Rachelle Horowitz was the transportation director of the l963 March on Washington. She was arrested protesting lunch counter discrimination on Route 40, Maryland, protesting Soviet Nuclear Testing at the Russian Embassy in New York City, protesting anti-labor and discriminatory policies at the World’s Fair in Queens, New York, protesting Apartheid at the South African Embassy in Washington, D.C. She was the Administrative Director of the A. Philip Randolph Institute and Political Director of the American Federation of Teachers. She sits on the board of the National Democratic Institute.
Thinking about a protest vote?
An open letter from an old protest voter to new ones
Dear Protest Voter,
I was once you.
In l960 when John F. Kennedy ran against Richard Nixon, I was 21. I was about to cast my first vote for President of the United States.
In my heart, I knew John F Kennedy was a far better choice to lead our country than Richard Nixon. I was a civil rights activist, a democratic socialist, a protester and JFK was not radical or even liberal enough for me. So I wrote in Norman Thomas.
After voting I helped organize a protest march and rally for civil rights in New York City. We were demanding an end to segregation and discrimination. The speaker was a southern hero, the Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth. He had risked his life – literally – that morning by voting in Birmingham, Alabama, and had then flown to New York to speak at our rally.
We chatted a little as he waited to speak, and he casually mentioned how happy he was to have voted for JFK. I confessed my Norman Thomas write-in. He was incredulous and horrified. I felt like a silly, white, northerner who had the luxury to protest while his life and the fate of the nation was at stake.
I knew then that I would never waste another vote. I would protest; I would march; I would let my opinion be known. But when there were lives at stake, I would not demand political purity or total agreement with what I thought was right.
Sadly, I didn’t get a second chance to vote for JFK. Years later, I became active in Ted Kennedy’s 1980 campaign. My husband and I became his friends. Yet, I never had the courage to tell him about l960.
Well, its 56 years later. I don’t think Hillary is perfect.
But I do think she is plenty good enough… And I hope you don’t waste your vote.
I wrote in Norman Thomas in NYC – JFK won without me…
But in this election if you live in Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and a bunch of swing states, your vote may do more than weigh on your conscience. It may plunge this country into a Trumpian nightmare.
So get out there and protest, march, rally and lead this country in the right direction. But, please, make your vote count. You can’t afford not to.
Rachelle Horowitz

Thank you. It is much easier to vote a protest candidate when you aren’t part of the ethnic group that is likely to become the scapegoat when the faux policies of the candidate of hate don’t work.
LikeLike
My friend Gary who is 70 years old and a substitute teacher now in LAUSD, sent this to me last night, He says…..
“Does the left want Trump to win?
“I find myself feeling appalled, and sickened that so many on the left and progressives and Greens seem determined to help Trump get elected. Do they give a damn about what might happen to welfare benefits, social security, medicare, and paid home care for the elderly and special needs children, and free public education? I myself might lose MediCal and affordable health care if the Repugs and Trump rule. As flawed as it is, I probably would have died last fall if I didn’t get affordable health care. Defeating Republicans and their anti- welfare for the people agenda is real personal for me, not just political ideology.
I am convinced that MANY progressives and lefties are too self righteous in their ideology would rather see Hillary Clinton defeated and do not at all care about the consequences for the poor.
To many left progressives are too smug, affluent and comfortable and to far removed from the poor to think about the awful consequences of a Trump presidency and Republican triumph. Far to
little, is the left a working class movement that champions high wages for workers and a strong
firm saftey net, and free public education, but instead identifies with a middle class of pseudo liberal values of identity politics.
A defeat of Hillary Clinton might satisfy pseudo left aspirations for revenge on the establishment, but it might well mean the destruction of “the New Deal” social reforms, that a Democratic Party and congressional leadership helped to build.
Let’s not be ideological purists in our vote.
Chomsky says it well, to paraphrase, pragmatism is sanity.”.
