https://apple.news/A1C6kVIGlSD2AMo2pAdgMzQ
Michael D’Antonio writes opinion pieces for CNN. He previously wrote a book “The Truth About Trump.”
This article is fascinating in a morbid way, about Trump’s contempt for rules, conventions, promises, commitments. Breaking the rules and ignoring what others think have been his lifelong practices.
(CNN) President-elect Donald Trump signaled who he is when he announced he was going to remain executive producer of “The Apprentice” and then dismissed as “ridiculous” the Central Intelligence Agency’s concern that Russia hacked his opponent’s computers to help him win the White House. When given a choice between unreality as represented by TV and the real-world work of protecting the United States from Vladimir Putin, Trump stayed loyal to the money-making fiction and threw the CIA under the bus.
Consider that Trump has refused to sit for nearly all the daily intelligence briefings, which have been prepared for presidents since the 1960s, and his response to the CIA seems consistent with his view of himself and the world. He said he doesn’t need intelligence briefings because he’s so “smart.” By this measure, each one of his predecessors, from Kennedy to Reagan to Obama, must have been woefully unintelligent. At the very least, they worried far too much about the norms that traditionally guided the presidency.
Trump has long used manipulative techniques to get what he wants. These tendencies to shade the truth, break the rules and ignore the damage he does were apparent when he first made himself known as a publicity hound and developer in New York, and they continue to be an essential part of his character.
No rules for me
When Donald Trump proposed his first big project in the 1970s, he called on politicians whom his father had befriended and funded to grease the skids. In those days, local politics was the kind of swamp Trump now says he wants to drain, and yet he swam as well as anyone. The last step in his bid for approval required that he provide a signed contract indicating he owned the right to develop the site. Trump submitted paperwork, but since it was unsigned it shouldn’t have been accepted. Mysteriously, the city approval came, and Trump later bragged to me about pulling off the deception.
Less obvious, but no less significant, was Trump’s decision to use a contractor who hired scores of undocumented workers, in violation of the law, to tear down the Bonwit Teller department store at the site of what is now Trump Tower. In the same period, he destroyed architectural artwork he was supposed to preserve and adopted a fake persona to serve as a spokesman for himself. In Trump’s estimation, the deception was good business.
Fast forward to the 2016 election, and Trump is insulting war hero John McCain, inciting the kind of violent practices against protesters used in “the good old days” and demeaning almost every one of his opponents. When he was concerned about losing the election, he began speaking of a “rigged” system, undercutting public confidence in the foundation of the American democracy. The norms of politics have prevented every candidate in modern history from making such dangerous statements. However, Trump has not accepted those rules.
Now, as President-elect, Trump believes the standards accepted by other newly elected presidents out of respect for America’s political culture don’t apply to him. Others held press conferences almost immediately after the votes were tallied. Trump has yet to hold one. Others put their assets in trust to avoid conflicts of interest. Trump will not.
He has never acted as if the rules applied to him and, so far, he’s keeping up the practice.
One of Trump’s oft-used methods for getting what he wants involves flipping narratives to benefit him. He first did this in the early 1970s, when the federal government charged the Trump Organization with discriminating against minority applicants for apartments. Instead of acknowledging the public good in equal housing and respecting a GOP administration’s effort to encourage equality, Trump put himself above all other considerations. Crying “reverse discrimination,” he claimed he was the real victim in the situation. And though the Trump Organization eventually agreed to comply with fair housing rules, he fought hard against doing the right thing.
More opposite talk came from Trump when he argued that black men have advantages in life that he would have wanted in his youth. “I would love to be a well-educated black, because I believe they do have an actual advantage.” Every bit of data available suggested that the opposite was true, but the facts wouldn’t get in the way of Trump making a point that played to the racial fears and anxieties of many whites.
In the election campaign, Trump indulged in opposite talk almost every time he was challenged about his fitness for office. Well known for wild rants, he nevertheless insisted he had the best temperament of anyone running for president. Now, as President-elect, Trump is practicing opposite talk without saying a word. By appointing a climate change denier to run the Environmental Protection Agency and a fierce critic of public schools to run the Department of Education, President-elect Trump is communicating that he’s willing to move from opposite talk to opposite action.
Read on to see the many rules that Trump has broken and ignored and will continue to ignore. He has said that the president is exempt from conflicts of interest, so he will continue to own his many properties.
