A friend in Indiana wrote to say “Not all Hoosiers are morons,” referring of course to one who is a leader on the national scene.
She linked to this article in The New Republic about the 35-year-old mayor of South Bend, Pete Buttigieg.
He participated in a recent debate among contenders for chair of the Democratic National Committee and impressed the audience.
Graham Vyse writes:
With their party now decimated at the national and state level, Democrats cling to one refuge for promoting progressive policies in the Trump era: Cities. They still control two-thirds of America’s biggest ones, and mayors nationwide are vowing to defy the new president’s agenda by shielding undocumented immigrants from deportation, pushing their own efforts to fight climate change, and working to preserve their citizens’ healthcare even as the Affordable Care Act faces repeal. Cities are where Democrats can still prove their muster, lead by example, and offer Americans an alternative vision under Republican rule.
That’s part of the appeal of Pete Buttigieg, the 35-year-old mayor of South Bend, Indiana (pop. 101,000), who was a late entry this month in the campaign to chair the Democratic National Committee. A gay Afghanistan veteran, Harvard graduate, and Rhodes Scholar, he says he’ll turn around his party like he’s turning around his Rust Belt city—promoting progressivism in places where it’s in short supply. Former DNC Chair Howard Dean calls him “the wild card” in this year’s race, and he’s a rising star nationally, promoted by President Barack Obama and hailed by New York Times columnist Frank Bruni as potentially the first gay president.

I’m from Indiana as well, though I haven’t lived there for 30 years. I was there in April 2016 marching in a women’s rights rally. I’m glad to see some progressives coming up.
LikeLike
The Dems really need to broaden their appeal beyond the cities. The Republicans are really no friend economically to the white working class (WWC) and Dems are their natural allies if 1) they stop trying to portray racial struggles as winners and losers and 2) they figure out a way to distribute economic success more broadly across the country.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Unions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Does anyone know his position on schools? We don’t need anymore pro charter Democrats.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I was introduced to another rising star in the Democratic Party today.
Her name is Tulsi Gabbard. She represents the 2nd District of Hawaii in the House of Representatives.
Tulsi is impressive; quite possibly a hero, the future of the United States; the future of the Democratic Party.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard
I’m suggesting that we start a list of who to support, NOW, for the elections in 2018 and 2020, and then start supporting them on as many blogs as possible with profiles, etc.
LikeLike
Great idea, Lloyd!
LikeLike
Lloyd, please do some research into her. She is among the bluest of blue dog Democrats. Her “support” of Sanders of notwithstanding, she was one of the Dems who Donald hoped to recruit into his administration. If she’s the future of the Democratic Party, it’s time to close up shop.
LikeLike
Already, the assault starts on those who would be the future.
LikeLike
Again, do some research and stay away from Wikipedia to draw your opinions, especially on politics and government.
LikeLike
No, I will not stay away from proper Wiki pieces that are supported with citations and links and haven’t been challenged for accuracy. If you allege that some or all of the facts were wrong, you are free to challenge them on Wiki. If you are right, then it will be noted and/or corrected.
LikeLike
Misplaced my response below. But there’s also this from Foster Friess, he of “Bayer aspirin between the knees contraception”: Note the list of people and who seems to be most enthusiastic: http://www.lrlrfm.com/featured-supporters/
LikeLike
Here is the only site that I’ll use to research Tulsi Gabbard if she ever runs in a national election where I’ll be able to vote for her in California.
http://votesmart.org/candidate/biography/129306/tulsi-gabbard#.WIPQGvkrKUk
From Vote Smart, I can research her voting history, her positions, her ratings, her speeches, her funding.
Based on that fact-based information with no opinions stated by the site, I’ll decide if I vote for her.
LikeLike
Much easier way to have your decisions made.
LikeLike
I repeat, I checked the facts on Vote Smart and I liked what I saw. If I hold out looking for the perfect candidate that matches everything I think, then I’ll never vote for anyone again.
Forget the traditional and Alt-Right media. I’m not paying attention to what they report about her unless she is indicted for fraud and is convicted.
But is she a natural born American citizen if she was born in American Somoa, a U.S. territory and not a state.
https://votesmart.org/candidate/129306/tulsi-gabbard#.WIQDx_krKUm
LikeLike
“perfect candidate”: this is about who is a perfect candidate, it is about who is an authentic candidate.
You conflate “traditional with Alt-right [fascist] media”. Trump 1, Lloyd 0.
Where do you see anything above that questions if she is an American?
LikeLike
Once again GregB, I will use Vote Smart to find out about her and then decide from those facts, not gossip, flawed news reporting, misinformation, lies, rumors, conspiracy theories, etc.
Anyone who has an open mind can click the Vote Smart link and decide for themselves.
