Frank Rich, a veteran political and cultural critic, makes a safe prediction: we are about to enter an era of corruption and influence peddling that will make Warren Harding’s Teapot Done scandal look like child’s play.
Rich writes:
“After the press revealed that a hastily assembled “Opening Day Foundation,” with Donald Jr. and Eric Trump on its board, was selling access to the president-elect and his family the day after his inauguration, for $500,000 to $1 million, the Trump family abruptly distanced itself.
“Simultaneously, Trump surrogate Newt Gingrich floated the idea of using the presidential pardon to help advisers get around conflict rules. What happens if Trump doesn’t work out a consistent conflicts-of-interest policy before his inauguration?
I hate to break it to anyone at this time of year, but (a) there is no Santa Claus, and (b) there will be no conflicts-of-interest policy in the Trump administration. What there will be are rampant conflicts of interest, more than you can count, as the Trump family and his appointees rip off anything they can — from taxpayers, from consumers, from shareholders — in a spree of deregulation, special dealing, lax white-collar-law enforcement, and corporate welfare. Just in the past day we’ve learned that the billionaire investor Carl Icahn will be Trump’s adviser on deregulation and do so under a legal dodge (he won’t collect a government salary) that will allow him to hold on to his own investments in the industries he’ll be enriching.
“Only hours before the Icahn announcement we had learned that Corey Lewandowski, Trump’s former campaign manager and ever-loyal wingman, was opening a “consulting” firm “just a block from the White House” (this was the language in the press release) to facilitate access to the White House for corporations, trade associations, and heaven knows what other favor seekers. As I’ve said before, the Trump kleptocracy is going to make the Harding administration’s pay-for-play Teapot Dome scandal look like a Sunday-school picnic.
“And so instead of draining the swamp, Trump is going to build a bigger and better swamp smack in the middle of the Rose Garden.
“Many have noted the hypocrisy: Trump promised to “drain the swamp” in Washington. Gingrich explained the seeming discrepancy in that same NPR interview in which he proposed that the new president evade ethics laws by granting mass pardons to any administration hands that get caught in the till. “I’m told he now just disclaims that,” Gingrich said of Trump’s current attitude toward his former catchphrase. “He now says it was cute, but he doesn’t want to use it anymore.” (Gingrich has since disowned his own phraseology in a subsequent tweet.) Instead of draining the swamp, Trump is going to build a bigger and better swamp smack in the middle of the Rose Garden — and, don’t worry, it will be fantastic. Meanwhile, it says all you need to know that Gingrich, the first Speaker of the House ever to be punished for ethics violations, is stepping into the vacuum to serve as moral arbiter of this new regime.”

I guess this is where my frustration lies. Corruption and influence peddling are nothing new, not even on the scale Trump seems to intend. Time did not start with Trump. How do you think the Clintons left office “flat broke” [sic] and are now worth hundreds of millions? And not to pick on them – the same has been true of nearly all office holders of all political stripes.
The only difference with Trump is that he’s naked about it – he’s doing it right out in the open. This, in my opinion, is a good thing. We can no longer ignore what’s going on in our names right under our noses. We will either have to stand up and fight back, or surrender and just admit that this is who we are.
LikeLike
Yes, Mark Rich was certainly a Swamp Creature who had a mutually advantageous relationship with the Clintons.
That said, Trump is going to turn the corruption/looting dial past eleven…
LikeLike
Trump is going to turn corruption/looting dial past infinity. I shudder every time I think of him in control of the US Treasury.
LikeLike
Dienne–I understand what you mean about Trump’s openness about his corruption being a good thing. But let’s not forget: Trump’s moral degeneracy, corruption, and influence peddling are one thing, but his various assaults on the Constitution, the Bill or Rights, the laws, and more–are what distinguish him from other corrupt, influence-peddling politicians.
As Bill Maher said–he used to be able to criticize politicians (he is an incisive bipartisan critic) as if he were in a glass-bottom boat and could look down and see the sharks (politicians) swimming around where they couldn’t get at him. NOW, he feels that the sharks can get at him.
He’s talking about the difference between HAVING Constitutional protections, and NOT having them.
Trump and his family (nepotism) keep bumping into the power of the Constitution and its Separation of Powers–but once Trump is in office, how long will that last?
LikeLike
Catherine,
You are right about Trump’s ignorance of and indifference to the Constitution.
Worse is that there are no checks on his abuses.
The Republicans are cowed by him.
What will they do about his conflicts of interest? Probably nothing.
Will they object to his tweeting new foreign policies daily?
LikeLike
Diane..unfortunately, the Dems too are “cowed” by Trump. Where is Dem unity in speaking out against his every tweet, every issue, every single time?
LikeLike
Here is what Elizabeth Warren has to say about Trump:
Donald Trump isn’t fighting for working people. He’s just handing over the keys to government to the same corporate insiders who took care of themselves, then crashed the economy for everyone else. Yes, Trump will take the White House, but a majority of Americans voted against Donald Trump and his reckless policies. Even huge numbers of people who did vote for Trump don’t support dismantling the Affordable Care Act, privatizing Medicare and Social Security, or gutting Wall Street regulations. Our agenda is still America’s agenda – and fighting for that agenda is more important than ever…
The financial industry spent more than a million dollars a day to defeat Wall Street reform and the new consumer agency. But we got organized, we made every nickel we had count, and we fought like there was no tomorrow. The American people made their voices heard – and today, the CFPB has already forced the big financial institutions to return nearly $12 billion directly to the people they cheated.