We are about to see four years of unprecedented corruption as foreign powers clear the way for Trump hotels, casinos, and golf clubs, and curry favor with the president by enriching his children and his company.
All this violates the “emoluments” clause of the Constitution, which forbids government officials from accepting any gifts from foreign powers, but no one can enforce the Constitution other than Congress, by impeachment. What are the odds of that?

MINORITY president-elect trump …. don’t forget the word “MINORITY.” Say this word over and over again when writing or speaking about trump.
LikeLike
Perhaps we should allow the “constitutionally” elected President Trump take office and then we can judge him by his actions rather than our presumptions.
LikeLike
Yes, let’s all give the chancellor a chance.
LikeLike
Tom Brown,
I regret to say that we can’t stop Trump from taking office. He is Putin’s president, not mine.
We know him by his appointments, the worst collection imaginable of deplorables.
LikeLike
Why are we not allowed to judge Trump by all his horrific appointments, heinous actions and outrageous words up until now? Is that some kind of rule? Here’s another disgusting appointment: President-elect Donald Trump said on Saturday he has chosen U.S. Representative Mick Mulvaney of South Carolina to be his White House budget director, turning to a fiscal conservative to help pursue his policy agenda. end quote.
Fiscal conservative? Translation, he’s an austerian, a deficit scold, a deficit vampire who ONLY wants to make cuts to all the social safety net programs and things that help ordinary Americans. Try far right wing libertarian Tea bag wrecking ball.
LikeLike
We’ve seen decades of his actions and heard way too many of his words. Should a man not be judged by who he already is. The guy is 70 for Christ’s sake. He has a track record. His campaign was public. His tweets are daily. What do you propose we wait on. That’s just plain crazy.
LikeLike
Common denominator in all these picks: they elicit the maximum horror from the New York Times editorial board. Trump’s pledge to unify is garbage. This man is barbarous. Aren’t there any civil Republicans left?
LikeLike
Ponderosa: Trump’s definition of “unify:” Everyone follows and agrees with Trump, or get ragged, harassed, fired, or “locked up.” In Russia, it’s “everyone follows and agrees with Putin, or get jailed or killed.
LikeLike
Catherine –you’re probably right. To me unify means show respect for differences and seek common ground. To him it means crush dissent.
LikeLike
Ponderosa: Yes–but Trump uses language indiscriminately–he says whatever others want to hear, and then he circumvents what others assume it means. When I see him talk to others, I get the image of being in a small room with a large bear who is about to eat you alive.
LikeLike
Just to underline the point, Trump believes that rules are meant to be broken by him — others must play by the rules or it’s just no fun. Thus he exhibits, and I do mean exhibits, that GOP knack for the double standard.
LikeLike
If rules are meant to be broken, he shouldn’t try to deport millions of unauthorized people. If Trump breaks too many rules, we can start the impeachment proceedings.
LikeLike
The Republican control house will never start impeachment proceedings against Trump. They won’t ever investigate Foreign interference in out election process. They probably will continue to investigate HRC’s use of a secure server.
LikeLike
“Trump believes that rules are meant to be broken by him — others must play by the rules or it’s just no fun.”
A perfect description of the heavyweights and chief beneficiaries of corporate education reform.
But there’s no surprise there…
He’s one of them.
😎
LikeLike
“Sound familiar?”
By Sarah Jones on Sat, Dec 17th, 2016 at 2:00 pm
“Malcolm Nance described the kind of person the KGB sought out to manipulate, ‘This is who the KGB targeted for recruitment. Egocentric people, who lack moral principles, who are either too greedy or who suffer from exaggerated self importance. These are the people KGB wants and finds easiest to recruit.'”
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/12/17/intelligence-expert-explains-donald-trump-perfect-kgb-recruit.html
LikeLike
Thanks. Trump should never be regarded as the new normal. He failed to moderate his bombast, contradictions, and has now selected a cabinet by the one criterion that seems to matter most–money as proof of success. He is not just amoral but a corrupting force intent on demeaning anyone who criticizes him. He ethically challenged, and so are his lawyers and the family members who are enlisted to make him look perfectly reasonable.
Shame on anyone who is supporting him.
LikeLike
His crowds at his “rallies” are still shouting “Lock her up.”
Sounds like blood lust.
LikeLike
Bloodlust–exactly. The dogs are let loose.
LikeLike
Not sure whether to laugh or cry about this Christmas gift suggestion (note the 35+ age recommendation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCRBQGs34FE
LikeLike
laugh
LikeLike
Ridicule him and his family till he has a massive stroke while trying to respond on twitter.
