Robin Darling Young, a native of Hampton, Virginia, writes in Commonweal magazine about the frightening possibility that Trump has rekindled the spirit of white nationalism and race hatred that she knew so well in her youth. https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/fence-water
“To comprehend fully the anarchic spectacle of Donald Trump—a show unhindered by the guiding political and religious institutions of the United States—it helps to have been a young white woman growing up a half century ago, as I did, inside the border of the Old Confederacy. In my Tidewater hometown of Hampton, Virginia, democratic hopes were abundant. The twenty years after World War II had seen American progressivism pry open the old Southern social order and force it to admit black Americans. Southern integrationists expected that another generation or two would banish Jim Crow forever, more or less as the scourge of polio had yielded to Salk’s vaccine. Such things were inevitable, after all, like the ever-rising prosperity guaranteed by American industry and empire.
“What the progressives of my girlhood did not foresee was the postindustrial impoverishment of the working class; furthermore, even as the Republicans’ Southern Strategy captured the Old South, those same progressives failed to reckon with the lasting wages of America’s original sin. In time these two phenomena combined with ominous ramification. The crash of 2008 underscored the insecurity of the white working and middle classes, and in the context of this abiding insecurity, Trump’s slogan of “Make America Great Again” now clearly signals its real meaning: bring back white jobs, and with it white male power, to quell the threat of dark-skinned immigrants and the menace of black urban neighborhoods. Like the witch of Endor, Trump has the power to summon America’s undead, in the form of the white nationalists now relabeled the “alt-right.” Seizing the legacy of the new Southern Republicanism rooted in Richard Nixon’s cynical appeal to Dixiecrats, he has reanimated the race-hatred of the Old South.
“The success of Trump’s dog-whistle appeal to race comes as no surprise to someone who observed firsthand the satisfactions that white Southerners took in segregation. In my 1950s childhood, Confederate statues and flags sanctified the landscape throughout the South. My nursery-school class marched, battle-flags clutched in our hands, to commemorate Confederate Memorial Day. My elementary school class watched Gone With The Wind during the Centennial. My Episcopalian parish featured a statue of a Confederate soldier in its graveyard, facing the town’s main street. My second-grade class excursion to Richmond included a devotional visit to Lee’s statue, where we learned that his boots had no spurs because the noble “General Lee would harm neither man nor beast.” At the time Virginia was fighting in vain to hold the line against miscegenation, its bitter defeat inscribed in the Supreme Court’s 1967 landmark ruling in Loving v. Virginia. Four decades after the last lynching in the state in 1926—which occurred after a white woman gave birth to a “mixed” baby and named a black man as the father—racial lines remained clear, and white women and black men knew all too well that they must not touch in public. Yet everyone also knew that the paler, blue-eyed blacks among us had come from precisely such unions….
“Though Donald Trump’s path to victory appears increasingly narrow as the election approaches, his ascendancy to the Republican nomination—boosted by his coded segregationist rhetoric—has left a mark on American politics. Even if he loses, he’s emboldened the dormant monster of white supremacy, in part by nurturing a pernicious lie that played to white resentment at the election of a black president. Assessing the significance of Trump’s appeal, John Cassidy, writing in The New Yorker, warned of a “long-term Trumpian movement —a nationalist, nativist, protectionist, and authoritarian movement that will forever be associated with him, but which also has the capacity to survive beyond him.” While Trump himself might lack the discipline of a serious candidate, Cassidy reasoned, another leader could arise in four or eight years to lead a movement like the Know Nothings of the 1840s or the America First Committee of the 1930s.”
We have been warned.

We should quit using the term alt-right and call it what it is: fascism. Then we need to explain to our neighbors just exactly what fascism means and why it threatens our nation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apropos, Keith Olbermann address this topic in today’s commentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VT90j5-1rXY
LikeLike
I’ve been watching Olbermann, too. Some essays better than others. But check out, if you haven’t already, the one comparing Trump to a foreign invader. It strips away the ridiculous false equivalencies people make between Clinton and Trump.
LikeLike
One more for the reading pile: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-white-nationalists_us_581a103be4b0a76e174c51bb
LikeLike
In just the last few days, I’ve read repeated comparisons of Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler (and some to Josef Stalin, although I also read that Hillary Clinton was made of steel, which would have made the late Soviet dictator, who changed his last name to the Russian word for “steel,” smile a bit, I’m sure). As a 66-year-old man of Jewish heritage whose father saw combat in Germany during the Second World War, I find such comparisons odious, just as I found similar comparisons of Barack Obama to Hitler, Stalin, Bin Laden, etc. to be ignorant and utterly unapt. I was also informed this morning that Hillary Clinton doesn’t support Israel, a fact that must come as a shock to millions of her supporters, Jewish or otherwise, particularly if they heard her 2016 address to AIPAC.
