Peter Greene wrote this column a year ago, but it remains pertinent as ever.
Reformers like to say that the student should have “a backpack full of cash” (there is a terrific new documentary with that title, exposing the harm that school choice does to children and public schools).
Peter takes that canard on:
One of the foundational assertions of the charter movement is that public school tax dollars, once collected, should be attached to the child, maybe in a backpack, or perhaps surgically. “This public money… belongs to the student, not the failing school” wrote a commenter on one of my HuffPost pieces today. And I’ve heard variations on that over and over from charter advocates.
The money belongs to the student.
I’ve resisted this notion for a long time. The money, I liked to say, belongs to the taxpayers, who have used it to create a school system that serves the entire community by filling that community with well-educated adults who make better employees, customers, voters, neighbors, parents, and citizens. But hey– maybe I’ve been wrong. Maybe that money, once collected really does belong to the student. In which case, let’s really do this.
Let’s let the student spend his voucher money (and let’s stop pussyfooting around this– when we talk about the money following the students, we’re talking about vouchers) on the education of his dreams.
Does she want to go to the shiny new charter school? Let her go (as long as they’ll take her, of course). But why stop there? Travel has long been considered a broadening experience– what if she wants to take the voucher and spend it on a world cruise? Why not? It’s her money. Perhaps she wants to become a champion basketball player– would her time not be well spent hiring a coach and shooting hoops all day? Maybe she would like to develop her skills playing PS4 games, pursuant to a career in video-game tournaments. That’s educational. In fact, as I recall the misspent youth of many of my cohort, I seem to recall that many found smoking weed and contemplating the universe to be highly educational. I bet a voucher would buy a lot of weed….
Heck, let’s really go all in. Why use the odd fiction of a voucher at all– let’s just collect taxes and cut every single student an annual check for $10,000 (or whatever the going rate is in your neighborhood). Let’s just hand them the money that we’re asserting belongs to them, and let them spend it as they wish. Maybe they’d like a nice couch, or a new iPad, or a sweet skateboard, or a giant voucher party, or food and clothing for themselves and their family.
He goes on from there. Read it and learn why that backpack full of cash is a dopey idea.

Plus there is the premise that some students need more resources than other students, like special ed, or children who have less enrichment ages 0 to 5 or 0 to 15. In any choice system where there are separate educational providers drawing from the same public pool of money, it is quite important to dial in the fair amount for each type of student. Otherwise, whomever takes the students with unfunded federal and state mandates will lose.
LikeLike
I guess it’s about as “dopey” as giving a citizen a backpack full of tax credits and letting them only spend it on the healthcare plan of their choice, eh?
LikeLike
As dopey as evaluating teachers using test scores.
LikeLike
I once looked at an apartment for rent that was beneath another apartment where 8 kids were supposedly being home schooled, yet both parents were at work all day everyday. That meant the older kids were left in charge of the younger ones, but it was very noisy and chaotic and sounded more like they were moving furniture than studying. The landlady said she never saw evidence that there was much learning actually taking place.
I can just imagine how many people would grab the thousands of dollars that would be provided each year for them to home school each of their kids, but never spend much time really teaching them. For some, it would be just too lucrative an opportunity to pass up, especially since home schooling is minimally regulated, if regulated at all. That could conceivably become a new form of welfare, regardless of family income, since vouchers are not means-tested.
LikeLike
This would happen along with countless other scams that converted some of the voucher to cash for the parents.
LikeLike
So let’s take this to an even more absurdist extreme.
If someone has never had to call 911 for fire service or an ambulance, let’s give them back any tax dollars they have paid that have gone to those services.
If someone does not drive a car or take public transportation, give them back any tax money they have paid to maintain the roads and any tax dollars that go to subsidizing public transportation.
And on and on and on.
We are all in this together, and just because people do not have children (or children in public schools), doesn’t mean that they, in the long run, and society in general, do not benefit from having a well-educated citizenry.
Apparently, Ayn Rand is alive and well today. Everyone for themselves, and the he!! with the rest of you.
LikeLike
Zorba: you are not taking it to much of an absurd extreme…
Corporate education reform is in large part a massive re-education plan designed to make even the thought of a “public good” impossible.
So don’t be too surprised when they start charging people for the air they breathe…
😎
LikeLike
{{Sigh}} I suppose so, KTA.
We should expect to see more and more push for privatizing things that are currently paid for by our tax dollars. Libraries. Roads (yes, there are toll roads, and bridges, but most are not- that will no doubt end). (And we already have many private, for-profit prisons in a lot of areas.) Etc, etc, and so forth.
Corporate education reform is not just to indoctrinate our kids against the idea of the public good, and it’s not just to make money for the gazillionaires (although that’s a lot of it), it’s also to produce good little worker-bees who will be content to do what they’re told, accept whatever salary and working conditions they’re offered, and vote how they’re told.
😦
LikeLike
Vouchers, a Mad-Max approach to “public” education.
LikeLike
We believe in variety in education which can mean a classical education. Accordingly, my grandson is in the fourth grade at the Nova Classical Academy in St. Paul, Minnesota, a charter school. Check out the school’s website. I was delighted when his mother sent me a YouTube video of him reciting a Belloc poem. And he is learning cursive handwriting.
LikeLike