Gary in the Valley”
Gary goes on to quote Noam Chomsky and the NY Times and other who are supporting Hillary…..
“Noam Chomsky: ‘I’m Criticized for Advocating a Politics of Fear. That’s Not Criticism. That’s Sanity.’
By Sam Tanenhaus, The New York Times
03 November 16
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/40064-noam-chomsky-im-criticized-for-advocating-a-politics-of-fear-thats-not-criticism-thats-sanity”
“Trump’s climate change denail and picking nuke hysteria as a priority.
Trump and His CEO Steve Bannon Make Plans
By Ronnie Dugger, Reader Supported News
05 November 16
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/40092-focus-ronnie-dugger-trump-and-his-ceo-steve-bannon-make-plans
At the time of this consultation [with Stephen K. Bannon, CEO ofTrump’s campaign] President Obama was participating in early stages of the worldwide climate-change summit in Paris. “Obama is worried about climate change,” Trump said to Bannon. “We have a President over there worried about climate change instead of worrying about
nuclear weapons coming into the middle of our cities,” said Trump.”
Gary, I know you read this blog and want you to know how much I respect your opinion. You are a gifted scholar and historian…and I hope you recover well from your recent surgery. I am in total accord with your words above. I am voitng for Hillary.
Ellen
LikeLike
I AM voting for Hillary…and intend to continue to be vocal and to work with Bernie (and Hillary) for progressive change. Thanks Bernie for all the fantastic ads in California where you urge YES on 61.
LikeLike
Thank you for posting this. Your friend Gary nails it.
LikeLike
I agree with Chomsky. We do not need a repeat of the 2000 election. Did Florida steal the election or was it the Nader factor? All we got from it was the Iraq war.
LikeLike
Rachelle Horowitz has an amazing history of being fully iengaged in the political life of the nation. I hope others are following in her footsteps.
LikeLike
Thanks for posting this Diane, Rachelle Horowitz has credibility and the credentials to speak forcefully for voting for HRC, warts and all. All we can do is hope that the progressives who will exercise their right of a protest vote will come to their senses. Rachelle Horowitz is not a sell out or a traitor to progressive ideals. She’s certainly not a dupe or a useful idiot, she’s just an intelligent realist and speaks the truth. I wish she could have debated Chris Hedges about this issue 4 months ago, would have been very interesting.
LikeLike
Sorry, Rachel, but there’s no such thing as a protest vote. There are only votes. No one is going to stand outside the voting booth and smack you for not voting for the “right” candidate. Down the road, you’ll live with the decision you make in that booth based on what I hope is the best information available. If that’s Trump or Clinton or Stein or Johnson or Sanders or someone else, you will have done your civic and ethical duty. If you vote strictly out of fear of the “greater evil,” you’ll have to live with that. I’m done with that sort of voting, particularly this time. There’s no “lesser evil,” by my calculus. Just two different, but very great evils that will help take us further down one of many wrong roads. We had our chance to do better and blew it or let it be stolen from us. Obama – the last ‘progressive savior,’ helped it happen. That we didn’t man and woman the barricades just indicates how much has changed since 1969 when it comes to not tolerating the intolerable.
LikeLike
When you believe there is absolutely no difference between Hillary Clinton being Secretary of State and Rudy Giuliani being Secretary of State, then the “greater evil” is certainly not voting for a 3rd party candidate that you can believe in.
LikeLike
Ouch…now it shows up three times…sorry…but this is hair raising info re Trump. Might change some minds about why we need to vote for Hillary. Today an LA Times article reports that she might have either or both of the current California Senators, Boxer and Feinstein, in her Cabinet.
LikeLike
This just in from The Hill….
