Mike Rose is a gifted writer who has written many books about education, work, and culture.
In this post, he reflects on the meaning of the election. I exchanged emails with Mike, and he told me felt paralyzed by the election. And then he wrote this essay, which I think you will enjoy reading.
He begins like this:
Some friends and readers have been wondering why I haven’t written anything about the presidential election. The truth is I was numb with disbelief and anger and felt as hopeless about politics as I can remember feeling. What else was there to say other than the obvious: so much pain is going to be inflicted on so many. I also couldn’t get out of my head the fact that if a relatively small number of people in a handful of districts in a few states had voted or voted differently, this catastrophe of suffering would have been averted.
One of the things that has baffled me from the start of Donald Trump’s rise in the GOP primary is how he could become the darling of so many White working class voters. I know some segments of this population, particularly the people who worked in heavy industry in the Northeast, many of them, like me, are the children or the grandchildren of the Southern and Eastern European immigrants who came to the United States in huge numbers between 1880 and 1920: Italian, Polish, Slovakian. Many of my contemporaries’ children also worked in those industries as they were in decline, or didn’t get to work in them at all, for by the early 1980s (a decade before NAFTA), the processes of deindustrialization had begun. If someone like Donald Trump, pampered and entitled, a braggart, demanding and overbearing… if such a guy happened into their midst—perhaps his limousine broke down en route from Northeast Ohio to Western Pennsylvania—if such a thing happened, many of them would certainly not embrace him, and could well dislike him, for he represents everything contrary to the codes of behavior they grew up with, the kind of man they respect, the way you talk about yourself in public.
I know rural America much less well, though benefited tremendously when I stayed with local teachers in small towns during my travels for Possible Lives. I feel comfortable saying that the majority of the people I met in places like Southwestern Montana or the coal fields of Eastern Kentucky would have the same reaction to a Trump-like fellow descending into their midst. They would regard him with suspicion.
So what gives? Well, as numerous political commentators have noted, especially after the election, Donald Trump was saying what a lot of people wanted to hear. The messenger didn’t matter.
Trump said many things, most of them shockingly blatant—no subtle dog whistling, except, perhaps, with anti-Semitism—assailing Mexicans, Muslims, undocumented immigrants, women, you know the list. His pocketbook appeal to working-class voters was his anti-trade message—which got intimately wrapped up in anti-immigrant, nativist language—and his bold proclamations that he was going to bring jobs back to economically devastated regions. And though it gets much less mention than the White working class issue, we should not overlook the fact that many in the traditional Republican base who are not blue-collar folk at all—the banker next door to me, the flower shop owner in Omaha, the dentist in Atlanta—voted in large numbers for Trump even though they might have done so reluctantly. He would reverse the Obama policies they don’t like, cut taxes and regulations, put conservatives on the Supreme Court. A lot of White Republican women voted for Mr. Trump, defying predictions that his loutish behavior would drive them into the Clinton camp, or at least lead them to not vote on the top of the ticket. And, Good Lord, Evangelical Christians overwhelmingly supported our Sinner-in-Chief, justifying their vote with talk of forgiveness and redemption. Certainly on their minds were social issues and the Supreme Court. While some high-profile Republicans—foreign policy experts or big players like Meg Whitman—supported Clinton, most Republicans voted for Trump, with some opting for third party candidates. What elites wanted in this election—elites from the Never Trump GOP types to Katy Perry and LeBron James—was rejected in an angry spasm by those who felt ignored one time too many. In the bitterest of ironies, they voted for the most elite candidate of the lot, cocooned in a world of chandeliers and self-absorption.
Please read on.

Citizens United
Dark Money, Dark Money, Dark Money
Manipulation Manipulation Manipulation
Toxic Sludge Is Good For You
And So Are Weapons Of Mass Deception
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agree totally with Mike Rose. Will Trump be the American version of Putin? Only time will tell. One thing is for certain, Trump and his gang of far right wing gargoyles will do incredible damage that will last for many decades. Trump just appointed Carson to HUD! This is so typical of Trump, who has no governmental experience, appointing yet another yahoo who has no qualifications to be head of HUD or any agency.
