only one call. They “exchanged logistical information” for an upcoming call between Trump and Vladimir Putin after the inauguration.
Jan. 15, 2017: “We should trust Putin,” Trump told The Times of London. Expressing once again his skepticism about NATO, Trump lambasted Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel.
Jan. 15, 2017: Appearing on CBS’s Face the Nation, Vice President Pence said Flynn’s call to the Russian ambassador on the same day President Obama announced new sanctions was “strictly coincidental,” explaining: “They did not discuss anything having to do with the United States’ decision to expel diplomats or impose censure on Russia…. What I can confirm, having to spoken with [Flynn] about it, is that those conversations that happened to occur around the time that the United States took action to expel diplomats had nothing whatsoever to do with those sanctions.”
Jan. 22, 2017: Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn was sworn in as National Security Adviser, a position that did not require Senate confirmation.
Jan. 23, 2017: At Sean Spicer’s first press briefing, Spicer said that none of Flynn’s conversations with the Russian ambassador touched on the Dec. 29 sanctions. That got the attention of FBI Director James Comey. According to the Wall Street Journal, Comey convinced Acting Attorney General Sally Yates to delay informing the White House immediately about the discrepancy between Spicer’s characterization of Flynn’s calls and US intelligence intercepts showing that the two had, in fact, discussed sanctions. Comey reportedly asked Yates to wait a bit longer so that the FBI could develop more information and speak with Flynn himself. The FBI interviewed Flynn shortly thereafter.
Jan. 24, 2017: According to a subsequent article in The Washington Post, Flynn reportedly denied to FBI agents that he had discussed US sanctions against Russia in his December 2016 calls with the Russian ambassador.
Jan. 26, 2017: Acting Attorney General Sally Yates informed White House counsel Don McGahn that Flynn had made misleading statements about his late December conversations with the Russian ambassador. Sean Spicer later said Trump and a small group of White House advisers were “immediately informed of the situation.”
Jan. 30, 2017: Trump fired Acting Attorney General Sally Yates. According to his statement, the reason was that she had “betrayed the Department of Justice” by refusing to defend Trump’s travel ban in court.
Feb. 8, 2017: Flynn told reporters at The Washington Post that he did not discuss US sanctions in his December conversation with the Russian ambassador.
Also on Feb. 8, 2017: Jeff Sessions, the first senator to endorse Trump’s candidacy and the former chair of the Trump campaign’s national security advisory committee, became attorney general. Every Republican senator and Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia voted to confirm him. During the confirmation process, Sessions had said he was “not aware of a basis to recuse myself” from the Justice Department’s Russia-related investigations of Trump.
Feb. 9, 2017: Through a spokesman, Flynn changed his position: “While [Flynn] had no recollection of discussing sanctions, he couldn’t be certain that the topic never came up.”
Feb. 10, 2017: Trump told reporters he was unaware of reports surrounding Flynn’s December conversations with the Russian ambassador.
Feb. 13, 2017: The Washington Post broke another story: Then-acting Attorney General Sally Yates had warned the White House in late January that Flynn had mischaracterized his December conversation with the Russian ambassador, and that it made him vulnerable to Russian blackmail. Later that evening, Flynn resigned.
Feb. 14, 2017: The New York Times corroborated the Russian Deputy Foreign Minister’s admission on Nov. 10. Based on information from four current and former American officials, The Times reported, “Members of the Trump campaign and other Trump associates had repeated contacts with senior intelligence officials in the year before the election.” Meanwhile, advisers to Attorney General Jeff Sessions reiterated his earlier position: Sessions saw no need to recuse himself from the ongoing Justice Department investigations into the Trump/Russia connections.
Feb. 15, 2017: Trump tweeted a series of outbursts attacking the Trump/Russia connection as “non-sense,” diverting attention to “un-American” leaks in which “information is illegally given out by ‘intelligence’ like candy.” Shortly thereafter, Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz and other congressional Republicans formally asked the Justice Department’s Inspector General to investigate the leaks, but they and their GOP colleagues resisted the creation of an independent bipartisan commission with the power to convene public hearings and discover the truth about the Trump/Russia connections.
During an afternoon appearance with Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump refused to answer questions about connections between his presidential campaign and Russia. That evening, The New York Times reported that Trump was planning to appoint Stephen Feinberg, a billionaire hedge fund manager and Trump ally, to lead “a broad review of American intelligence agencies.” Feinberg has no prior experience in intelligence or government, but he has close ties to Steve Bannon and Jared Kushner.
Feb. 16, 2017: Trump continued his diversionary twitter assault on the intelligence leaks that were fueling intensified scrutiny of his Russia connections. At Trump’s afternoon press conference, he said: “I own nothing in Russia. I have no loans in Russia. I don’t have any deals in Russia… Russia is fake news. Russia — this is fake news put out by the media.” Reporters asked repeatedly about anyone else involved with Trump or his campaign. “No,” Trump said. “Nobody that I know of.”