We know what we are fighting for:
• We will NOT let them gut the rules on Wall Street or weaken the CFPB.
• We will NOT let them privatize Social Security and Medicare.
• We will NOT let them completely dismantle the Affordable Care Act.
• We will NOT let them weaken workers’ rights to good pay, decent benefits and the right to organize for better conditions.
• We will NOT let them cut taxes for billionaires and giant corporations.
• We will NOT let them cut investments in education, infrastructure, or medical research.
• We will NOT let them poison our air and water and destroy our planet.
• We will NOT let them rip apart families or build Trump’s stupid wall.
• And we will NOT them legalize hate and bigotry against African Americans, Latinos, Muslims, immigrants, women, or LGBT Americans.
We will fight them whenever and wherever we need to fight them. We will fight them with more energy, more passion and more determination than ever before because the fights to come are going to decide who we are as a people, and what kind of country we will be.
LikeLike
The tabloid WaPo story about Donald Jr. and Eric Trump selling access is a fake news story. The Trumo transition team did not authorize this invitation and no member of the Trump family will be present on the hunting trip.
I’m no fan of Trump. However, the Democrats have to find a better message to win back the Presidency, Congress, governorships, and state legislatures than all this nonsense. It’s very disturbing
LikeLike
Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks said
” that the initial invitation was just a draft and had not been approved by Trump’s transition team. Furthermore, Hicks added, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump were not involved with the event:”
So let me raise the bar for you a little bit: Translation yes we did put it out there but then we got caught with our pants down and are now covering our asses.
On par with the many of the emails that the right correctly pointed out smelled rotten. The difference there was no evidence they were acted on. Here the press caught them about to break in and they claimed they were in the backyard to see if anyone was home.
Like every thing else about this deplorable piece of turd who will occupy the Oval Office in about twenty five days .Barring a prayed for act of God. What he said yesterday is not relevant to what he says today nor tomorrow. So if you catch us in the act and report it we will simply deny we ever said or did such a thing.
But as Groucho Marx said, denying the obvious , when caught in bed with another mans wife.
“who are you going to believe me or your own eyes “
LikeLike
It is only partially fake. There was an invite, there is an organization called Opening Day Foundation. It is the boys involvement and how deep that is questionable. I think this is Trump Transition Team covering their butts.
Why create a nonprofit in Texas called Opening Day?
LikeLike
they got caught
LikeLike
Joel: What seems so engrossing to me is that they seem to have no clue about their own degenerate actions–until someone calls them on it. Watching Trump is like watching an unsupervised toddler on a cliff, and watching his children is like watching a drunk illiterate fly a 747.
LikeLike
“Corrupt Donald” and family, will get away with as much as he (they) can unless progressive Democrats (are there any left?) and others such as journalists like Chris Hedges, David Swanson and Diane keep writing, and the rest of us keep sounding the alarm and keep protesting in the streets, and using social media, and raising a lot of hell. It’s something we must do to preserve what is left of the American experiment. Perhaps, even the “deplorables,” will begin to realize that they have been “had.”
LikeLike
I hate to ask, but where are the Democrats? They’ve just abandoned the field?
The whole point of having two Parties was one would hold the other accountable. They’re all but irrelevant at the state level and they’re now planning on becoming irrelevant at the federal level too?
Can we at least get a functioning opposition Party? Do Democrats plan to hide out until the next Presidential election? For God’s sake, Congress has a specific oversight role. That’s the point of separate branches. Do they need to ask Trump for permission?
LikeLike
Despite the fact he is not a true Democrat, Bernie is watching Trump carefully and posting all the missteps and faux pas on social media. He has also been on numerous talk shows since the election attempting to inform the public about Trump’s gross cabinet and his self serving actions. Bernie continues to stand up for ethical behavior and democracy.
LikeLike
“Despite the fact he is not a true Democrat….”
I’d say because he is not a true Democrat….
LikeLike
But he’s about the only one. We hear occasionally from Senator Warren, but the Democrats in the mean have been eerily silent on this whole disaster. WHY aren’t they stepping up????
LikeLike
Too many Democrats are wishy washy. They need to develop some intestinal fortitude, and they have an identity crisis. Are they for big business or the people? Many of today’s Democrats are more conservative than Republicans of fifty years ago.
LikeLike
Maxine Waters came out against Trump with pitchforks, torches and small nuclear devices. From Raw Story: Appearing on MSNBC, a California congresswoman made it absolutely clear that she has no intention on working with President-elect Donald Trump, saying there is no reason to trust him and that she will “fight him every inch of the way.”
