Jennifer Berkshire (aka EduShyster) recently raised money by crowd-sourcing so she could spend a week in Michigan learning about the DeVos family and its crusade to privatize public education.
She describes Betsy DeVos as “The Red Queen.”
It begins like this:
By the measures that are supposed to matter, Betsy DeVos’ experiment in disrupting public education in Michigan has been a colossal failure. In its 2016 report on the state of the state’s schools, Education Trust Midwest painted a picture of an education system in freefall. “Michigan is witnessing systematic decline across the K-12 spectrum…White, black, brown, higher-income, low-income—it doesn’t matter who they are or where they live.” But as I heard repeatedly during the week I recently spent crisscrossing the state, speaking with dozens of Michiganders, including state and local officials, the radical experiment that’s playing out here has little to do with education, and even less to do with kids. The real goal of the DeVos family is to crush the state’s teachers unions as a means of undermining the Democratic party, weakening Michigan’s democratic structures along the way. And on this front, our likely next Secretary of Education has enjoyed measurable, even dazzling success….
A characteristic DeVos move in Lansing traces a familiar pattern. A piece of legislation suddenly appears courtesy of a family ally. It pops up late in the session, late at night, or better still, during lame duck, when the usual legislative horse trading shifts into overdrive. So it was with a controversial bill that popped up 2013, doubling the limits for campaign contributions—a limit that no one in Michigan was wealthy enough to hit. Well almost no one. The GOP jammed the measure through, Governor Snyder signed it, and it took effect immediately. “The DeVoses then got their whole clan together and held a check writing party,” recalls Jeff Irwin, a democratic state representative from Ann Arbor who was recently term limited out. “It was a love letter to the richest people in Michigan and they delivered with a huge thank you.”
I was captivated by the image of the extended DeVos clan gathered on New Year’s Eve 2013, writing check after check to Republican candidates and caucuses to the tune of more than $300,000, an exercise they would repeat just a few months later. Did they sip champagne as they signed? Did their hands grow weary? For the DeVoses, the ability to give even more money means that they can exert even more influence. “When you empower a billionaire family like that, you give them more power,” Michigan Campaign Finance Network director Craig Mauger told me when I stopped by to see him in Lansing. Just blocks from the Capital, his office is in a part of the city that teems with the lobbyists who hold so much sway here. His building is home to not one, but two different for-profit charter operators. “The DeVoses are tilting the field and changing the structures of politics in Michigan.”
To understand why the DeVoses exert so much influence, and more importantly, why their power has only increased in recent years, a quick session in civics is required. Today’s topic: term limits. Approved in 1992 by voters in a “throw out the bums” state of mind, term limits have radically reordered the state’s political landscape. Legislators here can serve no more than three two-year terms in the House, and two four-year terms in the state Senate—the strictest limits in the country. “They’re in office for such a short time that it doesn’t pay off for them to build a strong base of support in their own districts,” Steve Norton, the head of the public education advocacy group Michigan Parents for Schools, explained to me. Instead, legislators are highly dependent on the party machinery, down to being told which way to vote. “They salute and follow caucus orders,” says Norton. As both the funders of the GOP machine, and its de facto operators, that means that the DeVoses essentially control the legislature these days. “They are the 800 lb gorilla.”
In Michigan, no one says no to the DeVos family. They have bought the legislature. They defeat legislators who dare to say no. They own the state. Is that too strong a statement? Read this blistering, frightening article.
The DeVos family use their money strategically to achieve their goals. They are not just a threat to public education. They are a threat to our democracy.
Include Eric Prince, mercenary entrpreneur brother of Betsy, and they’re a threat to humanity.
“Michigan is witnessing systematic decline across the K-12 spectrum…White, black, brown, higher-income, low-income—it doesn’t matter who they are or where they live.”
That was always how ed reform should have been measured. Not by how many charters they open or how many unions they bust or how many vouchers they hand out.
They’ve done real damage in Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Public education is weaker as a result of their efforts.
It’s not an accident that ed reformers always point to NYC and Boston rather than Detroit or Toledo. Ed reform in the Great Lakes states has been a disaster.
You know the Senate could elicit answers on public schools from DeVos. It’s not that hard to ask the question.
They could simply ask her to list the ways she has improved public schools in Michigan.
The honest answer to that is she hasn’t done anything to improve public schools, and on the whole she has made things worse.
DeVos and her family are a menace to democracy. Betsy DeVos is a manipulative, opportunist that uses her wealth to control legislators so that she gets exactly the law she pays for, and it does not matter what the “little people” need or want. She will attempt to crush organized labor and destroy public education. Her goals have nothing to do with what most Americans want.
She’s just doing god’s work!
Which god I can’t tell but take it for what it ain’t worth.
Testing: She’s just doing god’s work!
Which god I can’t tell but take it for what it ain’t worth.
I think I’m slowly figuring out why I sometimes get the message “your comment is awaiting moderation” and other times I don’t. Still not sure though.
Does anyone else have this problem?
Any clues Diane?
The Akron Beacon Journal will print my DeVos letter in tomorrow’s edition (Jan 14). They cut it down a bit, but kept my most relevant points:
Threat to public schools
We in Ohio have had front row seats to see the effects of misguided federal and state education policies on our public schools, from President Bush’s No Child Left Behind to President Obama’s Race to the Top.
We have also had loge seats to see events in Michigan and get a glimpse of our possible future. We see disastrous results such as the elimination of local control and the wholesale expansion of charter schools in Detroit, which is proving to be the educational equivalent of the Flint water crisis.
Betsy DeVos, Donald Trump’s billionaire nominee to be education secretary, is one of the most fanatical, consistent advocates of these issues. She is a clear threat to our nation’s public schools who has crusaded to establish voucher policies to divert public school funds to charter and religious schools.
As someone who has never had any personal connection to public schools, she has been obsessed with policies to profit from our children’s education and fuel predatory corporate schemes. If she were to be confirmed, she would put demonstrably destructive policies into hyper-drive and enable the worst instincts of zealots across the nation and in Ohio.
The existence of American public education, arguably the most important institution sustaining this nation throughout its history, is at stake. Education policy must value children as investments in our nation’s future, not commodities for short-term economic profit.
Please call and write U.S. Sens. Sherrod Brown and Rob Portman to oppose the DeVos nomination.
DeVos would love to privatize Michigan education and destroy the Michigan Education Association, but in fact most of our members see this evil for what it is and have continued paying dues and standing strong.
A great read. Sadly, in my own experience I’ve found that not only a few, but the larger society in general holds the view that black and brown teachers are not prepared to teach. In the opinion of too many, what choice does government have but to invade schools where non-wealthy black and brown kids attend and take out their so many sadly incompetent black and brown (read: ANY teachers “incompetent” enough to find themselves working with non-wealthy black and brown kids) teachers. http://www.ciedieaech.wordpress.com/2015/10/11/choosing-siberia