The founder of a small charter chain in Michigan has been sentenced to 41 months in prison.
I have written about Ingersoll here and here.
Steven Ingersoll founded the Grand Traverse Academy in Michigan.
Blogger Anita Senkowski has followed this scandal from its beginnings. She writes about Ingersoll’s sentencing here.
In its December 15, 2016 sentencing memorandum, the government stated:
In general, the four purposes of sentencing are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation. In a tax case such as this, the sentencing purposes of retribution and deterrence are especially important. A sentence within the guideline range of 41 to 51 months is necessary to accomplish those purposes.
“When looking first at the need for retribution, Ingersoll has committed a serious offense, and his sentence should reflect it. His offense was not a one-time lapse in judgement, or a record-keeping mistake with purely civil tax consequences. His criminal tax-loss amount exceeds a million dollars. And he was convicted of tax evasion and fraud with respect to three years of false income tax returns.
Ingersoll has done nothing to repay the money that he owes. To the contrary, he has continued to violate the tax laws to this day by failing to file any personal income tax return since 2012.
The profit and loss statement that Ingersoll previously filed with the court shows that from 2012 to 2015, he earned over two million dollars in gross income. The only income tax payment he has made for those tax periods, however, was a $10,000 payment submitted when he applied for an extension to file his 2012 return.
Defendant’s repeated and significant criminal conduct warrants a lengthy sentence.”
Here is a quote from an earlier post linked above:
“This is one of the most curious, most convoluted charter scandals I have come across. Of course, it happened in Michigan, where about 80% of charters operate for-profit and where the state exercises minimal oversight of the charter sector.
“In 1999, an optometrist named Steven Ingersoll was among the first to see the potential in the charter industry. He developed his own pedagogy called Integrated Visual Learning and opened the first of four charters, Grand Traverse Academy. The board of directors were other optometrists who liked Ingersoll’s ideas. Certainly, optometrists would be drawn to a teaching method based on “visual learning.”
“There were chummy relationships among Ingersoll, the management company he hired, and board members:
“It was not until lawyers for the school began asking questions that the tangled financial relationship between Ingersoll’s management company and the charter he founded began to unravel, culminating in the most significant federal criminal case in the history of Michigan’s 20-year-old charter school industry. Ingersoll, who started Smart Schools Management, Inc., stands accused of illegally diverting construction loan money for another charter school to his private account, in part to pay back money he had taken from the Grand Traverse charter. His hand-picked members on the school board knew he had advanced himself money from Grand Traverse, but had no problem with the arrangement, school records show.
“Ingersoll will go on trial next month on seven criminal charges of bank fraud and tax evasion. The allegations of financial self-dealing and cozy relations between Ingersoll, his associates and board members could not come at a worse time for the Michigan charter movement. The state’s powerful, mostly for-profit charter school industry has found itself on the defensive since the Detroit Free Press published a devastating series last June chronicling how charters receive nearly $1 billion a year in state taxpayer money with little accountability or transparency on how that money is spent. The series detailed how board members at some charter schools were forced out when they pushed to learn more about finances from management companies, and how state law failed to prevent self-enrichment by those operating some low-performing charter schools.”
“One blogger, Anita Senkowski, doggedly followed the case of Steven Ingersoll and posted documents. Her blog is called “Glistening Quivering Underbelly,” where she calls herself Miss Fortune. She described Ingersoll as the poster boy for Michigan’s lack of charter oversight.”
Ingersoll was convicted and has been sentenced to 41 months in prison.

Will he serve 41 months or get out early. Remember those public school teachers in Atlanta, Georgia who went to prison for the cheating scandal. No money was involved, just test results that were changed. Three top administrators were sentenced to seven yea5r sin prison with 13 years probation. Five lower-ranked educators received one to two year prison terms.
How many other fraud and con men in the private sector education industry have been caught and never even made it to trial but just moved to another state or city and went right back into the same business?
What do we learn from this? If you’re going to break the law, steal money and don’t change test scores and it’s safer to break the law if you work in the private sector education industry than the public one. If you are an educator in the public education sector, you have a target on your back. If you are an educator in the private education sector, you have laws that protect your right to steal.
LikeLike
We live in an upside down country.
Thanks. Lloyd.
LikeLike
Yes, a pyramid with the sharp point at the top is occupied by the Trumps of the world, and they are standing on top of the rest us, smashing us down and compacting us toward the bottom.
LikeLike
This jumped out at me from the posting:
“The series detailed how board members at some charter schools were forced out when they pushed to learn more about finances from management companies, and how state law failed to prevent self-enrichment by those operating some low-performing charter schools.”
From rheephormish to plain English: what corporate education reformers call “policing themselves” amounts to singling/pushing out those in management positions that try to engage in ethical and responsible behavior.
Evidently they didn’t get—or refused to follow the guidelines of—their how-to guide, THE ART OF THE STEAL.
$tudent $ucce$$—ain’t it grand?
😎
LikeLike
There goes my retirement plan. My plan all along has been to start a virtual charter school and rake in the dough. What are my qualifications, zero, but does it matter?
LikeLike
This case is not just another one of the thousands of corrupt-charter cases, to me.
Ingersoll got his start at a charter in the center of my district, just north of Ann Arbor, persuading parents that their children’s learning difficulties could be remedied by glasses and a cockamamie, not-recommended-by-anyone pedagogical theory, “Integrated Visual Learning.” When I retired and moved upstate, here he was again, damaging the (very fine) districts up north, by using our tax dollars to fund the expansion of his corrupt empire.
Anita Senkowski is the go-to expert on this, for sure–and thanks for quoting the federal prosecutor. Here’s a clip from the local paper (which barely covered this story, even though it was local districts being harmed by funneling resources and students–the charter has 1200 students–away from genuine public schools):
‘ “It cost the GTA board nothing to acquiesce in Ingersoll’s manipulation of the GTA budget to conceal his diversion of funds that should have been used to educate GTA students,” prosecutors wrote. “By his conduct, however, Ingersoll did victimize the students, faculty and staff of the GTA, as well as the tax-paying public at both the federal and state level.”
Ingersoll told Ludington [the judge] he didn’t follow advice to keep proper records of transactions. Ludington praised Ingersoll’s character and accomplishments, but said he must account for his legal obligation to pay taxes on the transactions.’
Praised his character???? What the hell… As if this were just a bookkeeping mistake!
The federal prosecutor was a woman, by the way. And the judge–well, man-to-man, he seemed to think Ingersoll was just a well-meaning edupreneur, in it for the kids, who made some unfortunate accounting errors.
I attend Board meetings at this charter–and can testify that there’s blame to spread around. The GTA Board is and always has been compliant, and the authorizing university, Lake Superior State, deserves condemnation. THEY–under MI law–are responsible for maintaining ethical and academic standards. But they get nearly $300K annually for essentially attending quarterly Board meetings and walking around the (beautiful, new) buildings to make sure everything looks OK.
Here’s a blog I wrote earlier about Ingersoll and Grand Traverse Academy:
http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/teacher_in_a_strange_land/2016/10/seven_things_i_learned_from_attending_a_charter_school_board_meeting.html
LikeLike