LikeLike
You were anticipated more than a century ago:
“Against the assault of laughter, nothing can stand.” [Mark Twain]
And a very old and very dead and very French guy reminds us how deeply folks like The Donald react to even the slightest hint that they are less than perfect:
“Ridicule dishonors a man more than dishonor does.” [François de la Rochefoucauld]
Ever so much more damaging when the target copiously provides all the ammunition.
Making him an excellent example of the walking self-wounded.
But then, in addition to his small hands, he has such a bigly yuuuuge shoe-shaped mouth…
😎
LikeLike
After watching SNL’s opening tonight, it will be interesting how long it takes Trump to respond by twitter. I think you’re both onto something. More Trump jokes please.
LikeLike
While Trump is tweeting about SNL, Vanity Fair, and Hamilton, his reactionary cabinet and advisors will run our country into the ground. Once a Know Nothing, always…
LikeLike
And Trump will keep his support.
The christian right will continue to support him, because Trump will do nothing when they attack and dismantle Planned Parenthood and end Abortion rights a state at a time.
Skinheads, The American Nazi Party, and the KKK, all racists, will continue to support him because he will not step in when they burn churches and terrorize anyone they hate for whatever reason and suppress minority voters during elections.
The Koch brothers tea party movement will continue to support him because he will cut taxes and create more loopholes for the wealthiest Americans and corporations while stripping away the watchdog status of the federal government that’s there to protect the environment and the rights of the people who aren’t rich and powerful.
Then there are the rust-belt Americans, the fools who actually elected him, who swallowed Trump’s lies that he was going to bring back all the manufacturing jobs he alleged went to Mexico and China, but that isn’t going to happen because 88-percent of those jobs did not go to Mexico or China. They were automated and those factories are still in the U.S. Trump will blame someone else when those jobs don’t come back and the easy-to-fool, rust-belt Americans will continue to trust him and hate whoever Trump blames. A few might wake up but will it be enough to make sure Trump is not reelected for a 2nd term, and if the GOP gets enough seat in Congress, will the Republicans repeal the two-term limit for presidents so Trump can rule for the rest of his life and beat FDR’s record. To keep Trump alive, he will eventually look just like Darth Vader with all the tubes keeping his vital organs from failing.
LikeLike
The Silicon Valley crew already went to Trump to tell him they need H1 B visas. They don’t really “need” more H1 Bs. They want more so they can hoard more profit instead of hiring trained Americans that need jobs, but would cost more. The H1 Bs put Americans on the same level of skill in America out of work. Trump vowed in his campaign to stop the flow of H1Bs. We’ll have to see how this plays out once Trump is in power.
LikeLike
“What did the president-elect know, and when did he know it?”
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/what-did-donald-trump-know-about-vladimir-putins-attempt-hack-election-and-when-did-he
LikeLike
Was that before or after he said he loves H1B’s and we need more of them .
http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-h1b-visas-gop-debate-immigration-2016-3
LikeLike
Until Trump delivers on his campaign promises, I’ll treat everything he says as a lie. But, did he really make any promises or do the easy to fool deplorables just think he did?
Trump has a habit of forgetting what he says and when someone has a video to remind him of what he said, he also has a habit of saying he was misunderstood.
LikeLike
Lloyd Lofthouse
No 88 % of those jobs did not go to automation. They may go to automation in the future. The factories that are brought back re-shoring may be modern and automated.,reducing the potential for new employment . But neither the jobs that went to China nor Mexico since 96, went for automation or were replaced by automated factories here .
Like most narratives that the plutocracy pedals including failing schools and a skills gap, the devil is in the details. Yes 88% of manufacturing jobs may have been lost to automation. That automation was the retooling in the late 60’s 70’s and the 80’s that reduced the manufacturing base dramatically. By the 90’s manufacturing stabilized at a much lower number. That stayed that way through the decade and then those trade agreements kicked in full force around 2000 . Manufacturing fell off the cliff 5 million jobs between 20000 and 2007 prior to the crash. That has a multiplier effect on spending and industries that service those plants. The total job loss including the waitress at the luncheonette near a closed plant is probably 15 Million.