My conclusion is fairly simple: the country as a whole has gone stark raving bonkers. The idiots many of us harbor inside us have been unleashed to enter Full Blither. And I’m personally so tired of it, regardless of whether the name-calling, distortions, hyperbole, and gross inaccuracies are coming from Trump supporters, Clinton supporters, or even Jill Stein supporters (no doubt there are Gary Johnson supporters who have lost their minds, but I bump into virtually none of them, and the majority of the Sanders supporters I know who haven’t publicly claimed that they will vote for one of the other candidates or stay home doesn’t seem to harbor a lot of people who are currently enamored of citing Hitler, Stalin, etc. as obvious heroes, models, or avatars of the other candidates (which isn’t to say that they are out there FLATTERING those people.
It’s impossible for me to make a serious comparison between Hitler and Trump, Hitler and Hillary Clinton, or Hitler and any mainstream or even second-stream US politician. I don’t consider George Wallace to have been Hitlerian, though his racism was heinous and wrong, as he acknowledged, regretted, and apologized for later in life. I would not compare Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, or either of the Bushes to Hitler. Ditto Lyndon Johnson, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama, though I think every one of these imperial presidents and many of their highly-placed cabinet members and advisors should be tried for war crimes, starting with Henry Kissinger, an avowed admirer of Hillary Clinton.
Apparently, my being loath to make comparisons between American politicians I dislike or even despise and repudiate and the late Herr Hitler puts me in a fast-shrinking minority.
I make this point to get it off my chest, but also to suggest that the sort of racist that Donald Trump is and the sort that George Wallace was are as different, at least, as the differences between the above-mentioned politicians and the dead German dictator. George Wallace was born in the deep south at a time when racist assumptions were so deeply embedded in the culture that they were in the very molecules of the air that everyone breathed. To not be racist or deeply affected by the racism was to be a true rarity among the natives of the region. It took getting shot and paralyzed for Wallace to have the circumstances that made him rethink his assumptions and change his perspective.
Donald Trump is, to my mind, a racist and xenophobe “of convenience.” That is to say, it serves a useful purpose for him to not think too hard at all about his father’s pedestrian NY rich guy racism. I’ve read a couple of stories in publications I respect that suggest Donald is not exactly a friend to black and Latino people in his employ. But I doubt that he sits up at night plotting the rounding up of ethnic minorities into camps for purposes of their extermination. He may have found a contact point with some millions of white (and non-white) Americans in promoting, fear, suspicions, and hatred of Muslims (or anyone who “looks like a Muslim,” which is this country includes pretty much anyone from the Middle East AND the Indian subcontinent. And I think the sort of racism Trump’s father practiced was grounded in profit (financial) more than any deeply-held ideological beliefs in the natural inferiority of people of color, or at least no more deeply-held than tens of millions of white Americans who would NEVER consider themselves to be racists.
This may strike some people as a distinction without a difference, but I think it is one at least worth considering, particularly if one is inclined to bring in Hitler and Nazi Germany’s “final solution” into serious conversations about US national elections. We are at the close of the second term of a president who, we have been told for nearly eight years, was going to take away everyone’s guns and throw those who didn’t cooperate into FEMA camps (still waiting to see all those Texans and Oklahomans herded into the basements of abandoned Walmart stores via Operation Jade Helm). The black helicopters haven’t flown and everyone who wants to have tons o’ guns has them. Why is “liberal/centrist” hysteria about Trump any less ridiculous, I wonder?
LikeLike
Michael, I agree that the comparisons of Trump to Hitler are hyperbolic, but I think you fall into the same trap of those who make that claim. Trump is a fascist who openly encourages and flirts with followers of Nazism, a form of fascism of which Hitler is the most extreme version. Fascism, as Isaiah Berlin has explained, is a political ideology, which consists which discards pragmatism to fit predetermined beliefs. As an ideology it is built on a foundation of anti-intellectualism, the legitimacy of prejudice, the primacy of ideology as a test of civil service and private life (Gleichschaltung), the use of violence and intimidation as a deliberate policy choice—often a first choice, and a wholesale rejection of pluralism, diplomacy, and democratic (small d) political opposition.
