Who is Jeff Bezos? Jeff Bezos founded Amazon. He is a billionaire. He loves charters and privatization of schools. In 2013, he bought The Washington Post, which had been a bastion of liberal thought under the ownership of the Graham family.
Bezos did not introduce charter-love and teacher-bashing to the Washington Post. While the news staff always played it straight, the Post editorial board was madly in love with Michelle Rhee during her stormy tenure. In their eyes, Rhee could do no wrong. She was their Joan of Arc. Even now, after a decade of Rhee-Henderson control, the Post still worships Rhee, as this article by editorial page editor Fred Hiatt showed.
When Bezos bought the Post in 2013, investigative journalist Lee Fang revealed in The Nation that Bezos is a generous supporter of school privatization.
Lee Fang wrote:
“There’s one area where Bezos has been hyper-active, but it is largely unknown to the general public: education reform. A look at the Bezos Family Foundation, which was founded by Jackie and Mike Bezos but is financed primarily by Jeff Bezos, reveals a fairly aggressive effort in recent years to press forward with a neoliberal education agenda:
• The Bezos Foundation has donated to Education Reform Now, a nonprofit organization that funds attack advertisements against teachers’ unions and other advocacy efforts to promote test-based evaluations of teachers. Education Reform Now also sponsors Democrats for Education Reform.
• The Bezos Foundation provided $500,000 to NBC Universal to sponsor the Education Nation, a media series devoted to debating high-stakes testing, charter schools and other education reforms.
• The Bezos Foundation provided over $100,000 worth of Amazon stock to the League of Education Voters Foundation to help pass the education reform in Washington State. Last year, the group helped pass I-1240, a ballot measure that created a charter school system in Washington State. In many states, charter schools open the door for privatization by inviting for-profit charter management companies to take over public schools that are ostensibly run by nonprofits.
Other education philanthropy supported by the Bezos Foundation include KIPP, Teach for America and many individual charter schools, including privately funded math and science programs across the country.”
Lee Fang says there is one good result of Bezos taking over the Post. It used to be controlled by for-profit Kaplan University and avoided negative coverage of the sham industry.
He wrote:
“For now, the change in ownership will probably only benefit the Post’s education coverage, given the newspaper’s long relationship with Kaplan, which helped prop up the paper’s finances for years while the Post either largely ignored the issue of for-profit colleges or sent its executives to Capitol Hill to lobby against better oversight of the industry.
“Part of the ugly history of the Post is its reliance on a predatory for-profit college called Kaplan University. Though Washington Post blogger Lydia DePillis seemed to whitewash this relationship yesterday by referring to Kaplan as only a “lucrative test prep business,” in reality, Kaplan University was one of worst for-profit colleges in the country.”
BATs today has a post requesting that people call the senators on the Ed Committee (Patty Murray, E. Warren etc) and even if you don’t live in that state you can …. People for the American Way is having a National call in today…..
Here is another article with some information in what we can use in “script” building before making calls. Education deserves better than this…
Bezos is also behind Amazon Cloud Services, which is intended specifically for use by the CIA and other intelligence agencies. No wonder the Washington Post has been at the forefront of all the overheated, unverified stories about Putin “hacking the election.”
The Post, with the significant exception of Valerie Strauss’ blog, has been a source of “fake news” about education for years, often via Jay Matthews slavish devotion to Michelle Rhee, KIPP and charter schools in general.. Now it’s rapidly evolving as a fake news source that has been busy smearing legitimate alternative news sites such as Naked Capitalism, TruthDig, Counterpunch (which have all been outspoken in opposition to so-called education reform) and others.
thanks Michael for a list of those that you trust. because I have always valued your opinions here it is important to know what sources you trust …. so I will follow up on your list. I have several friends who have not TV turned on no cable; some who don’t even have it in the house… and some who have turned it off since the election… finding valued references is essential … I try to follow Robert Reich , Bill Moyers etc. Daily Kos has a radio on iTunes that I listen to but not every day — Greg Dworkin and others at Daily Kos …
Thank you, Jean: I’m flattered.
The sites mentioned, like any other, need to have their reportage confirmed via other sources, internal consistency and the like, but I find them useful. I particularly like Naked Capitalism for its melding of economics, finance and politics, along with its links and comments section, which are outstanding.
Other worthwhile finance and economics sites are WolfStreet and Jesse’s Cafe Americain, which also has useful links.
Add a few think tanks to the list CEPR and EPI
It is amazing how we see the false narratives and fake news when it is in areas that we are concerned about. But do not see them in those we feel unaffected by.
Donald Trump can be right in calling for a reset of policy toward NATO expansion east. Yet wrong about dismissing Putin being a tyrant who meddled in our elections.
He can be right about trade and even immigration being the cause of middle-class decline and totally wrong about proposed solutions.
That, like honest discussion of education is something we seldom get from our papers of record, who like to portray themselves as above the fray. Truth be told they are owned by publishers and as such are usually are going to pursue the interests of their owners.