In an interview with host Jacob Soboroff, a feisty Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) was unrelenting in her attacks on Trump saying she would refuse to meet him if he asked her to sit down with him. End quote.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/12/california-congresswoman-declares-war-on-trump-im-going-to-fight-him-every-inch-of-the-way/
LikeLike
I saw Waters’ interview. Wow. But her takeaway message is: How many times do we have to play Charlie Brown to Lucy and her football before we realize, with at least 99+percent accuracy, that we are being played? Waters asked the right question: Why, on earth, would we believe what Trump says?–and I would add: only an idiot . . ? It’s what he did to Romney?
LikeLike
“I’d say because he is not a true Democrat….”
I’d say it is because he is a true American. With Bernie party will never trump what is good for the American people.
LikeLike
Chiara…you ask the operant question? Where are the Dems? The only voices that I hear shouting in the fog, are Warren, and Bernie who is an Independent. His Our Revolution seems not to be taking hold as did his candidacy.
As long as the Dems remain divided and back stabbing as with DW-S and Schumer, there seems no will or ability to make a concerted effort to block Trump’s every act. The DNC needs far less divisive leadership that what is being offered in Keith Ellison whose baggage weighs a ton, nor Tom Perez whose views as Obama’s Labor Sect. were/are too in line with Wall Street.
I keep asking for Russ Feingold to lead the DNC, but their are others who would be far better at unifying the Party than Ellison and Perez. What the hell is wrong with Dems that they continue to have a death wish. After the Convention, and after the world learned of how manipulated it was, why didn’t they get their act together and truly represent We, the People, and not Goldman Sachs?
LikeLike
addendum….Last week I suggested that we all help in finding a few Repubs who function independently re Trump see through the ruse of his tainted carnival act, to ally with Senate Dems in order to control damaging legislation and appointments.
This week I suggest we all contact Dem legislators demanding better representation to run the DNC and the Dem Party. Surely out of thousands of those in Dem leadership,past and present, there must be a few who do not have a fairly recent history of Radical Islamic support, nor support of TPP and rotten trade policy.
Former California Congressman, Henry Waxman, would be a possibility, and my fave, Russ Feingold. Or someone Senator Barbara Boxer or Congresswoman Lois Capps might suggest. These retired ‘proven Dems’ are far wiser than those leading the party right now. Each person I named here was re-elected many times and each spent decades serving in the House and in the Senate. None have been besmirched by scandal…so where are their voices?
Right now, Dem leaders, even those who are Progressive, have selected two candidates to run the Party who each have what many informed Dems see as huge political ‘black marks’ against them. It is our responsibility to let our representatives know this.
LikeLike
One Dem whom I never see or hear, Is Chris Coons who made some great statements today on MSNBC…worth watching.
LikeLike
Where are the Democrats? They’re having dinner with the Republicans at a fancy restaurant givich eachother high fives and counting their loot.
LikeLike
Real One,
Yours is the voice of defeat and passivity. If both parties are the same, why bother? Why fight? You counsel resignation and defeat. No thanks.
LikeLike
Anyone who thought Donald Trump would run the government more ethically than he ran his business was kidding themselves.
They all saw Trump University and the contractors he cheated and stiffed and the bankruptcies he filed to escape paying debts he owed. This is what he is. It’s how he’s behaved his entire life. He’s dishonest. There won’t be some miracle where he becomes honest. In fact, he’s been rewarded for shady business practices.
I wouldn’t hire him to repave my driveway and I don’t care how much NYC real estate he inherited. Makes not a bit of difference.
LikeLike
“Anyone who thought Donald Trump would run the government more ethically than he ran his business was kidding themselves.”
You hit it solid ! He will make a mess.
LikeLike
The blue collar workers and bigots wanted a change. They will get more than they bargained for. I just hope that voters will be so repulsed by the next four years, there is a huge progressive backlash.
LikeLike
I would not count on a progressive backlash. I do not think the media outlets that where these folks get their information will allow that to happen. When things fail it will be either “It wasn’t our fault, stuff happens,” “We weren’t allowed to do what we really wanted because those derned libruls wouldn’t let us,” or “See! They voted for it too!” The corruption that will all be explained away the same way all of Donnie’s other scams are explained away: “Well this is how smart businessmen operate when they see an opportunity.”
LikeLike
The”art of the deal” does not have to be ethical; it just has to bring in cash.
LikeLike
As long as Democrats keep calling Trumo supporters names, they will keep on losing.
Remember when Democrats used to care about the poor and the working class? Remember when the Democrats fought Citizens United and corporate greed? Now the Republicans are talking about poverty and jobs. The Democrats are fighting to hold onto all their establishment privilege, offshoring, tax credits. Super PACs, it’s an interesting change of position.
LikeLike
RaisetheBar,
Funny, I haven’t heard the Republicans talking about poverty. Yes, they talk jobs, but they falsely claim they will bring back coal mining–they won’t. They falsely claim they will bring back the manufacturing jobs lost to automation–they lie.
LikeLike
RaiseTheBarHigher
Dealing with you is an Orwellian exercise . There is a working class word for newspeak. Bull !!!
I could give a – – – – about Democrats or their political fortunes . In fact I will agree with you that the NDC and Clinton/Obama have been a disaster for working people . But here is the catch to claim that Republicans or Trump care about working class Americans is revolting.