NEW THIS MORNING — CAN YOU IMAGINE THESE SENATE CONFIRMATION HEARINGS?: Via NBC’s Katy Tur and Benjy Sarlin, Donald Trump’s plans for his Cabinet-in-waiting has been revealed. Trump is lining up names if he wins. Rudy Giuliani: attorney general; Newt Gingrich: secretary of State: RNC Chairman Reince Priebus: chief of staff; retired Lt. Gen Michael Flynn: Defense secretary or national security adviser; Trump finance chairman Steve Munchin: Treasury secretary; Republican National Committee finance chair Lew Eisenberg: Commerce secretary. Notably missing from the shortlist: The head of Trump’s transition team, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (!) http://nbcnews.to/2fLmTIu
LikeLike
Can you imagine Giuliani as Attorney General? How many here would end up in Guantanamo?
And how about Gingrich at Sect. of State? How long before we nuke N.Korea?
Today it is in the news that Trump wants a new triumvirate for world rule, the US, Russia, and China as the only Big Three…without NATO.
LikeLike
As counterweight to this letter, please see this article: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/11/spin-clinton-campaign-feminist-privilege-politics/
LikeLike
Thanks for the link. Betting few here will read it or, if they do, be able to respond to it rationally.
LikeLike
David…yes, this article from a Marxist perspective spells out how serious the problems are in America. And why activist progressives must watch Hillary carefully, and must encourage the Bernie initiatives to be part of her governing. However, the proven liabilities of a Trump administration are so much worse, and present a far more clear and present danger to our nation and to the world. And as Diane reminds us, there are only two viable choices tomorrow. I am sticking with Hillary.
LikeLike
As to what the article states: YEP!
Thanks for the link, David!
LikeLike
NEW THIS MORNING From The Hill — CAN YOU IMAGINE THESE SENATE CONFIRMATION HEARINGS?:
Via NBC’s Katy Tur and Benjy Sarlin, Donald Trump’s plans for his Cabinet-in-waiting has been revealed. Trump is lining up names if he wins. Rudy Giuliani: attorney general; Newt Gingrich: secretary of State: RNC Chairman Reince Priebus: chief of staff; retired Lt. Gen Michael Flynn: Defense secretary or national security adviser; Trump finance chairman Steve Mnuchin: Treasury secretary; Republican National Committee finance chair Lew Eisenberg: Commerce secretary. Notably missing from the shortlist: The head of Trump’s transition team, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (!) http://nbcnews.to/2fLmTIu
LikeLike
And this from lead DFER, Tilson, just now.
“I currently have made three bets totaling $10,510 that Hillary will win the election, and am willing to take $50,000 of action (i.e., another $39,490).
The bet is simple – no odds, just straight up: if Hillary wins, you make a donation to my favorite charity (KIPP charter schools), and if Trump wins, I make a donation to your favorite charity.
Just email me and name the amount you’d like to wager.
Full disclosure: pretty much every poll and betting site has Hillary at least a 2:1 favorite, so I think I’m making a bet in which the odds are good that you will be making a donation to my favorite charity, not the other way around.”
Glad this jerk has confidence that Hillary will win….but….
Interesting to see that Tilson, hedge fund manager, and KIPP leader, continues to gamble on even elections…not enough to use other people’s money, his clients, to be hedging the stock market which is pure betting. And this is the theme of his FREE MARKET pitch to support charter schools. Between Tilson and Lowe, lesser Americans like me, must always keep our wallets in our inside pockets.
LikeLike
Until I see evidence otherwise, I am going to remain hopeful that Hillary is not quite the “see no evil” promoter of charter schools that Obama is.
And while Trump could not praise the reformers enough, Hillary seemed to keep them at arm’s length. Maybe they were simply tucked away until she won and could hand over the DOE to them. But I suspect not. She is a wonk. I hope that makes her curious about what the critics are saying instead of being like Obama. Whose curiosity seemed to be “Arne tells me those critics are just disaffected suburban moms or union teachers so let’s dismiss them. My billionaire pals tell me we are good.”