By not doing in-depth critical journalism which exposes both sides of issues, even if they in the end they chose one narrative. They muddy the waters leaving the public with the popular “they’re all the same ” . That puts FOX and Breitbart on par with the W. POST and the NYTIMES.
Baker pointed out that even in simple economic pieces they are not doing homework . “Germany’s unemployment rate is 6%” NYT 1/2/17 leading Americans to believe that we must be doing something right. Well just like those PISA scores not quite right. Germany’s unemployment rate counts those working part time who would prefer full time as unemployed. We do not.
A fair comparison Germany’s unemployment rate is 4%, an annualized rate which we have not seen since the 1960’s
Of course my favorite fake news is. “Its the Robots” or we are manufacturing more than ever . Never mind what you see when you look for a label that says made in USA
They can drop the push for censorship any time now.
Putin is a reptilian figure (although I also happen to think he’s a geo-political genius who has outplayed the US and others on virtually every occasion) who is very dangerous to have as an enemy.
That said, while it may yet be proven that he meddled in our election, that proof is still wanting, despite the near-universal presumption (and desperate desire by clueless Democrats) that it’s so.
Putin is a tyrant who murders journalists and dissidents. Trump is his puppet.
Irrational, even for this list. “Puppet”?
Yes, Putin is a tyrant, and so unlike the leaders of Saudi Arabia (currently bombing Doctors Without Borders hospitals in Yemen with US-manufactured missiles), Quatar and other petro-state “democracies” we support.
I don’t approve of the tyrants we support in oil states. But they didn’t pick our insane president. Putin did
With all due respect, Diane, I think the obsession with Putin (whose interference with the election is still unproven, despite the tsunami of accusations-claiming-to-be-proof) is seriously undermining efforts to 1) understand what happened in the presidential election, and 2) respond in a politically effective way.
By insisting on a new Cold War (do the Dems really think they can out-hawk the Repugs, regardless of Trumps man-crush on Putin?), the Democrats are guaranteeing future losses and Republican/right wing control of the government for years to come.
It’s as if the Democratic Party, suffering from late-stage arterial sclerosis, instead decided to cure itself by sticking pins in a voodoo doll.
Hillary lost against an extremely unpopular opponent, and even if Putin did interfere, what does it say about her strength as a candidate that some pilfered emails from the campaign caused her loss, as you seem to be claiming?
I am not obsessed with Putin. I have no doubt he ordered the hacking of our election to put that fool Trump into office to weaken us. He is many times smarter than Trump.
thanks Michael but i still think it tells me more about the electorate than it does about the female candidate. For those who are sending out emails to push E. Warren to run I have repeatedly said NO to that in the past (because she is better for our purpose in the senate right where she is) and i would never put another woman through that horrendous type of campaign with Trump . One source i saw yesterday said that there was more “misogyny” in the electorate than we ever predicted and there was more “racism” than we were wiling to admit and the backlash about having Obama in there for 8 years. That plus the fact that people are so angry at government of any kind in any place that they just say “up with everything that is down and down with everything that is up”… (except when it is snowing today and we need those government snowplows out there )… A good many factors…. that was why I got so upset when people were saying in the campaign “just vote for Jill Stein ” or “write in a name like Mickey Mouse” because people would not consider what happened when Perot ran or would deny that Nader’s campaign had any effect whatsoever . I excuse it all with “Chaos” theory and it will take another 20 to 25 years to analyze what actually happened. So in my “Chaos’ theory I allow a good proportion of “Putin’s rascals did it”… (which , if I let it wander to far off path, will lead me into complete paranoia — being uncertain and unpredictable and therefore lacking in controls of any kind) I ilke to talk this over with my nephew who grew up in TX and has lived as an ex-pat for probably 40 of his 60 years (and when they ask him in Portugal where he was born he says Canada and won’t admit to U.S.). I’m not trying to get anyone angry with this response … just opening up the variables as we sometimes have no idea about cause – effect. (but I sure wouldn’t put any other woman through the hell that HRC endured for 40 years). Bill Weld was about the only one who came out near the end and said “she is a brilliant lawyer” …. so I thank him for that (but I was not thankful when he was Governor in MA). (I leo see comparisons with the way McCain treated Obama dying debates as if he were “taking him to the woodshed” like a “boy” to be scolded.) It’s just me, rambling, so don’t get upset
what does it say about her strength as a candidate that some pilfered emails from the campaign caused her loss, as you seem to be claiming?
jeanhaverhill@aol.com
Jean, I don’t think the pilfered emails tipped the election. On the contrary, my intention was to suggest that even if it was the the FSB or its proxies, acting under direct orders from Putin (still not conclusively proven, but let’s assume it’s true), that did so, that’s an extremely weak and denial-heavy explanation for Hillary’s loss, and one that completely ignores on-the-ground political realities in the US.
Those political realities must be understood, faced and engaged with, regardless of what Putin did or didn’t do. Focusing on the Big Bad Russian Bear is a material distraction from the actual political dilemmas and tasks we face, and absolves us of responsibility.