Now just so happens that I was not the only one who got fed up with this narrative today. So for the second time today(an email link I sent at 6:15 AM was the first) . I will post this must read link. The first time was at 6 A.M. when I opened my browser to see if maybe Trump dropped dead overnight.
http://www.alternet.org/economy/cnn-hosts-terrible-explanation-economy-put-me-funny-position-yelling-tv
LikeLike
“Why robots, not trade, are behind so many factor job losses”
“Despite the Republican presidential nominee’s charge that ‘we don’t make anything anymore,’ manufacturing is still flourishing in America. Problem is, factories don’t need as many people as they used to because machines now do so much of the work.
“America has lost more than 7 million factory since since manufacturing employment peaked in 1979. Yet American factory production, minus raw materials and some other costs, more than dou9bled over the same span …”
“research shows that the automation of U.S. factors is a much bigger factor than foreign trade in the loss of factory jobs. A study at Ball State University’s Center for Business and Economic Research last year found that trade accounted for just 13 percent of America’s lost factory jobs. The vast majority of lost jobs — 88 percent— were taken by robots and other homegrown factors that reduce factories’ need for human labor.” …
“General Motors, for instance, now employs barely a third of the 600,000 workers it had in the 1970s. Yet it churns out more cars and truck than ever..”
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/265cd8fb02fb44a69cf0eaa2063e11d9/mexico-taking-us-factory-jobs-blame-robots-instead
LikeLike
Lloyd Lofthouse
“General Motors, for instance, now employs barely a third of the 600,000 workers it had in the 1970s. Yet it churns out more cars and truck than ever..”
Exactly the point and when did that number drop to a third Before the nineties. So yes new plant and machinery in the. 70’sand 80s clobbered manufacturing. Those are not the jobs they are screaming about in the Mid West. Those jobs were long gone.
Show me the New auto plants since 1998 with these robots. Show me the steel mills built in the late 90’s .The textile mills built in the 90’s
Show me the sales in these new robotic systems. No doubt they are coming but they did not cause the disaster of the last 20 years Trade policy did .
Better yet show me the increases in productivity that would indicate that those robots were doing the work.
What is US industrial production x Oil and Gas
Follow the chart
https://www.creditwritedowns.com/2012/05/chart-of-the-day-us-manufacturing-unemployment-1960-2012.html
“The industrial Midwest never recovered. Between 1979 and 1983, 2.4 million manufacturing jobs vanished. The number of U.S. steelworkers went from 450,000 at the start of the 1980s to 170,000 at decade’s end, even as the wages of those who remained shrank by 17 percent. The decline in auto was even more precipitous, from 760,000 employees in 1978 to 490,000 three years later. In 1979, with Chrysler on the verge of bankruptcy, the UAW agreed to give up more than $650 million in wages and benefits to keep the company in business. General Motors and Ford were not facing bankruptcy but demanded and received similar concessions. In return for GM pledging not to close several U.S. factories, the UAW agreed to defer its cost-of-living adjustment and eliminate its annual improvement increases. Henceforth, as the productivity of the American economy increased, the wages of American workers would not increase with it. Tide and boats parted company.”
http://prospect.org/article/40-year-slump
http://www.businessinsider.com/deindustrialization-factory-closing-2010-9#
LikeLike
America’s New Manufacturing Boomtowns
an area in Michigan that is widely known as automation alley.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/joelkotkin/2013/05/15/americas-manufacturing-boomtowns/#366e93157c6c
LikeLike
Automation Propels U.S. Manufacturing Forward
http://www.areadevelopment.com/siteSelection/Q4-2013/automation-increases-US-manufacturing-competitiveness-363824.shtml
LikeLike
Automation for the U.S. Steel Industry
http://www.konecranes.com/industries/steel/automation-for-the-steel-industry
The U.S. is ranked 4th in the world for steel production.
1st place China
2nd Japan
3rd India
4th place, the U.S.
“Today, the US is home to over 100 steel production plants in localized regions all over the country. Most of the production is in the Pittsburg-Youngstown with several industries in its districts.”
http://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-top-10-steel-producing-countries-in-the-world.html
LikeLike
I’m with Joel on this one, Lloyd. Please do some research on German manufacturing. Automation at high levels still needs very skilled workers. It’s not an either/or proposition. We can either equip our nation to compete at a high level or complain about not producing enough steel. Even much of the U.S. auto industry’s advances over the past few years that we tout are basically technology transfer. Ford has finally figured out that their cars in Europe are much better and now reproduce them here. The Ford Mondeo is a great car that can compete against Audi and Mercedes. Buicks today are basically Opels. And Airbus airplanes beat out Boeing in terms of quality and sophistication. I’ve been fortunate to have toured the Airbus factory in Hamburg and its automation requires workers of incredibly high skills.
