Pasi Sahlberg is the great Finnish educator whose book Finnish Lessons gave us a vision of a nation that succeeds without high-stakes testing, without standardized testing, and without charter schools or vouchers. He wrote of highly educated teachers who have wide scope and autonomy in their classrooms and who collaborate with their colleagues to do what is best for their children. He wrote of a national school system that values the arts, physical activity, and play. And, lo and behold, the OECD calls it the best school system in the world!
So entranced was I but what I read about Finland that I visited there a few years ago and had Pasi as my guide. The schools and classes were everything he claimed and more.
Pasi, like many other education experts, is aghast at the GERM (Global Education Reform Movement) that has swept the world. The agency that has spread GERM far and wide is international testing, the great horse race that only a few can win. Since most are losers, the frenzy for more testing becomes even stronger.
Pasi suggests a different approach. Instead of Big Data, produced by mass standardized testing, why not search for small data?
Here is Pasi’s thumbnail sketch of the contrast between Big Data and small data:
Big data is a commonly used term in daily discourse that often comes with a label that big data will transform the way we think, work, and live. For many of us, this is an optimistic promise, while for others it creates anxiety and concern regarding control and privacy. In general terms, big data means data of very large size to the extent that its manipulation and management present significant practical challenges.
The main difference between big and small data in education is, of course, the size of data and how these data are collected and used. Big data in education always requires dedicated devices for collecting massive amounts of noisy data, such as specific hardware and software to capture students’ facial expressions, movements in class, eye movements while on task, body postures, classroom talk, and interaction with others. Small data relies primarily on observations and recordings made by human beings. In education, these include students’ self-assessments, teachers’ participatory notes on learning process, external school surveys, and observations made of teaching and learning situations.
To watch and listen to Pasi, introduced by Howard Gardner, here is the lecture he gave at Wellesley College in October.

Hi Diane,
There’s an interesting interview with him in the Singapore Times about why he thinks Finland is losing ground on the PISA tests: http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/whats-behind-finlands-pisa-slide
I thought this part was REALLY spot-on:
First, there has been a visible and alarming downward trend in Finnish schoolboys’ educational performance during the past decade. This inconvenient phenomenon is stronger in Finland than in any other OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) country.
As a result, Finland is the only country where girls significantly outperform boys not only in reading but also in maths and science. One factor that explains this is related to the diminished role of reading for pleasure among boys.
Finland used to have the best primary school readers in the world until the early 2000s, but not any more. Pisa test items rely heavily on the test-taker’s reading comprehension. Appearance of handheld technologies like smartphones among school-aged children in this decade has probably accelerated this trend.
Second, rapidly increased “screen time” with media is often eating into the time spent with books and reading in general. According to some national statistics, most teenagers in Finland spend more than four hours a day on the Internet (not including time with TV) and the number of heavy Internet and other media users (more than eight hours a day) is increasing just as it is doing in the United States, Canada and beyond.
Emerging research on how the Internet affects the brain – and thereby learning – suggests three principal consequences: shallower information processing, increased distractibility and altered self-control mechanisms. If this is true, there is reason to believe increasing use of digital technologies for communication, interaction and entertainment will make concentration on complex conceptual issues, like those in maths and science, more difficult. Interestingly, most countries are witnessing this same phenomenon of digital distraction among youth.
LikeLike
Aren’t Asian kids totally absorbed by the Internet and all the Wi-Fi electronic gizmos?
LikeLike
Not in class. The top Asian countries on the PISA test (taking that for what it is worth) mostly have low tech classrooms. http://www.oecd.org/edu/students-computers-and-learning-9789264239555-en.htm
LikeLike
Quote: Roughly one in 10 South Korean children between the ages of 10 and 19 are addicted to the internet, according to most recent government data via Reuters. In a new report, VICE estimates that number could be as high as 50%. end quote
http://www.businessinsider.com/south-korea-online-gaming-addiction-rehab-centers-2015-3
South Korea has low tech classrooms?
LikeLike
Joe–see here: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-students-computers-korea.pdf
LikeLike
Asians often hire specialized tutors for their children. It is a measure of status in their communities. They program and drill the kids to the exclusion of other activities. I know an ESL teacher that made more money tutoring Koreans than she made as a public employee.
LikeLike
OK, David. From your link: Computers do not have as much of a presence in Korean schools as they do on average across OECD countries. In 2012 there was only one school computer available for every five 15-year-old students in Korea (students-per-computer ratio: 5.3-to-1). Some 48% of students reported using the Internet connection at their school, but only two out of five students (41.9%) reported using computers at school – the lowest percentage among all countries participating in PISA. End quote.