After checking the actual facts, if they don’t like her voting record in Congress or her positions based on that voting record, then they don’t have to vote for her but if they base their thinking on unproven allegations that don’t match her voting record, then I think they fit into the deplorable category.
https://votesmart.org/candidate/129306/tulsi-gabbard#.WIQQVPkrKUm
LikeLike
not about who is perfect
LikeLike
Whatever happened to using your own intellect? Lloyd, you did not even try to respond to any of my three points: authenticity (what is a Democrat?), discernment (is traditional media the same as fascist propaganda?), or source of place of birth (?????)
LikeLike
To be honest, I don’t give a hoot or a holler about what it means to be a Republican or a Democrat. I’m an independent voter that does not belong to a political party. I vote for the candidate who matches my values the closest. I don’t vote for a political party.
LikeLike
Lloyd, maybe you should check out DownWithTyranny.com and check out his posts on Tulsi Gabbard.
among them are one from 7/31/2016
http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2016/07/to-label-tulsi-gabbard-progressive-is.html
LikeLike
Thank you posting this, lorenet. I have friends who work on Capitol Hill and this article mirrors exactly what some of them have told me in private. They almost snarl when talking about Gabbard. One once told me “She’s an elephant in an ill-fitting donkey costume.” Unfortunately the things you and I have posted can’t be distilled into a VoteSmart template.
LikeLike
Yes, you are obviously one who is influenced by biased gossip and spin. I prefer the facts and will continue to use Vote Smart to see what she actually does and other potential candidates in the Democratic Party. If she is a contender the sneer and smear campaign has already started.
https://votesmart.org/candidate/129306/tulsi-gabbard#.WIQDx_krKUm
LikeLike
Lloyd, I am not nearly as impressed with Vote Smart as you are, nor of its founder, Richard Kimball. They have had staffing problems and management problems.
If you like them, and Tulsi, that’s fine, but we are going to have to agree to disagree on this one, I’m afraid.
LikeLike
Sorry, I’ll stick with Vote Smart. I want to avoid biased sites. I want the actual facts that reveal who she really is, not what someone else thinks about her.
https://votesmart.org/candidate/129306/tulsi-gabbard#.WIQDx_krKUm
LikeLike
Mr. Buttigieg represents the progressive future of the Democratic party. He is certainly well educated, but has he been inflicted with neoliberal ideology? Does he favor privatization of education and other social services? From this link it appears the mayor uses business jargon by calling parents “customers.” Is this because he inherited a mostly privatized system or does he support “competition” as a means of improving schools? At this point, I have little patience with Republican “lite” Democrats. http://www.southbendtribune.com/news/education/south-bend-schools-aim-to-reverse-enrollment-slump/article_d0d936b4-ddef-11e6-8590-9bac33dc16ed.html
LikeLike
According to the Maui Times, Gabbard did not join 169 House Democrats in a letter opposing the appointment of Steve Bannon to a White House advisory role. Did this have anything to do with that:
“Bannon admires what Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) have done on the left in generating populist energy and stoking opposition to trade deals,” states The Hill article. “And he’s a big fan of Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, the Hawaii Democrat who frustrates progressives due to her more right-leaning stances on guns, refugees and Islamic extremism.”
I don’t think that made it into the Wikipedia profile her staff wrote for her.
She joined Republicans in criticizing President Obama for not using the term “radical Islam” and has since become Fox’s favorite House Democrat.
More recently, she belittled critics of the naming of retired generals to the Donald cabinet on CNN: “As a veteran and as someone who is still serving in the Air National Guard, I find it pretty offensive for people to outright discriminate against veterans. Here you have generals, who have literally spent their full lives serving our country, putting service above self, putting their lives on the line to defend democracy, and yet people are criticizing them, and discriminating against them, saying, ‘Just because you served as a general previously, you are disqualified from serving in a high position of leadership in our government.’ These people arguably have put far more on the line and are far more deeply personally committed to upholding and protecting our democracy than their critics.”
Read that again. We “discriminate against veterans” because we support maintaining a 10 year prohibition from retired military members being confirmed to lead the Department of Defense. So much for those of us who value civilian control of the military. Also, retired generals “are far more deeply personally committed to upholding and protecting our democracy than their critics.” Did you catch that one? Retired generals and veterans ARE more equal than others.
If you think Joe Manchin represents the future of the Democratic Party, you’ll love Tulsi Gabbard.
LikeLike
She certainly sounds like a Blue Dog Democrat to me, and we don’t need any more of them.
LikeLike
My view: Democrats shot themselves in the foot by not electing Bernie as their standard bearer – for many reasons.
I think, hope, that the Republicans have shot themselves in the head by electing a nonentity like Trump IF we can survive the next 4 years.