As Berlin wrote many times, the intellectual father of fascism was Joseph de Maistre, a diplomat of the court of Savoy who served for many years in St. Petersburg. “In place of the ideals of progress, liberty, perfectibility,” Maistre “preached the sacredness of the past, the virtue, and the necessity, indeed, of complete subjection, because of the incurably bad and corrupt nature of man. In place of science, he preached the primacy of instinct, superstition, prejudice. In place of optimism, pessimism. In place of eternal harmony and eternal peace, the necessity—for him the divine necessity—of conflict, of suffering, of bloodshed, of war.” Maistre coined the term “law and order” and believed the only way to achieve it was to instill among people a fear of the “hangman.” Fear of punishment, not consent of the governed, was paramount. Prejudice is a virtue because it is “merely the beliefs of the centuries, tested by experience.” He preached the necessity of irrationality as a necessary policy because the problems in the world were built on man’s constant search for rational solutions.
Interestingly, Trump also echoes Maistre on his core populist idea, the demonization of immigrants. According to Berlin, Maistre opposed immigration because “good men—family men, men who have traditions, faith, religion, respectable morals—do not leave their countries. Only the feckless and the restless and the critical do so.” The core of Maistre’s anti-intellectualism was expressed in his wholesale disdain of science, which has a “dry, abstract, unconcrete nature” and that scientists are “incapable of adapting themselves to actual facts, and anyone listening to them is automatically doomed.” Compare this to Trump’s views on climate change and fracking as well as the need to do away with common-sense, proven regulations like clean water, air, and public lands.
Additionally, as Hannah Arendt has explained and documented, fascism was fundamental to buttressing the idea of totalitarianism. The fascist commonality of the extremes of Nazism and Stalinism was that they institutionalized the idea that strong men knew more about how to regulate society than the messy, ugly work of democracies, parliaments and the electoral processes. History confirms that overwhelming majorities of their subjects agreed to give them that power. Compare that to Trump’s pronouncements that he knows more than the generals or who he can’t tell us what his plans are because he knows better and doesn’t want to give them away and how many of his followers blindly agree.
I don’t believe that Trump has thought this through—nor do I think he or his most ardent followers are capable of doing so—but it is inarguable that the he embodies and espouses these beliefs. That, by definition, makes him a fascist but not necessarily a Nazi. When you focus exclusively on the comparisons between Hitler and Trump, you overlook the real danger—that he and many of his followers would discard the constitution and the lessons of American history. I don’t see death camps in America’s future. But Trump’s own, under appreciated call for “ideological certification” of immigrants is an important signal to the world that the relationship of government and citizen would, if enacted, be one of institutionalizing an American fascism. If that happened, Sinclair Lewis’s novel “It Can’t Happen Here” would move from fiction to futurist literature. It would fundamentally change what it means to be an American and isolate us from the rest of the civilized world.
LikeLike
MPG,
I don’t think I have compared Trump to Hitler. When he says that the election should be canceled and he should be named president, he doesn’t sounds like much of a small-d democrat. I think it is important not to talk in terms of analogies, but the actual issues that divide the candidates: gun control (Trump is against it); climate change (Trump says it is a hoax); abortion rights (Trump speculated that women who get abortions should be punished or their doctors should); voting rights (Trump wants his followers to go to majority black districts to watch for cheating, although the Republican Party is under a court order dating back to 1982 not to interfere with or try to intimidate black voters); taxes (Trump wants to cut taxes on the rich). There are many other important issues (racism, misogyny, xenophobia, etc.). It is difficult for me to believe that there are people who don’t see a sharp divide. And yet there are. There are people who despise Hillary, hate her with a burning passion. I admit I don’t understand them. To me, she is a conventional liberal Democrat, not very different from Obama or Kerry or any other mainstream Democrat. From family members who support Trump, I have learned that they really don’t want a woman as President. Others may have other reasons, but she seems to invoke in some people a feeling that she is the worst person ever to run for president. I think she is very well qualified. No one is perfect. Bernie appears perfect because he lost and will never have to make the compromises that all politicians have to make to bring people of opposing views together.
The Hillary Derangement Syndrome baffles me. She represents the final break with the Old Order of a universe controlled by white Christian men. Of course, she is white and Christian, but she is missing that one thing that men have.