LikeLike
“Good Lord, Evangelical Christians overwhelmingly supported our Sinner-in-Chief, justifying their vote with talk of forgiveness and redemption.”
If these Evangelical Christians can forgive Trump for his obvious and many documented sins that have a long repeated history, then why couldn’t they forgive Hillary for her alleged sins that have never been proven or only existed in myth and rumor?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Elections are often about the “cult of personality.” Tough talking Trump with his seventh grade vocabulary, despite his silver spoon pedigree, was more relatable than Hillary, especially to most rust belt voters.
LikeLike
I’ve read that his analyzed vocabulary is 4th grade.
LikeLike
That may be the case. Let’s say he has a talent of talking to those less education. He “loves the uneducated.”
LikeLike
Lloyd, we know the answer to your question, don’t we? I am not a Christian, but I do know the message of Jesus was one of love. They have lost it. What would Jesus say to them now?
LikeLike
If Jesus came back and told the Evangelical Christians what they are doing and thinking is wrong; that they are not practicing what he taught, they’d tar-and-feather him before they crucified him again, and deny he was Jesus.
If God appeared as a burning bush and spoke to them, they’d dump fire retarding and ice water on the burning bush and claim it was a trick.
There is only one way that Jesus/God might get their attention and that is to turn all of their false prophet leaders, including Trump, into pillars of salt. If that didn’t work, there’s always the 2nd flood, but thanks to Trump and the ignorant, deplorable,climate change denying Alt-Right, the flood is probably on its way.
Let’s not forget that Jesus Christ was not white. He was middle eastern with roots in North Africa, Egypt. The real Jesus would never fit the pure-white, saintly image that the Evangelical Christians have of him.
LikeLike
Trump would deport Jesus under suspicion of being a “terrorist.”
LikeLike
Trump would call Jesus a terrorist, a rapist, and a crook. In addition to that, with the racial profiling Trump wants to use against minorities and anyone who doesn’t look like a stereotypical white person, Jesus might end up being shot as a suspected illegal alien/terrorist. In fact, with all the revised images of Jesus making him look like a pure white and saintly, few if any would accept the real Jesus if he returned as prophesied. They’d take one look at Him and reject him.
LikeLike
“Let’s not forget that Jesus Christ was not white. He was middle eastern with roots in North Africa, Egypt.”
And he was Jewish to boot!
LikeLike
True, and the Christian religion wasn’t born for a few hundred more years until a Roman Emperor in Constantinople decided to create that Jewish sect that has exploded into thousands of Christian sects that are mostly unaware of their Jewish roots and Jewish alleged God called Jesus Christ.
LikeLike
when “god” is a cover for selfish endeavor
LikeLike
Keep getting the wrong message. Good luck in 2020 (and 2018 for that matter). Fact is that Trump got fewer votes than both Romney and McCain. It’s not that massive numbers of people turned out to vote for Trump. It’s that people didn’t turn out to vote for Hillary. She got about 9 million fewer votes than Obama did in 2008 (and U.S. population has increased by about 17 million in that time period). When you start wondering where those 9 million voters went, you’ll be closer to getting the answer right.
(Oh, I know, I know. The media! The Russians! Vast right-wing conspiracy! Bernie Bros! The Electoral College!)
LikeLike
I don’t think voter suppression and gerrymandering that mostly favor the GOP are myths. Hillary didn’t get the voter turnout in the areas that would have given her the electoral college vote. By a very thin margin, a bloc of Americans favored an obvious reactionary demagogue who has no respect for the truth and lies on a monumental epic scale. In one of his speeches during the campaign, he referred to Bernie as a maniac, as a socialist, communist really (his words): From the guardian – Speaking in Cleveland, Ohio, on Saturday, Donald Trump calls Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders a communist and says Sanders supporters are ‘troublemakers’. On Saturday night, crowds outside Trump’s rally in Kansas City were pepper sprayed while the cancellation of a rally in Chicago on Friday led to clashes and angry confrontations between protesters and Trump supporters…https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2016/mar/13/donald-trump-calls-bernie-sanders-a-communist-at-cleveland-rally-video
LikeLike
Suppression yes, but this should have been a blow away
LikeLike
And it should have been a blow away for Russ Feingold, too. And it wasn’t.