Did “the 74” even make an endorsement until today?! Way to hedge their bets. No doubt they were hoping for Trump to give them free reign but when the FBI’s attempt to throw the election didn’t work, endorsing Hillary the day before the election, when many people already voted, seemed like a no-brainer.
Let’s hope that is an endorsement they regret terribly for the next 4 years.
LikeLike
“I’d rather vote for what I want and not get it than vote for what I don’t want and get it.”—-Eugene Victor Debs
LikeLike
By about 6:15 a.m. Central Time tomorrow I will have voted for Jill Stein for president. No, it isn’t a protest vote. Never have registered a “protest vote” whatever the hell that is. I vote for who I believe has the best overall platform that will be of benefit for the most, but especially those who have the least. In my view voting for either of the duopoly’s candidates is a vote against those interests therefore my conscientious vote for Stein.
And boy will I be glad to getting back to “discussing a better education for all”.
LikeLike
If Trump wins, and the Senate and House are Republican, discussing “a better education for all” will be secondary to making sure that this country remains a democracy.
But that’s just my humble opinion. Although I think Bernie would agree that education is going to way down in the priorities (as he himself made it).
LikeLike
Hi señor Swacker:
I hope that you did not miss the link about Dr. Jill Stein’s investment portfolio in which she earns dividend from all corrupted corporate that she condemns.
Here is a confirmation from Chuck Schumer, the senior United States Senator from New York
[start paragraph]
‘Clinton is one of the most accomplished people ever to run’
By Chuck Schumer, U.S. Senator for New York, Democratic party.
Hillary Clinton is one of the most accomplished people ever to run for the Presidency. I’m lucky enough to have seen those accomplishments up close from her time as Senator from New York and as Secretary of State.
Hillary Clinton was instrumental in helping secure $21 billion in federal aid to help New York rebuild after 9/11. She fought tooth and nail to protect the first responders who rushed into danger when the towers collapsed and was pivotal in the passage of legislation that helped those first responders who got sick get the care and treatment they deserved.
She worked night and day to protect and create jobs in New York, whether that was at the Niagara Falls Air Force base or the Center for Bioinformatics at the University of Buffalo. She also led the charge on
the Lilly Ledbetter Pay Equity Act, which is now the law of the land.
[end paragraph]
I hope that you would agree that the TEAM of Hillary and Tim are the best among all four presidential candidate’s teams. May
All shall pass to enjoy or to might MISS discussion about Public Education after November 9, 2016. May
LikeLike
Have my cup of tea ready to take with me and “The Wealth of Nations” to read as I go vote now. It will be a vote for Jill Stein!
LikeLike
And I haven’t been a fan of Chuck Shumer for many years.
LikeLike
.
“If you sit this election out and Trump wins by a few votes,”
“many people are going to be dealing with that reality for their entire lives.”
Bernie Sanders
LikeLike
With so any conscientious and thoughtful essays, this one is disgraceful. Voting FOR the candidate that most closely reflects your beliefs, instead of voting against a candidate, is the most patriotic thing you can do. I will proudly vote for the third party candidate I think will be the best for our country and so should everyone.
Oh, and by the way, not everyone who thinks charter schools are bad are socialists or progressive! Oh contrare!!!
LikeLike
To FH33:
Please be sanity and educate yourself American regulation of two major parties system.
GOP has the severe choice in Trump. You do not need to waste your vote on third party that does not have enough representatives to approve and pass its President’s meaningful Act or Bill to help citizens with better living conditions = LIP-SERVICES
The worst of all is that Trump DID NOT respect GOP, but he would co-operate with Russian + Chinese mobs to harm all Americans and the world = fascism.
Please remember that in POLLUTED water, all fishes regardless of being strong or weak, ALL DIE sooner or later or immediately = all rich or poor, all educated or illiterate, ALL are controlled by fascism, including Trump and his lusty manner. All will pay the stiffened price for being gullible, theoretical and naive. Back2basic
LikeLike