Joan Goodman, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania who has studied no-excuses charter schools, notes that no-excuses charters are sensitive to complaints that their heavy emphasis on discipline is joyless. Therefore, many of them have now inserted “joy” into their curriculum or made it a part of their mission statement. True, students must obey the rules to a T, and they must remain silent in the halls, but there will definitely be a time and a place for “joy.” It shall be so.
She writes:
Uncommon Schools promotes *joy* as one of its five values; Democracy Prep advertises a *joyous culture* with enthusiasm as one of its DREAM values; Mastery lists *joy and humor* among its nine core values; and Achievement First includes the child’s joy in its assessments of student progress. Success Academy says that, along with rigor, its schools stress *humor (joy)…making achieving exhilarating and fun!* Meanwhile, KIPP includes joy’s close cousin, *zest,* as one of the seven character strengths on its Character Growth Card. Chicago’s Noble Network has likewise embraced *zest.* According to Doug Lemov, a major source of CMO pedagogy, the Joy Factor, one of his 49 essential techniques, is *a key driver not just of a happy classroom but of a high-achieving classroom…. people work harder…when their work is punctuated regularly by moment of exultation and joy.*
When I first began visiting no excuses schools, I was struck by the striking juxtaposition of teachers presiding over silent class periods during which children diligently followed instructions, only to interrupt them periodically with the demand for reciprocal clapping, rhymed motivational cheers, and choral responses that seemed more appropriate to an athletic or marching event than an academic environment. The effort of schools to whoop up excitement appeared artificial and disingenuous given the often tedious tasks students were assigned, and the passive/receptive role they were, for the most part, expected to assume.
The intentional artifice is particularly clear in teacher training videos, when leaders like Lemov, or Doug McCurry of Achievement First, talk about how teachers must be skilled at quickly turning arousal on and quickly turning it off so that it serves its purpose – aiding their academic objectives. Stimulating this shallow *joy* is, then, just another control technique designed to foster high achievement. Joy has become a *character strength,* like grit, because of the results it produces, not for its own sake.
To elicit joy, the CMOs use emotional arousal techniques such as choral chanting, finger snapping, and gestural sequences. For instance, to lend *sparkle* to a lesson, Lemov advocates the Vegas Technique. This entails breaks from instruction, as brief as 30 seconds, for a ritualized routine loosely associated with the lesson. Students might, for example, do an action-verb shimmy, clap a routine to accompany a pronoun, or perform a vocabulary word charade. Achievement First’s McCurry advises teachers to plan *joyous interludes* by using four chants accompanied with gestures and 10 cheers per class. One chant, for example, is: *hey hey hey, I feel all-right,* followed with a stomp. The phrase is repeated with two stomps, then three stomps and finished off with: *I feel motivated to learn. And graduate college.*
Does it strike you that there is something unnatural about a program that tells you when to feel joy? It rings a bell for me, but I don’t want to be too harsh. It reminds me of a trip I made to China many years ago, about 1986. The government arranged the schedule, and the first stop was a women’s prison. Our group was treated to a performance by prisoners who sang and danced about how joyful they felt because they were being socially rehabilitated. It was joy on command. There was no real joy. It was a performance.

Are they training chimps?
LikeLike
No, they’re trying to program robots.
LikeLike
“Artificial and disingenuous” sounds like a good description of everything related to so-called education reform, and no-excuses charters in particular.
It’s also striking, but not surprising. how much this on-command, regimented “joy” resembles the group chanting demanded of Walmart workers. It’s not surprising, since these schools – their fatuous talk about “scholars” notwithstanding – are all about training, not education: training young people for the powerless, precarious, absurd, high-surveillance and low-paying labor markets they will be entering in the coming years, labor markets dominated by the very same interests (and in the case of the Waltons, the very same employers!) bankrolling so-called reform.
LikeLike
Worker drones to be kept in line by a police state of publicly funded private security in body armor , with attack dogs and tanks. If they ever decide to rebel.
If you think the response to Occupy was over the top. The actions in North Dakota should send shivers down your spine. I cant help but wonder what would happen, if the Native Americans were armed with assault rifles? Would their be a slaughter or a stand off ? My guess is slaughter.
Would they be acquitted for occupying their own land vs a Federal property (Bundys )?
All coming to a picket line or a city near you. In the not to distant future as the 80% gets crushed by Oligarchs like the Walton’s.
Which would only be a repeat of our past history of violence against American workers and activists.