Frank Bruni has a good article about how voters in Ohio split their votes for huge margins to vote for a Republican incumbent Senator offering them exactly what they wanted.
The fact that voters in Wisconsin chose not to vote for Russ Feingold is because of what Russ Feingold represented or what he was made to represent by the characterization in the media. They preferred the right wing incumbent who offered nothing.
You can cover your ears and scream “Russ Feingold was a bad candidate – we need better ones for Wisconsin that white Christian voters will run to vote for” but if you pretend that Hillary Clinton is to blame for voters rejecting liberals and you insist that Bernie Sanders would have won Wisconsin in a landslide, then you are simply hanging your hopes on nothing. Sure ignore the FBI, voter suppression, the alt right characterizations of democrats being picked up by the media, and just pretend if it was only Bernie he would have won by a landslide.
But please explain why voters in Ohio split their vote by a huge margin to vote for the Senator they wanted, while Russ Feingold could not even muster the Jill Stein plus Hillary votes and got even fewer than Hillary did.
LikeLike
NYC public school parent
December 5, 2016 at 6:22 pm
Because democratic voters stayed home. .
LikeLike
I agree. Hillary failed to inspire much enthusiasm among many groups including teachers.
LikeLike
So did Russ Feingold. Lucky for the right wingers that voters in Ohio loved Ron Johnson — including teachers — and so many of them split their vote.
LikeLike
“It is much easier for them to keep on flogging Trump…”
Trump is the president elect, should I just ignore that fact and do the much more important job of smashing the evil demon (Hillary), birthed from the lowest sphincter of Satan (he’s got more than one sphincter). I apologize mostly deeply for being a puss filled blob of obtuseness. Dienne and Allen have a monopoly on truth, they know best, all others shut up.
LikeLike
I’m just pulling this off Wikipedia, and I’m not suggesting any particular inferences that can be made from these numbers, but I’m seeing Trump with more votes than either Romney or McCain. And I’m seeing Clinton with about 4 million (not 9 million) votes than Obama in 2008, and only 670,000 fewer than Obama in 2012.
2008: 69,498,516 (Obama) 59,948,323 (McCain)
2012: 65,915,795 (Obama) 60,933,504 (Romney)
2016: 65,240,114 (Clinton) 62,686,675 (Trump)
LikeLike
I think the reference to Trump getting fewer votes than Obama means votes by the only Americans that count — the ones who live in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
Because Hillary couldn’t garner as many of the votes of the important people who live in those states — especially the ones who voted for Jill Stein because they knew Bernie Sanders was a sell-out and was lying through his teeth when he asked them to vote for Hillary — she is less than nothing. Worthless. Crooked Hillary. And it’s the fault of the people who dared to support her candidacy when we should have known that Bernie Sanders would bring us to nirvana. Because those Wisconsin voters who preferred the right wing Republican who served only the .001% over Russ Feinberg were sure to vote for Bernie. They absolutely 100% beyond a shadow of a doubt know that just because a voter despises Russ Feingold and votes for a right wing Republican who has done nothing for them in the past, is no reason to think that very same voter won’t absolutely adore Bernie.
LikeLike
Yes, Joe, you nailed it.
That is what anyone who thinks Hillary is no different than Trump is supposed to do.
LikeLike
Stephen Hawking’s comment on Trump.
When asked to explain the rise of support for Trump, appearing on ITV’s Good Morning Britain the esteemed scientist said: “I can’t”.
“He is a demagogue, who seems to appeal to the lowest common denominator,” he added.
Hawking also warned that Brexit would put the country at risk of recession.