What we need is a serious youth apprenticeship system built on collaboration between local, state, and federal governments, business, and public schools. And they aren’t one-size-fits-all, they rely on workers who are represented by unions, allow worker autonomy, and consensus building with ownership and management. Pretty much what most of us think public education should be.
But the argument that automation loses jobs is not that simple. Automation might eliminate low-skill jobs, but not necessarily high-skill jobs. Driving a Mercedes, BMW or Audi, vacuuming with a Miele, cutting wood with a Stihl chainsaw, brewing coffee (or doing a whole bunch of other jobs) with a Bosch machine should convince most objective observers. And there are a whole lot of other industries we’ve never heard of that support them with high-skilled jobs and automation.
LikeLike
Greg,
Automation requires high skill workers but far fewer workers.
A friend who recently retired from Kraft used to inspect factories that employed 1,000 people. The same factories are now run by 2 people.
LikeLike
This is exactly what I heard when I was still teaching and attended a workshop designed to help teachers with skill/methods to help them improve learning outcomes; to get students involved and motivated for learning.
The lecturer was a nationally renowned innovator for classroom teaching methods (and I don’t remember his name, but he ran a university lab school, I think it was out of UCLA, where all the children had been selected from a list after parents went out of their way to sign them up for the program he ran), and he told us why it was so important that children grew up literate, lifelong learners.
To make a long story short, what he did in that k-12 university lab school was difficult to replicate in a school where no parents went out of their way to get their child on a waiting list, and the poverty rate was more than 70 percent, and violent street gangs made the turf outside the school’s fence unsafe 24/7.
His example was a GM bumper factory in Michigan that had 500 workers in the 1950s but only 2 the year of that workshop. He said, that factory still turned out the same number of bumpers and the 2 workers that maintained the bots were paid about $90k each with great benefits, but 498 workers had been replaced by automation.
It was in the 1990s when I heard that in an audience of several hundred teachers from several school districts.
LikeLike
My point is that we need to create more high-value products; the jobs associated with them will require skills and pay well. Kraft products are associated with low-skilled work. Comparing the work and automation that goes into producing boxes of mac and cheese with a Mercedes is not, in my view, a valid comparison. A better example is the growth of jobs in producing solar power gathering equipment in the U.S. Germans are way ahead of us on that too, as well as wind and biomass.
LikeLike
“Who is happy? He who is satisfied with his portion.”
Ethics of the Fathers
LikeLike
And those who are never happy, are never satisfied with the portion they get. They always want more.
LikeLike
Exactly Lloyd! The last thing billionaires need is more money. They are insatiable. They need the entire pie to themselves. Not a crumb should be left to the rest of us.
LikeLike
Donnie Boy Trump’s motto: “I will do it until I get caught and then put the blame on someone else.” He is a Slinky Boy Don (meaning mobster). Nothing sticks to him.
Isn’t Donnie Boy a fantastic example for our children and grandchildren to immolate? Children will start saying: “If President Trump can be a racist, sexist, bully and get away with it then I can too. The stupid adults voting him into office so all this stuff about NOT being a racist, sexist, bully, and love thy neighbor is all a bunch of BS. I will follow our new President.”
Good luck America
LikeLike
From my Congresswoman, Bonnie Watson Coleman: Quote – Donald Trump is unfit to be president. He is uninformed, mean spirited and a jerk.
His nominations are antithetical to the greater humanitarian purpose of the position or agency.
I can’t believe that the Senate should allow those nominations to go forth.
How do you justify a Secretary of State with questionable personal and business ties to Russia?
How do you nominate an EPA secretary who denies climate change is a serious world problem
or an Energy Secretary who wanted to eliminate the Department?
How do you nominate a Labor Secretary who does not support workers protections
or an Education Secretary who does not value public education, or an Attorney General who doesn’t support civil rights?
How do you propose ambassadors that will just create more chaos in place of peace?
Just How….. End quote.
Thank you, Bonnie Watson Coleman, and rah, rah, rah, for telling the truth about this GOP horror show and nightmare. Eisenhower would be appalled and aghast at his GOP party of 2016.
LikeLike
Lincoln is rolling over in his grave.
LikeLike
Lincoln was wrong he never fooled you or me, or the up to 3 Million more Americans that voted against him.