NOBODY BUT NOBODY HAS DONE MORE HARM TO WORKERS THAN REPUBLICANS.
Every state that they take over working class Americans suffer. The corporate swamp grows . As the middle class disappears.
Four years of Trump and Madame Defarge may no longer be a fictional character..
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/07/the-republican-war-on-wages-119879
LikeLike
You got that right. And this Trump administration is going to undo everything.
LikeLike
Susan Lee Schwartz
A few years back Trumka had a much broader inclusive vision for the AFL CIO. It would have given full membership with voting rights to many progressive organizations,ie. the NAACP, Sierra Club … A shame it was basically rejected by some member unions.
In reality it could have grown into a progressive alternative to the Democratic party or forced the party way left.
LikeLike
Chiara: What you said.
It’s like Lucy and her football (as Chris on MSNBC said.)
LikeLike
My voice is not one of defeat its one of reality. Both parties are extensions of corporations. How in world do you think Al Gore went from a modest net worth after his defeat in 2000 to a net worth of over $200 million today? Both parties are corrupt to the core. Keep putting your faith in corrupt politicians and let me know how that works out for ya. Wake up and smell the coffee.
LikeLike
Real One,
Your cynicism saps energy from any effort to fight against Trump. Maybe you are a Trump troll.
LikeLike
I felt it was a good move when Obama abstained on a UN vote to call an end to Israeli building on the Palestinian area West Bank and East Jerusalem.
Of course, Trump’s international news came out in twitter. He’s hopeless.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38451258
…………….
BBC just came out with the following news alert:
US President-elect Donald Trump has urged Israel to “stay strong” until he assumes office next month….
In comments referring to last week’s UN Security Council vote which criticised Israeli settlement building on occupied land, he complained Israel had been treated with “disdain and disrespect”…
“They used to have a great friend in the US, but… not anymore. The beginning of the end was the horrible Iran deal, and now this (UN)! Stay strong Israel, January 20th is fast approaching!”
More than 500,000 Jews live in about 140 settlements built since Israel’s 1967 occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The settlements are considered illegal under international law, though Israel disputes this.
The UN Security Council resolution passed on Friday stated that the establishment of settlements “has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-state solution and a just, lasting and comprehensive peace”.
The US decision to abstain infuriated Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose spokesman said on Tuesday that he had “ironclad information” from Arab sources that the White House had helped draft the language of the resolution and “pushed hard” for its passage.
A US state department spokesman replied that the accusation was “just not true”, but he hoped the resolution would “serve as a wake-up call” for Israel.
LikeLike
Why was abstaining a “good move”? Why couldn’t he just vote for the resolution? Israel is illegally occupying Palestinian territory – what would really be so bad about calling that out?
Politically speaking, I suppose it was a “good move”, but it’s not like he needs to get elected again. This sort of milquetoast behavior is exactly what has cost the Democrats support over the last eight years.
LikeLike
Trump is far to the right of Netanyahu. He won. I doubt that the Dems lost votes because of Israel. The evangelicals are very hawkish about protecting Israel.
LikeLike
You are right. I was just happy that the UN Security Council vote wasn’t vetoed.
LikeLike
As a public policy educator for many decades, I disagree about the US/UN abstention vote which was orchestrated by Obama and Kerry. This fit of pique has delayed any settlement of a peace process indefinitely. The UN certainly cannot claim to be a neutral party to bring together the two sides, and now neither can the US.
There is so much sophisticated, well funded, underground, well contrived political ‘realpolitik putsh’ going on, that the rush to judgment here, and in DC, based on personal bias, has little to offer.
Obama, who has too often done negotiating starting with the final offer line so there is no place to go (as with Pharma and Insurance) did the Iran negotiating the same way. We in the US have little to say about the Israeli reaction, since they sit in the Middle East, the sole target of all the surrounding Arab and Islamic countries who wish to drive them into the sea and refuse to accept their right to even exist.
Rationalize as you will regarding who was first on this tiny strip of land (smaller than the state of Rhode Island) over 5,000 years ago, today it is a thriving democratic nation that has opened its doors to others in need of advance medical care, to farmers needing to learn water skills, to educators, musicians, artists, etc., and welcome participating with them in many mutual endeavors. When there is a major world disaster like an earthquake, Israel is first to send their highly trained teams to help. It was Israeli special forces which went into Uganda years ago to save the plane crash victims of Edi Amin when no other world government including ours did this.
I wish this constant gratuitous hammering of Israel would be toned down. Yes, I do see it as anti Semitism and IMO some new commenters here are purposely trying to incite the blog members and are probably trolls.
Remember, in the US we have about 360 M who now live in the ‘settlements’ won and occupied by the European invaders whose only intention here was to steal the land from the Native Americans. In Israel, the birthplace of Chrisr and of Judaism and Christianity, it is history that Jews lived there over 5,000 years ago. Read the tablets (e.g. Dead Sea Scrolls) for the earliest written word.