The Oligarchies goal since the 70s was the destruction of the University system and critical thought. Aligning public schools to this goal part of the process. To gain public support for the assault ,vouchers for segregated academies and not just in the South a key part of the plan.
LikeLike
Yeah. All that fun is irresistible. So much so that I think hedge funders and ed reformer types should encourage their own children to attend these happy schools with their zestful programs. Who needs Andover and Lakeside Academy when you could just move to New York City and send them to Success Academy? They rock at math scores! And it’s a blast!
LikeLike
This is really the bottom line.
If this curriculum is so terrific, why aren’t the private schools where the billionaires who underwrite it send their children adopting it?
Do you know why billionaires are happy to underwrite it as long as their own kids don’t have to experience it? Because it is CHEAP. I mean, if you run a no excuses school, you have every excuse in the book to get rid of the kids who can’t adapt to it. If you tell young children and their parents that there is “no excuse” for them not being high performing scholars, you then can justify your school’s humiliation and disgust with them. Because of course, the charter school’s hand is forced by the child himself. It’s like what those abusers say — they have to abuse their victims because their victims made them do it.
“No excuses” should really be renamed. It is only no excuses for the children. And the children themselves provide every excuse for their own abuse by the school. But only if they deserve it. The ones who can make the grade and are a credit to the school are fawned over so that the ones who don’t can see what it takes for them to stop being abused.
LikeLike
“It was joy on command. There was no real joy. It was a performance.”
LikeLike
Read the wiki for a video game that came out a couple of months ago on the XBOX One:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_Happy_Few_(video_game)
Eerily similar minus the “joy” drug.
LikeLike
Reminds me of that humorless, punitive lieutenant in “Good Morning, Vietnam.”
LikeLike
This is very concerning. The lack of accountability for many charters allows these kinds of misguided philosophies to run rampant. These schools are taking crucial funding from our public schools – and doing THIS? In public education, we talk about school climate – these are measurable qualities that allow us to assess the environment of the school. Assessing an individual student on their level of “joy” or “zest” makes a complete farce of educational assessment. These are subjective qualities that cannot be measured and any attempt to do so demonstrates both ineptitude on the part of the school and serious mistreatment of students.
LikeLike
It’s why the dishonesty of the charter movement is so truly evil and damaging to children.
No excuses is almost always coupled with high attrition rates – the higher the attrition rates, the “better” no excuses works. But no one talks about that because if they did, charters would be forced to acknowledge that no excuses works only for the kids who it works for! And those kids are more than likely children who could have been taught in a school that didn’t force so much anti-joy!
If military style prep schools claimed that they “proved” that military discipline achieved superior academics because no child who graduated was an F student, the rich and powerful would know what a false claim that was and never send their children there unless they were a very particular type of child. The rich and powerful understand that military style prep schools don’t work for the vast majority of their very privileged children. And people who told them they were idiots who hated their own children and wanted them to be in subpar schools because they didn’t value education would be attacked as liars.
But no one attacks the pro-charter liars who are in the pockets of the rich and powerful who make exactly those claims for less privileged kids. If charters were not so dishonest at every turn, we could have an interesting discussion about what works and what doesn’t and why so many children are disappearing from those charter schools and why charters are so determined to pretend those children don’t exist and whether that is a good thing to pretend there are not huge cohorts of children who aren’t being served by the schools who charters claim are working miracles. And who pays for their education when charters profit from drumming them out of their schools.
Lies. Deceit. Dishonesty. When I see it practiced, I know those people care only about their own high salaries and not one bit about the children they are happy to throw out with the trash while lying about them in order to keep their own lies and dishonesty from being discovered. I’m sure there are some dishonest folks in the teachers’ union as well, but the ones in the charter movement have been held up as saints who we are supposed to worship and adore and pay millions to. When the liars have won – as they have in the charter movement – the movement needs to disband because reform within the movement is obviously impossible. As the attacks on the NAACP prove. If you keep insisting you are perfect, you will never reform. And public schools have NEVER insisted they were perfect. That reprehensible ideal is reserved for charter folks only, led by people like Robert Pondiscio who can’t speak an honest word because their own careers are far more important than some pesky at-risk kids who aren’t good enough for them to care about.
LikeLike
Sounds to me like a scene in the movie Office Space.
Those kids just need more flair. The charter schools should set the minimum at 37 pieces.
Or they should make every Friday Hawaiian shirt Day. The kids could see what life is like out of uniform.
