Myra Blackmon, veteran journalist, writes that people from all backgrounds in Georgia joined to defeat Amendment 1, the governor’s plan to change the state constitution to allow the state to take over low-scoring schools and turn them into charter schools. Whatever their race or their place, Georgians didn’t want to give up local control of their public schools.
Now that the ALEC plan for state takeover has gone down to defeat, Blackmon has some positive ideas for helping the 127 schools that were picked for state takeover.
First, we can use the same techniques to insist the Legislature fully fund the Quality Basic Education formula that promises equitable and sufficient funding for all schools. Changing the formula will do no good if we don’t know what would happen if we actually funded the one we have had in place for decades. We must also insist that money that would have been spent on the Opportunity School District be used to help those 127 schools on the original target list.
Second, we must advocate for allowing the state Department of Education to do its job. As state School Superintendent Richard Woods outlined in a recent piece, the state DOE has the knowledge and expertise to help struggling schools improve their performance. In recent years, however, the governor and the Legislature have regularly bypassed the DOE and its elected head, imposing new rules and ignoring any input from the one department of state government that has the personnel, experience and reach most likely to help solve our problems.
Third, we must insist on appropriate assessment of school performance. The College and Career Ready Performance Index is being misused to “grade schools” as passing or failing when it was designed to simply measure growth. Further, the CCRPI wrongly relies almost entirely on the results of the Georgia Milestones standardized tests.
Throwing money at schools doesn’t help them, but neither does starving them of resources they need. New funding should be used wisely to reduce class sizes, to hire experienced teachers, give them the supplies and support they need, and retain them, and to make sure that children have a full and rich curriculum, including the arts.
Getting the politicians out of the way of educators is a swell idea. For some reason, state legislators think they should tell educators how to do their job; they are wise enough not to do that to any other profession.
Blackmon points out that the Georgia tests have changed frequently and have never been useful for teachers or students.
Despite the hundreds of millions of our tax dollars invested in the Georgia Milestones, the tests have never been validated as reliable measures of education. That is, they have never been put through the statistical process that guarantees that the questions actually measure what they are intended to. For the last two years, at least portions of the test results have been completely unusable; the tests themselves have changed annually and the results provide no diagnostic information to help teachers zero in on what students need. The test is used punitively when a more effective use would be to provide individual data that would allow schools to tailor instruction to student needs.
Last, she suggests that all the energy that went into defeating Amendment 1 should now be channeled to help the schools and school boards do a better job for the children.
Such common sense is rare these days and much needed.

There has been a movement for the state to take over low performing public schools and turn them into charter schools. How come there is not a similar movement for the state to likewise take over low performing charter schools and turn them into public schools? Doesn’t the faith in competition apply equally? Is it only public schools that can benefit from the competition initiative?
LikeLike
A wonderful question. May it be repeated.
LikeLike
State takeover is a joke. Then, as we have seen, they usually call their charter pals to slice and dice the corpse of public funding, which then gets squandered on market based garbage. The people in Georgia should read the Camins article and work to implement many of his suggestions. We need to consolidate our resources, not dilute them.
LikeLike
It’s great to see a plan. I forwarded it to my list. As we in California see every indication that the charter lobby will try to remove control from locally elected school boards, its helpful to see an articulated opposition.
LikeLike
As a teacher and resident in the state of Georgia, I advocated and voted against Amendment 1. My first reaction to the amendment was that I was appalled (but not surprised) by the wording that was used. I believe that it was written in such a way to confuse voters and appeal to their desire to help all students. However, when we took a harder look at the proposed law, it was more about power of education being taken away from all the local stakeholders and placed solely in the Governor’s hands. I believe that education should be kept in the hands of local stakeholders. It it those people who know how to best help their own schools and students. I agree with Blackmon. Now that we have defeated Amendment 1, we need to come together to create new ideas that will help our schools and students.
LikeLike