LikeLike
Here is another perspective posed by the Christian Science Monitor…
“WORLD MIDDLE EAST
Why UN resolution against Israeli settlements could backfire
A SHIFT IN THOUGHT The political geography has changed dramatically since the Security Council’s last such resolution in 1980, and support is growing for the settlers’ cause in Netanyahu’s Israel.
Why UN resolution against Israeli settlements could backfire
Christa Case Bryant
@christacbryant
DECEMBER 27, 2016 —The United Nations Security Council’s resolution Friday condemning Israeli settlements as “a flagrant violation under international law,” and the United States’ decision not to block it, has been broadly welcomed by anti-settlement advocates.
But it could end up having exactly the opposite effect from the one desired.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long carried on a delicate balancing act between the right wing’s pressure to support settlement expansion and the left’s push for peace with the Palestinians. The UN’s move may compel him to choose between those forces, and it appears the momentum is on the side of the settlers.
At the time of the last such Security Council resolution on settlements, in 1980, there were fewer than 23,000 Israelis living in the West Bank. Today their numbers are around 400,000 and they have far more influence in Israeli government and society – including within Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet and the officer ranks of the Israeli Defense Forces, which would be responsible for evacuating settlements in case of dismantlement.
Since Friday’s announcement, the Jerusalem municipality has already announced plans to step up Israeli building in areas of East Jerusalem. And Netanyahu has retaliated diplomatically against countries that supported the resolution – even calling in the US ambassador for a talking-to.
How much do you know about Israel? Take the quiz
“Israel is a country with national pride, and we don’t turn the other cheek,” said Mr. Netanyahu, defending his response. “This is a wise, aggressive, and responsible reaction, a natural response that makes it clear to the nations of the world that what took place at the UN is unacceptable to us.”
To a certain extent, there is always some bluster in such dust-ups, and this is an especially big dust-up. Essentially the Obama administration has poked Netanyahu’s government in the eye on its way out the door.
But there’s more to the pushback than just feisty rhetoric. For with the dramatic change in physical geography since the 1980s has also come a shift in thought among the Israeli public. Once seen as a fringe movement, those defined by the United Nations as settlers now account for about 10 percent of the Israeli Jewish population. Many of them are driven by religious or ideological convictions – from fulfilling biblical prophecy to bolstering Israel’s security in a time of regional upheaval – and are unlikely to be swayed by the edicts of the United Nations.
And though there is still a very vocal Israeli opposition to the settlement enterprise, there is growing support for it.
‘Way of the left has failed’
From 2013 to 2015, as the war in Syria worsened and at times came nearly to Israelis’ doorsteps, the percentage of Israeli Jews who believe settlements help Israel’s security jumped from 31 percent to 42 percent, according to a Pew survey. And the Israel Democracy Institute, as part of its monthly Peace Index, found last month that 44 percent of Israeli Jews support annexing the West Bank.
Given that political context, and perhaps emboldened by a global tailwind of right-wing populism and fears of radical Islam, some in Netanyahu’s government see a ripe opportunity for capitalizing on those sentiments.
“The way of the left has failed, now it is time to try our solution, sovereignty – taking the maximum territory with minimum Palestinians,” said Education Minister Naftali Bennett of the Jewish Home party, which is to the right of Netanyahu’s Likud.
For a number of years, Mr. Bennett – the former head of the Yesha Council, an umbrella group representing settlers – has advocated extending Israel’s sovereignty to the portions of the West Bank known collectively as Area C. It accounts for about 60 percent of the West Bank and includes all Israeli settlements.
In the wake of the UN vote, Bennett is now pushing for the Israeli parliament to start by extending sovereignty to Maale Adumim, a settlement of more than 40,000 residents just to the east of Jerusalem. A poll earlier this year found 78 percent of Israelis in favor of annexing the settlement.
Problem is ‘so much worse’
Even without any annexation, the growth of the settlements – many by 20 to 25 percent just since President Obama took office, according to a settler tally – has already made creation of a Palestinian state vastly more difficult.
“The settlement problem has gotten so much worse that it is now putting at risk the very viability of that two-state solution,” said US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power, in explaining the US decision to abstain from, rather than veto, Friday’s Security Council resolution.”
My thought….Just think what a Palestinian nation in full bloom could be there now if only Arafat had been reasonable and not self serving.
LikeLike
This comes from the Guardian. How is there ever going to be peace? In my opinion both sides need to step back and work together. Trump has already said where he stands.
……………..
Headline: Netanyahu ‘told New Zealand backing UN vote would be declaration of war’
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/dec/28/netanyahu-told-new-zealand-backing-un-vote-would-be-declaration-of-war?CMP=share_btn_link
“…Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly told New Zealand’s foreign minister that support for a UN resolution condemning Israeli settlement-building in the occupied territories would be viewed as a “declaration of war”.
According to reports in Israeli media, the Israeli PM called Murray McCully, the foreign minister of New Zealand, before Friday’s resolution, which was co-sponsored by Wellington. Netanyahu told him: “This is a scandalous decision. I’m asking that you not support it and not promote it.
“If you continue to promote this resolution, from our point of view it will be a declaration of war. It will rupture the relations and there will be consequences. We’ll recall our ambassador [from New Zealand] to Jerusalem.”