LikeLike
Yes, we have been warned. As Bill Maher asks, “What have we done wrong?” That is the central question. Clearly the schools have failed –not that they alone could have prevented this situation, but I know they could have done a better job to try to avert it. Decades of anti-knowledge curricula leads to citizens with empty heads. Empty heads want to be filled, and we’ve left this job to the hate mongers and ministers who fill the heads with lies and poison. Schools need to fill heads with facts that serve as ballast against the gales of lies. But current ed fashion denigrates facts and filling up heads. How do we expect the Trump supporters to care about facts when educators themselves denigrate them? Is there any hope we can now do a serious autopsy of this disaster, and craft a serious curricular response as opposed to the usual half-baked crap that we pull out of our butts, deploy, and hope for the best? A curriculum that makes intelligent, thoughtful, well-informed citizens should be the next Manhattan Project. Germany made such a serious anti-fascist curriculum in the wake of WWII. It represents a massive, concerted effort. We never do anything like that. Something as important as forming the minds of our citizens should not be left to solo amateurs working in their spare time, or non-educators like David Coleman, or a little ed tech startup, or the dairy council or oil producers or insert other industry here that sends out biased curriculum materials to teachers to use. A Manhattan Project for curriculum is the sort of thing Gates and Co. could be doing, but aren’t, as far as I know. It’s all scattershot, half-baked and misguided work. Of all the pre-existing curricula out there, E.D. Hirsch’s Core Knowledge curriculum seems to me to hold the most hope. Teaching third graders about India’s history may seem esoteric, but what that’s doing is implanting the idea that there are lots of non-white, non-Christian people in the world, that they are REAL, that they are not mere demons…facts plant the seeds for respect for facts and a sound, sane conspiracy-theory proof view of the world. Our current vacuous skills-centric curricula leave brains unmoored and vulnerable to crackpots. We are reaping the fruits of it now.
LikeLike
Right. I’m sure Trump supporters are all progressive ed graduates.
LikeLike
The schools are in part to blame for the rise of Trump? Really? That’s an epic stretch. Ponderosa said, “Decades of anti-knowledge curricula leads to citizens with empty heads.” Wow, that’s quite a knock against public schools and their teachers, as if they need any more shaming and demeaning.
LikeLike
Joe
I would not go that far. But keep in mind this is a failure of education (not of educators) ,fortunately most of that failure occurred up to a half century ago. That is not to say that the current generations will be any better or worse. Although they certainly appear to be as a snapshot in time.
But the economic facts on the ground are probably far more important. The feeling of insecurity for working class voters is supplementing that basket of deplorables . The failure of education is that these voters can not see the big picture. Most of that education should have come after they graduated k-12 .
“It was not always thus. It would have been hard to find an uneducated farmer during the depression of the 1890s who did not have a very accurate idea about exactly which economic interests were shafting him. An unemployed worker in a breadline in 1932 would have felt little gratitude to the Rockefellers or the Mellons. But that is not the case in the present economic crisis. After a riot of unbridled greed such as the world has not seen since the conquistadors’ looting expeditions and after an unprecedented broad and rapid transfer of wealth upward by Wall Street and its corporate satellites, where is the popular anger directed, at least as depicted in the media?”..At “Washington spending”
Mike Lufgren 2011
And few of those people completed grade school. Their education came from other sources. As did the education of those idiots voting for Trump. It came mostly from a media who has been moved in exactly the direction intended. Back in 1972 when the assault on the Media and Higher education began .
LikeLike
Most of this election is built on feeling rather than observable evidence. Republicans like Pence and Gingrich admit this.
Facts are twisted and explained away. Rants are in, over reasoned discussion.
But to blame the schools for Trump is connecting a lot of dots. Connect enough, and you get some result, but it may not be what was intended or be recognizable.
I find most voters are just plain lazy. It takes time and effort to read many sources, study history, reason outcomes, and see through rhetoric and sound bytes. Most people I talk to just parrot “Hillary wants our guns and will dismantle the Second Amendment” or “Trump supporters are all racists full of white privilege”. Or “Johnson wants small government (just not sure what that is)”. If you try to discuss deeper issues and nuance, you get glazed looks, more talking points, or an angry tirade.
Hillary may win, but it looks like four more years of a government that can’t govern.
LikeLike
No top down reform will work. Curriculum needs to come from the bottom up. Standardization is anathema. How about an alternative.
Give teachers power. Tell them to move children out of their classes that will not work. Keep moving the kids until you find a teacher who can put the kid with the task they will and can do.
LikeLike
LIES ARE THE NEW TRUTH and th internet did it.
