http://www.journalgazette.net/food/the-dish/Indiana-s-vouchers-wow-GOP-16999984
Mike Pence is a devout believer in school choice and privatization of public funds. The Indiana state constitution specifically prohibits spending public funds in religious schools but the state courts ruled that the public money went to families, not to the religious schools that actually received the money. Now Indiana is a national model for the privatization movement, although the public was never asked to vote on this dramatic abandonment of public schools.
Indiana lawmakers originally promoted the state’s school voucher program as a way to make good on America’s promise of equal opportunity, offering children from poor and lower-middle-class families an escape from public schools that failed to meet their needs.
But five years after the program was established, more than half of the state’s voucher recipients have never attended Indiana public schools, meaning that taxpayers are now covering private and religious school tuition for children whose parents had previously footed that bill. Many vouchers also are going to wealthier families, those earning up to $90,000 for a household of four.
The voucher program, one of the nation’s largest and fastest-growing, serves more than 32,000 children and provides an early glimpse of what education policy could look like in Donald Trump’s presidency.
Trump has signaled that he intends to pour billions of federal dollars into efforts to expand vouchers and charter schools nationwide. Betsy DeVos, his nominee for education secretary, played an important role in lobbying for the establishment of Indiana’s voucher program in 2011. And Vice President-elect Mike Pence led the charge as the state’s governor to loosen eligibility requirements and greatly expand the program’s reach.
Most recipients are not leaving the state’s worst schools: Just 3 percent of new recipients of vouchers in 2015 qualified for them because they lived in the attendance area of F-rated public schools. And while private school enrollment grew by 12,000 students over the past five years, the number of voucher recipients grew by 29,000, according to state data, meaning that taxpayer money is potentially helping thousands of families pay for a choice they were already making.
Most recipients qualify for free or reduced-price lunches, according to state data, but a growing proportion – now 31 percent – do not.
Opponents argue that vouchers are not reaching the children most in need of better schools. They also assert that voucher programs violate the constitutional separation of church and state by funneling public dollars into religious schools, including those that teach creationism instead of the theory of evolution.
Indiana’s program survived a legal challenge in 2013, when a judge ruled that the primary beneficiaries of the vouchers were families, not religious institutions.
Growing larger
The Indiana General Assembly first approved a limited voucher program in 2011, capping it at 7,500 students in the first year and restricting it to children who had attended public schools for at least a year.
“Public schools will get first shot at every child,” then-Gov. Mitch Daniels said at the time. “If the public school delivers and succeeds, no one will seek to exercise this choice.”
DeVos, who had lobbied for the program as chairwoman of the American Federation for Children, hailed its passage and proposed that other states follow Indiana’s lead. Two years later, Pence entered the governor’s office with a pledge to extend vouchers to more children.
“There’s nothing that ails our schools that can’t be fixed by giving parents more choices and teachers more freedom to teach,” Pence said during his inaugural address in 2013.
Within months, Indiana lawmakers eliminated the requirement that children attend public school before receiving vouchers and lifted the cap on the number of recipients. The income cutoff was raised, and more middle-class families became eligible.
When those changes took effect, an estimated 60 percent of all Indiana children were eligible for vouchers, and the number of recipients jumped from 9,000 to more than 19,000 in one year.
The proportion of children who had never previously attended Indiana public schools also rose quickly: By 2016, more than half of voucher recipients – 52 percent – had never been in the state’s public school system.

I just called my Senator Dan Coats from Indiana and gave the message of why as a retired teacher, I am against Betsy DeVos being appointed Secretary of Education.
The confirmation hearings for Betsy DeVos will happen soon. Please call your senators this week and let them know you oppose her appointment as Secretary of Education. If you called already, please call again.
It is most effective to call a local office.
………….
Trump as President is a frightening thought. Pence, who is no better, would totally approve the worst of the Republican proposals. We need to fight back in every way possible.
LikeLike
Carol Malaysia,
The phone call to your senator’s local office is very important.
LikeLike
Kirtley said DeVos is redefining the idea of public education.
“Today public education means district magnets, charters, virtual schooling, dual enrollment with colleges, and even scholarships to private schools,” he said.
“I know Gov. Bush shares Betsy’s belief in this new definition of public education,” Kirtley said.”
Absolute nonsense. Ed reformers changed the definition of “public” to include “private”
They literally believe this in the echo chamber. They believe “publicly funded” = “public”
Someone should take them on a tour of defense contractor. Those companies will be surprised that they’re now public entities.
Next year we’ll see this “Social Security means 401k’s, IRA’s and Social Security”
Okay doke. If you say so!
LikeLiked by 1 person
With this voucher plan, DeVos would not be “redefining” public education. The voucher plan legalizes the piracy of public education funds. It certainly does nothing to improve educational opportunities for poor students or any students since religious schools are usually taught by well intentioned individuals that are clueless about preparing students for the 21st century. The hypocrisy of this move is clear. While “reformers” keep complaining about the need for higher standards, they are really looking for access to funds, especially if they will send public funds to schools that rarely offer educational excellence. Once again the goal is to defund public schools so they will collapse.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Legalized piracy. Good choice of words when now apparently anything goes. In so many cases whatever school reform is implemented one day is simply gone the next — along with the money originally poured into it.
LikeLike
I know public schools are unfashionable but I’m looking and I have yet to see anyone in the ed reform echo chamber address what DeVos plans for PUBLIC schools.
I hate to bother the public employees in DC with public schools but these folks know 90% of kids attend the unfashionable “public sector schools”, right?