McCully, however, refused to back down, telling Netanyahu: “This resolution conforms to our policy and we will move it forward.”
A western diplomat confirmed that the call took place and described the conversation as “harsh”…”
LikeLike
Dienne,
From what I read just before the UN Security Council vote, the wording of the resolution was a strong factor for the US decision to abstain.
LikeLike
No good guys and no bad guys in this one. The behavior of both parties to the conflict has been deplorable. Like the rest of the Middle East.
But the problem with Obama’s action like most of his actions. It is too little too late and rather meaningless. For several years now Netanyahu has had an in your face attitude toward U.S. policy and Obama. The time to put him inline was years ago when he announced settlements the day that Biden landed in Israel. That was back in early 2010 .
One can extrapolate this to much of the Obama Presidency Domestic and Foreign.
LikeLike
Joel…I would ameliorate this a bit.
Netanyahu was only voted in by the Israeli people when the threat of nuclear annihilation became so close and so real. The terribly flawed Obama/Iran deal which had great opposition here, put Israel even more decidedly into the cross hairs for being decimated by its surrounding neighbors.
The years of terrorists blowing up children on school buses, of weddings blown to smithereens, of bombs lobbed into towns all day and night, yet still kept the progressive and younger population voting for liberals like Ehud Barak (who offered the Palestinians over 98% of what they asked for, but their leader Arafat laughed in his face and turned down that Clinton peace process as he simultaneously stole billions of dollars from his own people and stashed it in his Swiss bank account). And liberal female candidate Tzipi was almost elected PM…but these endless threats of total destruction and the history of living with death hanging over them every single day, did finally radicalize voters and brought them Netanyahu who promised to save them.
Do you see the similarity in the US of the almost the entire wealth of our nation be lobbed/robbed into the bank accounts of the uber wealthy bringing us the hard line of Trump, also based on false promises to save the ‘little guys’ in America? And the similarity in the Rise of the Third Reich where Hitler protested Communism and demanded he was the ‘savior’ for the German people? Lots of personality disordered theocrats are waiting to take over, and they are ubiquitous in global society.
I am stretching with these analogies…but the similar circumstances are brought about when the masses are threatened and a strong voice says, I am the POWER to save you. When you have no where else to turn, you want to believe ‘big daddy’ will save you.
I kinda wish these days that we had an Iron Dome. And yes, I do admit to some bias of my own but as a student of history and of government, I try to see beyond the prisms of bias.
LikeLike
As I said no good guys . Which is not denying that the Arab world and Palestinian leadership have failed the Palestinian people. Since 48 a long sordid history.
Although you are being a little generous to Netanyahu who was first elected in 96 before Barak and only a year after the assassination of Rabin by a right wing settler.
Right wing governments have a way of playing on fears yet seldom deliver the security people crave. He is putting that country on an unsustainable path. A path that caused the resignations of his own defense minister and Army chief of staff , members of his own party You know all this so it is mainly for others.
“Maj. Gen. Yair Golan, deputy chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, essentially the No. 2 man in the army, ”
Yes Obama should have cut him down to the little peon that he is years ago . Like Trump they are two peas in a pod. Neither will deliver security to their people. Yet a few weeks before Donald the
Dunce takes office , it is an ineffective move .
LikeLike
And this news just hit my mail box…evidently Congress agrees with me that Obama made a very bad call by abstaining instead if vetoing the UN vote re settlements, exasurbated today with Kerry’s angry rationale..
“Wednesday, 28 December 2016 15:59
Congress Quickly Moving To Undercut Obama’s Anti-Israel Move
Written by Robert Gehl
Congress Quickly Moving To Undercut Obama’s Anti-Israel Move
Congress is setting the stage to completely cut off U.S. funding of the United Nations in the aftermath of a unanimous vote last week where the Obama Administration permitted an anti-Israel resolution to win overwhelming approval in the security council.
There are other punitive actions the GOP-controlled congress could take – from scaling back ties with foreign nations that voted for the measure to expelling Palestinian diplomats from the U.S., the Washington Free Beacon is reporting.
The Obama Administration has been under blistering attack from both sides for their part in the unanimous vote that condemned continued Jewish settlement building on the West Bank – a move that reversed decades of U.S. foreign policy on the matter.
The Obama Administration played a key role in facilitating the vote, including a call from Vice President Joe Biden to the Ukrainian President to urge a “yes” vote. They had previously planned to abstain too.
With anger over the issue still roiling, leading members of Congress said they will not delay in seeking retribution against the U.N. for the vote. This could include cutting off U.S. funding for the U.N. and stripping the Palestinian mission’s diplomatic privileges.
Lawmakers will also work to rebuff further attempts by the Obama administration to chastise Israel on the international stage.”
Read more at TheFederalistpapers
Last modified on Wednesday, 28 December 2016 16:22
LikeLike
Congress is going one way and Obama and Kerry are going another.