LikeLike
Ponderosa is right on target.
LikeLike
Ponderosa says. “A Manhattan Project for curriculum is the sort of thing Gates and Co. could be doing, but aren’t, as far as I know. ”
And thank heavens Gates and Co. are not envisioning another Manhattan Project. That sort of grandiose thinking gave us that amateur-hour production known as the Common Core.
Moreover, Bill and Melinda Gates are no fans of public education or democratic governance, period.
The Bill and Melinda Gates foundation policies are so odious that they pay “voice groups” to market them. Their idea of democracy is creating the illusion of “grassroots” support by paying shills.
LikeLike
I agree. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation changed the college transfer curriculum of North Carolina community colleges with its promotion of a guided pathways program. I do not like the new curriculum and neither do our students. Enrollment across the entire system is falling and continues to do so. Enrollment at the University of North Carolina system is increasing. Why would students choose to go to a college that is purposefully restricting their choice of courses to just some boring general ed classes? My students complain constantly about how they cannot take any interesting courses anymore. They had a better choice of courses in high school! Ridiculous.
LikeLike
IMO, N.C.’s community colleges are plotting, for the demise of public higher learning.
Gates, the man, not his foundation, is an investor (along with Zuckerberg, Pearson,…), in the largest seller of schools-in-a-box (Bridge International Academies). Standardized curriculum/testing/data analytics makes the, schools-in-a-box business model, profitable. The founder of the firm, that sells the product box, projected a 20% return to investors.
In Philanthropy Roundtable, an external affairs manager of a Gates-funded organization wrote “…reformers…declare ‘We’ve got to blow up the ed. schools.” The article’s title, “Don’t Surrender the Academy”, implies the wealthy own and can blow up America’s universities. The suggested alternative to blowing them up, was plutocratic influence.
LikeLike
I just finished watching Obama speak at in NC . I am not an Obama fan . But how can this country go from Obama and Michelle to Trump and Melania. This is a pathetic statement on this country.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Joel Herman for a reading about Mike Lofgren.
I hope that USA and Canada where there are multicultural immigrants who understand communism and fascism well. However, first immigrant generation are almost gone. I consider myself as first immigration generation, and I am gone soon.
As a result, second and third immigrant generations will be exactly like American and Canadian citizens who were born and brought up from the same WESTERN education here in USA and Canada. Yes, their skin color does not bear the same knowledge of horrified communism and fascism in their parents or grand parents whose experiences have left a scar forever in their mind.
It is sadden truth that all, yes all intelligent, good heart BUT GULLIBLE and easy trusting people, who fall for all fabricated news from all major media outlets that are completely controlled by GREEDY CORPORATE, will cause chaos in society through their support of bad leadership.
My wish is that Secretary Hillary Clinton will win this Presidential election so that she will pass the LAW that will allow CITIZENS to fight back all corrupted military, or police force who come to harass or kill people in middle of the night. This only happens in communist and fascist country. If President-to-be Clinton can do this, then communists and fascists organizations will be prevented to kill innocent people/or opposed politicians in middle of the night in the future.
Everything should be done in the daylight. All flights to oversea must be scrutinized in airport to prevent terrorists at all times. Neighbor watch program should be promoted and alerted to all children and adults WITH RESPONSIBILITY for their neighbor’s security.
All public zones like school, meeting hall, airport’s public spaces should have security cameras. This will minimize all minor or major chaos because of the people’s gullibility.
Being considerate (with experience) is much different from being nice, gullible, and naive (only with theory).
Being cautious (with observation) is much different from being prejudice I(with emotion).
Being safe than being sorry should be a motto for all concerned citizens from young to old. Back2basic
LikeLike
Sorry. There is no I before (with emotion). It should read as:
Being cautious (with observation) is much different from being prejudice (with emotion).
LikeLike
Neoliberals and conservatives are two sides of the same coin.
LikeLike
Posted the Commonweal piece at
http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/A-Fence-in-the-Water-by-Ro-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Election_Future_Hate-Racism-Bigotry_Significance-161105-318.html
with this comment: And speaking of the future and the effect!
The consequences of Trump’s actions will last far beyond Nov. 8., says Randi Weingarten. Children are listening and this video will show the TRUMP EFFECT ON OUR KIDS..Watch and share the video now!,
http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Trump-Effect-video–R-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-Anti-bullying_Bullying_Bullying_Children-161105-171.html
It made me very sad!
LikeLike