Joy, absolutely. But please, charter school kids, get those TPS reports filed. No excuses!
LikeLike
The Joy Factor stuff was especially troubling for me when I taught at Achievement First. I remember Doug McCurry pressing hard for teachers to come up with chants. It was not encouraged, it was expected. And I remember students being stressed about remembering them. Manufactured, simulated joy just made you feel the culture of compliance even more.
LikeLike
This reminds my of “The Bridge on the River Kwai” where the Japanese commander tells the prisoners-of-war to be happy in the work that is killing them off one by one.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Politicians Are Poody Heads and commented:
This is supposed to be “Joy”?
What is this, the world of George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four”? And these no-excuses charters have set up their own Ministry of Newspeak?
“War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength”
And apparently, “Joy is mandatory.”
Oy!
LikeLike
It’s the nature of beast that all those upside-down ideas look perfectly logical, correct, and right to the eyes of those with banal minds.
LikeLike
Catherine, they are worse than banal. They are ego-maniacs who know nothing about eduction or child development, but run these schools for their own warped purposes.
Making money for the techno-corporate complex. Churning our future worker bees who will do what they’re told. The condescending belief that poor children (particularly those of color) cannot learn any other way.
Choose one. Or all three.
LikeLike
Zorba: Yes to all–but the point to “banal” is the inability to see the conflict that you so clearly reveal in your note.
LikeLike
Sadly, all too true. They don’t see the conflict, and they actually choose not to see it. 😦
LikeLike
Yes–deliberate obtuseness.
LikeLike
These classrooms aren’t great, but neither are the realistic alternatives. Deciding between them isn’t as easy as many of us think. Yes, if we hold up a utopian ideal next to this regimented classroom, it looks like Hell. But if we hold up a deafeningly noisy, unruly, and very unproductive classroom, it starts to look pretty good. The perfect is the enemy of the good. Education discussions will become a lot more fruitful when we begin to acknowledge that no one really has very appetizing and effective solutions for educating the hard-to-educate. Unfortunately it’s a lesser of two evils situation. Kind of like how to manage Iraq: it’s an open question whether Saddam’s cruel order was any worse than the current cruel disorder. I’ll believe I’m wrong when Alfie Kohn sets up his own low SES charter school where children thrive and learn without strict discipline. Come on, Alfie. Show us how it’s done.
LikeLike
While your point is well taken, I would wonder if the children in these schools are “hard to educate.” Most of the regimentation serves to drive out students who will not suffer the punishment of this type of treatment. If you want an education bad enough, you will endure anything. Coaches have used this psychology for a long time. You rant at the team. They respond by looking at themselves. “Well,” the players think, “l must really love this sport because i hate the coach.”
While this may be good psychology, I cannot agree that it is a good model for teaching communities that need help. People learn the best when everybody works together to get the kids to learn. Learning is not a thing that can be taught by chants and mantras. It takes generations. It takes values. It takes buy in by students and communities.
LikeLike
Here’s a long (very long) post I did about Campbell Brown’s hypocrisy regarding Common Core curriculum and testing. Like so many other corporate reformers, she’s being paid huge money to advocate that Common Core curriculum and testing be shoved down the throats of students and parents, yet when it comes to her own children, she “opts out” by sending them to a rich kids’ private schoo;. Since this is an option that most parents can’t afford, they and their kids are stuck with Common Core, like it or not.
Okay, so the unqualified, non-teacher David Coleman and his equally unqualified, non-teacher fellow co-creators of Common Core think that novels, plays, poems, short stories, etc. are all a waste of time, and will not prepare future workers with the dry, boring skills they will need to take their place as drones or cogs in the nation’s economy?
Well, the litmus test for all this nonsense is…. are the children of the 1% going to get Coleman’s Common Core shoved down their throats as well?
Let’s answer that question:
Chicago Lab School—where Obama’s, Duncan’s, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s kids attend (and btw, where my nephew and niece attended… my niece was a classmate of Malia’s prior to Malia’s dad’s change in job & residencey😉 )
ANSWER: NO
Lakeside School—where Bill Gates’ kids attend
ANSWER: NO
Sidwell Friends School—where Obama’s kids attend after moving to D.C.