Also: on the internet news today is a full article on this; It is well worth reading. type in Stephen Hawking/the Guardian and it will come upl
Stephen Hawking: ‘This is the most dangerous time for our planet’
Stephen Hawking, The Guardian
15h
161,089
LikeLike
Mike Rose said: “I also couldn’t get out of my head the fact that if a relatively small number of people in a handful of districts in a few states had voted or voted differently, this catastrophe of suffering would have been averted.” Tsk, tsk, Mike, according to certain people on this blog you are obtuse, hypocritical and blind to the evil that is Hillary and the Democratic party.
I agree with Mike’s statement.
Equating Trump to Hillary is blanking foolish. Supreme court, abortion, climate change, LGBQT rights, tax cuts for the rich, etc. That does not make Hillary a saint or progressive but it makes her several magnitudes better than Trump. Yes, he is that bad.
LikeLike
Joe is right on the money and so is Mike Rose, author of
Lives on the Boundary which I had the pleasure years ago to review
for “Caliornia English.” To quote our Nobel Lauerate,
“It’s a hard rains a gonna fall.” and “there are guns and sharp
knives in hands of young children,” and a sociopath as president
of the United States and pure idiocy to think Trump doesn’t mean
what he says or that Hillary was not a better choice than this
billionaire phony.
LikeLike
Mike Rose has done a wonderful job of reminding us of the hazards of looking for simple answers to the election of Trump. Retrospective analyses of who voted for him, where they live, income, education, and various affiliations all point to a big role for people living in what is called the rust belt.
But that is too simple.
Mike also makes a great point on the need for Democrats to find some leaders who have credibility as people with real work experience. Real workers used to be thought of as people in occupations such as labor unions. But labor unions have lost credibility as sources of political leadership. Too many have shown a studied indifference to issues that matter to their members.
Tycoons have also sought the demise of union voice. Billionaire Betsy DeVos is just one example, She played a key role in the election of Scott Walker, the master basher of unions, especially teacher unions.
Mike Rose also reminds us that images matter. In Ohio, he leader of the Democratic party, David Pepper, is the son of the retired CEO of P&G. David is a professional politician, not always successful…a “public servant” of sorts, well educated, savvy on many issues, J.D. from Yale. If Ann Richards were still with us, she would probably say he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. Davis is not a great spokesperson for people who work in blue and pink collar jobs, or any of the many people who work in social services, including teachers, nurses, firefighters, police officers, our volunteers for the military.
I know that David’s father and mother have been major contributors to social service programs and social justice causes in our community. David has followed that path as well, evident in the post below. Even so, I am troubled by the flow of incoming boilerplate and survey monkey quickies from the Democratic Party. None of these salvos ask for much beyond money and a ranking of predetermined topics (so general they are meaningless). Then there is the assured boilerplate response to my letters sent to legislators and members of Congress asking for greater support, overt, and targeted to public education.
This is to say that I understand some of the cynicism about professional politicians and the sludge in government. I am also aware of the limited number of causes that any single person can be devoted to, if they are able and inclined to think about anything other than “today and tomorrow and next week.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-pepper/a-report-from-ohio-john-k_b_9533554.html
LikeLike
No more RFKs or Ted Kennedy’s for the Democrats. Only Republicans can have candidates of the “working man” who are born with silver spoons.
LikeLike
” I also couldn’t get out of my head the fact that if a relatively small number of people in a handful of districts in a few states had voted or voted differently, this catastrophe of suffering would have been averted.”
“I remember the unease I felt soon after the 2008 election when I saw either a photograph or video clip of President Obama talking with what might have been his Council of Economic Advisors, Austan Goolsbee and people like that. University of Chicago types. Suits. Something visceral in me registered no. These people are very smart but light years away from the guy on the forklift, the woman in a cannery. Find at least a few advisors with that level of economic expertise who also have an intellectual as well as emotional connection to the warehouse and the factory floor. ”
Funny I had a bit more than unease . It was more like a visceral reaction that kept coming back for eight years . It was only tempered by the fact that catastrophe had to be avoided at all costs. But the knowledge was always there that eventually:
“a relatively small number of people in a handful of districts in a few states”
whose economic well being was being ignored and whose suffering was being trivialized were going to bring a
“catastrophe of suffering”
http://www.starnewsonline.com/business/20080612/union-critical-of-obamas-top-economics-aide
Lets correct some fake news while we are here and talking about the working class .