Keep Sending the Message
In response to the latest controversy surrounding Mike Flynn and Russia, Trump tweeted a Valentine’s Day diversion: “The real story here is why are there so many illegal leaks coming out of Washington?”
No, the real story is the question Trump ducked on Jan. 11 and deflected repeatedly on Feb. 16: What contact did Trump or anyone on his team have with Russia before the US election?
Stay on message. Tell Republicans in Congress that American democracy requires an answer — under oath — to Ann Compton’s Jan. 11, 2017 question: “Mr. President-elect, can you stand here today, once and for all, and say that no one connected to you or your campaign had any contact with Russia leading up to or during the presidential campaign?”
Putin knows the answer. So does the Russian Deputy Foreign Minister, who said in November that the Kremlin had maintained continuing communications with Trump’s “immediate entourage” prior to the election. So do any campaign members and other Trump associates who, according to The New York Times, had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials in the year before the election.”
But the American people don’t, and that asymmetry of information could give Putin the power to blackmail the country’s leaders. On Jan. 7, Sen. Lindsey Graham urged an investigation “wherever it leads.” A few Republicans want the Senate Intelligence Committee to add the Flynn affair in its ongoing inquiry — but they’re offering too little, too late. At this point, a credible investigation requires the approach that Sen. John McCain initially proposed: a bipartisan commission with subpoena power. American democracy can no longer trust Senate Republicans to run this show. Nor can hearings be conducted secretly.
Congress must authorize a special independent 9/11-type commission. Step 2 of The Trump Resistance Plan has contact information and language for messages to Republicans and Democrats in Congress. The message to all of them is simple: “Step up, stand strong, and save democracy while someone still can.” Call, write, email, march and win.
This is part of a series by Steven Harper. Read the other posts in the series: Trump Resistance Plan.
*This post initially stated that a batch of emails released on Oct. 7, 2016 by WikiLeaks was Wikileaks’ first email dump relating to the 2016 US election. That was incorrect; WikiLeaks’ first email dump occurred on July 22, 2016. The post also stated that the emails released on Oct. 7, 2016 were obtained from DNC servers. That was incorrect; hackers obtained the July emails by accessing DNC servers but obtained the October emails by accessing from Clinton campaign manager John Podesta’s email account. The post has been corrected and we regret the error.
**This post was originally published on Feb. 15, 2017 and was updated on Feb. 17 with new information.
TOPICS: Democracy & Government
TAGS: election 2016, mike flynn, rex tillerson, russia, sean spicer, trump resistance plan, vladimir putin
http://billmoyers.com/author/stevenharper/
Steven Harper
Steven Harper blogs at The Belly of the Beast, is an adjunct professor at Northwestern University, and contributes regularly to The American Lawyer. He is the author of several books, including The Lawyer Bubble — A Profession in Crisis and Crossing Hoffa — A
LikeLike
Ellen, you posted this about six times.
LikeLike
If you had told me 20 years ago that I would be defending the CIA and NSA, I would have scoffed. But now? Man….
LikeLike
Please don’t go to the dark side!
And I don’t mean this dark side:
LikeLike
Thanks Duane: Youtube is filtered out in this school, but I’ll look at this at home when I have a chance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The text for the IPOTUS’s latest press conference has been up on WaPo. The title is Donald Trump’s combative, grievance-filled press conference, annotated. I skimmed it…
It is literally unbelievable that the enablers in the GOP hierarchy and the rabid 45 lapdogs are still not getting this.
Here’s a quote:
As you know, our administration inherited many problems across government and across the economy. To be honest, I inherited a mess. It’s a mess. At home and abroad, a mess. Jobs are pouring out of the country; you see what’s going on with all of the companies leaving our country, going to Mexico and other places, low pay, low wages, mass instability overseas, no matter where you look. The middle east is a disaster. North Korea – we’ll take care of it folks; we’re going to take care of it all. I just want to let you know, I inherited a mess.
WTF is going on here?
LikeLike
Dezerov,
We have a deranged president.
He blames others. He scapegoats. He can’t stop talking about his election. He despises the free press. He belittles others. He fired Flynn and blames the media. He says the leaks are dangerous but fake.
LikeLike
deserov Trump is playing to his base–Fox News snips out such statements as “I’ll fix everything,” and leaves the rest behind. Those who watch Fox News–that’s all they hear, and they believe it–and go back to watching “The Bachelor.”
LikeLike
Diane, any reason I have a comment “in moderation” for this thread. Has it gotten through or should I send it again?
LikeLike
My response
LikeLike