ANSWER: NO
Harpeth Hall—where Michelle Rhee and ex-husband Kevin Huffman’s daughters attend
ANSWER: NO
The private Montessori School that former N.Y. State Ed. Commisioner John King sends his kids
ANSWER: NO (King claimed otherwise, but that claim has since been debunked)
Heschel School—where Campbell Brown’s kids attend
ANSWER: NO
—————————
The last example is particularly galling, as Mrs. Brown-Senor writes vicious attacks on Common Core opponents like the following:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/political-attacks-on-common-core-are-driven-by-pandering/2015/02/27/bfbf9f80-bad8-11e4-b274-e5209a3bc9a9_story.html?postshare=4201425094031685
———————
CAMPBELL BROWN:
“Let’s be clear about what Common Core is. It spells out what students should know at the end of each grade. The goal is to ensure that our students are sound in math and literacy and that our schools have some basic consistency nationwide. But the standards do not dictate a national curriculum, and teachers are not told how or what to teach.
“The unpopularity of the initiative with segments of the public has been caused by rough implementation in some states and the tests linked to the standards. That frustration is legitimate and can be addressed. But abandonment of the initiative for political reasons is craven…
“Education never quite gets the attention it deserves in presidential campaigns, but monster flip-flops surely do. So here’s some advice for people running for office: If you want to campaign against core standards, perhaps you should try having core standards of your own first.”
Really Campbell? So what standards and testing do you have for your own children?
According the Mercedes Schneider, you send your kids to a private Jewish school with A CURRICULUM, STANDARDS, AND TESTING THAT IS DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED TO COMMON CORE.. AND NO STANDARDIZED TESTING OF ANY KIND UNTIL HIGH SCHOOL
The Abraham Joshua Heschel School
http://www.heschel.org/
The Abraham Joshua Heschel School: Mission
from the link immediately above:
HESCHEL:
“In an open and engaging academic setting, the school’s curriculum interweaves the best of both Jewish and general knowledge and culture throughout the school day.
“The school’s approach to education is governed by profound respect for students. It nurtures their curiosity, cultivates their imagination, encourages creative expression, values their initiative and engenders critical thinking skills. The school is committed to development of the whole child and supports each student’s intellectual, emotional, social, physical and spiritual growth. In addition, the school seeks to create an environment that encourages the professional and personal growth of teachers, administrators, and staff.
“Among the Central goals of the Abraham Joshua Heschel School are the following:
“Fostering a lifelong love of learning. The school seeks to develop the understanding that the discovery of personal meaning and the growth of individual identity can emerge from the rigors of study.
“Creating an environment of intellectual challenge and academic excellence.
“Creating an ethical learning community that inspires its students to become responsible, active, compassionate citizens and leaders in the Jewish and world communities.
“Cultivating the spiritual lives of its students and the nurturing of their commitment to Jewish values. The school helps students learn about and respect a range of Jewish practices and encourages them to embody these traditions in the way they live their lives; students learn the skills that enable them to participate fully in Jewish life.
“Building of bridges between different sectors of the Jewish community, and between the Jewish community and other communities, as expressions of our religious imperative to unite human beings through justice, shared humanity and mutual respect.
“Fostering in its students a deep commitment to and a lifelong relationship with the State of Israel and its language, culture and people, in recognition of the centrality of the State of Israel to Jewish identity and to the Jewish people.”
=======================================
Here’s more of what you can get at Heschel—a comprehensive Arts Curriculum—one that is impossible at public schools thanks to so much its funding going to Pearson and the other Common Core-related vendors:
http://www.heschel.org/page.cfm?p=1130
From the link above:
The Arts at Heschel
“As students are exposed to a multitude of media in their daily lives, art courses can help them navigate the unfolding context of contemporary culture and technology in order to understand and find meaning in the possibilities through creating and analyzing.
“The Visual Arts department is rooted in the school’s vision that the discovery of personal meaning and the growth of individual identity can emerge from the rigors of study, of student centered inquiry and the development of a sensitive eye, a discerning mind and skillful hand.
“Music as non-verbal expression continues to say something universal, essential, and native to even the humblest of involved seekers. Music education, therefore, must stand alone as an important and necessary part of the total learning and growing process.”
=======================================
And here’s what happens at Heschel in Grades 1-5 (i.e. “Lower School”) :
The Abraham Joshua Heschel School: Lower School
http://www.heschel.org/page.cfm?p=16
=======================================
Lower School
“It is my pleasure to welcome you to the Heschel Lower School. We hope you will learn about our philosophy and curriculum. If you have additional questions after you have read through the website, please contact us.
