Nevada imported a woman named Jana Wilcox Lavin to run its “Achievement School District.” She is not an educator. She has a degree in marketing. The Nevada ASD is modeled on Tennessee’s failed ASD, which took over the state’s lowest performing schools and promised to vault them to the state’s top 25% in only five years and failed to do so (most are still in the bottom 5%). Lavin is employed by the United Way at the same time that she plans for the Nevada ASD. She ran charters in the Tennessee ASD and holds it up as a model. Is this what is called an “urban myth” or is it just a hoax? How many teachers and principals will be fired, how many charters will scoop up millions of dollars, and how many will succeed or fail? Place your bets, folks, it is Nevada.
Angie Sullivan, who teaches in a low-income school in Clark County (Las Vegas) writes:
The unfairness of the Achievement School District law became crystal clear during a discussion with Jana Wilcox Lavin.
The law requires a list which includes the under-performing schools in the bottom 5%.
It is apparent that Nevada’s under-performing schools are mainly charters and rural schools. 70% of the under-performing Nevada schools are charters and rural schools.
However the law ONLY allows a public school to be selected for charter take-over.
Severely underperforming charters are not allowed to be taken over by the Achievement School District.
This law is a direct attack on public schools while obviously ignoring the cancerous and tragic Nevada charters.
Also, rural schools which fill the under-performing list will most likely never be selected because there simply is zero appetite by charter schools to take over a rural school. This made me laugh inside to learn -having grown up in the rural communities of Lovelock, Winnemucca, and McDermitt. I would love to see an outsider go into those places and take over the school. I picture the community chasing the outsider out of town with a shotgun.
We also had a frank discussion about the alternative schools – 3 are on the list. These schools fill a specific need in our communities. Desert Oasis for instance is actually a school which serves a unique community of high school students and adult students. Teachers there teach could teach a 90 year old adult student in the same classroom as a 16 year old student. While the data looks terrible for this school, the school is likely to be the most effective we have at actually graduating students. Literally no other school serves the communities Desert Oasis takes on. The Desert Oasis teacher who attended the BEC meeting spoke about helping a student graduate who lied about his age to serve in the American Military during World War II.
For obvious reasons, Jana Wilcox Lavin will be looking into the possibility of the Nevada State School Board moving the Alternative Schools onto a different system because it is not appropriate to grade them as we currently do or include them on this list.
We had a frank discussion about the lists.
Apparently the multiple failure lists which caused 6,000 teachers to panic were produced by CCSD. I’m not exactly sure who or why this destruction and disruption occurs year after year. I would like to investigate this further and ask for the resignation of whomever takes on this task of scaring 140 school staffs – unnecessarily. Media needs to be aware of this scare tactic. Next year, when these lists are published, we all need to ask frankly if it is a “real” list or a scare tactic by the district. If it is not the “real” list – teachers need to stand against this harassment.
Frankly, CCSD blames the Nevada State School Board, I have asked during multiple interviews. Jana Wilcox Lavin stated the only list she has created is the under-performing 5% as required by legislators. And a Nevada State School Board member claims their hands are tied by the legislators.
Everyone blames someone else while public school teachers are bullied and threatened.
Bottom line: There is a list of 47 underperforming schools but the only schools seriously being considered are the 17 regular public schools in Vegas within the urban core. 30% of the schools are targeted. And it will most likely be Limited English Language students who will have their schools taken over.
Nothing will be done about the numerous charters which have extreme failing track records.
Nothing will be done about failing rural schools.
It will be brown children in Vegas with limited English who will be experimented on by the Achievement School District.
Jana Wilcox Lavin claimed the Achievement School District has been successful other places. I have read thousands of pages of University research which refute those claims. I regularly communicate with activist teachers all over the nation who refute those claims.
I follow this unfair and wasteful charter movement very closely – the success of charters nationwide has been very, very limited. The success of charters in Nevada is almost zero. As I have noted, Nevada charters are best at segregation by race, money, and religion.
This is the most blatantly unfair privatization legislation ever implemented. It targets ONLY public schools in urban Vegas and blatantly ignores all the other school failures in the state.
This law is not about helping Nevada kids. It is about public school privatization.
And a very wise BEC Meeting attendee stated: No one ever considers how many bodies will be damaged as we make these changes.
I am tired of being one of the bodies.
No one in power listens to the people directly affected. Teachers, Parents, and Students have zero voice.
Communities which do not want their neighborhood school to participate in this unfair take-over need to stand up for their schools – like West Prep and Tom Williams.
_____________________________
__________________________

In a participatory democracy the people have a voice. In Nevada teachers, parents and childre, the people, have no voice. Nevada is moving away from being a democracy and so are other states and cities that are being taken over by the neo-lib/con libertarian movement to get rid of the pubic sector and strip the elected government of most if not all of its power to govern.
The time is coming where the people, who are losing their democracy, will have a choice: walk away from the meaningless ballot box for bullets.