Call me shocked. S. Korea is so technologically advanced with faster Internet connections than the US and yet does not have as much school computer density as the other OECD countries. Who knew?
LikeLike
Joe–So your point is what? In class computer usage in most East Asian countries is less than the OECD average and in places like the US.
Out of school, maybe they pleasure read or not–I don’t know, but that would be their systems rather than the Finnish model. According to Sahlberg, in Finland (and I’d argue in the US), more devices have undermined a number of important educational goals.
However, I’m uncomfortable with you taking a stereotype with no support and trying to make some kind of point that is beyond what the quote I gave from Sahlberg said.
LikeLike
And here you go: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisainfocus/48624701.pdf
Korean kids read more for pleasure than American kids. East Asian countries performing well on PISA read more for pleasure than the US as well. So much for “Asian kids totally absorbed by electronic gizmos” stereotype, no?
LikeLike
David, no stereotype: From my other comment: In a new report, VICE estimates that number could be as high as 50%. end quote
http://www.businessinsider.com/south-korea-online-gaming-addiction-rehab-centers-2015-3
Argue with the S. Koreans.
LikeLike
Great comment, David. Thank you.
LikeLike
I don’t buy this excuse. As E.D. Hirsch points out in his new book, France and Sweden’s scores plummeted when they deviated from a coherent, national, content-focused curriculum. From the way Sahlberg talks about Finnish schools, I suspect there’s been a similar deviation from this kind of curriculum there. I think we’re seeing the baleful effects of the introduction of the content-lite, skills-centric Progressive education model that prevails in the US. When are we going to grasp the fact that reading ability is NOT a skill –it is a function of general knowledge? The kids with the most general knowledge are the best comprehenders. Think about it: how can anybody understand a text if they don’t know what the words mean? The best way to boost reading comprehension scores is to institute a coherent, cumulative, knowledge-based curriculum that builds general knowledge and its attendant vocabulary. It is folly to try to make good readers without systematically building knowledge and vocabulary.
LikeLike
A samplereading test will prove Ponderosa’s point:
A pair of centuries and some late wickets put South Africa in a strong position with Australia 4 for 112 at stumps on day two of the second Test in Port Elizabeth. South Africa was bowled out early in the final session for 423, after AB de Villiers (116) and JP Duminy (123) both ground out tough, vital centuries for the home side. Nathan Lyon finished with 5 for 130 after bowling tirelessly all day, while Australia’s fast bowlers uncharacteristically struggled on a lifeless pitch. Wayne Parnell’s (2 for 19) first three balls featured the wickets of Doolan and Marsh, as the left-armer made the most of his Test recall. Parnell coerced edges out of the Australia pair with fine line-and-length bowling, needing only a fraction of movement to earn the scalps. Warner and nightwatchman Nathan Lyon (12 not out) faced a number of close scares to reach stumps unbroken. De Villiers grassed a regulation chance behind the stumps when Warner was on 39, while Lyon was also dropped by the usually safe hands of Duminy and given not out when replays proved he nicked one behind to the keeper.
1) Which best describes the “fraction of movement” needed to earn scalps in this cricket match?
a) nicking behind the keeper
b) edging out a lifeless pitch
c) breaking fine-line wickets
d) stumping vital centuries
LikeLike
Big Data is overused today in public schools. Silicon Valley and giant testing companies are pushing states and school districts to buy their products. They keep making inflated claims about what products can do. Much of it like monitoring facial expressions is pure gibberish. Some of these big data systems are wasting teachers’ time and overburdening them in order to collect data, and the collection of the data is interfering with their ability to teach well. We have to get vendors and commercial products out of our schools, and put decisions about teaching in the hands of those that know how to do it.
I have always found small data far more useful and informative. I learned a lot about how students learn from observing them. As a result, I could often pinpoint where the student had difficulty and how to get the learner on the right track. It was immediate, useful feedback for the student, and the intervention had a lasting impact. Often the suggestions supported a strategy or helped students make a connection. Experienced teachers often know when a student is going through a difficult time due to a family, friend or a personal issue. They can help the student cope, or reach out to someone that can help the student. We used small data at our student study team meetings when we created class lists. We tried to match students with teachers and other students, and we tried to balance the classes for following year. It was not a perfect system, and it was somewhat subjective. For the most part, it worked because the teachers and principal making the lists knew the students well and knew about problems or issues.