“The Lower School comprises grades 1-5 and offers a rich and rigorous curriculum in both general and Judaic studies. Every part of the school day is planned to offer each student a challenging, well-supported, and nurturing environment. Our highly qualified and enthusiastic faculty brings the curriculum to life through analysis of text, thoughtful discussion, projects, and field trips.
“In all areas, the emphasis is on thinking and questioning. Jewish traditions form the basis for teaching ethical values and the imperative to treat others as we would like to be treated.
“As you walk through the Lower School, you will see children happily engaged. The classrooms and hallways are alive with students learning, studying, singing, praying, and playing with joy. You will learn a great deal about us from our website, and we hope you will schedule a visit to experience the spirit of our faculty and students.”
Dina Bray
Lower School Head
Does that sound like David Coleman’s “no-one-cares-what-students-think” Common Core currriculum?
Cambpell, in effect, you spend tens of thousands of dollars of money to make sure that your own children are, figuratively speaking, kept as far away from Common Core as your money can manage:
Check out these costs:
http://www.heschel.org/page.cfm?p=232
According to the above link, this is what Campbell pays
FOR EACH CHILD (she has 2 or 3… I forget):
=======================================
Tuition for the 2014-2015 school year is as follows:
N $26,125
PK $35,775
K $36,050
1 $37,425
2 $37,425
3 $38,150
4 $38,150
5 $38,150
6 $38,800
7 $38,800
8 $38,800
9 $39,650
10 $39,650
11 $39,650
12 $40,225
Campbell, since you think Common Core is so great, I’m sure that you and/or your husband have stormed into the offices of the administrators of your Heschel, and demanded they implement Common Core standards, curriculum, and testing forthwith… with threats to remove your kids if this doesn’t occur?
Well, we all know that ain’t gonna happen.
So in short, the opinion of Obama, Rhee, Huffman, Duncan, John King, and Campbell Brown: “Common Core rules!!! Just keep it the-hell away from my own kids.”
It also has a pedagogy and classroom management that is DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED TO THE WHAT GOES ON AT THE CHARTER SCHOOLS YOU WANT THE 99% OF AMERICANS TO ATTEND — once you and your money-motivated allies achieve that David Cameron wet dream of no more traditional public schools taught by unionized teachers.
More on your kids’ school BELOW…
Instead of the non-stop test prep, and militarized walking in lines that Eva provides
SUCCESS ACADEMY (where you serve on its board …. a high-up SUCCESS ACADEMY administrator told NEW YORK MAGAZINE proudly that the school turns its kids into “test-taking machines”….
Heschel HAS NO TEST PREP, AND NO STANDARDIZED TESTING.
The first standardized tests that kids are exposed to in 11th grade
in preparation for applying to college. Gee, I wonder how any of
them ever get accepted, after being denied a decade of test
prep that turns them into “test-taking machines”?
Instead, this is what your own kids get:
(one more thing: notice how the Heschel kids in the
pictures are all dressed in their own clothes, where they
can, in sartorial terms, express their individually, AND ARE
NOT FORCED TO WEAR THOSE HIDEOUS, GOD-AWFUL
ORANGE-‘n-GREY-BLUE Success Academy UNIFORMS FROM
L..L BEAN, and forced to buy the matching orange-‘n-blue
backpacks, or face expulsion.
If those uniforms and backpacks are so great, why aren’t you
and your husband demanding the Heschel administrators
come up with their own Pink Floyd ‘THE WALL’ uniforms
to crush their kids spirits and individuality????!!!
“If you don’t eat your meat, you can’t have any pudding…”
(from 02:10 on)
(from 02:10 on)
No, no, no…. dressing individually is only for the special
people’s kids… other people’s kids have to wear this crap. )
LikeLike
Yes, excellent comment, Jack.
Obviously, what’s good enough for the rich kids, is not good enough for everyone else’s kids.
Really, it’s terribly racist and classist- what the wealthy desire for the children of “those people.” But not their own kids- they are the “special” ones, obviously. 😥
LikeLike
One’s mood affects one’s gestures, posture, and expressions. Similarly, there is excellent evidence that assuming certain postures and displaying certain expressions can alter mood (e.g., making yourself smile will tend to make you feel happier).
This forced conditional training to try to create joy is, however, taking this ‘way too far, I think. Still, the only real questions the answers to which will determine whether or not these practices should continue are: (a) what are the pedagogic goals of the forced joy practices, and (b) are they effective and efficient in achieving those goals?
I doubt the answers will lead to these practices becoming common place in truly student- and learning oriented academic environments.
LikeLike