Oh, I definitely agree….. but we need to include all o them (and not settle on one)…. I don’t think there was ever a woman with the qualifications, and i don’t think in the future we will see a woman as well qualified ( at least in my life time)…. so my hopes for ere seeing a woman there are day (at least in my life time). But the issue of gender is not uppermost in my mind as there are priorities in life. I guess I am just confirming that, as a society we have more hate for women then is admitted to (more than we hate racial minorities) . . I remember going to a national conference in the 1970s and the male presenter stood at the podium and used visuals with women’s bodies portrayed in his material the way we use puppies and kittens to to “sell” and at a professional conference I spoke up (I know it is everywhere on tv/cable/media/sales/marketing etc)
“the reason that I am involved in special education and civil rights and attending these national conferences on education is , at some point, when all of these issues are considered and we have rested some, we will finally get to the human rights of women as well. ” My comment landed flat but I am still glad I said it. I went to another conference (in Boston but not national) and the speaker from Chicago was quite good (describing federal/state grants etc) and I thanked him at the end “no one ever tells women these things” and I got an automatic boo tom the audience (98% male/caucasian) … So I was probably just sharing with you that I think we hate women more than we are willing to admit (as a society). I would have been just as pleased to have the first president of Jewish origins as well — I initially did some campaign work for Bernie a year ago now… and I think Bernie is helping to focus on the important topic that you have raised here… but we have to get them right and we have to get all of them not stop after we settle on the first big one….. and that is what you are saying also, don’t accept the rascals interfering (spies) as the one and only problem identified….
Those political realities must be understood, faced and engaged with, regardless of what Putin did or didn’t do.
jeanhaverhill@aol.com
Michael: an addendum… I rely on Colin Woodard’s description of how we are 11 different nations (not one)…and there are all these different “reasons” . When they analyzed the exit polls in the primary the voters for Bernie were actually lower income than those choosing trump…. also, in my neck of the woods, [we are not “rust belt” or “coal miners with no work”] those who had the largest signs for Trump were homes above the median price of our cirty/region. (this is not proven in fact but my own “windshield” survey looking around during the campaign as we covered the miles ) the two men who admitted to me they were voting for trump were both 6 figure salaries with college degrees …now I know that is a very limited sample….but there is a mis-conception in some places of interpreting what “fell apart” — that was my point about taking 20 years sometimes to analyze what happened and I rely on Rick Perlstein for a lot of that analysis. I know to do the next campaign we need data faster than a 20 year cycle. (I still include the russian rascals as a minuscule factor — having been to Moscow and Leningrad I remember the gigantic maps they showed us of world maps lit up with all their “possessions” and where Stalin’s portrait was exactly at the eye level of the 1st and 2nd graders in their schools– and that is what we are also facing with the current authoritarian tyrant who will be entering the oval office in two weeks)…. …. this is also related to my other post on having to get right back to the “No on #2” issue in state (local) politics because we cannot rest on the fact hat the 60%/40% split on charter schools is a safe bet and we have another school committee election to get back to and these issues just never go away . (like Roe v. Wade ) the constant fight must be waged.
Lee Fang is the man. If you’re not following his work on The Intercept, you should.
Yes, he’s an extremely fine investigative journalist who did excellent work exposing charter schools when he wrote for The Nation, which was treating them with kid gloves at the time.
And Jeff Bezos is a product of Miami Dade County Public Schools!
Sent from my iPhone Merri Mann 305-342-6362
>
Lets not let the debutante Betsy Devos turn NYC into Detroit. No way will we allow Betsy Devos turn NYC into DEtroit!!!! Detroit is a complete mess and the Devos family is responsible. The Devos family is only interested in destroying unions and working families abilities to earn a decent pay. That is why the city of Detroit and many other cities in the once great state of Michigan are slums including nearby Dearborn, a once great city destroyed by Devos family. We must not allow this crud to enter NYC and try to turn NYC into Detroit this must be our slogan. The schools in the inner cities of Michigan are the LOWEST performing schools in the country!!!!!!!!!! Devos is poison and will not last the term.
Leaving aside DeVos’s fitness to serve, remember that Detroit and Detroit Public Schools destroyed themselves long before Betsy arrived through political corruption from Coleman Young through Kwame Kilpatrick. Even Dave Bing couldn’t fix it. Dishonest politicians will destroy any place they rule. It is a disease mainly of Democrats, but not exclusively, from Reconstruction to the present. Don’t blame all of Detroit’s troubles on her. Detroit did it to itself. She still may be a totally worthless Education Secretary, but don’t attribute to her crimes that lie at the feet of others.
Harlan,
Detroit was done in by deindustrialization, white flight, and corrupt politicians. You are correct. But it is clear that DeVos’s policies did not make Detroit better. They probably made things worse.
Another good reason to boycott Amazon (my initial reasons: the culture of fear Bezos fosters at the Seattle HQ and the brutal working conditions in the “fulfillment centers”).