LikeLike
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/10/27/1587497/-Texas-high-school-stadium-costs-70-million-in-district-that-can-t-afford-elementary-schools?detail=email&link_id=14&can_id=83b9da2e1b3f913c45a5994d93d18556&source=email-this-is-awesomethe-editorial-board-at-the-yale-record-did-not-endorse-hillary-clinton&email_referrer=this-is-awesomethe-editorial-board-at-the-yale-record-did-not-endorse-hillary-clinton___125570&email_subject=texas-high-school-stadium-costs-70-million-in-district-that-cant-afford-elementary-schools
LikeLike
What is happening in Nevada highlights the hypocrisy of the charter movement. Only the public entity can be penalized in Nevada, not the privatized substitutes. I suppose the poor performing privatized options are making money for influential people, and democracy no longer matters.
LikeLike
The discussion above about rural schools reminds me of the first controversy that greeted me as a young teacher years ago. It was pre charter, pre high stakes testing, and had political roots that were pre Ted Sizer Report. The rural schools were suing the states claiming funding for rural schools was being denied due to tax structure.
That this was true was so obvious that only those highly trained to question could question it. For over a century, youths trained in rural areas have gone to urban areas to use their good educations. There they create critical masses of good people yearning for their kids to learn as much as possible. They supplement state tax money with their own hard earned dollars so that these schools excel beyond the wildest imagination. Meanwhile, the rural places they came from struggle to provide minimal services. Their teachers leave for the better-paying suburban jobs. Their politicians deal with a shrinking tax base. Some of the most debilitating poverty is in rural areas, but it is mostly ignored because journalists live in cities, who have their own poverty to write on.
This problem persists. There are dwindling resources in small urban and rural areas. Mostly the rural areas get unfunded mandates from politicians who write their laws for urban problems. Small wonder that they are supporting Trump in this election, even though we all know he could not care less about rural life.
LikeLike
I am not in the region but this Nevada initiative looks like it is spawning a lot of backscratching arrangements for consultants and evaluators http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/education/state-board-examiners-oks-contract-research-firm-evaluate-success-school-reforms
When I poke around on local news reports, I see that “Opportunity 180” is focussed on charters for Clark Co Nevada. A trip to the “Opportunity 180” website shows that outfit is part of the national network of “Education Cities,” but with three “local” foundations supporting the charter initiative.
Surprise. Surprise. Surprise. There is the Broad Foundation, not exactly local. If you want to see where else this intended capture of public schools is being engineered, go to the Education Cities Website http://education-cities.org/who-we-are/
There you will find the 31 “city-based organizations” in 24 cities where nonprofit organizations seek control of public schools. For Las Vegas, Nevada, 180 Opportunity is listed. The bottom line, evident in the funds for 180 from the Broad Foundation, is that this is a national movement.
Education Cities are cities where unelected nonprofits, foundations, and civic groups are organized for the purposes of controlling the governance of public education, substituting their judgment for policies and practices forwarded by professionals in education, elected school boards, and citizens whose tax dollars are invested in public schools.
The national work of Education Cites is supported by the Broad Foundation, The Walton Family Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, and Michael and Susan Dell Foundation. http://education-cities.org/who-we-are/our-contributors/. Here are the cities and the local groups that want the power to govern your schools.
Arizona, Phoenix, New Schools for Phoenix
California, Los Angeles—Great Public Schools Now
California, Oakland—Educate 78 & Great Oakland Public Schools Leadership Center & Rogers Family Foundation
California, Richmond—Chamberlin Family Foundation
California, San Jose—Innovate Public Schools
Colorado, Denver—Gates Family Foundation Donnell-Kay Foundation
District of Columbia— Education Forward DC & CityBridge Foundation
Delaware, Wilmington—Rodel Foundation of Delaware
Illinois, Chicago—New Schools for Chicago, Chicago Public Education Fund
Indiana, Indianapolis—The Mind Trust
Louisiana, Baton Rouge—New Schools for Baton Rouge
Louisiana, New Orleans—New Schools for New Orleans
Massachusetts, Boston—Boston Schools Fund & Empower Schools
Michigan, Detroit—Excellent Schools Detroit & The Skillman Foundation
Minnesota Minneapolis—Minnesota Comeback
Missouri Kansas City—Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
Nevada Las Vegas—Opportunity 180
New York, Rochester—E3 Rochester
Ohio, Cincinnati—Accelerate Great Schools
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia—Philadelphia School Partnership
Rhode Island, Providence—Rhode Island Mayoral Academies
Tennessee Memphis—Hyde Family Foundations
Tennessee, Nashville—Project Renaissance
Wisconsin, Milwaukee—Schools That Can Milwaukee
This is an example of philanthrogovernance by stealth, except for customer friendly branding of initiatives including words such as forward, accelerate, great, new, innovate, empower, now, and so on.
Be aware that United Way organizations are being co-opted as providers of choice for any wrap-around services needed in this new and privatized “ecosystem” of schooling.
LikeLike
When rheephormsters trot out acronyms like “ASD”—
Does the word “Achievement” make it an excellent example of an oxymoron?
Hmmmm… There is a dramatic flourish to ASD—accompanied by a painful lack of sense—that fits perfectly with the penchant of charterites/privatizers for preferring [self-serving] style over [provable] substance.
If the shoe fits…
😎
LikeLike
I believe you are referring to Desert Rose, not Desert Oasis, in your article. I teach at Desert Rose, and we have teenaged as well as adult students. Our graduation rates look terrible because we take students that regular schools refuse to keep enrolled. Our school is the only option for students who need to make up several credits, and I hate the idea that the ASD may try to take away this option for them.
LikeLike