LikeLike
Tulsi Gabbard: The presumption is that she is in Syria and Lebanon at Trump’s behest.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/tulsi-gabbard-secret-syria-trip-233762
LikeLike
” A gay Afghanistan veteran, Harvard graduate, and Rhodes Scholar, he says he’ll turn around his party like he’s turning around his Rust Belt city—promoting progressivism in places where it’s in short supply.”
So I’m wondering. Does being gay make him more qualified for the job? What does his sexual choice have to do with becoming chair if the DNC?
Others are vying for this position and were mentioned on this list. Their sexual preference was not listed. So why now?
LikeLike
Ah, Rudy, I’ll break my boycott for this one. I’m in a good, hopeful mood for the first time since late October.
First, Mayor Buttigieg has a sexual orientation, it is not a “choice.” Siddhartha Mukherjee in his brilliant book “The Gene” makes a compelling scientific argument that this orientation can be demonstrated through genetic analysis, even to the point of explaining why transgender persons do not want sex change operations.
“So why now?” Because we, as a nation and society have grown and many of us have lost our irrational bigotry because we have met, known, worked with, and loved (platonically) many gay and lesbian people. When I went to high school, I followed the crowd and ostracized gay boys because that was the thing to do to get along. When I went to college, I slowly realized how wrong I was and have been made amends and repented over the next decade.
Second, “[d]oes being gay (here, interestingly, it’s not a ‘choice’) make him more qualified for the job?” No, absolutely not. But it does inform his worldview and it signals to me something about him. It signals a confidence. What I have learned over the past 26 or so years is that gays and lesbians who are not in the closet tend to be more confident, assertive, and self-aware. Perhaps that’s a sweeping generalization and bigoted in its own way, but that’s how I feel. In the past, closeted gay persons lived with a fear of being outed. That was a reason used, for example, for not allowing gay persons to serve in the CIA or the military. Once you take away that fear, they are just as competent and effective (or, like all humans, less competent or ineffective) as anyone else.
Lastly, it is a factor that helps explaining, as Germans call it, Weltanschauung. Everyone has it. You have it as an immigrant from the Netherlands, I have it as a first generation American born in Germany, a Native American who grew up on a reservation in South Dakota has it, etc. Every candidate to lead the DNC has it, and it differs for each. Those experiences do not make them more qualified, but they inform us a little more about how they might (we will not know how they will until one is picked) act and think.
That’s “why now.” Because 10, 20, 30 years ago, it would have been almost unthinkable. Ask Ken Mellman, the former chair of the RNC, who didn’t out himself publicly until well after his term expired. I’m glad that it is, at the same time, both a minor, insignificant issue as well as an important one. Boycott in effect again.
LikeLike
From the Genetic Literacy Project -not really known for their “gay bashing” so I figured you might accept their note
==
The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.
Scientists presenting at the 2015 meeting of the American Society of Genetics announced the discovery of a gene-based algorithm that could predict male homosexuality with 70 percent accuracy. It’s the first time a gene-based model has been used to predict sexual orientation, giving credence to the idea that homosexuality has a biological basis.
Exciting as the claim may be, it’s crucial not to oversimplify the findings.
The scientists from UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine discovered that methylation, a form of DNA modification, in certain regions of the genome differed between homosexual and heterosexual identical twin brothers. What they did not find were the elusive “gay genes.” Amid the ever-present “homosexuality is a choice” chants of the anti-gay community, it is, naturally, tempting to claim that this study is concrete proof that sexual orientation is entirely genetic. To say so would be simplistic and, well, wrong. But it does constitute evidence that homosexuality has a biological basis.
The real focus of the study was epigenetics, a field of biology dealing with the ways different genes are turned on and off. What’s really important to bear in mind is that the evidence doesn’t point to a cause-effect relationship. Just because one individual might have the epigenetic pattern associated with homosexual individuals doesn’t mean he is, necessarily, a homosexual. Ditto for heterosexual patterns. It could be a coincidence. His sexuality and his pattern may simply be correlated.
LikeLike
Thank you Greg B for your wonderful and thorough explanation to Rudy.
It has been 60 years for me to make sense about gender. I must admit that my mother’s words are precise about KARMA.
Here is what my mother’s story is about gender which I have always chuckled whenever I recited it.
It begins with authority who abuses its power to harm powerless people, so that they are punished by being reincarnated into a gender that they deserve.
For instance, the king’s women who are guarded by eunuch who will reincarnate into gay in order to haunt King’s next life whose gender would be transgender…Or, in some savage culture, authority destroys young girls’ private, these people with power will reincarnate into transgender.
I hope that you find humor in my mother’s theory. Back2basic
LikeLike
m4potw: I did like the humor. I am areligious, but would very much like to believe karma like this to be true!
LikeLike
“Not all…are morons.” Comments like that are very Trump-ish.
LikeLike