Maybe we could get ONE advocate in DC? Just one? The rest can continue their daily promotion of charter and private schools. I’m only asking for one Senator out of 100.
Do you think it’s because so few of our elites attended public schools or have children who attend them or even know someone personally who attends one? How do you forget 90% of kids? How does that happen?
LikeLike
Chiara,
I like the word unfashionable. It accurately describes the state of public education in the wake of Waiting for Fiction (Superman). It is inaccurate to describe public schools as failing, but ‘unfashionable’ is a correct label. And, I’m no fashion expert like Ivanka, but it seems to me that hemlines go up and hemlines go down. Fashion changes. My vocabulary just did.
LikeLike
I feel as if it’s accurate. Public schools are the “default”- they’re mentioned at the tail end of ed reform pieces (if they’re mentioned at all) usually at the point in the piece where they’re claiming they are “agnostics”. It’s like checking a box.
If these people really valued existing public schools they would talk about them more. They focus on what they care about, which is charters and vouchers.
I can almost guarantee the vast majority of any Senate discussion of K-12 education will be charters and vouchers. I’ll be surprised if public schools merit a single specific question in DC. They simply don’t value our schools.
LikeLike
Public schools are the host for the parasites looking to put public money in private pockets while public schools starve.
LikeLike
Pence and DeVos are supposed to be religious. Aren’t they supposed to value charity and justice, as it clearly says to in the Bible, not robbing the poor and giving the money to “wealthier families, those earning up to $90,000 for a household of four?” What awaits people who take from the poor? I surely do not know, but I know it’s not heaven. I would think they would value public schools that serve the needy. But, maybe I just don’t have enough inherited wealth to understand the value of hypocrisy.
LikeLike
Diane, I wonder if you would consider doing a livestream of the DeVos confirmation hearing. If you can find a running transcript that would be great too.
I’d like to see how many of our representatives in DC mention public schools, apart from labeling them all failing or promoting testing.
We could keep a running tally. It’ll give us a good sense of whether these thousands of public employees plan on devoting any time, attention or funding to the unfashionable public school sector.
I know our schools are disfavored in expert and elite circles. I’d like to know which Senators ignore them and focus exclusively on charters and vouchers.
Charters and vouchers will have at least 60 Senators acting as advocates. I’m looking for ONE Senator who supports existing public schools. If we find ONE I’ll be amazed.
LikeLike
Does the majority of citizens of in this country understand PROPAGANDA techniques? Answer: NO!
http://www.energygrid.com/media/2003/09ap-manipulation.html
LikeLike
As a former Indiana PS teacher I certainly hope not. The Daniels/Pence voucher plan is a total disaster. And it’s a crying shame that the incompetent state supreme court did not strike it down as a clearcut violation of the constitution’s Article I, Sections 4 and 6. — Edd Doerrt
LikeLike
Indiana’s funding to support vouchers is also distressing. Following the ALEC playbook, Indiana’s Republican governor and legislature made massive cuts in public schools and substantially increased funding for vouchers and charters as was reported on this blog in 2015.
According to that post, from 2009 to 2013 public school funding was cut by more than $3 billion. During the same period, charter funding was increased by $539 million, vouchers by $248 million, and virtual schools by $143 million. Students who attend public schools account for 94% of Indiana students and took a huge hit. The remaining six percent gained more than $900 million.
Similar actions were taken in a host of other states such as North Carolina, Michigan, Oklahoma, and Kansas. Betsy DeVos is a major supporter of ALEC.
LikeLike
“The Indiana state constitution specifically prohibits spending public funds in religious schools but the state courts ruled that the public money went to families, not to the religious schools that actually received the money.”
I’m not a lawyer, but it seems to me that UNLESS the legislature gives cash-money directly to families without control, direction, or earmarks for educational purposes, the courts above have just used a word ploy to get around the Indiana State Constitution. Of course they’re not going to just write checks to families with the tra-la hopes of parents, poor or otherwise, spending it on educating their children.
It seems to me that ANY control, direction, or earmarks by the State (for educational purposes) makes for breaking the Constitutional prohibition since their funding education at all implies a State stake in the education of their children. And what has happened to their curriculum requirements and oversight? If the courts did the same with, say, State funds for road repair, everyone in the State would have a diamond-studded driveway and no roads to ride on. Please correct me and my logic–I am open to understanding the “thinking” that went into the court’s decision?
LikeLike
I am not a lawyer either. But the Indiana Supreme Court ruled 5-0, that the school voucher program was in conformance with the Indiana State constitution. Read all about it:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/03/26/indiana-school-voucher-ruling/2021021/
LikeLike
cemab4y,
This decision by the Indiana court was bizarre, as the Indiana state constitution very explicitly says that public funds should be directed only to PUBLIC schools, and specifically says that spending public funds in religious schools is prohibited. I have to assume that the state supreme court is packed with rightwing Republicans, as there is no one alive who can say with a straight face that public funds in Indiana are not being spent in religious schools. They are. Why lie?
LikeLike
“Why lie?”
Because that is their modus operandi. They know no other way.
LikeLike
I can’t speak for the court. I do not find their reasoning convincing. They seem to say, that the money was directed to families. Who can figure courts? The US Supreme Court ruled in Dred Scott v. Sandford, that slaves were property, and not citizens.
I am reading a fascinating book called “The Dirty Dozen”, about the twelve worst decisions of the US Supreme Court.
LikeLike
“I can’t speak for the court.”
No need to as judges can be bought almost as easily as regular ol politicians.
LikeLike