Headline: Kerry harshly condemns Israeli settler activity as an obstacle to peace from The Washington Post
http://wapo.st/2i7T44E?tid=ss_mail
LikeLike
I wonder how much it will cost to get a presidential veto or a signature on a bill? And BTW, why would anyone want to have such power if they couldn’t make money on it? What’s wrong with you people–A Bunch of Losers?
LikeLike
I find it hard to believe that Trump went into politics for the money. He is already fabulously wealthy. I believe that he cannot be “bought”. How can you bribe man of his wealth?
He is on record, as planning to donate his presidential salary to charity, like John F. Kennedy and Herbert Hoover.
LikeLike
Cema4yb,
The $400,000 he is forgoing is chicken feed compared to the millions, hundreds of millions that he continues to get from foreign governments that lease his name and buy services from his children. The Constitution specifically prohibits the receipt of any money from foreign government. It is called the Emoluments clause.
LikeLike
No one knows how much money he has. That entire empire could be loaded with debt for all we know.
It’s more likely it IS deeply in hock than it isn’t- that’s how real estate developers operate. The whole business relies on turning around loans and robbing Peter to pay Paul.
I see his name all over the place That means absolutely nothing as far as “wealth” or “assets”. Every asset he owns could be mortgaged to the hilt. He can pay himself solely by flipping debt from one property to another. As long as he generates enough income to cover interest payments he’s golden.
I don’t know how “rich” Donald Trump is and either does anyone else.
You’d need MUCH more disclosure than he’s given and even then you would need people who understand how to unravel all these entities.
LikeLike
You are guessing that Trump will make money off deals with foreign governments. It is a fact that the Clinton’s made money off deals with foreign governments, and put our national security at risk.
LikeLike
RaisetheBar,
I am not guessing that Trump will make money from business deals with foreign governments, it is a fact. Even the conservative Wall Street Hournal said that Trump should liquidate his business empire in order to avoid conflicts of interest.
Instead, he refuses to relinquish any of his business but engages in the fiction that his children will run it. Foreign governments will do lucrative deals with the Trump organization to curry favor with the president.
Let’s see if he gives up his lease on his new D.C. Hotel, which the General Services Administration told him will be illegal once he becomes president.
LikeLike
O/T but this is sort of interesting, politically:
“Our record here has been consistent: In recent years we’ve fought for high-quality pre-Kindergarten expansion, high academic standards and topnotch district leadership. As a city, we should be doing more to support and learn from some of our incredible charter schools, while doing a lot more to lift up the schools that the other 90 percent of students attend. It’s really not that complicated.”
Stand For Children seem to be backing away from their reputation as charter cheerleaders and re-branding as an organization that serves “the other 90%”- kids in public schools.
I wonder if ed reformers on the ground are worried they’re perceived as anti-public schools – they’re maybe starting to get the message in local races that’s not a good place to be.
I wonder if we’ll start to hear more about “the other 90%”- it usually takes a while for local insights to trickle up to DC and national orgs.
Stand for Children supporting the unfashionable “public school sector”! Now THAT’S new and different. Wonder what inspired their change of heart? 🙂
Who knows? Maybe public school advocacy will become fashionable again in DC and elite circles now that Trump and DeVos are solidly anti-public school.
http://www.tennessean.com/story/opinion/2016/12/26/stand-children-geared-up-2017-after-political-battles/95759770/
LikeLike
Stand for Children was a major conduit for pro-charter funding in the 2016 judicial election in Washington State, where billionaires tried but failed to oust the justices who ruled that charters were not public schools.
Watch what they do, not what they say.
LikeLike
Right, but it’s interesting they feel they have to DEFEND. There’s some reason they’re changing their rhetoric from charters to charters AND public schools.
Ed reform is as much or more about politics than it is about education. Political actors don’t change tactics for no reason. They must think the “all charters, all the time” message hurts them in these communities.
LikeLike
Chiara–I think Diane is right about this–let’s see what other twisted thinking they come up with to ply their trade..
LikeLike
Chiara: Maybe some finally “got it,” “IT” being the implications of what they were involved in, like (apparently) the NAACP did? Maybe it has Diane Ravitch written all over it? Maybe there’s hope?
LikeLike
Trump defines corrupted human beings.
“If You Think Clinton Is Corrupt, You’re Rewarding 25 Years of GOP Smears” http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/12/22/1613685/-If-You-re-Liberal-You-Think-Clinton-Is-Corrupt-You-re-Rewarding-25-Years-of-GOP-Smears?detail=email&link_id=9&can_id=47594dc7343bb19ac4f7621b50e457f8&source=email-trump-middle-fingers-the-alt-right-they-dont-like-it&email_referrer=trump-middle-fingers-the-alt-right-they-dont-like-it&email_subject=trump-middle-fingers-the-alt-right-they-dont-like-it
LikeLike
So Trump is really planning to bring jobs back to the US? He could start by having his daughter use US companies. HA!