LikeLike
If Eisenhower would be aghast, imagine what Teddy Roosevelt or Lincoln would think.
LikeLike
.. . or FDR?
LikeLike
FDR was a Democrat but I’m sure he wouldn’t be happy with what’s going to probably happen to Social Security. I’ve read that the way the Republicans are going to fix SS is cuts, cuts, cuts to benefits and you’ll have to wait longer to be eligible.
Another safety net program FDR signed into law in 1933 was SNAP, food stamps, another program that might be at risk, because Republicans can’t stand anything that helps people living in poverty, because of low pay or no jobs.
LB, another Democrat, signed Medicare into law, and the GOP wants to get rid of that too.
And we can be sure of one thing, as the social safety net unravels and fades into history, taxes for the wealthy will continue to shrink and possibly also vanish.
In 1900 at the dawn of the progressive movement and the birth of safety net programs, 40 percent of Americans lived in poverty. The average age was also 46 (men) and 48 (women).
CNN reported this month that US life expectancy drops for first time in 22 years.
LikeLike
Rules?
Not for this guy.
Educators would describe it this way.
He has violated:
DASA (Dignity Act)
Any state or district bullying policy (repeated acts to gain power over another)
Cyber-bullying
Sexual Harassment policy
Acceptable Use Policy (required technology agreement)
Title IX
OCR (office of civil rights) violations against individuals with disabilities (oh and what will the new education secretary do with IDEA protections as they are under that office’s prevue)
Plagiarism
Lying
…
If he were a student anywhere – any high school liberal or conservative – public or private – religious – college or university – he would have been suspended and if it were private, as is the practice, kicked out asap to avoid the embarrassment of the school
LikeLike
Normally I avoid psych-labelling, but this article hit a chord. Reminded me immediately of “Games People Play” by Eric Berne (1964). But these are more insidious games– found immediately at psychcentral.com when I googled “gaslighting as games people play”. Here are excerpts from “Mind Games People Play”, an article by Gerald Schoenewolf, PhD. Trump routinely uses all 7 “games” cited. I had a grandfather like this. My mother pigeonholed him as “borderline personality disorder”. I just called him a bully.
1 – Disqualifying. This is a method of saying something hurtful to someone and then, when they become hurt, doing a double-whammy by making it seem you didn’t at all mean what they thought you meant
2 – Forgetting. Passive-aggressive personalities play this game… they forget important things… They make you feel that you’re angry over nothing, which makes you more angry. This is how they “dump” their anger onto you without giving you a chance to voice your own anger.
3 – Persecuting. Sometimes people project their hatred onto others and persecute them. They are either unaware of their own hatred or they think it’s justified. Once they begin projecting, they look for reasons to persecute… If the hated individuals disagree with them on politics, decline an invitation or smile the wrong way, the persecutor finds a way to punish them.
4 – Guilt-Tripping. The game here is to make someone feel guilty unless they do what you want them to do… Thus, instead of simply saying [something] which would lead to a discussion… one simply calls the other a name and arouses guilt while avoiding reality.
5 – Gas-lighting… They say and do things and then deny they ever said them.
6 – Shaming. People who play the shaming game express their anger by looking to catch people they don’t like saying or doing something they consider inappropriate… This game enables the shamer to dump his or her anger while looking to all the world like an innocent, concerned citizen.
7 – Pretending… People can pretend to be your best friend in order to get you to trust them while they hide their real motives. Good pretenders are good actors… Pretending is a way of controlling you and avoiding any confrontation that might result from honesty.
LikeLike
Interesting. We used to think bullies were anomalies. But perhaps 40% of American are bullies.
LikeLike
Guess what country the U.S. buys the most steel from? Canada exports to the U.S. 46.1 percent of the steel the U.S. buys from other countries. China represents only 3.3 percent of steel exported to the U.S.
Click to access imports-us.pdf
LikeLike
Probably because China is using all the steel it can produce to replicate the factories that used to be in the Rust Belt.
LikeLike
Most of the steel made in China ends up in China building new infrastructure, new damns, new airports, new cities and rebuilding old cities, and much more. If only 3.3 percent of the steel the US imports from other countries came from China, how many factories in the American rust belt went out of business?
And the US even exports some of its steel. The U.S. still produces 70 percent of the country’s steel consumption.
https://www.bbh.com/en-us/insights/steel-market-update–as-foreign-imports-surge–u-s–steelmakers-launch-trade-war/15976
LikeLike