LikeLike
Retired Teacher,
Your comments are spot on. In the USA, $$$$$ and power over others reign. In the USA, we have a FEW HAVES, and a whole lot of HAVE NOTS. The educational gap is an equity gap. Huge inequalties exist in these United States, but those in power do not want to address this major issue. The deformers like to blame the victims while they laugh all the way to the bank to store the $$$$$ from the lies they spout for their behalf.
LikeLike
No matter how many selective splinter charters we establish, we still will be unable to address the issues of poverty. That is why public schools are our best and enduring hope. We really don’t need splinter schools as most decent sized public schools offer way more choice. We need to fund schools more equitably. We also don’t need to bankrupt our communities to support a bunch of inefficient charters while we simultaneously defund education for 90% of the students. Destroying our public system is reckless, irresponsible and shortsighted. We should cap and control charters, and stop making them the center of the universe. Our policymakers should look firmly at the meager results from charters, and stop trying to force everyone to adopt them. Other students have a right to attend a well funded public school, just like in most other industrialized, western nations.
LikeLike
SNOW DAY!! Just finished shoveling a heap of snow. ate some bacon rolls (what the..?), drank a frappuccino and am listening to to Big Data’s song, “Dangerous”.
Note: link is to fan video of the song….the official clip is a bit too R -rated for this site.
Love small data. Like, we have 8 snow days and have now used 3. Or, how about the percentage of students (and teachers) hoping for day off today…..maybe 100%?
To quote Pasi: “One of the first things I learned in my classrooms was that many students, probably most of them, have self-created conceptions of science and images of mathematics. Students’ inner worlds are very difficult to capture in any other way than by helping them to think hard about their own minds and try to turn these thoughts then into tangible representations, such as stories and drawings.
I spent a lot of time then collecting small data, in and out of my classroom, to understand students’ own ideas about the mathematical and scientific worlds. Only after knowing what students imagine when they think about what mathematicians do (most of those are not positive images at all) I started to find better ways to make the world of mathematics accessible and understandable to students. Small data can help teachers to understand why some students don’t learn as well as they could in schools better than big data that most often show whether students learn or not what they are supposed to learn.”
Or, just self conceptions of school in general, right?
And, so why are so many students and teachers simply overjoyed to escape the drudgery that is so often “SCHOOL USA”? (My daughter has a friend who was praying to God on Facebook this morning that the roads would be impassable!) Now, that is certainly a good question for small data.
LikeLike
Yikes –Sahlberg’s writing reeks of American ed schools, of Progressivism and Constructivism –all discredited in my opinion. Kids would like school more if it were less about vapid navel-gazing writing prompts and dreary “skills-buliding” reading and math tasks, and more about learning about the world –the Great Barrier Reef, folks songs, life on a medieval manor, etc. In other words, if were more about learning fresh content than about drills and ruminating on one’s familiar self. Kids are born with skills; they’re not born with knowledge. That’s what they crave.
LikeLike
Kids have a general dislike of math as a subject of study; even many who are good at it. No “small data” needed, just some common sense.
Empty skills that they will rarely use.
Numbers without the meaning the human brain craves.
Very little knowledge that is new or interesting or important.
Its difficult for many as cognitive requirements often exceed brain development.
Topics are rarely if ever connected to real world applications.
Calling math a STEM topic is a practical joke – minus the humor.
LikeLike
Have Trump or DeVos met with a single public school leader, teacher, parent or student yet?
I know public schools are unfashionable and disfavored in ed reform circles but this is ridiculous.
They know 90% of kids attend the schools they’re smearing/ignoring, right?
We’re supposed to pay thousands of public employees to oppose the schools our kids attend? Why would we do that?
It’s fabulous that the entire DC establishment are head over heels in love with vouchers and charters but I don’t feel like paying these people to attack the schools 50 million children attend every day. Can we hire a private advocate at least?
LikeLike
Wow. Love the metaphor: “The agency that has spread GERM far and wide is international testing, the great horse race that only a few can win. Since most are losers, the frenzy for more testing becomes even stronger.”
LikeLike
Stop the navel exploration and begin teaching what the future wants to learn. Children own the future. Provide the opportunities for dreams to soar. Corporate control is disconnected from iterations of content.
LikeLike
The problem with this is that all evidence is subjective. This method of small data is riddled with bias. Just saying.
LikeLike
Read all the way to bottom .. .he was at Wellesley this fall!#!
LikeLike