IVANKA TRUMP’S COMPANIES USE CHEAP FOREIGN LABOR – We’re guessing she’s not going to get a stern talking from dad about this. Laura Holson and Rachel Abrams: “Cheap production overseas means more coin in the coffers of Ms. Trump and the shoe, accessory and clothing makers that are her partners, among them Marc Fisher footwear, the G-III Apparel Group and Mondani. (Ms. Trump’s company, which is privately held, does not disclose its financials.) Almost all of her goods are made overseas, according to a New York Times review of shipments compiled separately by Panjiva and ImportGenius, two trade databases. ImportGenius tallied 193 shipments for imported goods associated with Ms. Trump for the year through Dec. 5, mostly Chinese-made shoes and handbags. Her dresses and blouses are made in China, Indonesia and Vietnam, according to a review of hundreds of clothing tags and financial documents filed by G-III.” [NYT]
LikeLike
Yet again…in support of your good research, Carol, I add that she even advertised and sold out the pink dress she wore at her father’s Rep Convention, when she introduced him. Everything each Trumpster does seems to be mainly about lucre and profit for themselves. What a bunch.
LikeLike
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/will-donald-trump-turn-his-presidency-one-massive-insider-trading-scam
LikeLike
DEMS TARGETING EPA PICK’S KOCH / FOSSIL FUEL TIES – Alexander Kaufman: “Six senators urged President-elect Donald Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency pick on Wednesday to reveal his ties to a secretive fundraising group that enables fossil fuel companies to make anonymous donations to politicians.
Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt helped found the nonprofit Rule of Law Defense Fund to collect campaign contributions from companies like oil giant ConocoPhillips and coal mining titan Alpha Natural Resources, The New York Times reported in December 2014. Pruitt now sits on the group’s board. The group, which keeps the identities of most of its donors secret, received $175,000 in 2014 from Freedom Partners, a business organization that organizes political activities for the billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch, who run the privately held chemical and oil giant Koch Industries….
[The letter was signed by] Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), Sen. Jeffrey Merkley (D-Ore.), Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Sen. Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.).” [HuffPost]
LikeLike
Between Tillerson and Pruitt, can you imagine how the price of gas at the pump will race upwards? The increased market pricing for oil is being made by the traders even before the inauguration. I had written here last week that the price of gasoline at the tank would rapidly zoom up, and lo and behold, filled my tank a week ago for $2.73 a gallon, and today for $3.15 at my cheap gas station, but saw it at a major gas station, up to $3.59. I am taking bets that it hits $4 by Jan. 20.
LikeLike
Probably more to do with OPEC and Saudi cuts, ,But bring it on, the only thing that will save the country from Trump is a crashed economy the sooner the better . My greatest fear is short term Keynesian success allowing public support for Republican policy, whose long term effect will be serfdom for the American worker.
Disaster for minorities and the planet.
Thirty five years after Reagan we are still paying the price.
LikeLike
Agree with what you say, Joel. Yellin is shaking too. Wonder if she will finish her term. Dr. Doom predicts a major downturn.
But too many American workers are already in the ranks of serfdom, and in despararte straits, living below the poverty level.
LikeLike
Booker did something useful? I am amazed.
LikeLike
Here is what Noam Chomsky has to say concerning what will happen when Trump’s voters find out he is a con man who doesn’t work to help them:
What can we expect from Donald Trump? Does his rise provide ground for redefining and uniting a socialist movement around a common vision in the United States?
The answer to that is basically up to you and your friends. It really depends on how people, especially young people, react. There are plenty of opportunities, and they could be taken. It is not inevitable by any means.
Just take what is likely to happen. Trump is highly unpredictable. He doesn’t know what he plans. But what might happen, for example, one possible scenario is this: a lot of people who voted for Trump, working-class people, voted for Obama in 2008. They were seduced by the slogans “hope” and “change.” They didn’t get hope, they didn’t get change, they were disillusioned.
This time they voted for another candidate who is calling for hope and change and has promised to deliver all kinds of amazing things. Well, he is not going to deliver them. So, what happens in a couple of years, when he hasn’t delivered them and that same constituency is disillusioned?
What’s very likely is that the power system will do what it typically does under such conditions: try to scapegoat the more vulnerable to say, “Yeah, you haven’t gotten what we promised, and the reason is those worthless people, the Mexicans, the blacks, the Syrian immigrants, the welfare cheats. They are the ones who are destroying everything. Let’s go after them. The gays, they are the ones to blame.”
That could happen. It’s happened over and over in history with pretty ugly consequences. And whether that could succeed depends on the kind of resistance that will be mounted by people just like you. The answer to this question should be directed to you, not to me.
LikeLike
Trump may simply bring himself down, by a thousand self-inflicted cuts, or hits as he likes say.
http://m.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/12/donald-trump-holds-micro-press-conference-comes-idiot
LikeLike
Loved the link! Thanks for a look at this idiot’s word salas and tweets. I though Bush was ignorant, but Trump is a class onto himself because he has no internal monitor…been accustomed to saying his mind in a world where everyone is afraid to set him straight… Remember wha he told Billy Bush? How he was so special he could do anything!!!
Well he thinks he can say anything… and now HE IS OUR PRESIDENT and represents you and me???
Donald Trump Holds a Micro Press Conference, Comes Off As an Idiot | Mother Jones:http://m.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/12/donald-trump-holds-micro-press-conference-comes-idiot
LikeLike