This morning Richard N. Haass, from the council of foreign relations. (I do have to stop watching Morning Joe as they normalize Trump) talking about Trade and factory jobs made a statement about the Robots taking the jobs of the future. He may be right, we will have to deal with driver-less trucks and fully automated assembly someday . But China was not building a city a week to house and employ R2D2 or CP3O. The jobs that Carrier is sending to Mexico are not going into robotic factories.
So yes the Democrats refusal to take their heads out of their butts. Will cause those that they have pretended to have concern for immensely. No they have not tirelessly worked for the underdog for poor children or the poor. They have tirelessly worked for their donor class who will see that they are well rewarded once out of office.
So is it time to move on yes . Its time to move away from Identity politics and move on to economics. All of the issues around Identity politics are economic.What good is it to tell a woman or a minority that they have equal access to a job at equal pay if that job is not there. Somebody said that about a lunch counter and a sandwich.
LikeLike
Joel, I’m sorry but I truly do not understand your point when you say “They have tirelessly worked for their donor class who will see that they are well rewarded once out of office.”
Who worked MORE for the donor class the past 8 years, the Democrats or the Republicans?
Please explain why those voters would keep rewarding the Republicans who have worked only for the donor class? Especially when they are running against progressive Democrats who didn’t.
How many progressive candidates have lost to the most right-wing Tea Party Republicans for the House and Senate since 2008? Why?
In fact, it is possible to take the lesson that if you want to be successful, you should simply copy the Republicans more and stop caring about anyone BUT the donor class! But also be sure to use racist tropes to make the white folks who are apparently the ones who we should all be pandering to think you like them better. None of that terrible “identity politics” that is the new nasty word for actually caring for anyone except white working class people who don’t really like non-whites, non-Christians, and uppity women (even if they are white and Christian) very much.
It is also possible that without the FBI and wikileaks and the disaffected Bernie voters (not all) helping to define Hillary as ONLY “the evil demon (Hillary), birthed from the lowest sphincter of Satan” (as Joe says above) she would have won by the landslide everyone expected.
And done a whole lot of good or at least tried her best to do so.
LikeLike
Please tell me how Hillary and Bill worked for children . Was it the welfare reform bill that put more children in deep poverty. Was it the Crime bill bill that packed our prisons with young non violent Black men. Perhaps it was NAFTA that shipped away 5million jobs plus the multiplier making it closer to 15 .Hollowing out the economy creating the greatest income inequality since the age of the robber Barons .
Maybe it was financial deregulation that wound up tanking the economy that we should be thanking her and bill for.
I know it was the Bankruptcy bill that put the creditors ahead of alimony and child support.
Nobody is comparing Hillary to Trump .except you.
Have it your way, maybe she should run again in 2020.
Keep looking for excuses Jill Stein got 1% of the vote Gary Johnson the right wing libertarian got 7% ,
Obama voters stayed home. Bernie voters held their nose and voted for Hillary.
LikeLike
I know we’re all getting sick of the autopsies, but this is a good one. Cohen is a generalist –he sees more broadly than most, which is important at times like these. I agree with his stinging indictment of liberal elites’ arrogance at the end.
LikeLike
At least one elector will stand tall, refuse to vote Trump.
https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.nytimes.com/2016/12/05/opinion/why-i-will-not-cast-my-electoral-vote-for-donald-trump.amp.html?client=safari
LikeLike
He explains why, Trump unfit.
Is this precedented???
LikeLike
KISS.
Fear of Muslim immigrants and losing jobs to immigrants.
Anti-abortion judges appointed
Overturn TPP
Overturn “socialized” medicine
Create winning military
Negotiate tough to a world taking advantage of “us”
No need to over analyze. Candidate paid attention to electoral votes.
LikeLike